Part of
Outside the Clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents
Edited by Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer and Arne Lohmann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 178] 2016
► pp. 341378
References (73)
References
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1986. Conditionals are discourse-based. In On Conditionals, Elizabeth C. Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judith Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 333-351.Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2009. On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31: 1-13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2008. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. Version 4.4.33. <[URL]>.Google Scholar
Bowie, Jill & Aarts, Bas. forthc. Clause fragments in English dialogue. In Corpus Linguistics on the Move: Exploring and Understanding English through Corpora [Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics], María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo & Ignacio M. Palacios-Martínez (eds). Amsterdam: Brill/Rodopi. DOI logo
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1): 1-44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2014a. The extremes of insubordination. Exclamatory as if! Journal of English Linguistics 42(2): 93-113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014b. If you choose/like/prefer/want/wish: The origin of metalinguistic and politeness functions. In Late Modern English Syntax, Marianne Hundt, (ed.), 271-290. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel. 1999. Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. In The Clause in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 33-52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buscha, Annerose. 1976. Isolierte Nebensätze im dialogischen Text. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 13: 274-279.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1996. Intonation and clause combining in discourse: The case of because. Pragmatics 6(3): 389-426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Croft, William A. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Hertefelt, Sarah 2013. Independent conditional clauses in Germanic languages. Paper given at Complex Sentences International Workshop, Leuven, 16 November.
2015. Insubordination in Germanic: A Typology of Complements and Conditional Constructions. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2014. Independent complement constructions in Swedish and Danish: Insubordination or dependency shift? Journal of Pragmatics 60: 89-102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals and Prediction. Time, Knowledge, and Causation in Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Sweetser, Eve. 2005. Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat & Reed, Susan. 2001. Conditionals. A Comprehensive Empirical Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eilfort, William H. 1987. A unified analysis of intial if-clauses in English. In Papers from the 23rd Annual Regional Meeting of the CLS, Part One: The General Session , 56-63. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Elvira-García, Wendy. 2014. The prosody of insubordination. Talk given at University of Leuven.
Espinal, M. Teresa. 1991. The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67(4): 726-762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nicolaeva (ed.), 366-431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Gibson. 2001. If you pop over there: A corpus-based study of conditionals in medical discourse. English for Specific Purposes 20: 61-82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. 1993. Grammar in Interaction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Speaking conditionally: Some contexts for if-clauses in conversation. In On Conditionals Again, Angeliki Athanasiadou & René Dirven (eds), 387-413. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1986. Conditionals in discourse: A text-based study from English. In On Conditionals, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judith Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 353-372. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 134-184. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam & Östman, Jan-Ola. 2004. Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective, Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds), 11-86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geis, Michael L. & Zhang, Zheng Sheng. 1986. Conditional sentences in speech act theory. In Proceedings of the Third Eastern States’ Conference on Linguistics , 233-245. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. Constructions at work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gras, Pedro. 2016. Revisiting the functional typology of insubordination: que-initial sentences in Spanish. In Dynamics of Insubordination, Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1984. Pragmatic conditionals in English. Folia Linguistica 18: 485-502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In Aspects of Modern English Linguistics. Papers Presented to Masamoto Ukaji on his 60th Birthday, Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Norio Yamada, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Osama Koma & Takao Yagi (eds). 232-254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.Google Scholar
. 2003. Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18(4): 317-39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Kuteva Tania. 2016. On insubordination and cooptation. In Dynamics of Insubordination, Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping. 2013. An outline of discourse grammar. In Functional Approaches to Language, Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds), 175-233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kac, Michael B. 1972. Clauses of saying and the interpretation of because . Language 48(3): 626-632. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 848-93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva. 2012. Syntactically non-integrated Finnish Jos ‘If’-conditional clauses as directives. Discourse Processes 49(3-4): 213-242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Jan, Lindholm, Camilla & Laury, Ritva. To appear. The interactional emergence of conditional clauses as directives: Constructions, trajectories and sequences of action. Language Sciences.
Lombardi Vallauri, E. 2004. Grammaticalization of syntactic incompleteness: Free conditionals in Italian and other languages. SKY Journal of Linguistics 17: 189-215.Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo. 2010. Free conditionals. Linguisticæ Investigationes 33(1): 50-85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mato-Míguez, Beatriz. (forthc.). The expression of directive meaning: A corpus-based study on the variation between imperatives, conditionals and insubordinate if-clauses in spoken British English. In Corpus Linguistics on the Move: Exploring and Understanding English through Corpora [Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics], María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo & Ignacio M. Palacios-Martínez (eds). Amsterdam: Brill/Rodopi. DOI logo
. 2014a. Are isolated if-clauses independent clauses? Evidence from spoken British and American English. In Current Research in Applied Linguistics: Issues on Language and Cognition, Paula Rodríguez-Puente, Teresa Fanego, Evelyn Gandón-Chapela, Sara Riveiro-Outeiral & Mª Luisa Roca-Varela (eds), 48-71. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
. 2014b. If you would like to lead: on the grammatical status of directive isolated if-clauses in spoken British English. In Diachrony and Synchrony in English Corpus Linguistics, Alejandro Alcaraz-Sintes & Salvador Valera-Hernández (eds), 259-283. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony, Baker, Paul & Cheepen, Christine. 2002. Lexis, indirectness and politeness in operator calls. In New Frontiers of Corpus Research. Papers from the 21st Interantional Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Sydney 2000, Pam Peters, Peter Collins, Adam Smith (eds), 53-69. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2008. The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 84(1): 69-119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondorf, Britta. 2014. Apparently competing motivations in morphosyntactic variation. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov, Edith Moravcsik (eds), 209-228. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean & Thompson, Sandra A. 2008. The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining. The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, Ritva Laury (ed.), 179-204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Gerald, Wallis, Sean & Aarts, Bas. 2002. Exploring Natural Language. Working with the British Component of the International Corpus of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2007. ‘Incrementing’ in conversation. A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics 17(4): 513-52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Peter. 1999. On the boundaries of syntax: Non-syntagmatic relations. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 229-250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed 1988, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rutherford, William W. 1970. Some observations concerning subordinate clauses in English. Language 46(1): 97-115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sansiñena, María Sol, De Smet, Hendrik & Cornillie, Bert. 2015. Between subordinate and insubordinate. Paths toward complementizer-initial main clauses. Journal of Pragmatics 77: 3-19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott. 1996. The pragmatics of independent si-clauses in Spanish. Hispanic Linguistics 8: 316-351.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. 2016. Independent si-clauses in Spanish: Functions and consequences for insubordination. In Dynamics of Insubordination, Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley. 1998. Isolated if-clauses in Australian English. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 273-294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E. 1984. Semantic structure and semantic change: a cognitive linguistic study of modality, perception, speech acts, and logical relations. PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Trousdale, Graeme. 2010. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect? In Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 19-44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2010. Grammaticalization. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Historical Linguistics, Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds), 271-285. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van linden, An & Van de Velde, Freek. 2014. (Semi-)autonomous subordination in Dutch: Structures and semantic-pragmatic values. Journal of Pragmatics 60: 226-50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2007. Rethinking the Coordinate-subordinate Dichotomy: Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe, D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Van linden, An. 2012. A typology of complement insubordination in Dutch. Studies in Language 36:123-153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1987. System-dependent morphological naturalness in inflection. In Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology [Studies in Language Companion Series 10], Wolfgang U. