Part of
New Approaches to English Linguistics: Building bridgesEdited by Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja and Sarah Chevalier
[Studies in Language Companion Series 177] 2016
► pp. 213–249
Edited by Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja and Sarah Chevalier
[Studies in Language Companion Series 177] 2016
► pp. 213–249
Discourse markers in L2 English
From classroom to naturalistic input
This chapter investigates how the context of acquisition, and more precisely the amount of naturalistic input received, may influence non-native speakers’ knowledge of English discourse markers. It considers three levels of analysis, from the more individual (foreign language learners having spent different periods of time in a target language country) to the more general (foreign language setting vs. official language setting), over an intermediate level of analysis comparing populations of foreign language learners from different countries. The corpus study carried out suggests that a higher degree of exposure to naturalistic language tends to have a positive impact on learners’ knowledge of discourse markers, resulting in more frequent use, better approximation of native speaker frequencies and, possibly, more fluent usage.
Keywords: target language input, acquisition context, discourse markers, English as a foreign language, English as a second language
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Second language acquisition of discourse markers
- 3.Research questions
- 4.Data and methodology
- 5.The use of discourse markers by learners with varying degrees of naturalistic input
- 5.1Overall results
- 5.2Length of stay in a target-language country
- 5.3EFL-like vs. ESL-like environment
- 5.4Foreign vs. institutionalised second-language varieties of English
- 5.5A more qualitative peek
- 6.Discussion and conclusion
-
Notes -
References
References
Aijmer, Karin
2004 Pragmatic markers in spoken interlanguage. Nordic Journal of English Studies 3(1): 173–190.
2011
Well I’m not sure I think… The use of well by non-native speakers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16: 231–254. 
Andersen, Gisle
2011 Corpus-based pragmatics I: Qualitative studies. In Foundations of Pragmatics, Wolfram Bublitz & Neal R. Norrick (eds), 587–627. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Aşik, Asuman & Cephe, Paşa Tevfik
2013 Discourse markers and spoken English: Nonnative use in the Turkish EFL setting. English Language Teaching 6(12): 144–155. [URL]
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996 Pragmatic Markers in English. Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
De Cock, Sylvie
2004 Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literature (BELL) 2: 225–246.
Edwards, Alison
2016 English in the Netherlands. Functions, Forms and Attitudes [Varieties of English around the World G56]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fuller, Janet M.
2003 The influence of speaker roles on discourse marker use. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 23–45.
Fung, Loretta & Carter, Ronald
2007 Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics 28(3): 410–439.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2008 Hesitation markers among EFL learners: Pragmatic deficiency or difference? In Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics. A Mutualistic Entente, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 119–149. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2015a At the interface of contact linguistics and second language acquisition research: New Englishes and Learner Englishes compared. English World-Wide 36(1): 91–124.
2015b From design to collection of learner corpora. In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, Sylviane Granger, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 9–34. Cambridge: CUP.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, De Cock, Sylvie & Granger, Sylviane
2010 The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Granger, Sylviane
2011 From EFL to ESL: Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English. In Mukherjee & Hundt (eds), 55–78.
2015 Learner language. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds), 418–435. Cambridge: CUP.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Paquot, Magali
2008 Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation. English Text Construction 1(1): 41–61.
Goddard, Cliff
1994 The meaning of lah: Understanding “emphasis” in Malay (Bahasa Melayu). Oceanic Linguistics 33(1): 145–165.
Greenbaum, Sidney
(ed.) 1996 Comparing English Worldwide. The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gut, Ulrike
2012 The LeaP corpus. A multilingual corpus of spoken learner German and learner English. In Multilingual Corpora and Multilingual Corpus Analysis [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 14], Thomas Schmidt & Kai Wörner (eds), 3–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hellermann, John & Vergun, Andrea
2007 Language which is not taught: The discourse marker use of beginning adult learners of English. Journal of Pragmatics 39(1): 157–179.
Li, Min & Xiao, Yan
2012 A comparative study on the use of the discourse marker “well” by Chinese learners of English and native English speakers. International Journal of English Linguistics 2(5): 65–71.
Llanes, Àngels & Muñoz, Carmen
2009 A short stay abroad: Does it make a difference? System 37: 353–365.
Low, Ee Ling & Deterding, David
2003 A corpus-based description of particles in spoken Singapore English. In English in Singapore. Research on Grammar, David Deterding, Low Ee Ling & Adam Brown (eds), 58–66. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education.
McArthur, Tom
2003 World English, Euro-English, Nordic English? English Today 19(1): 54–58.
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Hundt, Marianne
(eds) 2011 Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes. Bridging a Paradigm Gap [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 44]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Rohrbach, Jan-Marc
2006 Rethinking applied corpus linguistics from a language-pedagogical perspective: New departures in learner corpus research. In Planing, Gluing and Painting Corpora: Inside the Applied Corpus Linguist’s Workshop, Bernhard Kettemann & Georg Marko (eds), 205–232. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Müller, Simone
2005 Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native English Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 138]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nayar, P. Bhaskaran
1997 ESL/EFL dichotomy today: Language politics or pragmatics? TESOL Quarterly 31: 9–37.
Nesselhauf, Nadja
2009 Co-selection phenomena across New Englishes: Parallels (and differences) to foreign learner varieties. English World-Wide 30: 1–25.
Overstreet, Maryann
2012 Pragmatic expressions in cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Research in English 1(2): 1–13.
Pahta, Päivi & Taavitsainen, Irma
2011 English in intranational public discourse. In The Languages and Linguistics of Europe. A Comprehensive Guide, Bernd Kortmann & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 605–619. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Ren, Wei
2014 A longitudinal investigation into L2 learners’ cognitive processes during study abroad. Applied Linguistics 35(5): 575–594.
Rieger, Caroline L.
2003 Disfluencies and hesitation strategies in oral L2 tests. In Proceedings of Disfluency In Spontaneous Speech (DISS) Workshop, 5–8 September 2003, Göteborg University, 41–44.
Romero Trillo, Jesús
2002 The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers in non-native speakers of English. Journal of Pragmatics 34(6): 769–784.
Sankoff, Gillian, Thibault, Pierrette, Nagy, Naomi, Blondeau, Hélène, Fonollosa, Marie-Odile & Gagnon, Lucie
1997 Variation in the use of discourse markers in a language contact situation. Language Variation and Change 9(2): 191–217.
Schourup, Lawrence C.
1985 Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York, NY: Garland.
Shimada, Kazunari
2014 Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis of discourse markers used by nonnative and native English speakers. JALT Journal 36(1): 47–67.
Siyanova, Anna & Schmitt, Norbert
2007 Native and nonnative use of multi-word vs. one-word verbs. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 45: 119–139.
Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna
2015 Collocation in beginner learner writing: A longitudinal study. System 53: 148–160.
Strevens, Peter
1992 English as an international language: Directions in the 1990s. In The Other Tongue. English Across Cultures, 2nd edn, Braj B. Kachru (ed.), 27–47. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Svartvik, Jan
1980
Well in conversation. In Studies in English Linguistics for Randolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik (eds), 167–177. London: Longman.
Wong, Jock
2004 The particles of Singapore English: A semantic and cultural interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 739–793.
Zhao, Hongwei
2013 A study on the pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers among Chinese English learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 4(4): 707–714.
Cited by
Cited by 21 other publications
Ahmed, Abdelhamid M., Xiao Zhang, Lameya M. Rezk & Wajdi Zaghouani
2024. Building an Annotated L1 Arabic/L2 English Bilingual Writer Corpus: The Qatari Corpus of Argumentative Writing (QCAW). Corpus-based Studies across Humanities 1:1 ► pp. 183 ff. 
Borreguero Zuloaga, Margarita & Anna De Marco
2021. The Role of Immersion and Non-immersion Contexts in L2 Acquisition: A Study Based on the Analysis of Interactional Discourse Markers. Corpus Pragmatics 5:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Borreguero Zuloaga, Margarita, Kathrin Siebold & Britta Thörle
2021. Methodological Approaches to Studying Discourse Particles in L2. Corpus Pragmatics 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Crible, Ludivine, Mathis Wetzel & Sandrine Zufferey
2021. Lexical and Structural Cues to Discourse Processing in First and Second Language. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2019. Light verb constructions in spoken L2 English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:2 ► pp. 181 ff.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2020. Learner Corpora. In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, ► pp. 283 ff.
Huang, Lan-fen, Yen-liang Lin & Tomáš Gráf
2023. Development of the use of discourse markers across different fluency levels of CEFR. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Huo, Huican
2023. A Corpus-Based Study on Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native Spoken English. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education, Language and Art (ICELA 2022), ► pp. 167 ff.
Le Foll, Elen
Lorenz, Eliane
2022. “We Use English But Not Like All the Time Like”—Discourse Marker Like in UAE English. Frontiers in Communication 7
Meriläinen, Lea
2018. The progressive form and its functions in spoken learner English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2 ► pp. 164 ff.
Meriläinen, Lea
2020. The progressive form and its functions in spoken learner English. In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108], ► pp. 24 ff.
Rosen, Anna
2019. The use of smallwords in the speech of German learners of English. In Learner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 92], ► pp. 219 ff.
Rosen, Anna
2019. The use of smallwords in the speech of German learners of English. In Learner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 92], ► pp. 219 ff.
Rüdiger, Sofia
2021. Likein Korean English speech. World Englishes
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka
2019. Frequency and Stylistic Variability of Discourse Markers in Nigerian English. Corpus Pragmatics 3:3 ► pp. 249 ff.
Werner, Valentin
2017. Adversative Pragmatic Markers in Learner Language: A Cross-Sectional Perspective. Corpus Pragmatics 1:2 ► pp. 135 ff.
Wolk, Christoph, Sandra Götz & Katja Jäschke
2021. Possibilities and Drawbacks of Using an Online Application for Semi-automatic Corpus Analysis to Investigate Discourse Markers and Alternative Fluency Variables. Corpus Pragmatics 5:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Öztürk, Yusuf & Gül Durmuşoğlu Köse
2021. “Well (er) You Know …”: Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native Spoken English. Corpus Pragmatics 5:2 ► pp. 223 ff.
ŞAHİN KIZIL, Aysel
2021. Discourse Markers in Learner Speech: A Corpus Based Comparative Study. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi 7:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.