Cover not available
Part of
The Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns
Edited by Laure Gardelle and Sandrine Sorlin
[Studies in Language Companion Series 171] 2015
► pp. 1–24

Chapter 1. Personal pronouns

An exposition

| ENS de Lyon, UMR ICAR
| Aix-Marseille University, LERMA, IUF
Published online: 10 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.171.01gar
References (84)
References
Achugar, Mariana. 2004. The events and actors of 11 September 2001 as seen from Uruguay: Analysis of daily newspaper editorials. Discourse and Society 15(2-3): 291-320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adam, Jean & Bonhomme, Marc. 2012. L'Argumentation publicitaire: Rhtorique de l'loge et de la persuasion. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Allan, Stuart. 2004. News Culture. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 1988. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24(1): 65-87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1994. Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive vs. a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics 30(1): 3-42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Referring expressions and the +/- coreference distinction. In Reference and Referent Accessibility [Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 38], Thorstein Fretheim & Jeanette K. Gundel (eds), 13-25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville G. 2005. The Syntax-Morphology Interface: A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bain, Alexander. 1873. A Higher English Grammar, new and revised edn. London: Longman & co.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique, volume 1. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bhat, D.N. Shakara. 2004. Pronouns [Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Biligiri, Hemmige S. 1965. Kharia. Pune: Deccan College.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire, Deulofeu, José, Stéfanini, Jean & Van den Eynde, Karel. 1984. Pronom et syntaxe: L’approche pronominale et son application au français. Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar
Bradley, David. 1993. Pronouns in Burmese-Lolo. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burmean Area 16(1): 157-215.Google Scholar
Brown, Goold. 1851. The Grammar of English Grammars, with an Introduction, Historical and Critical; The Whole Methodically Arranged and Amply Illustrated. London: Delf & Trübner.Google Scholar
Cohen, Dana. 2010. A comparative perspective on intensive reflexives: English and Hebrew. In Comparative and Contrastive Studies of Information Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 165], Carsten Breul & Edward Göbbel (eds), 139-168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris & Postal, Paul M. 2012. Imposters. A Study of Pronominal Agreement. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Joseph R. 1968. Pronominal Reference in Thai, Burmese, and Vietnamese [University of California Publications in Linguistics 52]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Number [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornish, Francis. 1999. Anaphora, discourse, and understanding. Evidence from French and English. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Covell, L.T. 1853. A Digest of English Grammar, Synthetical and Analytical [...] Adapted to the Use of Schools. New York NY: Appleton & co.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2006. Syntaxe générale: Une introduction typologique, Vol. 1 : Catégories et constructions. Paris: Hermès-Lavoisier.Google Scholar
Curzan, Anne. 2003. Gender Shifts in the History of English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Matt. 2013. Oppositions and Ideology in News Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
De Roo, Esterella. 2002. Pronoun omission in Dutch and German agrammatic speech. In Simon & Wiese (eds), 253-284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diller, Anthony. 1994. Thai. In Goddard &Wierzbicka (eds), 149-170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 2010. Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 2: Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Emmott, Catherine. 1997. Narrative Comprehension. A Discourse Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2002. Responding to style: Cohesion, foregrounding and thematic interpretation. In Thematics: Interdisciplinary Studies [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 3], Max Louwerse & Willie van Peer (eds), 91-117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 2003. Pronouns. In International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol. 3: Mande Languages, 2nd edn, William J. Frawley (ed. in chief). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monica. 1993. Second-person fiction. Narrative you as addressee and/or protagonist. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 18: 217-247.Google Scholar
. 1994. Introduction: Second-person narrative and related issues. Style 28(3): 281-311.Google Scholar
Gardelle, Laure. 2010. Language reforms in English: A case study of gender in third-person pronouns. In Inventive Linguistics, Sandrine Sorlin (ed.), 109–120. Montpellier: PULM.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff & Wierzbicka, Anna. 1994. Semantic Lexical Universals: Theory and Empirical Findings [Studies in Language Companion Series 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, Gustave. 1987[1947-48]. Leçons de linguistique 1947-48. Grammaire particulière du français et grammaire générale III, Roch Valin, Walter Hirtle & André Joly (eds). Quebec: Presses de l’Université Laval & Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2): 274-307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamlin, Lorenzo F. 1833. English Grammar in Lectures: Designed to Render its Principles Easily Adapted to the Mind of the Young Learner, and its Study Entertaining. New York NY: Bartlett & Raynor.Google Scholar
Head, Brian F. 1978. Respect degrees in pronominal reference. In Universals of the Human Language, Vol. 3, Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith Moravcsik (eds), 151-211. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, David. 1994. Textual “you” and double deixis in Edna O’Brien’s A Pagan Place . Style 28(3): 378-411. Also at <[URL]> [1 September 2014].Google Scholar
Hinds, John. 1986. Japanese. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hodge, Robert & Kress, Gunther. 1993. Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. 1994. The Syntax and Pragmatics of Anaphora. A Study with Special Reference to Chinese [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 70]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, Charles M. 1832. Conversations in English Grammar: Explaining the Principles and Rules of the Language [...] and Adapted to the Use of Schools, 11th edn. Boston MA: William Hyde & co.Google Scholar
Jobert, Manuel. Forthcoming. Odd pronominal narratives. The singular voice of the first-person plural in Julie Otsuka’s The Buddha in the Attic. In Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics, Violeta Sotirova (ed.). London: Continuum.
Kempson, Ruth & Wilfried Meyer-Viol. 2002. The dynamics of syntax: Anaphora, relative pronouns and crossover. In Simon & Wiese (eds), 137-160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1969. Pronominalization and the chain of command. In Modern studies in English: Readings in Transformational Grammar, David Reibel & Sanford Schane (eds), 160-200. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1975. A Communicative Grammar of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, Vols.1 and 2. London: CUP.Google Scholar
Margolin, Uri. 1986. Dispersing/voiding the subject: A narratological perspective in Théories du texte. Texte 5(6): 181-210.Google Scholar
Mason, Charles Peter. 1873. English Grammar, Including the Principles of Grammatical Analysis, 18th edn. London: Bell & Daldy.Google Scholar
McInerney, Jay. 1984. Bright Lights, Big City. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Michael, Ian. 1970. English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Mülhäusler, Peter & Harré, Ron. 1990. Pronouns and People: the Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Murray, Lindley. 1834. English Grammar, Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners, 47th edn. York: Longman and co.Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2002. Pronouns, Clitics and Empty Nouns. “Pronominality” and Licensing in Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 46]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1965 [1932]. Speculative grammar. In Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 2: Book 2, Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss (eds), 129-269. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Priestley, Joseph. 1762. A Course of Lectures on the Theory of Language and Universal Grammar. Warrington: W.W. Eyres. Reproduced by Gregg International Publishers, 1971.Google Scholar
Quackenbos, George Payn. An English Grammar. New York NY: D. Appleton & co.
Quine, Willard van Orman. 1964. From a Logical Point of View. Harvard MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Brian. 2006. Unnatural Voices. Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction. Columbus OH: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Sandys, John Edwin. 1915. A Short History of Classical Scholarship from the Sixth Century B.C. to the Present Day. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sanford, Anthony J. & Emmott, Catherine. 2012. Mind, Brain and Narrative. Cambridge: CUP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, Horst J. & Wiese, Heike (eds). 2002. Pronouns – Grammar and Representation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 52]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soames, Scott & Perlmutter, David M. 1979. Syntactic Argumentation and the Structure of English. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sonwalker, Prasun. 2005. Banal Journalism: The centrality of the ‘us-them’ binary in news discourse’. In Journalism: Critical Issues, Stuart Allan (ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Sorlin, Sandrine. 2014. Ideological crossings: “You” and the pragmatics of negation in Jamaica Kincaid’s A Small Place. Etudes de Stylistique Anglaise (7): 11-25.Google Scholar
Stefanini, Jean. 1976. Jules César Scaliger et son De Causis Linguae Latinae. In History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics, Herman Parret (ed.), 317-330. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sugamoto, Nobuko. 1989. Pronominality: A noun-pronoun continuum. In Linguistic Categorization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 61], Roberta Corrigan, Fred Eckman & Michael Noonan (eds), 267-291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swan, Michael. 1980. Practical English Usage. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Toolan, Michael. 1990. The Stylistics of Fiction. A Literary-Linguistic Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trask, Ralph L. 1993. A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1991. Racism in the Press: Critical Studies in Racism and Migration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2006. Discourse and manipulation. Discourse and Society 17(3): 359-83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wales, Katie. 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English [Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Warshawsky, Florence. 1965. Reflexivization. Mimeographed, MIT.Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike & Simon, Horst J. 2002. Grammatical properties of pronouns and their representation: An exposition. In Simon & Wiese (eds), 1-22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 1997. Das Ausland and anti-semitic discourse: The discursive construction of the other. In The Language and Politics of Exclusion: Others in Discourse, Stephen Harold Higgins (ed.), 65-87. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Chaemsaithong, Krisda & Yoonjeong Kim
2021. “Let’s kill him”: self-reference pronouns and speaking roles in capital trials. Social Semiotics 31:4 ► pp. 585 ff. DOI logo
Van Herck, Rebecca, Babette Dobbenie & Sofie Decock
2021. Person- versus content-oriented approaches in English and German email responses to customer complaints: a cross-cultural analysis of moves and first-person pronouns. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:2 ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Xi
2021. Construing Community with a Shared Future in President Xi Jinping’s Diplomatic Discourse (2013–2018): The Role of Personal Pronouns we and they. Critical Arts 35:3 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.