Article published in:
Causation, Permission, and Transfer: Argument realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET verbs
Edited by Brian Nolan, Gudrun Rawoens and Elke Diedrichsen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 167] 2015
► pp. 177193
References

References

Baker, Mark C.
1988Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: the University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa, Huang, James, Li, Audrey & Tang, Jane
1999Hoo Hoo Hoo in Taiwanese. In Contemporary Studies on the Min Dialects[Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 14], Pang-Hsin Ting (ed.), 146–203. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Chin, Andy
2010Two types of indirect object marker in Chinese: Their typological significance and development. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 38(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Feng, Shengli
2003Prosodically constrained postverbal PPs in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 46: 1085–1122.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, Mantaro
1976Language diffusion on the Asian continent: Problems of typological diversity in Sino-Tibetan. Computational Analyses of Asian and African Languages 3: 49–65.Google Scholar
Lee, Hui-Chi
2011Double object construction in Hainan Min. Language and Linguistics 12(3): 501–527.Google Scholar
Li, Y.-H. Audrey
1990Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Su-E.
2008Hanyu nanfang fangyan daozhi shuangbin jiegou chutan (A study on inverted double object construction in southern Chinese dialects). Yuyan Kexue 7(3): 308–319.Google Scholar
Liu, Danqing
2001Hanyu geiyulei shuangjiwu jiegou de leixingxue kaocha (A typological investigation of GIVE ditranstives in Chinese). Zhongguo Yuwen 5: 387–398.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L., Haspelmath, Martin & Comrie, Bernard
2010Ditransitive construction: A typological overview. In Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, Andrej L. Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Margetts, Anna & Austin, Peter K.
2007Three participant events in the languages of the world: Towards a crosslinguistic typology. Linguistics 45(3): 393–451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Waltraud & Whitman, John
2010Applicative structure and Mandarin ditransitives. In Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations. A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 158], Maia Duguine, Susana Huidobro & Nerea Madariaga (eds), 261–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peyraube, Alain
1981The dative construction in Cantonese. Computational Analysis of Asian and African Languages 16: 29–65.Google Scholar
Qiao, Yannong
1966Guangzhouhua kouyuci de yanjiu (Study on in colloquial words Cantonese). Hong Kong: Overseas Chinese Press.Google Scholar
Tang, C.-C. Jane
1990Chinese Phrase Structure and the extended X-bar Theory. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Takashima, Ken-ichi & Yue, Anne
2000Evidence of possible dialect mixture in oracle-bone inscriptions. In In Memory of Li Fang-Kuei: Essays on Linguistic Change and the Chinese Dialects, Pang Hsin Ting & Anne O. Yue (eds), 1–52. Seattle & Taipei: University of Washington & Institute Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Tang, Sze-Wing
1998On the ‘inverted’ double object construction. In Studies in Cantonese Linguistics, Stephen Matthews (ed.), 35–52. Hong Kong: The Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
2003A Parametric Theory of Chinese Dialectal Grammar. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Liejiong & Peyraube, Alain
1997On the double object construction and the oblique construction in Cantonese. Studies in Language 21(1): 105–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yichun Shizhi
1990Gazetteer of the Yichun County. Hainan: Nanhai Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Yue-Hashimoto, Anne
1993Comparative Chinese Dialectal Grammar. Paris: Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Zhang, Min
2010Hanyu fangyan jiwuxing jiegou nanbei chayi de chengyin: leixingxue jianjiu yingfa de xinwenti (Revisiting the alignment typology of ditransitive constructions in Chinese dialects). Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 4(2): 87–270.Google Scholar