Chapter 1. Personal pronouns
An exposition
References
Achugar, Mariana
2004 The events and actors of 11 September 2001 as seen from Uruguay: Analysis of daily newspaper editorials.
Discourse and Society 15(2-3): 291-320.
Adam, Jean & Bonhomme, Marc
2012 L'Argumentation publicitaire: Rhtorique de l'loge et de la persuasion. Paris: Armand Colin.
Allan, Stuart
2004 News Culture. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Ariel, Mira
1988 Referring and accessibility.
Journal of Linguistics 24(1): 65-87.
Ariel, Mira
1990 Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.
Ariel, Mira
1994 Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive vs. a pragmatic approach.
Journal of Linguistics 30(1): 3-42.
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville G
2005 The Syntax-Morphology Interface: A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge: CUP.
Bain, Alexander
1873 A Higher English Grammar, new and revised edn. London: Longman & co.
Benveniste, Emile
1966 Problèmes de linguistique, volume 1. Paris: Gallimard.
Bhat, D.N. Shakara
2004 Pronouns [
Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory]. Oxford: OUP.
Biligiri, Hemmige S
1965 Kharia. Pune: Deccan College.
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire, Deulofeu, José, Stéfanini, Jean & Van den Eynde, Karel
1984 Pronom et syntaxe: L’approche pronominale et son application au français. Paris: SELAF.
Bradley, David
1993 Pronouns in Burmese-Lolo.
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burmean Area 16(1): 157-215.
Brown, Goold
1851 The Grammar of English Grammars, with an Introduction, Historical and Critical; The Whole Methodically Arranged and Amply Illustrated. London: Delf & Trübner.
Collins, Chris & Postal, Paul M
2012 Imposters. A Study of Pronominal Agreement. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Cooke, Joseph R
1968 Pronominal Reference in Thai, Burmese, and Vietnamese [
University of California Publications in Linguistics 52]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Corbett, Greville G
1991 Gender [
Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP.
Corbett, Greville G
2000 Number [
Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP.
Cornish, Francis
1999 Anaphora, discourse, and understanding.
Evidence from French and English. Oxford: OUP.
Covell, L.T
1853 A Digest of English Grammar, Synthetical and Analytical [...] Adapted to the Use of Schools. New York NY: Appleton & co.
Creissels, Denis
2006 Syntaxe générale: Une introduction typologique, Vol. 1 : Catégories et constructions. Paris: Hermès-Lavoisier.
Curzan, Anne
2003 Gender Shifts in the History of English. Cambridge: CUP.
Davies, Matt
2013 Oppositions and Ideology in News Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
Diller, Anthony
1994 Thai. In
Goddard &
Wierzbicka (eds), 149-170.
Dixon, Robert M.W
2010 Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 2: Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.
Emmott, Catherine
1997 Narrative Comprehension. A Discourse Perspective. Oxford: OUP.
Fairclough, Norman
1989 Language and Power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, Norman
1995 Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
Fillmore, Charles
2003 Pronouns. In
International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol. 3: Mande Languages, 2nd edn,
William J. Frawley (ed. in chief). Oxford: OUP.
Fowler, Roger
1991 Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
Fludernik, Monica
1993 Second-person fiction. Narrative you as addressee and/or protagonist.
Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 18: 217-247.
Fludernik, Monica
1994 Introduction: Second-person narrative and related issues.
Style 28(3): 281-311.
Gardelle, Laure
2010 Language reforms in English: A case study of gender in third-person pronouns. In
Inventive Linguistics,
Sandrine Sorlin (ed.), 109–120. Montpellier: PULM.
Goddard, Cliff & Wierzbicka, Anna
Guillaume, Gustave
1987[1947-48] Leçons de linguistique 1947-48. Grammaire particulière du français et grammaire générale III,
Roch Valin, Walter Hirtle &
André Joly (eds). Quebec: Presses de l’Université Laval & Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
1993 Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse.
Language 69(2): 274-307.
Hamlin, Lorenzo F
1833 English Grammar in Lectures: Designed to Render its Principles Easily Adapted to the Mind of the Young Learner, and its Study Entertaining. New York NY: Bartlett & Raynor.
Head, Brian F
1978 Respect degrees in pronominal reference. In
Universals of the Human Language, Vol. 3,
Joseph H. Greenberg,
Charles A. Ferguson &
Edith Moravcsik (eds), 151-211. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Herman, David
1994 Textual “you” and double deixis in Edna O’Brien’s A Pagan Place
.
Style 28(3): 378-411. Also at
[URL] [1 September 2014].
Hinds, John
1986 Japanese. London: Croom Helm.
Hodge, Robert & Kress, Gunther
1993 Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.
Huang, Yan
1994 The Syntax and Pragmatics of Anaphora. A Study with Special Reference to Chinese [
Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 70]. Cambridge: CUP.
Ingersoll, Charles M
1832 Conversations in English Grammar: Explaining the Principles and Rules of the Language [...] and Adapted to the Use of Schools, 11th edn. Boston MA: William Hyde & co.
Jobert, Manuel
Forthcoming.
Odd pronominal narratives. The singular voice of the first-person plural in Julie Otsuka’s The Buddha in the Attic. In
Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics,
Violeta Sotirova (ed.) London Continuum
Kempson, Ruth & Wilfried Meyer-Viol
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W
1969 Pronominalization and the chain of command. In
Modern studies in English: Readings in Transformational Grammar,
David Reibel &
Sanford Schane (eds), 160-200. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.
Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1975 A Communicative Grammar of English. London: Longman.
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics, Vols.1 and 2. London: CUP.
Margolin, Uri
1986 Dispersing/voiding the subject: A narratological perspective in Théories du texte.
Texte 5(6): 181-210.
Mason, Charles Peter
1873 English Grammar, Including the Principles of Grammatical Analysis, 18th edn. London: Bell & Daldy.
McInerney, Jay
1984 Bright Lights, Big City. London: Bloomsbury.
Michael, Ian
1970 English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: CUP.
Mülhäusler, Peter & Harré, Ron
1990 Pronouns and People: the Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Murray, Lindley
1834 English Grammar, Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners, 47th edn. York: Longman and co.
Peirce, Charles Sanders
1965 [1932] Speculative grammar. In
Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 2: Book 2,
Charles Hartshorne &
Paul Weiss (eds), 129-269. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Priestley, Joseph
1762 A Course of Lectures on the Theory of Language and Universal Grammar. Warrington: W.W. Eyres. Reproduced by Gregg International Publishers, 1971.
Quackenbos, George Payn
An English Grammar. New York NY: D. Appleton & co.
Quine, Willard van Orman
1964 From a Logical Point of View. Harvard MA: Harvard University Press.
Reinhart, Tanya
1983 Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Richardson, Brian
2006 Unnatural Voices. Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction. Columbus OH: The Ohio State University Press.
Sandys, John Edwin
1915 A Short History of Classical Scholarship from the Sixth Century B.C. to the Present Day. Cambridge: CUP.
Sanford, Anthony J. & Emmott, Catherine
2012 Mind, Brain and Narrative. Cambridge: CUP
Siewierska, Anna
2004 Person. Cambridge: CUP.
Simon, Horst J. & Wiese, Heike
Soames, Scott & Perlmutter, David M
1979 Syntactic Argumentation and the Structure of English. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Sonwalker, Prasun
2005 Banal Journalism: The centrality of the ‘us-them’ binary in news discourse’. In
Journalism: Critical Issues,
Stuart Allan (ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Sorlin, Sandrine
2014 Ideological crossings: “You” and the pragmatics of negation in Jamaica Kincaid’s A Small Place.
Etudes de Stylistique Anglaise (7): 11-25.
Stefanini, Jean
1976 Jules César Scaliger et son De Causis Linguae Latinae. In
History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics,
Herman Parret (ed.), 317-330. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Sugamoto, Nobuko
1989 Pronominality: A noun-pronoun continuum. In
Linguistic Categorization [
Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 61],
Roberta Corrigan,
Fred Eckman &
Michael Noonan (eds), 267-291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Swan, Michael
1980 Practical English Usage. Oxford: OUP.
Toolan, Michael
1990 The Stylistics of Fiction. A Literary-Linguistic Approach. London: Routledge.
Trask, Ralph L
1993 A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. London: Routledge.
van Dijk, Teun A
1991 Racism in the Press: Critical Studies in Racism and Migration. London: Routledge.
van Dijk, Teun A
2006 Discourse and manipulation.
Discourse and Society 17(3): 359-83.
Wales, Katie
1996 Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English [
Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: CUP.
Warshawsky, Florence
1965 Reflexivization. Mimeographed, MIT.
Wiese, Heike & Simon, Horst J
Wodak, Ruth
1997 Das Ausland and anti-semitic discourse: The discursive construction of the other. In
The Language and Politics of Exclusion: Others in Discourse,
Stephen Harold Higgins (ed.), 65-87. London: Sage.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Chaemsaithong, Krisda & Yoonjeong Kim
2021.
“Let’s kill him”: self-reference pronouns and speaking roles in capital trials.
Social Semiotics 31:4
► pp. 585 ff.
Van Herck, Rebecca, Babette Dobbenie & Sofie Decock
2021.
Person- versus content-oriented approaches in English and German email responses to customer complaints: a cross-cultural analysis of moves and first-person pronouns.
Intercultural Pragmatics 18:2
► pp. 203 ff.
Wang, Xi
2021.
Construing Community with a Shared Future in President Xi Jinping’s Diplomatic Discourse (2013–2018): The Role of Personal Pronouns we and they.
Critical Arts 35:3
► pp. 35 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.