Article published in:Outside the Clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents
Edited by Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer and Arne Lohmann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 178] 2016
► pp. 305–340
The syntax of confirmationals
A neo-performative analysis
This paper explores the form, function and distribution of certain discourse markers which seem to occur outside traditional clause boundaries and are used to request confirmation. These ‘confirmationals’ differ according to what is expected to be confirmed. Some confirmationals trigger a response from the addressee to confirm that the proposition is true; others require a response to confirm that the addressee knows that the proposition is true. This variation is reminiscent of scope effects and suggests that confirmationals should be analysed in syntactic terms despite their peripheral position. For our analysis, we adopt the Universal Spine Hypothesis (Wiltschko 2014), which promotes a hierarchically organized series of core functional projections. We propose that the highest functional projection of a clause is dedicated to a ‘grounding’ layer, which in turn consists of a speaker-oriented and an addressee-oriented structure. The topmost layer is dedicated to regulate response and consists of a position that encodes the call on the addressee. Our analysis of speech act structure is an updated version of Ross’ (1970) performative hypothesis. We explore the predictions and implications of this hypothesis for the syntax-pragmatics interface.
Published online: 03 October 2016
1957 Canadian English merits a dictionary. Culture XVIII: 245-256.
Bach, Kent & Harnish, Robert
1979 Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Beyssade, Claire & Marandin, Jean-Marie
2006 The speech act assignment problem revisited: Disentangling speaker’s commitment from speaker’s call on addressee. In Selected papers of CSSP 2005, Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds), 37-68. http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss6/index_en.html
2004 Discourse markers. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, Laurence Horn & Gregory Ward (eds), 221-240. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cheshire, Jenny & Williams, Ann
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
1986 Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
1996 Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.
Clark, Herbert H. & Brennan, Susan E.
Clark, Herbert H. & Schaefer, Edward F.
Clark, Herbert H.
1992 Arenas of Language Use. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Déchaine, Rose Marie & Wiltschko, Martina
De Wolf, Galean Dodds, Fee, Margery, Gregg, Robert J. & McAlpine, Janice
2004 The Survey of Vancouver English: A Sociolinguistic Study of Urban Canadian English (No. 5). Strathy Language Unit, Queen's University.
Dombrowski, Ernst & Niebuhr, Oiver
Dombrowski, Ernst & Niebuhr, Oliver
2010 Shaping phrase-final rising intonation in German. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Speech Prosody , Chicago, USA.
Farkas, Donka F. & Bruce, Kim B.
2006 Towards a theory of discourse markers. Approaches to Discourse Particles 1: 189-204.
1996 Interrogatives: Questions, facts and dialogue. In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Shalom Lappin (ed.), 385–422. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gibson, Deborah Jean
1976 A Thesis on eh . PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.
2008 Which eh is the Canadian eh? Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 27: 73-85.
2003 True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English. London: Routledge.
Heim, Johannes, Keupdjio, Hermann, Lam, Zoe Wai-Man, Osa-Gomez, Adriana & Wiltschko, Martina
2015 Expertise and common ground. Ms. UBC.
2014 Recursion and truth. In Recursion: Complexity in Cognition, Margaret Speas & Thomas Roeper (eds), 113-137. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hirschberg, Julia & Ward, Gregory
Kayne, Richard S.
1994 The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Lam, Zoe Wai-Man
2014 A complex ForceP for speaker- and addressee-oriented discourse particles in Cantonese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 35: 61-80.
Malamud, Sophia A. & Stephenson, Tamina C.
2011 Three ways to avoid commitments: Declarative force modifiers in the conversational scoreboard. Journal of Semantics 31: 1-37.
1992 ‘We’ve all got to go one day, eh?’: Powerlessness and solidarity in the functions of a New Zealand tag. In Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Annual Berkeley Women and Language Conference, Kira Hall, Mary Bucholtz & Birch Moonwomon (eds), Berkeley CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
Pierrehumbert, Janet, & Hirschberg, Julia
1990 The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Intentions in Communication, Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha E. Pollack (eds), 271-311. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Pollock, Jean Yves
1989 Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365-425.
1969 Anaphoric islands. Chicago Linguistic Society 5: 205-239.
Ramchand, Gillian & Svenonius, Peter
1991 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed), 281–337. Dortrecht, Kluwer.
Ross, John R.
1970 On declarative sentences. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 222-272. Waltham MA: Ginn & Co.
2009 Tagged for Deletion: A Typological Approach to VP Ellipsis in Tag Questions. MA thesis, UCLA.
Searle, John R.
Speas, Penny & Tenny, Carol
1978 Assertion. In Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 315-332. New York NY: Academic Press.
Stubbe, Maria & Holmes, Janet
2016 Discourse particles in Bavarian German. PhD dissertation, UBC.
Trinh, Tue & Crnic, Luka
2011 On the rise and fall of declaratives. Proceedings of Sinn and Bedeutung (SuB) 15: 645-660.
2012 Semantics of intonation. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 3, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), 2039-2969. Berlin: De Gruyter.
. in press-a. Ergative constellations in the structure of speech acts.
. in press-b. Response particles beyond answering. In Order and Structure in Syntax, Laura Bailey and Michelle Sheehan (eds) Berlin: Language Science Press.
Wiltschko, Martina & Alex d’Arcy
2015 Deriving variation in function. A case study of Canadian ‘eh’ and its kin. Paper presented at NWAV 44 , University of Toronto (October 2015).
Woods, Howard B.
1980 The Ottawa Survey of Canadian English. Kingston: Strathy Language Unit, Queen’s University.
Cited by other publications
No author info given
Colasanti, Valentina & Giuseppina Silvestri
Espinal, M.Teresa & Susagna Tubau
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 july 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.