Article published in:
Causation, Permission, and Transfer: Argument realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET verbs
Edited by Brian Nolan, Gudrun Rawoens and Elke Diedrichsen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 167] 2015
► pp. 53105
References

References

Aissen, Judith L.
1979The Syntax of Causative Constructions. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Bausewein, Karin
1991 AcI-Konstruktionen und Valenz . In Betriebslinguistik und Linguistikbetrieb. Akten des 24. Linguistischen Kolloquiums, Universität Bremen, 4–6 September 1989 [Linguistische Arbeiten 260], Eberhard Klein, Francoise Puradier Duteil & Karl Heinz Wagner (eds), 245–251. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam
2003The light verb jungle. In Papers from the GSAS/Dudley House Workshop on Light Verbs [Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 9], Gulsat Aygen, Claire Bowern & Conor McDonough Quinn (eds), 1–49. Cambridge MA: Harvard Univerisity, Dept. of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976The syntax of causative constructions: Cross-language similarities and divergences. In The Grammar of Causative Constructions [Syntax and Semantics 6], 
Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 261–312. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Polinsky, Maria
(eds) 1993Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diedrichsen, Elke
2008Where is the precore slot? Mapping the layered structure of the clause and German sentence topology. In Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics-Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 105], 
Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. (ed.), 203–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The theoretical importance of constructional schemas in RRG. In Proceedings of the RRG 2009 Conference, Wataru Nakamura (ed.), 168–198. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2012What you give is what you GET? On reanalysis, semantic extension and functional motivation with the German bekommen-passive construction. Linguistics 50(6): 1163–1204. Special issue The Art of Getting: GET Verbs in European Languages from a Synchronic and Diachronic Point of View, Alexandra N. Lenz & Gudrun Rawoens (eds). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013aConstructions as memes. Interactional function as cultural convention beyond the words. In Beyond Words, Frank Liedtke & Cornelia Schulze (eds), 283–305. Berlin: De Gruyter.
2013bAuxiliary selection in German: Constructional gradience with perfect formation. In Argument Structure in Flux: The Naples/Capri Papers [Studies in Language Companion Series 131], Elly van Gelderen, Jóhanna Barðdal & Michela Cennamo (eds), 405–434. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013cFrom idioms to sentence structures and beyond: The theoretical scope of the concept “Construction”. In Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics. The Role of Constructions in Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 145], 295–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014A role and reference grammar parser for German. In Language Processing and Grammars: The Role of Functionally Oriented Computational Models [Studies in Language Companion Series 150], Brian Nolan & Carlos Periñán-Pascual (eds), 105–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
2000A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 30–83. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drach, Erich
1937 [41963] Grundgedanken der deutschen Satzlehre. Frankfurt: Diesterweg.Google Scholar
Duden
Eisenberg, Peter
2006Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik: Der Satz. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Enzinger, Stefan
2010Kausative und perzeptive Infinitivkonstruktionen. Syntaktische Variation und semantischer Aspekt. Berlin: Akademie. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fagan, Sarah M.B.
1992The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
García García, Luisa
2005Germanische Kausativbildung. Die deverbalen jan-Verben im Gotischen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther, Hamm, Fritz & Sternefeld, Wolfgang
1994Sprachliches Wissen. Frankfurt: SuhrkampGoogle Scholar
Hans-Bianchi, Barbara
2011Die kausative Verbalperiphrase zwischen Grammatikalisierung und Sprachkontakt [Daf-Werkstatt Beiheft 1]. Arezzo: Bibliotheca Aretina.Google Scholar
Hentschel, Elke & Weydt, Harald
2003Handbuch der deutschen Grammatik. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne & Verhagen, Arie
1994The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events. Cognitive Linguistics 5(4): 115–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid I.
2001Causatives. In Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 886–898. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. & Ruppenhofer, Josef
2001Beyond Alternations: A Constructional Account of the Applicative Pattern in German. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
1976Kausativkonstruktionen, German translation from Russian by 
Vaclav Kuchler & Heinz Vater. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Nolan, Brian
2012The Structure of Modern Irish. A Functional Account. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
2013Constructions as grammatical objects: A case study of the prepositional ditransitive construction in Modern Irish. In Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics. The Role of Constructions in Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 145], 143–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nübling, Damaris
2008Historische Sprachwissenschaft des Deutschen, 2nd edn. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Pinkwart, Heinz
1963Mord ist schlecht für hohen Blutdruck. München: Goldmann.Google Scholar
Pörtner, Rudolf
1964Die Erben Roms. Berlin: Econ.Google Scholar
Rawoens, Gudrun & Egan, Thomas
2013Distinguishing causative and permissive readings of the Swedish verb låta . Functions of Language 20(1): 64–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ronneberger-Siebold, Elke
1991Funktionale Betrachtungen zu Diskontinuität und Klammerbildung im Deutschen. In Beiträge zum 8. Bochum-Essener Kolloquium über ‘Sprachwandel und seine Prinzipien’, Norbert Boretzky, Werner Enninger, Benedikt Jeßing & Thomas Stolz (eds), 206–236. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Rosen, Sara
1989Argument Structure and Complex Predicates. PhD dissertation, Brandeis University.
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1976The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In The Grammar of Causative Constructions [Syntax and Semantics 6], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 1–40. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1976Semantic causative types. In The Grammar of Causative Constructions [Syntax and Semantics 6], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 43–116. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D.
2005Exploring the Syntax-semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Ralf
2009Skandal im Verbkomplex. Betrachtungen zur scheinbar inkorrekten Morphologie in infiniten Verbkomplexen des Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 28: 307–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wöllstein-Leisten, Angelika, Heilmann, Axel, Stepan, Peter & Vikner, Sten
1997Deutsche Satzstruktur. Grundlagen der Syntaktischen Analyse. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Xrakowskij, Viktor S.
2003Valenz und Sprachtypologie. In Dependenz und Valenz. Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, Vol.1, Vilmos Agel, Ludwig Eichinger, Hans-Werner Eroms, Peter Hellwig, Hans-Jürgen Heringer & Henning Lobin (eds), 444–457. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar