Cover not available
Part of
Outside the Clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents
Edited by Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer and Arne Lohmann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 178] 2016
► pp. 1–26

Extra-clausal constituents

An overview

| University of Vienna
| University of Vienna
| University of Vienna
Published online: 3 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.178.01kal
References (112)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. “I think” – An English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), 1-47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The interface between discourse and grammar: The fact is that . In Connectives as Discourse Landmarks [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 161], Agnès Celle & Ruth Huart (eds), 31-46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Arnold, Doug. 2007. Non-restrictive relatives are not orphans. Journal of Linguistics 43: 271-309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Dough. 2004. Non-restrictive relative clauses in construction-based HPSG. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Stefan Müller (ed.), 27-47. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Astruc, Lluisa. 2005. The Intonation of Extra-sentential Elements in Catalan and English. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Averintseva-Klisch, Maria. 2008. To the right of the clause: Right dislocation vs. afterthought. In 'Subordination' versus 'Coordination' in Sentence and Text: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 98], Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds), 217-239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barton, Ellen. 1990. Nonsentential Constituents: A Theory of Grammatical Structure and Pragmatic Interpretation [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. The grammar of telegraphic structures: Sentential and nonsentential derivation. Journal of English Linguistics 26: 37-67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Klaus. 1973. Verteilung und Funktion der sogenannten Parenthese in Texten. Deutsche Sprache 1: 64-115.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 2006. Divisions of labour: The analysis of parentheticals. Lingua 116: 1670-1687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1962[1933]. Language. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1989. Intonation and its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter. 2007. Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 31(3): 569-606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brenier, Jason M. & Michaelis, Laura A. 2005. Optimization via syntactic amalgam: Syntax-prosody mismatch and copula doubling. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1): 45-88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions [Topics in English Linguistics 19]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development [Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel. 1999. Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. In The Clause in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 33-52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Parentheticals. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, Vol. 9, Keith Brown (ed.), 179-182. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Corum, Claudia. 1975. A pragmatic analysis of parenthetic adjuncts. Chicago Linguistic Society 11: 133-141.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole. 2014. Parentheticals in Spoken English: The Syntax-prosody Relation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole & Kavalova, Yordanka. 2007. Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions. [Functional Grammar Series 21]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1973. Parenthetical clauses. In You Take the High Node and I’ll Take the Low Node, Claudia Corum, Thomas Cedric Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser (eds), 333-347. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1979. Appositive relatives have no properties. Linguistic Inquiry 10(2): 211-243.Google Scholar
Erman, Britt & Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt. 1993. Pragmaticalization: The case of ba and you know . Studier I modern språkvetenskap [Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis, New Series] 10: 76-93. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Espinal, M. Teresa. 1991. The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67: 726-762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicolas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nicolaeva (ed.), 366-431. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar
Fabb, Nigel. 1990. The difference between English restrictive and nonrestrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 26: 57-78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic Change. Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin. 2010. Constructions, frames and spoken interaction. Constructions and Frames 2(2): 185-207.Google Scholar
Frank-Job, Barbara. 2006. A dynamic-interactional approach to discourse markers. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 359-374. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar
Frota Sónia. 2000. Prosody and Focus in European Portuguese. Phonological Phrasing and Intonation. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Grenoble, Lenore. 2004. Parentheticals in Russian. Journal of Pragmatics 36(11): 1953-1974. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Parenthetical adverbials: the radical orphanage approach. In Aspects of Modern English Linguistics: Papers Presentedto Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th Birthday , Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Yamada, Osamu Koma & Takao Yagi (eds), 232-54. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1985. An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hannay, Mike & de los Ángeles Gómez-González, María. 2012. Thematic parentheticals in Dutch and English. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 6: 99-127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hannay, Michael & Keizer, Evelien. 2005. A discourse-treatment of English non-restrictive nominal appositions in Functioanl Discourse Grammer. In Studies in Functional Discourse Grammar, MaríaÁ. Gómez-González & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 159-194. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Kuteva, Tania. 2016. Forthcoming. On insubordination and co-optation. In Dynamics of Insubordination, Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. Cooptation as a discourse strategy. Linguistics.
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping. 2013. An outline of Discourse Grammar. In Functional Approaches to Language, Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jeny (eds), 155-206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kuteva, Tania & Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2014. Discourse Grammar, the dual process model, and brain lateralization: Some correlations. Language and Cognition 6: 146-180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kuteva, Tania, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Long, Haiping. 2015. On some correlations between grammar and brain lateralization. In Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, Lachlan. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar. A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heringa, Herman. 2011. Appositional Constructions. Groningen: LOT.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Ludger. 1998. Parenthesen. Linguistische Berichte 175: 299–328.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 19(1)], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17-35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ifantidou-Trouki, Elly. 1993. Sentential adverbs and relevance. Lingua 90(1-2): 69-90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1977. X’ Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Ziv, Yael. 1998. Discourse markers: Introduction. In Discourse Markers: Description and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 1-12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2007. Spoken parenthetical clauses in English. In Dehé & Kavalova (eds), 25-52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Prosody and function of English comment clauses. Folia Linguistica 42(1): 83-134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Development of comment clauses. In The English Verb Phrase: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech, & Sean Wallis (eds), 286-317. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2015. On theticals: A “rootless” analysis of I think . In Parenthetical Verbs Stefan Schneider, Julie Glikman & Mathieu Avanzi (eds), 39-70. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 848-893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2003. Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of its Interactional Functions, With a Focus on I think [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 115]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kavalova, Yordanka. 2007. And-parenthetical clauses. In Dehé & Kavalova (eds), 145-172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keizer, Evelien. 2013. The X is (is) construction: An FDG account. In Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 137], Lachlan Mackenzie & Hella Olbertz (eds), 213-248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995 [1982]. Thoughts on Grammaticalization [revised and expanded version]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
