Article published in:
The Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns
Edited by Laure Gardelle and Sandrine Sorlin
[Studies in Language Companion Series 171] 2015
► pp. 124
References
Achugar, Mariana
2004The events and actors of 11 September 2001 as seen from Uruguay: Analysis of daily newspaper editorials. Discourse and Society 15(2-3): 291-320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adam, Jean & Bonhomme, Marc
2012L'Argumentation publicitaire: Rhtorique de l'loge et de la persuasion. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Allan, Stuart
2004News Culture. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira
1988Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24(1): 65-87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1994Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive vs. a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics 30(1): 3-42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Referring expressions and the +/- coreference distinction. In Reference and Referent Accessibility [Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 38], Thorstein Fretheim & Jeanette K. Gundel (eds), 13-25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville G
2005The Syntax-Morphology Interface: A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bain, Alexander
1873A Higher English Grammar, new and revised edn. London: Longman & co.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
1966Problèmes de linguistique, volume 1. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bhat, D.N. Shakara
2004Pronouns [Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Biligiri, Hemmige S
1965Kharia. Pune: Deccan College.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire, Deulofeu, José, Stéfanini, Jean & Van den Eynde, Karel
1984Pronom et syntaxe: L’approche pronominale et son application au français. Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar
Bradley, David
1993Pronouns in Burmese-Lolo. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burmean Area 16(1): 157-215.Google Scholar
Brown, Goold
1851The Grammar of English Grammars, with an Introduction, Historical and Critical; The Whole Methodically Arranged and Amply Illustrated. London: Delf & Trübner.Google Scholar
Cohen, Dana
2010A comparative perspective on intensive reflexives: English and Hebrew. In Comparative and Contrastive Studies of Information Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 165], Carsten Breul & Edward Göbbel (eds), 139-168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris & Postal, Paul M
2012Imposters. A Study of Pronominal Agreement. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Joseph R
1968Pronominal Reference in Thai, Burmese, and Vietnamese [University of California Publications in Linguistics 52]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G
1991Gender [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Number [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornish, Francis
1999Anaphora, discourse, and understanding. Evidence from French and English. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Covell, L.T
1853A Digest of English Grammar, Synthetical and Analytical [...] Adapted to the Use of Schools. New York NY: Appleton & co.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2006Syntaxe générale: Une introduction typologique, Vol. 1 : Catégories et constructions. Paris: Hermès-Lavoisier.Google Scholar
Curzan, Anne
2003Gender Shifts in the History of English. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Matt
2013Oppositions and Ideology in News Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
De Roo, Esterella
2002Pronoun omission in Dutch and German agrammatic speech. In Simon & Wiese (eds), 253-284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diller, Anthony
1994Thai. In Goddard &Wierzbicka (eds), 149-170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W
2010Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 2: Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Emmott, Catherine
1997Narrative Comprehension. A Discourse Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2002Responding to style: Cohesion, foregrounding and thematic interpretation. In Thematics: Interdisciplinary Studies [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 3], Max Louwerse & Willie van Peer (eds), 91-117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1989Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1995Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
2003Pronouns. In International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol. 3: Mande Languages, 2nd edn, William J. Frawley (ed. in chief). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger
1991Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monica
1993Second-person fiction. Narrative you as addressee and/or protagonist. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 18: 217-247.Google Scholar
1994Introduction: Second-person narrative and related issues. Style 28(3): 281-311.Google Scholar
Gardelle, Laure
2010Language reforms in English: A case study of gender in third-person pronouns. In Inventive Linguistics, Sandrine Sorlin (ed.), 109–120. Montpellier: PULM.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff & Wierzbicka, Anna
1994Semantic Lexical Universals: Theory and Empirical Findings [Studies in Language Companion Series 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, Gustave
1987[1947-48]Leçons de linguistique 1947-48. Grammaire particulière du français et grammaire générale III, Roch Valin, Walter Hirtle & André Joly (eds). Quebec: Presses de l’Université Laval & Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
1993Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2): 274-307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamlin, Lorenzo F
1833English Grammar in Lectures: Designed to Render its Principles Easily Adapted to the Mind of the Young Learner, and its Study Entertaining. New York NY: Bartlett & Raynor.Google Scholar
Head, Brian F
1978Respect degrees in pronominal reference. In Universals of the Human Language, Vol. 3, Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith Moravcsik (eds), 151-211. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, David
1994Textual “you” and double deixis in Edna O’Brien’s A Pagan Place . Style 28(3): 378-411. Also at http://​cogweb​.ucla​.edu​/Abstracts​/Herman​_94​.html [1 September 2014].Google Scholar
Hinds, John
1986Japanese. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hodge, Robert & Kress, Gunther
1993Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan
1994The Syntax and Pragmatics of Anaphora. A Study with Special Reference to Chinese [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 70]. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, Charles M
1832Conversations in English Grammar: Explaining the Principles and Rules of the Language [...] and Adapted to the Use of Schools, 11th edn. Boston MA: William Hyde & co.Google Scholar
Jobert, Manuel
Forthcoming. Odd pronominal narratives. The singular voice of the first-person plural in Julie Otsuka’s The Buddha in the Attic. In Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics, Violeta Sotirova (ed.) London Continuum
Kempson, Ruth & Wilfried Meyer-Viol
2002The dynamics of syntax: Anaphora, relative pronouns and crossover. In Simon & Wiese (eds), 137-160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
1969Pronominalization and the chain of command. In Modern studies in English: Readings in Transformational Grammar, David Reibel & Sanford Schane (eds), 160-200. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1975A Communicative Grammar of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics, Vols.1 and 2. London: CUP.Google Scholar
Margolin, Uri
1986Dispersing/voiding the subject: A narratological perspective in Théories du texte. Texte 5(6): 181-210.Google Scholar
Mason, Charles Peter
1873English Grammar, Including the Principles of Grammatical Analysis, 18th edn. London: Bell & Daldy.Google Scholar
McInerney, Jay
1984Bright Lights, Big City. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Michael, Ian
1970English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Mülhäusler, Peter & Harré, Ron
1990Pronouns and People: the Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Murray, Lindley
1834English Grammar, Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners, 47th edn. York: Longman and co.Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos
2002Pronouns, Clitics and Empty Nouns. “Pronominality” and Licensing in Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 46]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders
1965 [1932]Speculative grammar. In Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 2: Book 2, Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss (eds), 129-269. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Priestley, Joseph
1762A Course of Lectures on the Theory of Language and Universal Grammar. Warrington: W.W. Eyres. Reproduced by Gregg International Publishers, 1971.Google Scholar
Quackenbos, George Payn
An English Grammar. New York NY: D. Appleton & co.
Quine, Willard van Orman
1964From a Logical Point of View. Harvard MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1983Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Brian
2006Unnatural Voices. Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction. Columbus OH: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Sandys, John Edwin
1915A Short History of Classical Scholarship from the Sixth Century B.C. to the Present Day. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sanford, Anthony J. & Emmott, Catherine
2012Mind, Brain and Narrative. Cambridge: CUP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2004Person. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Horst J. & Wiese, Heike
(eds) 2002Pronouns – Grammar and Representation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 52]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Soames, Scott & Perlmutter, David M
1979Syntactic Argumentation and the Structure of English. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sonwalker, Prasun
2005Banal Journalism: The centrality of the ‘us-them’ binary in news discourse’. In Journalism: Critical Issues, Stuart Allan (ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Sorlin, Sandrine
2014Ideological crossings: “You” and the pragmatics of negation in Jamaica Kincaid’s A Small Place. Etudes de Stylistique Anglaise (7): 11-25.Google Scholar
Stefanini, Jean
1976Jules César Scaliger et son De Causis Linguae Latinae. In History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics, Herman Parret (ed.), 317-330. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sugamoto, Nobuko
1989Pronominality: A noun-pronoun continuum. In Linguistic Categorization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 61], Roberta Corrigan, Fred Eckman & Michael Noonan (eds), 267-291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swan, Michael
1980Practical English Usage. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Toolan, Michael
1990The Stylistics of Fiction. A Literary-Linguistic Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trask, Ralph L
1993A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A
1991Racism in the Press: Critical Studies in Racism and Migration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2006Discourse and manipulation. Discourse and Society 17(3): 359-83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wales, Katie
1996Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English [Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Warshawsky, Florence
1965Reflexivization. Mimeographed, MIT.Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike & Simon, Horst J
2002Grammatical properties of pronouns and their representation: An exposition. In Simon & Wiese (eds), 1-22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
1997Das Ausland and anti-semitic discourse: The discursive construction of the other. In The Language and Politics of Exclusion: Others in Discourse, Stephen Harold Higgins (ed.), 65-87. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Chaemsaithong, Krisda & Yoonjeong Kim
2021. “Let’s kill him”: self-reference pronouns and speaking roles in capital trials. Social Semiotics 31:4  pp. 585 ff. Crossref logo
Van Herck, Rebecca, Babette Dobbenie & Sofie Decock
2021. Person- versus content-oriented approaches in English and German email responses to customer complaints: a cross-cultural analysis of moves and first-person pronouns. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:2  pp. 203 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Xi
2021. Construing Community with a Shared Future in President Xi Jinping’s Diplomatic Discourse (2013–2018): The Role of Personal Pronouns we and they. Critical Arts 35:3  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.