Cover not available
Part of
On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia
Edited by Pirkko Suihkonen and Lindsay J. Whaley
[Studies in Language Companion Series 164] 2014
► pp. 109–132

Spatial semantics, case and relator nouns in Evenki

| University of Chicago
Evenki, a Northwest Tungusic language, exhibits an extensive system of nominal cases, deictic terms, and relator nouns, used to signal complex spatial relations. The paper describes the use and distribution of the spatial cases which signal stative and dynamic relations, with special attention to their semantics within a framework using fundamental Gestalt concepts such as Figure and Ground, and how they are used in combination with deictics and nouns to signal specific spatial semantics. Possible paths of grammaticalization including case stacking, or Suffixaufnahme, are discussed.
Keywords: case morphology, deixis, grammaticalization, relator noun, spatial cases, Suffixaufnahme
Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.164.04gre
References (35)
References
All-Russian Census. [URL] (14 May 2012).
Atkine, Viktor. 1997. The Evenki language from the Yenisei to Sakhalin. In Northern Minority Languages: Problems of Survival [Senri Ethnological Studies 44], H. Shoji & J. Janhunen (eds), 109­–121.Google Scholar
Benzing, Johannes. 1955. Die tungusischen Sprachen. Versuch einer vergleichenden Grammatik. Wiesbaden: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry. 1994. Case. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bulatova, Nadezhda Ja. 1987. Govory èvenkov Amurskoj oblasti (Dialects of the Evenki of the Amur Region). Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Cincius, Vera I. 1948. Problemy sravnitel’noj grammatiki tunguso-man’chzhurskix jazykov (Problems of a Comparative Grammar of the Tungus-Manchu Languages). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
. 1975. Sravnitel’nyj slovar’ tunguso-man’chzhurskix jazykov: Materialy k ètimoligecheskomu slovarju (Comparative Dictionary of the Tungus-Manchu Languages: Materials for an Etymological Dictionary) 1. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2009. Spatial cases. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 609–625. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
De Lancey, Scott. 1997. Grammaticalization and the gradience of categories. Relator nouns and postpositions in Tibetan and Burmese. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type, Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 51–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Towards a descriptive framework of spatial deixis. In Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, Robert J. Jarvella & Wolfgang Klein (eds), 31–59. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Grenoble, Lenore. A. 2011. Switch or shift: Code-mixing, contact-induced change and attrition. In Instrumentarium of Linguistics: Sociolinguistic Approaches to Non-standard Russian [Slavica Helsingiensia 40], Arto Mustajoki, Ekaterina Protassova & Nikolai Vakhtin (eds), 147–161. Helsinki.Google Scholar
. 2013. The syntax and pragmatics of Tungusic revisited. In Language Typology and Historical Contingency [Typological Studies in Language 104], Balthasar Bickel, Lenore A., Grenoble, David A. Peterson, & Alan Timberlake (eds), 357-382. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grenoble, Lenore A. & Whaley, Lindsay J. 2003. The case for dialect continua in Tungusic: Plural morphology. In Current Trends in Caucasian, East European, and Inner Asian Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Howard Aronson [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 246], Dee Ann Holisky & Kevin Tuite (eds), 97–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 2012. Pyramids of spatial relators in Northeastern Turkic and its neighbors. In Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations: A Cross-linguistic Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series 126], Pirkko Suihkonen, Bernard Comrie & Valery Solovyev, (eds),191–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilby, David. 1980. Universal and particular properties of the Evenki case system. International Review of Slavic Linguistics 5: 45–74.Google Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo & Malchukov, Andrej. 2009. Varieties of accusative. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 547–561. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Konstantinova, Ol’ga A. 1964. Evenkijskii jazyk. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Lebedeva, Elena P., Konstantinova, Ol’ga A. & Monaxova, Iraida V. 1985. Evenkijskij jazyk. Leningrad: Prosveshchenie.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20: 303–318.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition. Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor. 1997. Evenki. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1994. Syntactic types of Evenki NPs. In The Noun Phrase Sketch Book, Frans Plank (ed.). EUROTYP Working Papers VII/22: 1–4.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 1995. (Re-)Introducing Suffixaufnahme. In Double Case. Agreement by Suffixaufnahme, Frans Plank (ed.) 3–109. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Romanova, Agnija V. & Myreeva, Anna N. 1964. Ocherki uchurskogo, majskogo i tottinskogo govorov (Essays on the Uchur, Maj and Tottin dialects). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Sadler, Louisa & Rachel Nordlinger. 2006. Case stacking in realizational morphology. Linguistics 44/3: 459–487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starosta, Stan. 1985. Relator nouns as a source of case inflection. In For Gordon Fairbanks, Veneeta Z. Acson & Richard L. Leed (eds), 111–133. Honolulu HI: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1975. Semantics and syntax of motion. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 4, John Kimball (ed.), 181–238. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1983. How language structures space. In Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application, Herbert L. Pick, Jr. & Linda P. Acredolo (eds), 225–282. New York: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on The Grammar of Event Structure, 480–519.
. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vasilevich, Glafira M. 1940. Ocherk grammatiki èvenkiiskogo (tungusskogo) jazyka (Essays on the Grammar of the Evenki (Tungus) Language). Leningrad: Uchpedgiz.Google Scholar
. 1948. Ocherk dialektov èvenkiiskogo (tungusskogo) jazyka (Essays on the Dialects of the Evenki (Tungus) Language). Leningrad: Uchpedgiz.Google Scholar
. 1958. Èvenkijsko-russkij slovar’ (Evenki-Russian Dictionary). Moscow: Gos. izdatel’stvo inostrannyx i nacional’nyx slovarej.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Haule, Emmanuely J.
2024. Examination of Spatial Deictic Markers in KingoniExamination of Spatial Deictic Markers in Kingoni. Mbeya University of Science and Technology Journal of Research and Development 5:2 ► pp. 740 ff. DOI logo
Shluinsky, Andrey
2023. Adpositions and adpositional relator nouns in Akebu. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 44:1 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Bez, Gitanjali
2020. The relator noun construction in Assamese. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.