Article published in:
Exploring the Turkish Linguistic Landscape: Essays in honor of Eser Erguvanlı-Taylan
Edited by Mine Güven, Didar Akar, Balkız Öztürk and Meltem Kelepir
[Studies in Language Companion Series 175] 2016
► pp. 143156
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan & Alıcı, Didem Mersin
2000Understanding sources of beliefs and marking of uncertainty: The child’s theory of evidentiality. In The Proceedings of the Thirtieth Child Language Research Forum, Eve V. Clark (ed.), 123-130. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan & Slobin, Dan I.
1986A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Advances in Discourse Processes, Vol XX, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (ed.), 159-167. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Aksu‐Koç, Ayhan, Ögel‐Balaban, Hale & Alp, İ. Ercan
2009Evidentials and source knowledge in Turkish. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 125: 13-28. San Francisco CA: Josey Bass. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan
1988[2006]The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality: The Case of Past Reference in Turkish, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995Some connections between aspect and modality in Turkish. In Temporal Reference aspect and Actionality, Vol. 2: Typological Perspectives, Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bianchi, Östen Dahl & Mario Squartini (eds), 271-287. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
2009Evidentials: An interface between linguistic and conceptual development. In Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Susan Ervin Tripp, Nancy Budwig & Şeyda Özçalışkan (eds), 531-541. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Aydın, Çağla & Aksu-Koç, Ayhan
2015Children’s knowledge acquisition: Comprehension of the epistemic function of the marker –DIr in Turkish. Poster presented at the Budapest CEU Conference on Cognitive development (BCCCD 2015) January 8-10.
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace & Nichols, Johanna
1986Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Advances in Discourse Processes, Vol. XX. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand
1999Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18(1): 83-101.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2001The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 369-382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dendale, Patrick & Tasmowski, Liliane
2001Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 339-348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erguvanlı-Taylan, Eser
2014A modality map of Turkish. Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, September 3-5, 2014, Rouen, France.
Givón, Talmy
1982Evidentiality and epistemic space. Studies in Language 6(1): 23-49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars & Utas, Bo
2000Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages, Vol. 24. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars
2000Turkic indirectives. In Johanson & Utas (eds), Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages, 61-87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
2001On the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 359-367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ögel, Hale
2007Developments in Source Monitoring and Linguistic Encoding of Source. MA thesis, Boğaziçi University.
Palmer, Frank Robert
1986Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2001Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A.
2001The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 349-357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sansa-Tura, Sabahat
1986DIr in modern Turkish. In Proceedings of the Turkish Linguistics Conference, August 9-10, 1984, Ayhan Aksu-Koç & Eser Erguvanlı-Taylan (eds), 145-158. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Publications.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. & Aksu, Ayhan
1982Tense, aspect and modality in the use of the Turkish evidential. In Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics [Typological Studies in Language 1], Paul J. Hopper (ed.), 185-200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tamm, Anne, Çağlar, Leyla Roksan, Aksu-Koç, Ayhan & Csibra, Gergely
In preparation. Generic grammar makes Turkish preschoolers generalize statements and tolerate exceptions. Poster presented at the Budapest CEU Conference on Cognitive development (BCCCD 2014) January 9-11.
Tamm, Anne, Çağlar, Leyla Roksan, Csibra, Gergely & Aksu-Koç, Ayhan
2014Turkish indirect evidential sentences provide information but thwart generalization. Paper presented at the Workshop Empirical Evidence for Evidentiality, Nijmegen, January 9-10.
Temürcü, Ceyhan
2007A Semantic Framework for Analyzing Tense, Aspect and Mood: An Application to the Ranges of Polysemy of-Xr, -DIr, - and-Ø in Turkish. PhD dissertation, Antwerp University.
Uzundağ, Berna, Taşcı, Süleyman, Küntay, Aylin & Aksu-Koç, Ayhan
İn preparation. Functions of evidentials in Turkish child and child-directed speech in early child-caregiver interactions. Paper presented at Boston University Conference on Language Development; to appear in BUCLD 40 Proceedings , Cascadilla Press, 2016.
Willett, Thomas
1988A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1): 51-97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar