Part of
Adverbs: Functional and diachronic aspects
Edited by Karin Pittner, Daniela Elsner and Fabian Barteld
[Studies in Language Companion Series 170] 2015
► pp. 118
References
Abraham, Werner
1988Terminologie der neueren Linguistik 2, revised edn, 19–21. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2012Illocutive force is speaker and information source concern. What type of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? Templates vs. derivational structure? In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 67–108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Deutsche Syntax im Sprachenvergleich. Grundlegung einer typologischen Syntax des Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2010Word order typology. A change of perspective. In Proceedings of the TADWO Conference, Michelle Sheehan & Glenda Newton (eds). Oxford: OUP. [URL]Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter
2013Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. Der Satz, 4th edn. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas
2002The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan & Green, Melanie
2006Cognitive Linguistic. An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Frey, Werner
2003Syntactic conditions on adjunct classes. In Modifying Adjuncts, Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, Ewald Lang & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 163–209. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frey, Werner & Pittner, Karin
1998Zur Positionierung von Adverbialen im deutschen Mittelfeld. Linguistische Berichte 176: 489–534.Google Scholar
1999Adverbialpositionen im deutsch-englischen Vergleich. In Sprachspezifische Aspekte der Informationsverteilung [Studia Grammatica 47], Monika Doherty (ed.), 14–40. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Geuder, Wilhelm
2000Oriented Adverbs: Issues in the Lexical Semantics of Event Adverbs. Phd dissertation, Universität Konstanz.
Giegerich, Heinz J
2012The morphology of -ly and the categorial status of ‘adverbs’ in English. English Language and Linguistics 16(3): 341–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert
2010The Syntax of German. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2001Word classes/parts of speech. In Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Neil Smelser & Paul Baltes (eds), 16538–16545. Oxford: Pergamon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1992Parts of speech. In Layered Structure and Reference in a Funtional Perspective. Papers from the Functional Grammar Conference in Copenhagen 1990 [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 23], Michael Fortescue, Peter Harder & Lars Kristoffersen (eds), 29–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus & Schultze-Bernd, Eva
2005Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts: an introduction. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification. The Typology of Depictives, Nikolaus Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Bernd (eds), 1–67. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, Pullum, Geoffrey, et al.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
2008Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, Wataru
1997A cognitive approach to English adverbs. Linguistics 35: 247–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, John, Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K
2010The distribution and category status of adjectives and adverbs. Word Structure 3(1): 31–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramat, Paolo & Ricca, Davide
1994Prototypical adverbs: On the scalarity/radiality of the notion ADVERB. Rivista di Linguistica 6: 289–326.Google Scholar
1998Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe. Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 187–275. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramat, Paolo
2002Die monolexikalischen Adverbien in den alten indoeuropäischen Sprachen. In Das Adverb – Zentrum und Peripherie einer Wortklasse, Friederike Schmöe (ed.), 17–24. Wien: Edition Praesens.Google Scholar
Rauh, Gisa
2010Syntactic Categories. Their Identification and Description in Linguistic Theories. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti, Kytö, Merja & Heikkonen, Kirsi
(eds) 1997Grammaticalization at Work. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1986From polysemy to internal semantic reconstruction. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting, Vassiliki Nikiforidou, Mary VanClay, Mary Niepokuj & Deborah Feder (eds), 389–405. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1989On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Discussion article: Discourse markers, modal particles, and contrastive analysis, synchronic and diachronic. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6:139–57.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Christoph
1982Was ist ein Adverb? Linguistische Berichte 81: 61–65.Google Scholar
Swan, Toril
1988Sentence Adverbials in English. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Telschow, Claudia
2014Die Adjektiv-Adverb-Abgrenzung im Deutschen. Zu grundlegenden Problemen der Wortartenforschung. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan
1998Introduction. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe. Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 1–24. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1958[2003]Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Lorenz, David
2023. Could Be it’s Grammaticalization: Usage Patterns of the Epistemic Phrases(it) Could/Might Be. Journal of English Linguistics 51:2  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Yi
2022. Chinese adverbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:2  pp. 330 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.