Cover not available
Part of
Embodiment in Latin Semantics
Edited by William Michael Short
[Studies in Language Companion Series 174] 2016
► pp. 1–14

Introduction

| The University of Texas at San Antonio
Published online: 11 May 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.174.01sho
References
Allan, Rutger
2003 The Middle Voice in Ancient Greek: A Study of Polysemy. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Allwood, Jens and Gårdenfors, Peter
1999 Cognitive Semantics: Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alverson, Hoyt
1994 Semantics and Experience: Universal Metaphors of Time in English, Mandarin, Hindi, and Sesotho. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bettini, Maurizio & Short, William
(eds) 2014 Con i Romani: Antropologia della cultura antica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans
2013 Cognitive Construction Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 233‒54. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Boden, Margaret
2008 Mind as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, Anna
2008 Memory and visualization in Homeric discourse markers. In Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World, E. Anne Mackay (ed.), 35‒64. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009a The pragmatic meanings of some discourse markers in Homer. In Pragmatische Kategorien: Form, Funktion und Diachronie, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds), 29‒36. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
2009b Discourse cohesion through third person pronouns: The case of κεῖνος and αὐτός in Homer. In Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, Gerry Wakker & Stephanie Bakker (eds), 1‒19. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Anaphoric pronouns αὐτός and κεῖνος in Homer: a cognitive-pragmatic approach. In La morfologia del greco tra tipologia e diacronia, Ignazio Putzu, Giulio Paulis, Gianfranco Nieddu, & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 97‒114. Milan: Francoangeli.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera
2000 Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75: 1‒28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brdar, Mario, Omazić, Marija, Pavičić Takač, Višnja, Gradečak-Erdeljić, Tanja & Buljan, Gabrijela
(eds) 2011 Space and Time in Language. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Brucale, Luisa & Mocciaro, Egle
2011 Continuity and discontinuity in the semantics of the Latin preposition Per: A cognitive hypothesis. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung: Language Typology and Universals 64(2): 148-69.Google Scholar
Brugman, Claudia & Lakoff, George
1988 Cognitive topology and lexical networks. In Lexical Ambiguity Resolution, Steven Small, Garrison Cottrell & Michael Tanenhaus (eds), 477‒508. San Mateo CA: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cairns, Douglas
2008 Look both ways: Studying emotion in Ancient Greek. Critical Quarterly 50(4): 43–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Weeping and veiling: Grief, display, and concealment in Ancient Greek culture. In Tears in the Greco-Roman World, Thursten Fögen (ed.), 37–57. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2013 A short history of shudders. In Unveiling Emotions II – Emotions in Greece and Rome: Texts, Images, Material Culture, Angelos Chaniotis & Pierre Ducrey (eds), 85–107. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
2015 The horror and the pity. Pyschoanalytical Inquiry 35: 75–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cánovas, Cristóbal Pagán
2011 The genesis of the arrows of love: Diachronic conceptual integration in Greek mythology. American Journal of Philology 132: 553–579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel
2010 Space for thinking. In Language, Cognition, and Space, Vyvyan Evans & Paul Chilton (eds), 453‒78. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001 Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clackson, James
2011 A Companion to the Latin Language. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, Alan
2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delgado, José Miguel Jiménez & Vázquez, Rafael Martínez
2011 Verbos de movimiento virtual en griego antiguo, Emerita 79(2): 277‒300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devine, Andrew & Stephens, Laurence
2013 Semantics for Latin. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
DeWitt, Norman
1918 Semantic studies in Latin. The Classical Journal 14(3): 185–90.Google Scholar
Ekberg, Lena
2004 Transformations on image schemas and cross-linguistic polysemy. Nordlund: Småskrifter från Institutionen för Nordiska Språk 24: 25‒46.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan & Green, Melanie
(eds) 2006 Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara
2014 Experiential Constructions in Latin. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Jerome
2006 From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Jerome & Narayanan, Srinivas
2004 Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language 89: 385‒92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles & Atkins, Beryl
1992 Towards a frame-based lexicon. In Frames, Fields, and Contrasts, Adrienne Lehrer & Eva Kittay (eds), 75‒102. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fowler, Don
2000 Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun
2005 How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garbarini, Francesca & Adenzato, Mauro
2004 At the root of embodied cognition. Brain and Cognition 56(1): 100‒106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García-Jurado, Francisco
2000 Las metáforas de la vida cotidiana en latín. Proceedings of the Congreso Internacional de Semántica 2: 1571‒84.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk & Cuyckens, Hubert
(eds) 2010 The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond & Colston, Herbert
1995 The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics 6: 347‒78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond
1994 The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2005 Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, Arthur & Kaschak, Michael
2002 Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(3): 558‒65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grady, Joseph
1997 Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
1999 A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor. In Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 175], Raymond Gibbs & Gerard Steen (eds), 79‒100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampe, Beate & Grady, Joseph
(eds) 2005 From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiaso, Yuchau
2003 Semantics and cognition. Language and Linguistics 4(2): 197‒205.Google Scholar
Hinds, Stephen
1998 Allusion and Intertext. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark
1987 The Body in Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1989 Image-schematic bases of meaning. Semiotic Inquiry 9: 109–118.Google Scholar
2007 The Meaning of the Body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaster, Robert
2005 Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2005 Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Language, Mind and Culture. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990 The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1(1): 39–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought, Andrew Ortony (ed.), 202–51. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
2008 Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2003 On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases [Studies in Language Companion Series 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Adverbial phrases. In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, Philip Baldi & Pier Cuzzolin (eds), 19–107. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Moon, Rosamund
2004 On specifying metaphor: An idea and its implementation. International Journal of Lexicography 17(2): 195–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Keith
2006 Space to time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics 17: 199‒244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikiforidou, Kiki
1991 The meanings of genitive: A case study in semantic structure and semantic change. Cognitive Linguistics 2: 149-205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oniga, Renato
2014 Latin: A Linguistic Introduction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Palmer, Gary
1996 Toward a Theory of Cultural Linguistics. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm
1990 Latin Syntax and Semantics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter
2006 The metaphor time as space across languages. In Metonymy-Metaphor Collage, Elżbieta Górska & Günter Radden (eds), 99‒120. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.Google Scholar
Roller, Matthew
2010 Culture-based approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies, Alessandro Barchiesi & Walter Scheidel (eds), 234–249. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1973 Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4: 328‒50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978 Principles of categorization. In Cognition and Categorization, Eleanor Rosch & Barbara Lloyd (eds), 27‒48. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rowlands, M
2010 The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sansò, A
2014 Cognitive linguistics and Greek. In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, Vol. 2, Georgios Giannakis (ed.), 308‒311. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Shore, Bradd
1996 Culture in Mind. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Short, William
2012 A Roman folk model of the mind. Arethusa 45(1): 109‒47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Getting to the truth. Arion 21(2): 140‒168.Google Scholar
2014 Metafora. In Con i Romani: Un’antropologia della cultura antica, Maurizio Bettini & William Short (eds), 329–52. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Fundamentals for a cognitive semantics of Latin. In Psychology and the Classics: A Dialogue of Disciplines, Jeroen Lauwers, Jan Opsomer & Hedwig Schwall (eds) Berlin De Gruyter
Sweetser, Eve
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
2000 Toward a Cognitive Semantics, 2 vols. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, John
1989 Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Viazzo, Paolo
2000 Introduzione all’antropologia storica. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Zwaan, Rolf
2004 The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Brian Ross (ed.), 35–62. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Burman, Annie C.
2023. From deceit to pain: Late Latin dolus and the interplay between semantics and analogy. Journal of Latin Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.