References (13)
References
Bresnan, Joan & Nikitina, Tatiana. 2003. On the gradience of dative alternation. Ms, Stanford University.
Bybee, Joan. 2002. Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan. 1982. On lexical ambiguity. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 11: 65–80.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2010. Semantic maps as metrics on meaning. Linguistic Discovery 8(1): 70–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J. 2003. Linguistic Epidemiology: Semantics and Grammar of Language Contact in Mainland Southeast Asia. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2010. Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff. 2011. Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, John 1996. Give: A Cognitive Linguistic Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and Cognition. The Acquisition of Argument Structure. 
Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1973. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 7: 532–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Jonathan R. 1973. A fake NP squish. In New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Charles-James N. Bailey & Roger W. Shuy (eds). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar