Article published in:
Causation, Permission, and Transfer: Argument realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET verbs
Edited by Brian Nolan, Gudrun Rawoens and Elke Diedrichsen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 167] 2015
► pp. 111
References

References

Comrie, Bernard
1976The syntax of causative constructions: Cross-language similarities and divergences. In Shibatani (ed.), 261–312.Google Scholar
Diedrichsen, Elke
2012What you give is what you GET? On reanalysis, semantic extension, and functional motivation with the German bekommen-passive construction. In Lenz & Rawoens (eds), 1163–1205Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
2010A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 30–83. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gronemeyer, Claire
1999On deriving complex polysemy: The grammaticalization of get. English Language and Linguistics 3: 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta & Narasimhan, Bhuvana
2012Events of Putting and Taking: A Crosslinguistic Perspective [Typological Studies in Language 100]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lenz, Alexandra N. & Rawoens, Gudrun
(eds) 2012The Art of Getting: GET Verbs in European Languages from a Synchronic and Diachronic Point of View. Special issue of Linguistics 50(6).Google Scholar
Margetts, Anna & Austin, Peter K.
2007Three participant events in the languages of the world: Towards a cross-linguistic typology. Linguistics 45: 393–451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato
2005English Ditransitive Verbs. Aspects of Theory, Description and a Usage-based Model. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newman, John
1996Give: A Cognitive Linguistic Study [Cognitive Linguistics Research 7]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1998The Linguistics of Giving [Typological Studies in Language 36]. 
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, Brian
2012aThe Structure of Modern Irish: A Functional Account. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
2012bThe GET constructions of Modern Irish and Irish English: GET-passive and GET-recipient variations. In Lenz & Rawoens (eds), 1111–1162.Google Scholar
2013Constructional polysemy and argument realisation with the Irish GET verb. In van Gelderen, Barðdal & Cennamo (eds), 87–116.Google Scholar
Nolan, Brian & Diedrichsen, Elke
2013Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics: The Role of Constructions in Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 145]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
(ed.) 1976The Grammar of Causative Constructions [Syntax and Semantics 6]. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2002The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation [Typological Studies in Language 48]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
1996Causatives and Causation: A Universal-typological Perspective [Longman Linguistics Library]. London: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. [Language, Speech, and Communication Series]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tragel, Ilona
2001On Estonian core verbs. In Papers in Estonian Cognitive Linguistics [Publications of the Department of General Linguistics 2], Ilona Tragel (ed.), 145–169. Tartu: Tartu University Press.Google Scholar
Tragel, Ilona & Habicht, Külli
2012Grammaticalization of the Estonian saama ‘get’. In Lenz & Rawoens (eds), 1371–1412.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly, Jóhanna Barðdal & Michela Cennamo
2013Argument Structure in Flux. The Naples-Capri Papers [Studies in Language Companion Series 131]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Jr., Robert D.
2005Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2008Investigations of the Syntax–Semantics–Pragmatics Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 105]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar