Article published in:
New Approaches to English Linguistics: Building bridges
Edited by Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja and Sarah Chevalier
[Studies in Language Companion Series 177] 2016
► pp. 213249
References

References

Aijmer, Karin
2004Pragmatic markers in spoken interlanguage. Nordic Journal of English Studies 3(1): 173–190.Google Scholar
2011 Well I’m not sure I think… The use of well by non-native speakers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16: 231–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Gisle
2011Corpus-based pragmatics I: Qualitative studies. In Foundations of Pragmatics, Wolfram Bublitz & Neal R. Norrick (eds), 587–627. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aşik, Asuman & Cephe, Paşa Tevfik
2013Discourse markers and spoken English: Nonnative use in the Turkish EFL setting. English Language Teaching 6(12): 144–155. http://​www​.ccsenet​.org​/journal​/index​.php​/elt​/article​/view​/31766​/18525
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996Pragmatic Markers in English. Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Cock, Sylvie
2004Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literature (BELL) 2: 225–246.Google Scholar
Edwards, Alison
2016English in the Netherlands. Functions, Forms and Attitudes [Varieties of English around the World G56]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fuller, Janet M.
2003The influence of speaker roles on discourse marker use. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 23–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fung, Loretta & Carter, Ronald
2007Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics 28(3): 410–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2008Hesitation markers among EFL learners: Pragmatic deficiency or difference? In Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics. A Mutualistic Entente, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 119–149. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2015aAt the interface of contact linguistics and second language acquisition research: New Englishes and Learner Englishes compared. English World-Wide 36(1): 91–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015bFrom design to collection of learner corpora. In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, Sylviane Granger, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 9–34. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, De Cock, Sylvie & Granger, Sylviane
2010The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Granger, Sylviane
2011From EFL to ESL: Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English. In Mukherjee & Hundt (eds), 55–78.Google Scholar
2015Learner language. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds), 418–435. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Paquot, Magali
2008Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation. English Text Construction 1(1): 41–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
1994The meaning of lah: Understanding “emphasis” in Malay (Bahasa Melayu). Oceanic Linguistics 33(1): 145–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney
(ed.) 1996Comparing English Worldwide. The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gut, Ulrike
2012The LeaP corpus. A multilingual corpus of spoken learner German and learner English. In Multilingual Corpora and Multilingual Corpus Analysis [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 14], Thomas Schmidt & Kai Wörner (eds), 3–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hellermann, John & Vergun, Andrea
2007Language which is not taught: The discourse marker use of beginning adult learners of English. Journal of Pragmatics 39(1): 157–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Min & Xiao, Yan
2012A comparative study on the use of the discourse marker “well” by Chinese learners of English and native English speakers. International Journal of English Linguistics 2(5): 65–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Llanes, Àngels & Muñoz, Carmen
2009A short stay abroad: Does it make a difference? System 37: 353–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Low, Ee Ling & Deterding, David
2003A corpus-based description of particles in spoken Singapore English. In English in Singapore. Research on Grammar, David Deterding, Low Ee Ling & Adam Brown (eds), 58–66. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
McArthur, Tom
2003World English, Euro-English, Nordic English? English Today 19(1): 54–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Hundt, Marianne
(eds) 2011Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes. Bridging a Paradigm Gap [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 44]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Rohrbach, Jan-Marc
2006Rethinking applied corpus linguistics from a language-pedagogical perspective: New departures in learner corpus research. In Planing, Gluing and Painting Corpora: Inside the Applied Corpus Linguist’s Workshop, Bernhard Kettemann & Georg Marko (eds), 205–232. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Müller, Simone
2005Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native English Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 138]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nayar, P. Bhaskaran
1997ESL/EFL dichotomy today: Language politics or pragmatics? TESOL Quarterly 31: 9–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nesselhauf, Nadja
2009Co-selection phenomena across New Englishes: Parallels (and differences) to foreign learner varieties. English World-Wide 30: 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann
2012Pragmatic expressions in cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Research in English 1(2): 1–13.Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi & Taavitsainen, Irma
2011English in intranational public discourse. In The Languages and Linguistics of Europe. A Comprehensive Guide, Bernd Kortmann & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 605–619. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ren, Wei
2014A longitudinal investigation into L2 learners’ cognitive processes during study abroad. Applied Linguistics 35(5): 575–594. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rieger, Caroline L.
2003Disfluencies and hesitation strategies in oral L2 tests. In Proceedings of Disfluency In Spontaneous Speech (DISS) Workshop, 5–8 September 2003, Göteborg University, 41–44.Google Scholar
Romero Trillo, Jesús
2002The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers in non-native speakers of English. Journal of Pragmatics 34(6): 769–784. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, Thibault, Pierrette, Nagy, Naomi, Blondeau, Hélène, Fonollosa, Marie-Odile & Gagnon, Lucie
1997Variation in the use of discourse markers in a language contact situation. Language Variation and Change 9(2): 191–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence C.
1985Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Shimada, Kazunari
2014Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis of discourse markers used by nonnative and native English speakers. JALT Journal 36(1): 47–67.Google Scholar
Siyanova, Anna & Schmitt, Norbert
2007Native and nonnative use of multi-word vs. one-word verbs. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 45: 119–139.Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna
2015Collocation in beginner learner writing: A longitudinal study. System 53: 148–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strevens, Peter
1992English as an international language: Directions in the 1990s. In The Other Tongue. English Across Cultures, 2nd edn, Braj B. Kachru (ed.), 27–47. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan
1980 Well in conversation. In Studies in English Linguistics for Randolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik (eds), 167–177. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wong, Jock
2004The particles of Singapore English: A semantic and cultural interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 739–793. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Hongwei
2013A study on the pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers among Chinese English learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 4(4): 707–714. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

No author info given
2018.  In Discourse Markers and (Dis)fluency [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 286], Crossref logo
Borreguero Zuloaga, Margarita & Anna De Marco
2021. The Role of Immersion and Non-immersion Contexts in L2 Acquisition: A Study Based on the Analysis of Interactional Discourse Markers. Corpus Pragmatics 5:1  pp. 121 ff. Crossref logo
Borreguero Zuloaga, Margarita, Kathrin Siebold & Britta Thörle
2021. Methodological Approaches to Studying Discourse Particles in L2. Corpus Pragmatics 5:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2019. Light verb constructions in spoken L2 English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:2  pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo
Meriläinen, Lea
2018. The progressive form and its functions in spoken learner English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2  pp. 164 ff. Crossref logo
Meriläinen, Lea
2020.  In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108],  pp. 24 ff. Crossref logo
Rosen, Anna
2019.  In Learner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 92],  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Rüdiger, Sofia
2021.  Like in Korean English speech . World Englishes Crossref logo
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka
2019. Frequency and Stylistic Variability of Discourse Markers in Nigerian English. Corpus Pragmatics 3:3  pp. 249 ff. Crossref logo
Werner, Valentin
2017. Adversative Pragmatic Markers in Learner Language: A Cross-Sectional Perspective. Corpus Pragmatics 1:2  pp. 135 ff. Crossref logo
Wolk, Christoph, Sandra Götz & Katja Jäschke
2021. Possibilities and Drawbacks of Using an Online Application for Semi-automatic Corpus Analysis to Investigate Discourse Markers and Alternative Fluency Variables. Corpus Pragmatics 5:1  pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo
Öztürk, Yusuf & Gül Durmuşoğlu Köse
2020. “Well (er) You Know …”: Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native Spoken English. Corpus Pragmatics Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.