Insubordinate clauses are a problem for grammatical analysis as they are subordinate in terms of their form but used like independent main clauses. This chapter investigates the grammatical status of insubordinate if-clauses in English on the basis of spoken data from the British Component of the International Corpus of English. The analysis shows that insubordinate if-clauses have highly specialised functions and fall into two main categories, viz. performatives and elaboratives. The former include directives, optatives, and exclamatives, while the latter express some elaboration of a previous utterance and as such are pragmatically linked to the preceding cotext. Directives represent the most frequent category and are shown to correspond with specific formal features which set them apart from ordinary conditional clauses: three dominant syntactic patterns (If you + [Verb: present], If you + [Modal: past], If you’d like to) and terminal prosodic contour. It is concluded that directive insubordinate if-clauses are not mere performance phenomena but represent a grammatical category in their own right in a Construction Grammar sense. It is further concluded that insubordinate if-clauses are part of a larger category of theticals (Heine et al. 2013), which also includes parenthetical if-clauses and conversational if-clauses (Dancygier 1998).
1986Conditionals are discourse-based. In On Conditionals, Elizabeth C. Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judith Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 333-351.Cambridge: CUP.
Auer, Peter
2009On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31: 1-13.
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
2008Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. Version 4.4.33. [URL].
Bowie, Jill & Aarts, Bas
forthc. Clause fragments in English dialogue. In Corpus Linguistics on the Move: Exploring and Understanding English through Corpora [Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics], María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo & Ignacio M. Palacios-Martínez (eds) Amsterdam Brill/Rodopi
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter
2012A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1): 1-44.
Brinton, Laurel J
2014aThe extremes of insubordination. Exclamatory as if! Journal of English Linguistics 42(2): 93-113.
Brinton, Laurel J
2014bIf you choose/like/prefer/want/wish: The origin of metalinguistic and politeness functions. In Late Modern English Syntax, Marianne Hundt, (ed.), 271-290. Cambridge: CUP.
Burton-Roberts, Noel
1999Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. In The Clause in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 33-52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Buscha, Annerose
1976Isolierte Nebensätze im dialogischen Text. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 13: 274-279.
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP.
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.
D’Hertefelt, Sarah
2013Independent conditional clauses in Germanic languages. Paper given at Complex Sentences International Workshop, Leuven, 16 November.
D’Hertefelt, Sarah
2015Insubordination in Germanic: A Typology of Complements and Conditional Constructions. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.
D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2014Independent complement constructions in Swedish and Danish: Insubordination or dependency shift?Journal of Pragmatics 60: 89-102.
Dancygier, Barbara
1998Conditionals and Prediction. Time, Knowledge, and Causation in Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: CUP.
Dancygier, Barbara & Sweetser, Eve
2005Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: CUP.
Declerck, Renaat & Reed, Susan
2001Conditionals. A Comprehensive Empirical Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dik, Simon C
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eilfort, William H
1987A unified analysis of intial if-clauses in English. In
Papers from the 23rd Annual Regional Meeting of the CLS, Part One: The General Session
, 56-63. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Elvira-García, Wendy
2014The prosody of insubordination. Talk given at University of Leuven.
Espinal, M. Teresa
1991The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67(4): 726-762.
Evans, Nicholas
2007Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nicolaeva (ed.), 366-431. Oxford: OUP.
Ferguson, Gibson
2001If you pop over there: A corpus-based study of conditionals in medical discourse. English for Specific Purposes 20: 61-82.
1986Conditionals in discourse: A text-based study from English. In On Conditionals, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judith Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 353-372. Cambridge: CUP.
Ford, Cecilia E. & Thompson, Sandra A
1996Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 134-184. Cambridge: CUP.
Fried, Mirjam & Östman, Jan-Ola
2004Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective, Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds), 11-86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Geis, Michael L. & Zhang, Zheng Sheng
1986Conditional sentences in speech act theory. In
Proceedings of the Third Eastern States’ Conference on Linguistics
, 233-245. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.
Goldberg, Adele E
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele E
2006Constructions at work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gras, Pedro
2016Revisiting the functional typology of insubordination: que-initial sentences in Spanish. In Dynamics of Insubordination, Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haegeman, Liliane
1984Pragmatic conditionals in English. Folia Linguistica 18: 485-502.
Haegeman, Liliane
1991Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In Aspects of Modern English Linguistics. Papers Presented to Masamoto Ukaji on his 60th Birthday, Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Norio Yamada, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Osama Koma & Takao Yagi (eds). 232-254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.
Haegeman, Liliane
2003Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18(4): 317-39.
