Cover not available
Part of
Embodiment in Latin Semantics
Edited by William Michael Short
[Studies in Language Companion Series 174] 2016
► pp. 1–14

Introduction

| The University of Texas at San Antonio
Published online: 11 May 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.174.01sho
References
Allan, Rutger
2003 The Middle Voice in Ancient Greek: A Study of Polysemy. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Allwood, Jens and Gårdenfors, Peter
1999 Cognitive Semantics: Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alverson, Hoyt
1994 Semantics and Experience: Universal Metaphors of Time in English, Mandarin, Hindi, and Sesotho. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bettini, Maurizio & Short, William
(eds) 2014 Con i Romani: Antropologia della cultura antica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans
2013 Cognitive Construction Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 233‒54. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Boden, Margaret
2008 Mind as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, Anna
2008 Memory and visualization in Homeric discourse markers. In Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World, E. Anne Mackay (ed.), 35‒64. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009a The pragmatic meanings of some discourse markers in Homer. In Pragmatische Kategorien: Form, Funktion und Diachronie, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds), 29‒36. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
2009b Discourse cohesion through third person pronouns: The case of κεῖνος and αὐτός in Homer. In Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, Gerry Wakker & Stephanie Bakker (eds), 1‒19. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Anaphoric pronouns αὐτός and κεῖνος in Homer: a cognitive-pragmatic approach. In La morfologia del greco tra tipologia e diacronia, Ignazio Putzu, Giulio Paulis, Gianfranco Nieddu, & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 97‒114. Milan: Francoangeli.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera
2000 Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75: 1‒28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brdar, Mario, Omazić, Marija, Pavičić Takač, Višnja, Gradečak-Erdeljić, Tanja & Buljan, Gabrijela
(eds) 2011 Space and Time in Language. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Brucale, Luisa & Mocciaro, Egle
2011 Continuity and discontinuity in the semantics of the Latin preposition Per: A cognitive hypothesis. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung: Language Typology and Universals 64(2): 148-69.Google Scholar
Brugman, Claudia & Lakoff, George
1988 Cognitive topology and lexical networks. In Lexical Ambiguity Resolution, Steven Small, Garrison Cottrell & Michael Tanenhaus (eds), 477‒508. San Mateo CA: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cairns, Douglas
2008 Look both ways: Studying emotion in Ancient Greek. Critical Quarterly 50(4): 43–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Weeping and veiling: Grief, display, and concealment in Ancient Greek culture. In Tears in the Greco-Roman World, Thursten Fögen (ed.), 37–57. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2013 A short history of shudders. In Unveiling Emotions II – Emotions in Greece and Rome: Texts, Images, Material Culture, Angelos Chaniotis & Pierre Ducrey (eds), 85–107. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
2015 The horror and the pity. Pyschoanalytical Inquiry 35: 75–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cánovas, Cristóbal Pagán
2011 The genesis of the arrows of love: Diachronic conceptual integration in Greek mythology. American Journal of Philology 132: 553–579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel
2010 Space for thinking. In Language, Cognition, and Space, Vyvyan Evans & Paul Chilton (eds), 453‒78. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001 Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clackson, James
2011 A Companion to the Latin Language. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, Alan
2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delgado, José Miguel Jiménez & Vázquez, Rafael Martínez
2011 Verbos de movimiento virtual en griego antiguo, Emerita 79(2): 277‒300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devine, Andrew & Stephens, Laurence
2013 Semantics for Latin. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
DeWitt, Norman
1918 Semantic studies in Latin. The Classical Journal 14(3): 185–90.Google Scholar
Ekberg, Lena
2004 Transformations on image schemas and cross-linguistic polysemy. Nordlund: Småskrifter från Institutionen för Nordiska Språk 24: 25‒46.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan & Green, Melanie
(eds) 2006 Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara
2014 Experiential Constructions in Latin. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Jerome
2006 From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Jerome & Narayanan, Srinivas
2004 Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language 89: 385‒92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles & Atkins, Beryl
1992 Towards a frame-based lexicon. In Frames, Fields, and Contrasts, Adrienne Lehrer & Eva Kittay (eds), 75‒102. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fowler, Don
2000 Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun
2005 How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garbarini, Francesca & Adenzato, Mauro
2004 At the root of embodied cognition. Brain and Cognition 56(1): 100‒106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García-Jurado, Francisco
2000 Las metáforas de la vida cotidiana en latín. Proceedings of the Congreso Internacional de Semántica 2: 1571‒84.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk & Cuyckens, Hubert
(eds) 2010 The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond & Colston, Herbert
1995 The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics 6: 347‒78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond
1994 The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2005 Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, Arthur & Kaschak, Michael
2002 Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(3): 558‒65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grady, Joseph
1997 Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
1999 A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor. In Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 175], Raymond Gibbs & Gerard Steen (eds), 79‒100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampe, Beate & Grady, Joseph
(eds) 2005 From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiaso, Yuchau
2003 Semantics and cognition. Language and Linguistics 4(2): 197‒205.Google Scholar
Hinds, Stephen
1998 Allusion and Intertext. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark
1987 The Body in Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1989 Image-schematic bases of meaning. Semiotic Inquiry 9: 109–118.Google Scholar
2007 The Meaning of the Body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaster, Robert
2005 Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2005 Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Language, Mind and Culture. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990 The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1(1): 39–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought, Andrew Ortony (ed.), 202–51. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
2008 Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2003 On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases [Studies in Language Companion Series 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Adverbial phrases. In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, Philip Baldi & Pier Cuzzolin (eds), 19–107. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Moon, Rosamund
2004 On specifying metaphor: An idea and its implementation. International Journal of Lexicography 17(2): 195–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Keith
2006 Space to time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics 17: 199‒244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikiforidou, Kiki
1991 The meanings of genitive: A case study in semantic structure and semantic change. Cognitive Linguistics 2: 149-205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oniga, Renato
2014 Latin: A Linguistic Introduction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Palmer, Gary
1996 Toward a Theory of Cultural Linguistics. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm
1990 Latin Syntax and Semantics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter
2006 The metaphor time as space across languages. In Metonymy-Metaphor Collage, Elżbieta Górska & Günter Radden (eds), 99‒120. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.Google Scholar
Roller, Matthew
2010 Culture-based approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies, Alessandro Barchiesi & Walter Scheidel (eds), 234–249. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1973 Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4: 328‒50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978 Principles of categorization. In Cognition and Categorization, Eleanor Rosch & Barbara Lloyd (eds), 27‒48. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rowlands, M
2010 The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sansò, A
2014 Cognitive linguistics and Greek. In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, Vol. 2, Georgios Giannakis (ed.), 308‒311. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Shore, Bradd
1996 Culture in Mind. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Short, William
2012 A Roman folk model of the mind. Arethusa 45(1): 109‒47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Getting to the truth. Arion 21(2): 140‒168.Google Scholar
2014 Metafora. In Con i Romani: Un’antropologia della cultura antica, Maurizio Bettini & William Short (eds), 329–52. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Fundamentals for a cognitive semantics of Latin. In Psychology and the Classics: A Dialogue of Disciplines, Jeroen Lauwers, Jan Opsomer & Hedwig Schwall (eds) Berlin De Gruyter
Sweetser, Eve
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
2000 Toward a Cognitive Semantics, 2 vols. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, John
1989 Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Viazzo, Paolo
2000 Introduzione all’antropologia storica. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Zwaan, Rolf
2004 The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Brian Ross (ed.), 35–62. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar