Chapter published in:
Paradigm Change: In the Transeurasian languages and beyond
Edited by Martine Robbeets and Walter Bisang
[Studies in Language Companion Series 161] 2014
► pp. 2360


Ackema, Peter, Brandt, Patrick, Schoorlemmer, Maaike & Weerman, Fred
2006Arguments and Agreement. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Adelaar, Alexander
2005The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: A historical perspective. In The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds), 1–42. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory
2006The Munda verb. Typological Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto & Lim, Lisa
2004Phonetic absence as syntactic prominence. Grammaticalization in isolating tonal languages. In Up and Down the Cline — The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Languag 59], Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds), 345–362. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco
2013Grammaticalization with coevolution of form and meaning in East Asia? Evidence from Sinitic. Language Sciences 40: 148–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baerman, Matthew & Corbett, Greville G.
2010Introduction: Defectiveness: Typology and diachrony. In Defective Paradigms. Missing Forms and What They Tell Us, Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett & Dunstan Brown (eds), 1–18. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James N.
1973Variation and Linguistic Theory. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bamgboṣe, Ayọ̀.
1967A Short Yoruba Grammar. Ibadan: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Geoffrey
1976An outline of Temiar grammar. In Austroasiatic Studies I and II, Philip N. Jenner, Laurence C. Thompson & Stanley Starosta (eds), 129–188. Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter
1992Das Verb im Chinesischen, Hmong, Vietnamesischen, Thai und Khmer. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
1996Areal typology and grammaticalization: Processes of grammaticalization based on nouns and verbs in East and mainland South East Asian languages. Studies in Language 20(3): 519–597. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Grammaticalization without coevolution of form and meaning: The case of tense-aspect-modality in East and mainland Southeast Asia. In What Makes Grammaticalization? - A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 109–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006South East Asia as a linguistic area. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 11, Keith Brown (ed.), 587–595. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2008Grammaticalization and the areal factor: The perspective of East and mainland Southeast Asian languages. In Rethinking Grammaticalization. New Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 76], López-Couso, María José & Elena Seoane (eds), 15–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009On the evolution of complexity — Sometimes less is more in East and mainland Southeast Asia. In Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable, Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds), 34–49. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2011Grammaticalization and typology. In Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 105–117. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013Language contact between geographic and mental space. In Linguistic Perspectives on Space: Geography, Interaction, and Cognition, Peter Auer, Martin Hilpert, Anja Stukenbrock & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi (eds), 61–100. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Khmer. In Handbook of Austroasiatic, Paul Sidwell & Mathias Jenny (eds) London Routledge
Bisang, Walter & Sonaiya, Remi
1999The function of the High Tone Syllable in Yoruba. The Journal of African Languages and Linguistics (JALL) 20: 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
1985Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Jack K. & Trudgill, Peter
1998Dialectology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie
1993Predicates across Categories: Towards A Category-neutral Syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Dede, Keith
2007The origin of the anti-ergative [xa] in Huangshui Chinese. Language and Lingusitics 8(4): 863–881.Google Scholar
Devos, Maud
2008A Grammar of Makwe. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Djamouri, Redouane
2013Object incorporation in Tangwang. Paper presented at the ‘1st International Symposium on Linguistic Typology’, Changshu, November 30 – December 01, 2013.Google Scholar
Donegan, Patricia & Stampe, David
2004Rhythm and the synthetic drift of Munda. In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2004, Rajendra Singh (ed.), 3–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold & Solnit, David
1988Introduction. In Comparative Kadai: Linguistic Studies beyondTai, Jerold Edmondson & David Solnit (eds), 1–26. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J.
