Cover not available
Part of
On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia
Edited by Pirkko Suihkonen and Lindsay J. Whaley
[Studies in Language Companion Series 164] 2014
► pp. xi–xviii

Introduction

ORCID logo
Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.164.003int
References (24)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, Robert M.W. (eds). 2003. Studies in Evidentiality [Typological Studies in Languages 54]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. & Keenan, Edward L. 1985. Deixis. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 259–308. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2011. Grammatical relations typology. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), 399–444. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, Lauri 1998. Tense, mood, aspect, diathesis. Their logic and typology. Ms, University of Helsinki, Department of Translation Studies.
Comrie, Bernard 1976. Aspect. An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1986. Tense [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1993. Argument structure. In An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Syntax 2, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds), 905–914. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2013. Alignment of case marking of full noun phrases. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (12 February 2014).Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1995. Modern syntactic typology. In Approaches to Language Typology, Mashayosi Shibatani & Theodora Bynon (eds), 85–144. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Foley, William & Van Valin Jr., Robert D. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1984. Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introdcution, Vol. I Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1996. The architecture of the linguistic-spatial interface. In Language and Space, Paul Bloom, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel, & Merrill F. Carrett (eds), 1–29. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Janssen, Theo A.J.M. 2004. Deixis and reference. In Morphologie, Ein Internationales Handbuch Zur Flexion und Wortbildung, Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds), 983–998. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 2012. Pyramids of spatial relators in Northeastern Turkic and its neighbors. In Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations: A Cross-linguistic Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series 126], Pirkko Suihkonen, Bernard Comrie & Valery Solovyev (eds), 191–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward. 1987. Predicate formation rules in universal grammar. In Universal Grammar: 15 Essays, Edward L. Keenan (ed.), 316–334. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard. 2001. Internal and external possessors. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 970–978. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lenz, Friedrich. 2003. Deictic conceptualization of space, time and person: Introduction. In Deictic Conceptualisation of Space, Time and Person [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 112], Friedrich Lenz (ed.), vii–xiv. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1975. Adverbs of quantification. In Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Papers from a Colloquium Sponsored by the King’s College Research Centre, Cambridge, Edward L. Keenan (ed.), 3–15. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindstedt, Jouko. 2001. Tense and aspect. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds). Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook, 768–783. Berlin: Walter De Grueter.Google Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian. 1987. Quantification as a major module of natural language semantics. In Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers [Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics (GRASS)], Jeroen Groenendijk, Dick de Jongh & Martin Stokhof (eds), 53–85. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor. 1997. Evenki [Descriptive Grammars]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas. 1979. Anaphora in Generative Grammar. Ghent: E. Story-Scientia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar