Cover not available
Part of
Language Contact and Change in the Americas: Studies in honor of Marianne Mithun
Edited by Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker, Diane M. Hintz and Carmen Dagostino
[Studies in Language Companion Series 173] 2016
► pp. 91–104

Synchronic and diachronic accounts of phonological features in Central Chumash languages

| California State University, Fullerton
Synchronic and diachronic explanations of phonological processes are, by necessity, often treated as mutually exclusive phenomena within any language; we accept that diachronic sound changes are not actively applied to any underlying forms. Extinct languages complicate this arrangement since distinguishing between synchronic and diachronic phonological processes can be difficult without access to native, fluent speakers. In this paper, I examine previously proposed synchronic accounts of several Central Chumash phonological alternations and suggest alternate diachronic explanations. I concur with others (such as Wang 1969) that, when synchronic rules fail to describe a phonology, our concept of sound change must enlarge and allow us to consider the role of diachronic processes in observable synchronic phenomena.
Keywords: Chumash, diachrony, historical linguistics, phonology
Published online: 19 April 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.173.05hen
References (24)
References
Applegate, Richard Brian. 1972. Ineseño Chumash Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
. 1976. Reduplication in Chumash. In Papers from the First Conference on Hokan Languages [Hokan Studies], Margaret Langdon & Shirley Silver (eds), 271-283. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Beeler, Madison Scott. 1970. Topics in Barbareño Chumash Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California.Google Scholar
. 1976. Barbareño Chumash grammar: A farrago. Papers from the First Conference on Hokan Languages [Hokan Studies], Margaret Langdon & Shirley Silver (eds), 251-269. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 1978. Barbareño Chumash text and lexicon. In Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Archibald A. Hill, II: Descriptive Linguistics, Mohammad Ali Jazayeri, Edgar C. Polomé, & Werner Winters (eds), 171-193. Lisse: Peter de Ridder. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berko, J. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14: 150-177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis. 1995. Gestural syllable position effects in American English. In Producing Speech: Contemporary Issues, for Katherine Safford Harris, Frederica Bell-Berti & Lawrence J. Raphael (eds), 19-33. Woodbury NY: American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrington, John Peabody. 1974. Sibilants in Ventureño. International Journal of American Linguistics 40(1): 1-9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Volume three: A guide to the field notes: Native American history, language, and culture of Southern California/Basin. In The Papers of John Peabody Harrington in the Smithsonian Institution 1907-1957, Elaine L. Mills & Ann J. Brickfield (eds). Millwood NY: Kraus International Publications.Google Scholar
Heizer, Robert Fleming (ed.). 1955. California Indian linguistic records: The mission Indian vocabularies of H.W. Henshaw. Anthropological Records 15(2): 85-200.Google Scholar
Henry, Timothy Paul. 2012. A Pedagogical Grammar of Ventureño Chumash: Implementing Grammatical Theory in Grammar Writing. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Klar, Kathryn Ann. 1977. Topics in Historical Chumash Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Kroeber, Alfred L. 1910. The Chumash and Costanoan languages. University of California Publications in American Archeology and Ethnography 9(2): 237-271.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1996. The relativity of time in Barbareño Chumash. Paper presented at the California Indian Conference, Berkeley, California, October 19, 1996.
. 1998. The regression of sibilant harmony through the life of Barbareño Chumash. In The Life of Language: Papers in Linguistics in Honor of William Bright, Jane H. Hill, P.J. Mistry & Lyle Campbell (eds), 221-242. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poser, William. 2004. On the Status of Chumash Sibilant Harmony. Ms, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Saba Kirchner, Jesse. 2010. Minimal Reduplication. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Vennemann, Theo. 1988. Preference Laws for Syllable Structure and the Explanation of Sound Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wang, William S.-Y. 1969. Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language 45: 9-25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wash, Suzanne Maria. 1995. Productive Reduplication in Barbareño Chumash. MA thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.
. 2001. Adverbial Clauses in Barbareño Chumash Narrative Discourse. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.