2003Linguistic Epidemiology. Semantics and Grammar of Language Contact in Mainland Southeast Asia. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
2005Areal linguistics and Mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 181–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph
1974Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. In Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguistics, Bologna - Florence, Aug-Sept 1972, Bologna 1974, 17–37. Reprinted in: Greenberg (1990: 16–93).Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom
2007Bantu in its macro-areal context of Africa and implications for the early typology of Bantu and Niger-Congo. Paper read at the International Conference on Bantu Languages, Gothenburg, Oct. 4–6.Google Scholar
2010Proto-Bantu and Proto-Niger-Congo: Macro-areal typology and linguistic reconstruction. In Geographical Typology and Linguistic Areas. With Special Reference to Africa [Tokyo University of Foreign Studies 2], Osamu Hieda, Christa König & Hirosi Nakagawa (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1983Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59: 781–819. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James
1984On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry Michael
1999The historical interpretation of vowel harmony. In Bantu Historical Linguistics: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Jean-Marie Hombert & Larry Michael Hyman (eds), 235–295. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2004How to become a Kwa verb. Journal of West African Languages 30: 69–88.Google Scholar
2010The Macro-Sudan Belt and Niger-Congo Reconstruction. <http://​linguistics​.berkeley​.edu​/~hyman​/Hyman​_Niger​_Congo​_Dynamics​.pdf> (4 September 2011).Google Scholar
Jacob, Judith M.
1968Introduction to Cambodian. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo & Safir, Ken
1989The null subject parameter in language acquisition. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli & Ken Safir (eds), 215–238. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenner, Philipp & Pou, Saveros
1982A Lexicon of Khmer Morphology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1973‘Elsewhere’ in Phonology. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 93–106. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Kruspe, Nicole
2004A Grammar of Semelai. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire & Brousseau, Anne-Marie
2002A Grammar of Fongbe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei
1977A Handbook of Comparative Tai. Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Li, Xuping & Bisang, Walter
2012Classifiers in Sinitic languages: From individuation to definiteness-marking. Lingua 122: 335–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Yongxian
1997The Subgroup Structure of the Tai Languages: A Historical-Comparative Study [Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 12]. Berkeley CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Mottin, Jean
1980Contes et légendes Hmong Blanc. Bangkok: Don Bosco Press.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Szendrői, Kriszta
2007Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 671–714. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nurse, Derek
2007Did Proto-Bantu have a syntactic or an analytic structure? School of Oriental and African Studies Working Papers in Linguistics15: 239–256.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David
1971Deep and Surface Constraints in Generative Grammar. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen
1960Über den Ursprung der voneinander abweichenden Strukturen der Munda- und Khmer-Nikobar Sprachen. Indo-Iranian Journal 4(1): 81–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ratliff, Martha
2010Hmong-Mien Language History. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1986Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine
2012Shared verb morphology in the Transeurasian languages: copy or cognate? In Copies versus Cognates in Bound Morphology, Lars Johanson & Martine Robbeets (eds), 427–446. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm
2002The history and transitivity of western Austronesian voice and voice-marking. In The History and Typology of Western Austronesian Voice Systems, Fay Wouk & Malcolm Ross (eds), 17–62. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent
1999The Roots of Old Chinese [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 184]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seifart, Frank
2011Bora Loans in Resígaro: massive morphological and little lexical borrowing in a Moribund Arawakan language. Cadernos de Etnolingüística. Série Monografias 2.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul
2008Issues in the morphological reconstruction of Proto-Mon-Khmer. In Morphology and Language History. In Honour of Harold Koch [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 298], Claire Bowern, Bethwyn Evans & Luisa Miceli (eds), 251–265. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Classifying the Austroasiatic Languages: History and State of the Art. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret
1994Null arguments in a theory of economy of projections. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17: 179–208.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Mark L.O.
2009Eton tonology and morphosyntax: A holistic typological approach. In New Challenges in Typology: Broadening the Horizons and Redefining the Foundations, Vol. 2, Pacience L. Epps & Alexandre Arkhipov (eds), 35–60. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van Driem, George
2001Languages of the Himalayas, Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wang, Jian
/ 王健 2013类型学视野下的汉语方言“量名”结构研究 (Bare classifier phrases in Sinitic languages: a typological perspective). Language Sciences 12(4): 383–393.Google Scholar
Wang, William S.-Y. & Cheng, Chin-Chuan
1970Implementation of phonological change: The Shuang-feng Chinese case. Chicago Linguistics Society 6: 552–559.Google Scholar
Zide, Norman H. & Anderson, Gregory D.S.
2001The Proto-Munda verb system and some connections with Mon-Khmer. In Yearbook of South Asian Linguistics, Peri Bhaskararao & Karumi Venkata Subbarao (eds), 517–540. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Bisang, Walter
2018.  In Positive Learning in the Age of Information,  pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
Seržant, Ilja A.
2021. Cyclic changes in verbal person-number indexes are unlikely. Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s1  pp. 49 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.