López-Couso, María José. 1996. On the history of methinks: From impersonal construction to fossilised expression. Folia Linguistica Historica XVII: 153-169.Google Scholar
López-Couso, María José & Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2014. From clause to pragmatic marker. A study of the development of like-parentheticals in American English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15(1): 36-61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massam, Diane. 1999. Thing is constructions: The thing is, is what’s the right analysis? English Language and Linguistics 3(2): 335-352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1982. Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 91-106.Google Scholar
. 1988. The Syntactic Phenomena of English, 2 Vols. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Jim & Weinert, Regina. 1998. Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2008. The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 84(1): 69-119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene. 1986. Prosodic Phonology [Studies in Generative Grammar 28]. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2015. Parentheticals and the grammar of complementation. In Parenthetical Verbs. Stefan Schneider, Julie Glikman & Mathieu Avanzi (eds), 13-37. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna. 1999. Grammaticalization and Social Embedding. I Think and Methinks in Middle and Early Modern English. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Peterson, Peter. 1999. On the boundaries of syntax: Non-syntagmatic relations. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 229-250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petola, Niilo. 1983. Comment clauses in present-day English. In Studies in Classical and Modern Philology, Iiro Kajanto, Inna Koskenniemi & Esko Pennanen (eds), 101-113.Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar
Pittner, Karin. 1995. Zur Syntax von Parenthesen. Linguistische Berichte 156: 85-108.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2003. Conventional implicatures: A distinguished class of meanings. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 475-501. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1970. On declarative sentences. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, R.A. Jacobs & P.S. Rosenbaum (eds), 222–272. Waltham MA: Einn & Co.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1973. Slifting. In The Formal Analysis of Natural Languages: Proceedings of the First International Conference. Maurice Gross, Morris Halle & Marcel-Paul Schützenberger (eds), 133-169. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar
Rouchota, Villy. 1998. Procedural meaning and parenthetical discourse markers. In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 97-126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696-735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Safir, Kenneth. 1986. Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17(4): 663-689.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Stefan. 2007. Reduced Parenthetical Clauses as Mitigators. A Corpus Study of Spoken French, Italian and Spanish [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 27]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Stefan, Glikman, Julie & Avanzi, Mathieu (eds), 2015. Parenthetical Verbs. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence Clifford. 1985. Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York NY: GarlandGoogle Scholar
Tabor, Whitney & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1998. Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In The Limits of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 37], Ramat Giacolone & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 229-272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. 'Object complements' and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26(1): 125-164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1, [Typological Studies in Language 19(1)], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 313-29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 24], Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 245-271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: 406-416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. The role of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics , Manchester, England, August. <[URL]>
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuggy, David. 1996. The thing is is that people talk that way. The question is why? In Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, Eugen H. Casad (ed.), 713-752. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urmson, James Opie. 1952. Parenthetical verbs. Mind 61: 480-496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie. 2010. A constructional taxonomy of I think and related expressions: accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics 14(3): 300-427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics 49(2): 295-332.Google Scholar
de Vries, Mark. 2003. Three-dimensional grammar. In Linguistics in the Netherlands, Leonie M.E.A. Cornips & Paula Fikkert (eds), 201-212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Invisible constituents? Parentheses as B-merged adverbial phrases. In Dehé & Kavalova (eds), 203-234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wackernagel 1897, see Scheider 2007b: 38-39.
Wichmann, Anne. 2001. Spoken parentheticals. In A Wealth of English. Studies in Honour of Göran Kjellmer, Karin Aijmer (ed.), 177-193. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgiensis.Google Scholar
Wischer, Ilse. 2000. Grammaticalization versus lexicalization: 'Methinks' there is some confusion. In Pathways of Change. Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 57], Olga, Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 355-370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziv, Yael. 1985. Parentheticals and functional grammar. In Syntax and Pragmatics in Functional Grammar, A. Machteld Bolkestein, Caspar de Groot & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 181-199. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Klumm, Matthias
2024. Peripheries and their internal structure: an empirical analysis of left- and right-peripheral sequences across written English discourse. Linguistics DOI logo
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Mitsuko Narita Izutsu
2023. Chapter 11. Highlighting beginning, end, or transition in-between. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227], ► pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Utterances without commitment. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. The grammar of dialogue. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. The Grammar of the Utterance, DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Doing things with utterance grammar. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Vocatives. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Interjections and particles. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Conclusions. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Introduction. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. The expression of affect. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. A grammar for the utterance. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Scivoletto, Giulio
2020. Semasiological cyclicity in the evolution of discourse markers. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:2 ► pp. 236 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Copyright Page. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. General Preface. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. vii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. List of Abbreviations. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. xi ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.