Chapter 4. Sex-indefinite references to human beings in American English
Effective uses and pragmatic interferences. A case study of your child
This paper contributes to the study of effective uses of gender-inclusive pronouns in American English, following the proscription of systematic he and, sometimes, of they, with morphologically singular sex-indefinite antecedents. While a number of studies start from the sex-indefinite anaphors in a corpus, the present paper takes the antecedent as a starting point, for additional results. It focuses on the phrase your child, in COCA and COHA. The masculine is found to remain the default gender compared to the feminine; neutralisation appears more successful than feminisation; degree of individuation (Newman 1998) is confirmed as a relevant linguistic contribution of the pronouns, though it cannot always be predicted from the sole context; finally, the paper warns against potential interferences between gender-inclusive strategies and fundamental anaphora processing mechanisms.
References
Albrespit, Jean
2001 Le pronom they, l’absorption du genre et la disjonction singulier-pluriel dans la reprise pronominale.
Cycnos 18(2).
[URL]
Ariel, Mira
1990 Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.
Baranowski, Maciej
2002 Current usage of the epicene pronoun in written English.
Sociolinguistics 6: 378-397.
Baron, Dennis
1986 Grammar and Gender. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
Baron, Dennis
2010 The gender-neutral pronoun: after 150 years still an epic fail.
The Web of Language.
[URL]
Bodine, Ann
1975 Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular “They”, Sex-Indefinite “He”, and “He or She”.
Language in Society 4(2): 129-146.
Boston University Editorial Style Guide
2014 <
[URL] [10 October 2014].
Christian, Darrell, Jacobsen, Sally & Minthorn, David
2012 The Associated Press Stylebook and Briefing on Media Law 2012. New York NY: Associated Press.
Cornish, Francis
1999 Anaphora, Discourse, and Understanding. Evidence from English and French. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Curzan, Anne
2014 Fixing English: Prescriptivism and Language History. Cambridge: CUP.
Einsohn, Emy
2000 The Copyeditor’s Handbook: A Guide for Book Publishing and Corporate Communications, with exercises and answer keys. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Fisher, Ann
1745 A New Grammar with Exercises of Bad English: or, and easy Guide to Speaking and Writing the English Language Properly and Correctly. Newcastle upon Tyne: printed for I. Thompson and Co. by J. Gooding.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
1993 Status and the form of referring expressions in discourse.
Language 69(2): 274-307.
Hamilton, Mykol C
1988 Using masculine generics: Does generic He increase role bias in the user’s imagery? Sex Roles 19(11-12): 785-799.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Kirby, John
1971 [1746] A New English Grammar. A Collection of Facsimile Reprints. Menston, England: Scolar Press.
Luker, Jana & McDonagh, Erin
2010 McGill University - Inclusive Language Guidelines.
[URL] [10 Ocotober 2014].
Marquette University
2014 Tips for using inclusive, gender neutral language.
[URL] [10 Ocotober 2014].
Martyna, Wendy
1978 What does “he” mean? Use of the generic masculine.
Journal of Communication 28: 131-138.
National Council of Teachers of English
1998-2014 Guidelines for Gender-Fair Use of Language.
[URL] [10 Ocotober 2014].
Newman, Michael
1992 Pronominal disagreements: The stubborn problem of singular epicene antecedents.
Language in Society 21(3): 447-475.
Patterson, Laura
2014 British Pronoun Use, Prescription, and Processing: Linguistic and Social Influences Affecting ‘they’ and ‘he’. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pauwels, Anne & Winter, Joanne
2006 Gender inclusivity or “Grammar Rules OK”? Linguistic prescriptivism vs linguistic discrimination in the classroom.
Language and Education 20(2): 128-140.
Sklar, Elizabeth S
1988 The tribunal of use: Agreement in indefinite constructions.
College Composition and Communication 39(4): 410-422.
Spender, Dale
I980 Man Made Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
1986 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wales, Katie
1996 Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: CUP.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Gardelle, Laure & Sandrine Sorlin
2018.
Introduction.
International Journal of Language and Culture 5:2
► pp. 133 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.