Halliday, Michael A.K
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Kuteva Tania
2016On insubordination and cooptation. In Dynamics of Insubordination, Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
forthc.). The expression of directive meaning: A corpus-based study on the variation between imperatives, conditionals and insubordinate if-clauses in spoken British English. In Corpus Linguistics on the Move: Exploring and Understanding English through Corpora [Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics], María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo & Ignacio M. Palacios-Martínez (eds) Amsterdam Brill/Rodopi
Mato-Míguez, Beatriz
2014aAre isolated if-clauses independent clauses? Evidence from spoken British and American English. In Current Research in Applied Linguistics: Issues on Language and Cognition, Paula Rodríguez-Puente, Teresa Fanego, Evelyn Gandón-Chapela, Sara Riveiro-Outeiral & Mª Luisa Roca-Varela (eds), 48-71. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Mato-Míguez, Beatriz
2014bIf you would like to lead: on the grammatical status of directive isolated if-clauses in spoken British English. In Diachrony and Synchrony in English Corpus Linguistics, Alejandro Alcaraz-Sintes & Salvador Valera-Hernández (eds), 259-283. Bern: Peter Lang.
McEnery, Tony, Baker, Paul & Cheepen, Christine
2002Lexis, indirectness and politeness in operator calls. In New Frontiers of Corpus Research. Papers from the 21st Interantional Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Sydney 2000, Pam Peters, Peter Collins, Adam Smith (eds), 53-69. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Mithun, Marianne
2008The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 84(1): 69-119.
Mondorf, Britta
2014Apparently competing motivations in morphosyntactic variation. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov, Edith Moravcsik (eds), 209-228. Oxford: OUP.
1999On the boundaries of syntax: Non-syntagmatic relations. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 229-250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pierrehumbert, Janet
1980The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed 1988, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Rutherford, William W
1970Some observations concerning subordinate clauses in English. Language 46(1): 97-115.
Sansiñena, María Sol, De Smet, Hendrik & Cornillie, Bert
2015Between subordinate and insubordinate. Paths toward complementizer-initial main clauses. Journal of Pragmatics 77: 3-19.
Schwenter, Scott
1996The pragmatics of independent si-clauses in Spanish. Hispanic Linguistics 8: 316-351.
Schwenter, Scott A
2016Independent si-clauses in Spanish: Functions and consequences for insubordination. In Dynamics of Insubordination, Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stirling, Lesley
1998Isolated if-clauses in Australian English. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 273-294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sweetser, Eve E
1984Semantic structure and semantic change: a cognitive linguistic study of modality, perception, speech acts, and logical relations. PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.
2010Grammaticalization. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Historical Linguistics, Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds), 271-285. London: Continuum.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP.
Van linden, An & Van de Velde, Freek
2014 (Semi-)autonomous subordination in Dutch: Structures and semantic-pragmatic values. Journal of Pragmatics 60: 226-50.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007Rethinking the Coordinate-subordinate Dichotomy: Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe, D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Van linden, An
2005Modularity in Language. Constructional and Categorial Mismatch in Syntax and Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by
Cited by 10 other publications
Cappelle, Bert
2017. What’s Pragmatics Doing Outside Constructions?. In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11], ► pp. 115 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Evelien Keizer
2022. Insubordinate if-clauses in FDG: Degrees of independence. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 675 ff.
2023. Bidirectional grammaticalization: Chinese modal and conditional. Journal of Linguistics► pp. 1 ff.
la Roi, Ezra
2021. The Insubordination of If- and That-Clauses from Archaic to Post-Classical Greek: A Diachronic Constructional Typology. Symbolae Osloenses 95:1 ► pp. 2 ff.
la Roi, Ezra
2022. Insubordination in Archaic and Classical Latin: commands, requests, wishes and assertives. Journal of Latin Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Lastres–López, Cristina
2020. Subordination and insubordination in contemporary spoken English. English Today 36:2 ► pp. 48 ff.
Sansò, Andrea
2020. Routes Towards The Irrealis. Transactions of the Philological Society 118:3 ► pp. 401 ff.
TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH CLOSS
2017. ‘Insubordination’ in the light of the Uniformitarian Principle. English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 289 ff.
Van linden, An
2023. Review of Lastres-López, Cristina. 2021. From Subordination to Insubordination: A Functional-pragmatic Approach to If/si- constructions in English, French and Spanish Spoken Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang. ISBN: 978-3-0343-4220-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/b18393. Research in Corpus Linguistics 11:1 ► pp. 184 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.