This paper explores the form, function and distribution of certain discourse markers which seem to occur outside traditional clause boundaries and are used to request confirmation. These ‘confirmationals’ differ according to what is expected to be confirmed. Some confirmationals trigger a response from the addressee to confirm that the proposition is true; others require a response to confirm that the addressee knows that the proposition is true. This variation is reminiscent of scope effects and suggests that confirmationals should be analysed in syntactic terms despite their peripheral position. For our analysis, we adopt the Universal Spine Hypothesis (Wiltschko 2014), which promotes a hierarchically organized series of core functional projections. We propose that the highest functional projection of a clause is dedicated to a ‘grounding’ layer, which in turn consists of a speaker-oriented and an addressee-oriented structure. The topmost layer is dedicated to regulate response and consists of a position that encodes the call on the addressee. Our analysis of speech act structure is an updated version of Ross’ (1970) performative hypothesis. We explore the predictions and implications of this hypothesis for the syntax-pragmatics interface.
2015The syntax of yes and no. Oxford University Press.
Hinzen, Wolfram
2014Recursion and truth. In Recursion: Complexity in Cognition, Margaret Speas & Thomas Roeper (eds), 113-137. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hirschberg, Julia & Ward, Gregory
1995The interpretation of the high-rise question contour in English. Journal of Pragmatics 24: 407-412.
Kayne, Richard S
1994The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Krifka, Manfred
2013Response particles as propositional anaphors. Semantics and Linguistic Theory. Vol. 23. 1–18.
Lam, Zoe Wai-Man
2014A complex ForceP for speaker- and addressee-oriented discourse particles in Cantonese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 35: 61-80.
Malamud, Sophia A. & Stephenson, Tamina C
2011Three ways to avoid commitments: Declarative force modifiers in the conversational scoreboard. Journal of Semantics 31: 1-37.
Meyerhoff, Miriam
1992‘We’ve all got to go one day, eh?’: Powerlessness and solidarity in the functions of a New Zealand tag. In Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Annual Berkeley Women and Language Conference, Kira Hall, Mary Bucholtz & Birch Moonwomon (eds), Berkeley CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
Pierrehumbert, Janet, & Hirschberg, Julia
1990The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Intentions in Communication, Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha E. Pollack (eds), 271-311. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Pollock, Jean Yves
1989Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365-425.
Postal, Paul
1969Anaphoric islands. Chicago Linguistic Society 5: 205-239.
Ramchand, Gillian & Svenonius, Peter
2014Deriving the functional hierarchy. Language Sciences 46: 152-174.
Rizzi, Luigi
1991The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed), 281–337. Dortrecht, Kluwer.
Ross, John R
1970On declarative sentences. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 222-272. Waltham MA: Ginn & Co.
Sailor, Craig
2009Tagged for Deletion: A Typological Approach to VP Ellipsis in Tag Questions. MA thesis, UCLA.
Searle, John R
1969Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Vol. 626. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1978Assertion. In Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 315-332. New York NY: Academic Press.
Stubbe, Maria & Holmes, Janet
1995You know, eh and other exasperating ‘expressions’: An analysis of social and stylistic variation in the use of pragmatic devices in a sample of New Zealand English. Language and Communication 15: 63-88.
Thoma, Sonja
2016Discourse particles in Bavarian German. PhD dissertation, UBC.
Trinh, Tue & Crnic, Luka
2011On the rise and fall of declaratives. Proceedings of
Sinn and Bedeutung (SuB)
15: 645-660.
Truckenbrodt, Harald
2013Satztyp, Prosodie und Intonation. In Satztypen des Deutschen, Jörg Meibauer, Markus Steinbach & Hans Altmann (eds), 570-601. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Truckenbrodt, Harald
2012Semantics of intonation. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 3, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), 2039-2969. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Wiltschko, Martina
in press-a. Ergative constellations in the structure of speech acts.
Wiltschko, Martina
in press-b. Response particles beyond answering. In Order and Structure in Syntax, Laura Bailey and Michelle Sheehan (eds) Berlin Language Science Press
Wiltschko, Martina
2014The Universal Structure of Categories: Towards a Formal Typology. Cambridge: CUP.
Wiltschko, Martina & Alex d’Arcy
2015Deriving variation in function. A case study of Canadian ‘eh’ and its kin. Paper presented at
NWAV 44
, University of Toronto (October 2015).
Woods, Howard B
1980The Ottawa Survey of Canadian English. Kingston: Strathy Language Unit, Queen’s University.
Cited by
Cited by 30 other publications
Badan, Linda
2020. Italian Discourse Markers: The Case ofGuarda te*. Studia Linguistica 74:2 ► pp. 303 ff.
2022. A corpus-based analysis of meaning variations in German tag questions Evidence from spoken and written conversational corpora. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
2022. Conclusions. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 299 ff.
Corr, Alice
2022. The expression of affect. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 157 ff.
Corr, Alice
2022. Utterances without commitment. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 203 ff.
Corr, Alice
2022. The Grammar of the Utterance,
Corr, Alice
2022. Doing things with utterance grammar. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 135 ff.
Corr, Alice
2022. Vocatives. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 51 ff.
Corr, Alice
2022. Introduction. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 1 ff.
Corr, Alice
2022. A grammar for the utterance. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 15 ff.
Corr, Alice
2022. The grammar of dialogue. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 251 ff.
Corr, Alice
2022. Interjections and particles. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 99 ff.
Denis, Derek
2020. How Canadian was eh? A baseline investigation of usage and ideology. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 65:4 ► pp. 583 ff.
2022. Copyright Page. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. iv ff.
[no author supplied]
2022. List of Abbreviations. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. xi ff.
[no author supplied]
2022. General Preface. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. vii ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.