Article published in:
Embodiment in Latin Semantics
Edited by William Michael Short
[Studies in Language Companion Series 174] 2016
► pp. 1556
References

References

Baldi, Philip
2006Towards a history of the manner of motion parameter in Greek and Indo-European. In Fonologia e tipologia lessicale nella storia della lingua greca: Atti del VI Incontro Internazionale di Linguistica Greca (Bergamo, settembre 2005), Pierluigi Cuzzolin & Maria Napoli (eds), 13–31. Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Bally, Charles
1926L’expression des idées de sphère personnelle et de solidarieté dans les langues indo-européennes. In Festschrift Louis Gauchat, Franz Fankhauser & Jakob Jud (eds), 68–78. Aarau: Sauerländer.Google Scholar
Bennet, Charles
1910Syntax of Early Latin. Boston MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Botne, Robert
2005Cognitive schemas and motion verbs: COMING and GOING in Chindali (Eastern Bantu). Cognitive Linguistics 16(1): 43–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bourdin, Philippe
1997On goal-bias across languages: Modal, configurational and orientational parameters. In Typology, Prototypes, Items Orderings and Universals, Bohumil Palek (ed.), 185–218. Prague: Charles University Press.Google Scholar
2014 When come and go go necessive . In ‘Come’ and ‘Go’ off the Beaten Grammaticalization Path, Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds), 103–164. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brachet, Jean Paul
2000Recherches sur les préverbes dē- et ex- du latin. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope
2006A sketch of the grammar of space in Tzeltal. In Grammars of Space, Stephen Levinson & David Wilkins (eds), 230–72. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chevalier, Jean-Claude
1976Sur l’idée d’aller et de venir et sa traduction linguistique en espagnol et en français. Bulletin Hispanique 78: 254–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corominas, Joan & Pascual, Josè Antonio
1980–1983Diccionario critico etimológico castellano e hispánico. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Cuzzolin, Pierluigi
2010How to move towards somebody in Plautus’ comedies. Some remarks on the adverb obviam . In Studies in Classical Linguistics in Honor of Philip Baldi, Richard Page & Aaron Rubin (eds), 7–20. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Devos, Maud & van der Wal, Jenneke
2014Introduction. In ‘Come’ and ‘Go’ off the beaten grammaticalization path, Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds), 1–18. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2014‘Come’ and ‘Go’ off the beaten grammaticalization path. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Meola, Claudio
1994Kommen und gehen. Eine kognitiv-liguistische Untersuchung der Polysemie deiktischer Bewegungsverben. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Duchan, Judith, Bruder, Gail & Hewitt, Lynne
(eds) 1995Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred
1954Aspects du vocabulaire latin. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1966Deictic categories in the semantics of come. Foundations of Language 2: 219–27.Google Scholar
1971Towards a theory of deixis. University of Hawaii Working papers on Linguistics 3(4): 219–42.Google Scholar
1975Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis 1971. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Virginia
1977A study of the comings and goings of the speakers of four languages: Spanish, Japanese, English, and Turkish. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 61–94.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
1997.The semantics of coming and going. Pragmatics 7(2): 147–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haverling, Gerd
2010Actionality, tense, and viewpoint. In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, Vol. 2: Constituent Syntax: Adverbial Phrases, Adverbs, Mood, Tense, Pierluigi Cuzzolin & Philip Baldi (eds), 277–523. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hewson, John & Bubenik, Vit
(eds) 1997Tense and Aspect in Indo-European Languages. Theory, Typology, Diachrony [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 145]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hewson, John
1997aThe Latin verbal system. In Hewson & Bubenik (eds), Tense and Aspect in Indo-European Languages. Theory, Typology, Diachrony, 189–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997b From Latin to Modern Romance . In Hewson & Bubenik (eds), Tense and Aspect in Indo-European Languages. Theory, Typology, Diachrony, 314–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, Johan Baptist
1926Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Vulgärlateins. Indogermanische Forschungen 43: 80–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, Johan-Baptist & Szantyr, Anton
1965Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1979Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax, Talmy Givon (ed.), 213–41. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Traugott, Elisabeth
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Imai, Shingo
2009, Spatial Deixis: How Finely Do Languages Divide Space? Saarbrücken: Müller.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1971Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In Selected Writings, Vol. 2, 130–147. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Létoublon, Françoise
1985Il allait, pareil à la nuit. Les verbes de mouvement en grec: Supplétisme et aspect verbale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
2004Deixis. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, Laurence Horn & Gregor Ward (eds), 97–121. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006The language of space in Yélî Dnye. In Levinson & Wilkins (eds), Grammars of Space, 157–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen & Wilkins, David
(eds) 2006, Grammars of Space. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Patterns in the data: Towards a semantic typology of spatial description. In Levinson & Wilkins (eds), Grammars of Space, 512–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewandowski, Wojciech
2007Toward a Comparative Analysis of Coming and Going Verbs in Spanish, German and Polish. MA thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Löfstedt, Einar
1933Syntactica. Studien und Beiträge zur historischen Syntax des Lateins, II: Syntaktisch-Stilistische Gesichtspunkte und Probleme. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Miller, George A. & Johnson-Laird, Philip N.
1976Language and Perception. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuti, Andrea
. In press. Between aspect and deixis: vado in Classical Latin and the evolution of motion verbs. Proceedings of the 18th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Toulouse, 8-13 June 2015.
Oldsjö, Fredrik
2001Tense and Aspect in Caesar's Narrative. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Orlandini, Anna & Poccetti, Paolo
2011La référence spatio-temporelle et métalinguistique des verbes de mouvement en latin et leurs évolutions romanes. In Espace et temps en latin, Claude Moussy (ed.), 25–45. Paris: Presses de l’université Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Pederson, Eric
2006Spatial language in Tamil. In Levinson & Wilkins (eds), Grammars of Space, 400–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinkster, Harm
1990Latin Syntax and Semantics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ricca, Davide
1989Gli avverbi deittici di luogo in Platone e Aristofane. Lingua e stile 24(1): 57–88.Google Scholar
1993I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: Una ricerca interlinguistica. Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Rosén, Hannah
2000Preclassical and Classical Latin precursors of Romance verb-stem suppletion. Indogermanische Forschungen 105: 271‒83.Google Scholar
Schlyter, Suzanne
1979Le verbe allemand kommen et ses correspondances en français. Moderna Språka 73: 215–67.Google Scholar
Stolova, Natalya
2015aFrom satellite-framed Latin to verb-framed Romance: Late Latin as an intermediate stage. In Latin vulgaire, latin tardif, Roger Wright (ed.), 253–62. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
2015bCognitive Linguistics and Lexical Change. Motion Verbs from Latin to Romance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timoty Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth
2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vetter, Emil
1957 Ire und fuisse . In MNHMEΣ XAPIN. Gedenkschrift P. Kretschmer, Vol. 2, Heinz Kronasser (ed.), 194–8. Wiesbaden-Wien: Harrassowitz Hollinek.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David & Hill, Deborah
1995When “go” means “come”: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 6(2-3): 209–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar