Cover not available
Part of
Adverbs: Functional and diachronic aspects
Edited by Karin Pittner, Daniela Elsner and Fabian Barteld
[Studies in Language Companion Series 170] 2015
► pp. 1–18

Introduction

| University of Bochum
| University of Leipzig
| University of Hamburg
Published online: 24 September 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.170.01int
References (34)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1988. Terminologie der neueren Linguistik 2, revised edn, 19–21. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 2012. Illocutive force is speaker and information source concern. What type of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? Templates vs. derivational structure? In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 67–108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Deutsche Syntax im Sprachenvergleich. Grundlegung einer typologischen Syntax des Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2010. Word order typology. A change of perspective. In Proceedings of the TADWO Conference, Michelle Sheehan & Glenda Newton (eds). Oxford: OUP. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter. 2013. Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. Der Satz, 4th edn. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan & Green, Melanie. 2006. Cognitive Linguistic. An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Frey, Werner. 2003. Syntactic conditions on adjunct classes. In Modifying Adjuncts, Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, Ewald Lang & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 163–209. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frey, Werner & Pittner, Karin. 1998. Zur Positionierung von Adverbialen im deutschen Mittelfeld. Linguistische Berichte 176: 489–534.Google Scholar
. 1999. Adverbialpositionen im deutsch-englischen Vergleich. In Sprachspezifische Aspekte der Informationsverteilung [Studia Grammatica 47], Monika Doherty (ed.), 14–40. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Geuder, Wilhelm. 2000. Oriented Adverbs: Issues in the Lexical Semantics of Event Adverbs. Phd dissertation, Universität Konstanz.
Giegerich, Heinz J. 2012. The morphology of -ly and the categorial status of ‘adverbs’ in English. English Language and Linguistics 16(3): 341–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 2010. The Syntax of German. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. Word classes/parts of speech. In Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Neil Smelser & Paul Baltes (eds), 16538–16545. Oxford: Pergamon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Parts of speech. In Layered Structure and Reference in a Funtional Perspective. Papers from the Functional Grammar Conference in Copenhagen 1990 [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 23], Michael Fortescue, Peter Harder & Lars Kristoffersen (eds), 29–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus & Schultze-Bernd, Eva. 2005. Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts: an introduction. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification. The Typology of Depictives, Nikolaus Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Bernd (eds), 1–67. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, Pullum, Geoffrey, et al. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 2008. Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, Wataru. 1997. A cognitive approach to English adverbs. Linguistics 35: 247–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, John, Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2010. The distribution and category status of adjectives and adverbs. Word Structure 3(1): 31–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramat, Paolo & Ricca, Davide. 1994. Prototypical adverbs: On the scalarity/radiality of the notion ADVERB. Rivista di Linguistica 6: 289–326.Google Scholar
. 1998. Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe. Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 187–275. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramat, Paolo. 2002. Die monolexikalischen Adverbien in den alten indoeuropäischen Sprachen. In Das Adverb – Zentrum und Peripherie einer Wortklasse, Friederike Schmöe (ed.), 17–24. Wien: Edition Praesens.Google Scholar
Rauh, Gisa. 2010. Syntactic Categories. Their Identification and Description in Linguistic Theories. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti, Kytö, Merja & Heikkonen, Kirsi (eds). 1997. Grammaticalization at Work. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1986. From polysemy to internal semantic reconstruction. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting, Vassiliki Nikiforidou, Mary VanClay, Mary Niepokuj & Deborah Feder (eds), 389–405. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Discussion article: Discourse markers, modal particles, and contrastive analysis, synchronic and diachronic. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6:139–57.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Christoph. 1982. Was ist ein Adverb? Linguistische Berichte 81: 61–65.Google Scholar
Swan, Toril. 1988. Sentence Adverbials in English. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Telschow, Claudia. 2014. Die Adjektiv-Adverb-Abgrenzung im Deutschen. Zu grundlegenden Problemen der Wortartenforschung. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan. 1998. Introduction. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe. Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 1–24. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1958[2003]. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Lorenz, David
2023. Could Be it’s Grammaticalization: Usage Patterns of the Epistemic Phrases(it) Could/Might Be. Journal of English Linguistics 51:2 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Yi
2022. Chinese adverbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 330 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.