Cover not available
Part of
On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia
Edited by Pirkko Suihkonen and Lindsay J. Whaley
[Studies in Language Companion Series 164] 2014
► pp. xi–xviii

Introduction

ORCID logo
Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.164.003int
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, Robert M.W
(eds) 2003 Studies in Evidentiality [Typological Studies in Languages 54]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. & Keenan, Edward L
1985 Deixis. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 259–308. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2011 Grammatical relations typology. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), 399–444. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, Lauri
1998 Tense, mood, aspect, diathesis. Their logic and typology. Ms, University of Helsinki, Department of Translation Studies.
Comrie, Bernard
1976 Aspect. An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1986 Tense [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1993 Argument structure. In An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Syntax 2, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds), 905–914. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2013 Alignment of case marking of full noun phrases. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (12 February 2014).Google Scholar
Croft, William
1995 Modern syntactic typology. In Approaches to Language Typology, Mashayosi Shibatani & Theodora Bynon (eds), 85–144. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1985 Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Foley, William & Van Valin Jr., Robert D
1984 Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Givón, T
1984 Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introdcution, Vol. I Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1996 The architecture of the linguistic-spatial interface. In Language and Space, Paul Bloom, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel, & Merrill F. Carrett (eds), 1–29. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Janssen, Theo A.J.M
2004 Deixis and reference. In Morphologie, Ein Internationales Handbuch Zur Flexion und Wortbildung, Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds), 983–998. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars
2012 Pyramids of spatial relators in Northeastern Turkic and its neighbors. In Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations: A Cross-linguistic Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series 126], Pirkko Suihkonen, Bernard Comrie & Valery Solovyev (eds), 191–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward
1987 Predicate formation rules in universal grammar. In Universal Grammar: 15 Essays, Edward L. Keenan (ed.), 316–334. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard
2001 Internal and external possessors. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 970–978. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lenz, Friedrich
2003 Deictic conceptualization of space, time and person: Introduction. In Deictic Conceptualisation of Space, Time and Person [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 112], Friedrich Lenz (ed.), vii–xiv. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David
1975 Adverbs of quantification. In Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Papers from a Colloquium Sponsored by the King’s College Research Centre, Cambridge, Edward L. Keenan (ed.), 3–15. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindstedt, Jouko
2001 Tense and aspect. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds). Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook, 768–783. Berlin: Walter De Grueter.Google Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian
1987 Quantification as a major module of natural language semantics. In Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers [Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics (GRASS)], Jeroen Groenendijk, Dick de Jongh & Martin Stokhof (eds), 53–85. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor
1997 Evenki [Descriptive Grammars]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1983 Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas
1979 Anaphora in Generative Grammar. Ghent: E. Story-Scientia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar