Cover not available
Part of
New Directions in Grammaticalization Research
Edited by Andrew D.M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale and Richard Waltereit
[Studies in Language Companion Series 166] 2015
► pp. 135–156

Periphery of utterances and (inter)subjectification in Modern Japanese

A case study of competing causal conjunctions and connective particles

| Tokyo Gakugei University
Comparing data from present-day conversation with that from the conversational parts of journals in late-Modern Japanese, this paper investigates the development of two synonymous causal constructions, namely the kara-clause and the node-clause constructions, in terms of the peripheries of an utterance. It illustrates that in Modern Japanese the two constructions are undergoing a similar developmental path, in that the causal conjunctive particles kara and node have been developing into part of the conjunctions dakara and nanode in the left periphery of a clause and developing final-particle-like functions in the right periphery. When they appear in either periphery of an utterance, they express and elaborate the speaker’s (inter)subjective meanings in interaction. They are also in the process of (inter)subjectification.
Published online: 8 April 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.166.07hig
References (51)
Text references
Kiruna no ne karakane no naruki, Koten Nihon Bungaku Taikei, Vol. 59. [Classical Japanese Literature Collection 59] 1958. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Hituzi Workplace Corpus (CD-ROM). 2002. Gendai Nihongo Kenkyuukai. ed. Dansei no Kotoba: Shokuba-hen [Male Language at Place of Work>]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar
References
Aoki, Reiko. 1973. Setsuzokushi oyobi setsuzokushi-teki goi ichiran (List of conjunctions and conjunctive items). In Setsuzokushi Kandooshi (Conjunctions Interjections), Kazuhiko Suzuki & Oki Hayashi (eds), 215-253. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich. 2014. Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Discourse Markers In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 285-314. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia & Leslie Arnovick. 2010. Pragmaticalisation and discursisation. In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 165-192. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Fagard, Benjamin. 2012. Competing connectives in the causal domain: French car and parce que . Journal of Pragmatics 44(1): 154-168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Grammaticalization and pragmaticalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 450-461. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366-431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Haraguchi, Yutaka. 1971. Node no teichaku (The establishment of node). Shizuoka Joshidaigaku Kenkyuu 4: 31-43.Google Scholar
Higashiizumi, Yuko. 2006. From a Subordinate Clause to an Independent Clause: A History of English because-clause and Japanese kara-clause [Hituzi Linguistics in English 2]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2011. Are kara- ‘because’ clauses causal subordinate clauses in present-day Japanese? In Subordination in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction Series 24], Ritva Laury & Ryoko Suzuki (eds), 191-208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higashiizumi, Yuko & Noriko O. Onodera. 2013. Cross-Linguistic approach to form-function-periphery (LP and RP) mapping: With a special focus on 'exchange structure' and 'action structure'. Panel at the 13th International Pragmatics Conference, New Delhi, India, 9 September.
Ishigaki, Kenji. 1955. Joshi no Rekishiteki Kenkyuu [Historical Study of Particles]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, Douglas. 2011. Grammaticalization and lexicalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 438-449. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
López-Couso, María José. 2010. Subjectification and intersubjectification. In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavisainen (eds), 127-163. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 1975. A Reference Grammar of Japanese. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yo, 1988. From bound grammatical markers to free discourse markers: History of some Japanese connectives. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, February 13-15, 1988. General Session and Parasession on Grammaticalization, Shelly Axmaker, Annie Jasser & Helen Singmaster (eds), 340-351. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K. 2004. Danwa Gengogaku (Discourse Linguistics). Tokyo: Shuppan.Google Scholar
Mitsui, Akiko. 1997. Hanashi kotoba no “dakara” “sorede” (“Dakara” and “sorede” in spoken language). In Josei no Kotoba: Shokuba-hen(Women’s Language: In the Workplace), Gendai Nihongo Kenkyuukai (ed.), 155-173. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar
Mori, Junko. 1996. Historical change of the Japanese connective datte: Its form and functions. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 5, Noriko Akatsuka, Shoichi Iwasaki & Susan Strauss (eds), 201-218. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2012. Beyond intersubjectification. English Text Construction 5(1): 29-51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nihon Kijutsu Bumpoo Kenkyuukai (NKBK). 2008. Gendai Nihongo Bunpoo (Modern Japanese Grammar), Vol. 6. Tokyo: Kurosio Shuppan.Google Scholar
Ohori, Toshio. 1996. Remarks on suspended clauses: A contribution to Japanese phraseology. In Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics in Honor of Charles J. Fillmore [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 32] Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 201-218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Toward a taxonomy of insubordination: Grammaticalization paths and discourse motivations. Paper presented at Symposium “Dynamics of Insubordination”, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, Tokyo, Japan, 27 October.
Ono, Tsuyoshi, Thompson, Sandra A. & Sasaki, Yumi. 2012. Japanese negotiation through emerging final particles in everyday talk. Discourse Processes 49: 243-272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. 1995. Diachronic analysis of Japanese discourse markers. In Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35], Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), 393-437. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Development of demo type connectives and na elements: Two extremes of Japanese discourse markers. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(1): 27-55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Japanese Discourse Markers: Synchronic and Diachronic Discourse Analysis [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 132]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Interplay of (inter)subjectivity and social norm. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2): 239-267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The grammaticalization of discourse markers. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 614-624. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2014. Setting up a mental space: A function of discourse markers on the left periphery (LP). In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, Kate Beeching & Ulrich Detges (eds), 92–116. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. & Suzuki, Ryoko. 2007. Special Issue: Historical Change in Japanese: Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rhee, Seongha. 2012. Context-induced reinterpretation and (inter)subjectification: The case of grammaticalization of sentence-final particles. Language Sciences 34: 284-300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko. 2007. (Inter)subjectification, Japanese syntax and syntactic scope increase. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2): 171-206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sohn, Sung-Ock S. 2003. On the emergence of intersubjectivity: An analysis of the sentence-final nikka in Korean. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 12, William McClure (ed.), 52-63. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Suzuki, Ryoko. 2011. The grammaticalization of final particles. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 668-680. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Motives for Language Change, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 124-139. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. (Inter)subjectification and unidirectionality. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2): 295-309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: reassessment. In Subjectification, (Inter)subjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29-71. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Intersubjectification and clause periphery. English Text Construction 5(1): 7-28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Degand, Liesbeth. 2013. The pragmatic role of elements at right periphery. Panel at the 13th International Pragmatics Conference, New Delhi, India, 12 September.
Yabe, Hiroko. 1997. Nokkechau kara ne kara mooshiteorimasu node made (From Because I’ll put (my child) on (my lap) to Because (my colleague) is humbly saying (so)). In Josei no Kotoba: Shokuba-hen (Women’s Language: In the Workplace), Gendai Nihongo Kenkyuukai (ed.), 139-154. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2002. Kara to node no shiyoo ni miru shokuba no dansei no gengokoodoo (Men’s language use in the workplace seen from the use of kara and node). In Dansei no Kotoba: Shokuba-hen (Men’s Language: In the Workplace), Gendai Nihongo Kenkyuukai (ed.), 133-148. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar
Yajima, Masahiro. 2011. Jikanteki kuukanteki hikaku o jiku ni shita kindaigo bunpooshi kenkyuu (A historical and areal study of grammar in modern Japanese). In Kindaito Kenkyuu no Perspective (Perspective of the Early Modern Japanese Language), Hiroyuki Kanazawa & Masahiro Yajima (eds), 56-82. Tokyo: Kasama Shoin.Google Scholar
Yazawa, Makoto. 2004. Nanode . In Mondaina Nihongo (Problematic Japanese), Yasuo Kitahara (ed.), 44-46. Tokyo: Kurosio Shuppan.Google Scholar
Yoshii, Kazuto. 1977. Kindai Tookyoo-go ingakaneki hyoogen no tsuuji-teki koosatsu: Kara to node o chuushin to shite (A diachronic consideration of the expression of causal relations in the modern Tokyo dialect: With special reference to kara and node). Kokugogaku 110: 19-36.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Higashiizumi, Yuko
2016. The development of confirmation/agreement markers away from the RP in Japanese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 282 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.