Article published in:Causation, Permission, and Transfer: Argument realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET verbs
Edited by Brian Nolan, Gudrun Rawoens and Elke Diedrichsen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 167] 2015
► pp. 227–252
GIVE an its arguments in Bohairic Coptic
The subject of this chapter is the competition between two prepositional markers of the Recipient, n- (the dedicated ‘dative’ marker) and e- (basically a marker of the allative), as used with the verb ti ‘give’ and some of its derivates, especially performative verbs, in Bohairic Coptic. The preposition n-/na= appears to be appropriate when the Agent obtains control over the Recipient’s personal sphere (potency, volition, awareness or face) by a transfer of material or symbolic goods or by communicative acts. The preposition e-/ero= can appear when the Recipient’s personal sphere is not accessible for the Agent’s control or when the Agent provokes externally observable reactions of the Recipient without necessarily controlling his or her personal sphere.
Published online: 14 January 2015
Aristar, Anthony Rodriguez
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca & Kádár, Dániel Z.
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C.
Caner, Daniel E.
Company Company, Conceptión
Delbecque, Nicole & Cornillie, Bert
2007 Transitive verbs with non-accusative alternation in Hebrew: Cross-language comparison with English, German and Spanish. In Delbecque & Cornillie (eds), 61–101.
2009 Grammaticalization of cases. In Malchukov & Spencer (eds), 458–469.
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
Janda, Laura A.
Kittilä, Seppo & Ylikoski, Jussi
Loprieno, Antonio & Müller, Matthias
2011 The coding of spatial relations with human landmarks: From Latin to Romance. In Kittilä, Västi & Ylikoski (eds), 209–234.
Malchukov, Andrej, Haspelmath, Martin & Comrie, Bernard
1960 [1923/1924] Essai sur le don: Forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques. In Sociologie et Anthropologie, 145–249. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Originally published in 1923/1924, English translations: The gift: the form and reason for exchange in archaic societies, London: Routledge Classics, 2002; and The gift: forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies, Charleston, SC: Nabu Press, 2011.
2009 Varieties of dative. In Malchukov & Spencer (eds), 572–580.
Narasimhan, Bhuvana, Kopecka, Anetta, Bowerman, Melissa F., Gullberg, Marianne & Majid, Asifa
2011 Some issues with the concept of face: When, what, how and how much? In Bargiela-Chiappini & Kádár (eds), 17–41.
Péristiany, John George
Rice, Susan & Kabata, Kaori
2007 Transitivity and referentiality in Spanish and Rumanian. In Delbecque & Cornillie (eds), 39–59.
2007 Canonical and non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages: A typological approach. In Europe and the Mediterranean as Linguistic Areas: Convergencies from a Historical and Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 88], Paolo Ramat & Elisa Roma (eds), 289–313. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Siewierska, Anna & Hollmann, Willem
2011 On the concept of face and politeness. In Bargiela-Chiappini & Kádár (eds), 42–58.
van Lier, Eva
2012 Referential effects on the expression of three-participant events across languages: An introduction in memory of Anna Siewierska. Linguistic Discovery 10(3): 1–16. http://linguistic-discovery.dartmouth.edu (21 May 2014).
Zakrzewska, Ewa D.
Forthcoming. Hidden voices: Narrative vs. non-narrative verb forms in Bohairic Coptic. Paper submitted for the proceedings of the workshop Aspect and discourse in African languages, organized by Shahar Shirtz and Doris L. Payne during the meeting of Societas Linguistica Europaea, Split, 18–21 September 2013.