Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Historical Syntax
Edited by Carlotta Viti
[Studies in Language Companion Series 169] 2015
► pp. 203–232

Traces of discourse configurationality in older Indo-European languages?

| Humboldt-University of Berlin

In old Indo-European languages such as Old Indian, Ancient Greek and Hittite, sentences are documented that indicate the discourse-configurational word order topic – focus – verb. There are, however, many deviations. To show to what extent the above mentioned languages are on the continuum between information structure and syntax, the kind of topic and focus, verb placement and the nature of subject, as well as the relation between topic and subject, are here scrutinized.

Keywords: Centering Theory, complex left periphery, discourse-configurationality, focus, subject, topic
Published online: 29 April 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.169.08luh
References
Abraham, Werner
1992 Clausal focus vs. discourse rhema in German: A programmatic view. Language and Cognition 2: 1-19.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Frascarelli, Mara
2010 Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia, Vol. 2.1. [URL]Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan
1998 Markedness and morphosyntactic variation in pronominal system. [URL]
Büring, Daniel
1999 Topik. In Focus, Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, Peter Bosch & Rob van der Sandt (eds), 142-165. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1993: A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 239-297.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Bertold
1888 Altindische Syntax. Halle: Verlag des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Dik, Helma
1995 Word Order in Ancient Greek. A Pragmatic Account of Word Order Variation in Herodotus [Amsterdam Studies in Classical Philology 5] Amsterdam: J. C. GiebenGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert
2006 On pure syntax (uncontamined by information structure). In Form, Structure and Grammar, Patrick Brandt & Eric Fuss (eds.). Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Need of mediation: The relation between syntax and information structure. In The Notions of Information Structure [Working Papers of the SFB 632, Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS), 6], Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds). Potsdam: University of Potsdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland
2007 Types of topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Susanne Winkler & Kerstin Schwabe (eds), 87-116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frey, Werner
2004 A medial topic position for German. Linguistische Berichte 198: 153-190.Google Scholar
2007 Some contextual effects of aboutness topics in German. In Interfaces and Interface condition [Language, Context & Cognition 7], Andreas Späth (ed.), 325-344. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Johannes
1960 Hethitisches Elementarbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert
1993 Deutsche Syntax – generativ. Vorstudien zur Theorie einer projektiven Grammatik [Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 325]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1985 Natural Syntax. Iconicity and Erosion. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim
2001 The dimensions of topic-comment. In Linguistics 39(4): 641-681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keydana, Götz
2008 Indo-European syntax. [URL]
Kiss, Katalin É
1995 Discourse Configurational Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1997 Discourse-configurationality in the languages of Europe. In Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe [Eurotyp 20(1)], Anna Siewierska (ed.), 681-727. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1998 Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74(2): 245-273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Discourse configurationality. In Language Typology and Language Universals [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 20.2], Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds), 1442-1455. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1993 Focus and presupposition in dynamic interpretation. Journal of Semantics 10: 269-300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Basic notions of information structure. In Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure [Vol. 6. ISIS, Working Papers of the SFB 632], Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds). Potsdam: University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and Mental Representations of Discourse Referents [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 71]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A
1976 Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 457-489. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lühr, Rosemarie
2006 Informationsstrukturelle Merkmale in der Morphologie des altindischen Personalpronomens. Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
2008 Die Abbildung grammatischer Merkmale in morphologiereichen Sprachen. In Sprachliche Motivation. Zur Interdependenz von Inhalt und Ausdruck, Peter Gallmann, Christian Lehmann & Rosemarie Lühr (eds), 141-143. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2008a Old Indic clauses between subordination and coordination. In ‘Subordinatio’ vs. ‘Coordinatio’ in Sentence and Text. A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 98], Catherine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds), 307-327. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b Information structure in Ancient Greek. In The Discourse Potential of Underspecified Structures[Language, Context and Cognition 8], Anita Steube (ed.), 487-512. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010 Zum Mittelfeld in indogermanischen Sprachen. In Anatolian and Indo-European Studies in Honor of Craig Melchert on the Occasion of his Sixty-fifth Birthday, Ronald Kim, Norbert Oettinger, Elisabeth Rieken & Michael Weiß (eds), 227-248. Ann Arbor MI: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar
Matić, Dejan
2003 Topics, Presuppositions, and Theticity: An Empirical Study of Verb-Subject Clauses in Albanian, Greek, and Serbo-Croat. PhD dissertation, University of Cologne.
2003a Topic, focus and discourse structure. Ancient Greek Word Order. Studies in Language 27(3): 573-633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul & Yabushita, Katsuhiko
1998 The semantics and pragmatics of Topic phrases. Linguistics and Phillosophy 21: 117-157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanja
1982 Pragmatics and Linguistics: An Analysis of Sentence Topics. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1992 A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75-116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sornicola, Rosanna
1996 Topic, focus and word order. In Concise Enclopedia of Syntactic Theories, Edward Killoran Brown & Jim Miller (eds), 331-338. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Speyer, Augustin
2007 Die Bedeutung der Centering Theory für Fragen der Vorfeldbesetzung im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 26: 83-115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steube, Anita
(ed.) 2001 Kontrast – lexikalisch, semantisch, intonatorisch [Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 77]. Leipzig: Institut für Linguistik der Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar
Steube, Anita, Alter, Kai & Späth, Andreas
2004 Information structure and modular grammar. In Information Structure. Theoretical and Empirical Aspects [Language, Context, and Cognition 1], Anita Steube (ed.), 15-40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stucky, Susan U
1985 Order in Makua Syntax. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Umbach, Carla
2001: Restriktion der Alternativen. In Steube (ed.), 165-198.Google Scholar
2003 Anaphoric restriction of alternative sets: On the role of bridging antecedents. In Proceedings of "Sinn und Bedeutung VII", [Konstanz Linguistics Working Papers]. Konstanz: University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
2004 On the notion of contrast in information structure and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics 21: 155-175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viti, Carlotta
2009 A quantitative analysis of the OSV word order in Vedic. In Pragmatische Kategorien. Form, Funktion und Diachronie. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 24. bis 26. September 2007 in Marburg, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds), 307-322. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
2010 The information structure of the OVS order in Vedic. In The Role of Information Structure in Language Change [Language, Context, and Cognition 10], Gisella Ferraresi & Rosemarie Lühr (eds), 37-62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van der Wal, Guenever Johanna
2009 Word Order and Information Structure in Makhuwa-Enahara. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar