Cover not available
Part of
Causation, Permission, and Transfer: Argument realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET verbs
Edited by Brian Nolan, Gudrun Rawoens and Elke Diedrichsen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 167] 2015
► pp. 327–352

The morphological, syntactic and semantic interface of the verb GIVE in Lithuanian

Lithuanian is one of the Baltic languages and has complex word relations in a sentence. GIVE is one of the verbs that illustrate the interrelatedness between morphological functions, syntactic restrictions and semantics. The analysis includes an overview of the verb’s GIVE meanings, outlines morphological restrictions, presenting the morpho-semantic interface discussing word prefixation and suffixation, referring to Ambrazas (2006) and Holvoet and Semenienė (2004). Thereafter, the most common syntactic patterns are established revealing the complexity of the Lithuanian phrase and sentence formation. This study reviews the issues of cases, specifically genitive and accusative cases of the noun which appeared as a theme and the semantic meaning transfer using these cases in simple sentences. Role and Reference Grammar was adapted for the analysis of the examples with the simplified logical structure.
Published online: 14 January 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.167.12bru
References (41)
References
Ambrazas, Vytautas. 2006. Lithuanian Grammar: Lietuvių Kalbos Gramatika, 2nd edn. Vilnius: Baltos Lankos.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1986. Mutations of Linguistic Categories. In Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium, W. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (eds), 83–94. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bielinis, Jurgis. 2007. Kad Lietuvoje būtų šviesiau (So it would be brighter in Lithuania). PRO VITA, 12 October 2007. <[URL]Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 2001. Case. 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. History of the research on case. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej L. Mal’chukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 13–26. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Blevins, Jim. 2011. Case and declensional paradigms. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej L. Mal’chukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 200–218. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
BNS. 2010. Dešinieji: E. Kusaitės byloje lietuviai pasiduoda Rusijos spaudimui (The right wing: in the case of E. Kusaite Lithuanians are giving in to the pressure from Russia). Klaipėda, 10 December 2010. <[URL]Google Scholar
. 2014. Vilniuje gydomas Ukrainos aktyvistas: Mane vadino JAV šnipu, tardė ir mušė (A Ukrainian activist is treated in Vilnius: I was called the spy for USA, interrogated and beaten). Kauno diena. 6 February, 2014. <[URL]Google Scholar
Butterfield, Jeremy (ed.). 2001. Collins Concise Dictionary. Glasgow: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Cizik, Veslava. 2003. Linksnių Atrakcija Lyginamosiose Konstrukcijose (The attraction of case in comparative constructions). Acta Linguistica Lithuanica 48: 1–17.Google Scholar
Delahunty, Gerald P. & Garvey, James J. 2010. The English Language: From Sound to Sense. Fort Collins CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.Google Scholar
DELFI. 2013a. Girtiems užsieniečiams duoti kyšį policijai – savaime suprantamas dalykas? (Is it natural for drunk foreigners to give a bribe to the police?) DELFI, 5 July 2013, <[URL]Google Scholar
. 2013b. Kiek duoti kišenpinigių vaikui? (How much pocket money to give to a child?) DELFI, 2 september 2013. <[URL]Google Scholar
. 2014. Girtas vairuotojas policininkus bandė papirkti loterijos bilietu (The drunk driver tried bribe the officers with a lottery ticket). DELFI, 5 May, 2014, <[URL]Google Scholar
Gil, David. 1982. Case marking, phonological size, and linear order. In Syntax and Semantics, Paul J. Hopper & Sandra A. Thompson (eds). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice. 1984. Inversion as a rule of universal grammar: Georgian evidence. In Studies in Relational Grammar 2, David M. Perlmutter & Carl G. Rosen (eds), 259–291. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Shelly P. 2003. On the limits of the comparative method. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 213–243. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene. 2002. On the projection problem for presuppositions. In Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings, Paul Portner & Barbara H. Partee (eds), 249–260. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2003. Grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel & Semenienė, Loreta. 2004. Linksnio teorijos pagrindai [Fundamentals of a theory of case]. In Gramatinių Kategorijų Tyrimai, 33–60. Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas.Google Scholar
de Hoop, Helen. 1989. Case assignment and generalized quantifiers. Proceedings of NELS 19: 176–190.
. 1996. Case Configuration and Noun Interpretation. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
de Hoop, Helen & Zwarts, Joost. 2011. Case informal semantics. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej L. Mal’chukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 170–184. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kaikarytė, Daiva. 2010. Po U. Kiguolio stogu – pusė pasaulio (Half of the world underneath the roof of U. Kiguolis). Lrytas.lt, 22 June 2010. <[URL]Google Scholar
Keinys, Stasys (ed.). 2012. Dabartinės Lietuvių Kalbos Žodynas (Modern Lithuanian Language Dictionary). Vilnius: Lietuvių Kalbos Institutas.Google Scholar
Kruopas, Jonas, Lyberis, Antanas, Paulauskas, Jonas, Senkus, Juozas & Tolutienė, Biruté (eds). 1969. Lietuvių kalbos žodynas (Lithuanian Language Dictionary), 2nd edn. Vilnius: Mintis.Google Scholar
Labutis, Vitas. 2002. Lietuvių Klabos Sintaksė (Syntax of the Lithuanian Language), 3rd edn. Vilnius: Vilniaus Universiteto Leidykla.Google Scholar
Labutis, Vitas, Pupkis, Aldonas & Šukys, Jonas. 2003. Sintaksė: Linksnių vartojimas (Syntax: Case usage). Vilnius: Mokslo ir Enciklopedijų Leidybos Institutas.Google Scholar
Mal’chukov, Andrej L. 2011. Rare and ‘exotic’ cases. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej L. Mal’chukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 635–650. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Nolan, Brian. 2012. The Structure of Modern Irish. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank. R. 1994. Grammatical Roles and Relations. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavey, L. Emma. 2010. The Structure of Language: An Introduction to Grammatical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rivero, Maria Luisa & Arregui, Ana. 2012. Building involuntary states in Slavic. In Understanding Syntax: A Cross-categorical View of Event Structure, Violea Demonte & Louise McNally, 301–332. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja. 2014. The independent partitive case in Lithuanian. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-canonical Encoding in Baltic, Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 257–300. 
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1988. Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 14: 31–55.
Tallerman, Maggie. 2011. Understanding Syntax, 3rd edn [Understanding Language Series]. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Vaicaitiene, Daiva. 2014. Sielą išgydyti turėjusi knyga gyvenimo nepakeitė (The book that was supposed to heal the soul, did not change the life). DELFI, 16 April, 2014. <[URL]Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. 2012. Role and reference grammar as a framework for linguistic analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 703–738. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randi. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar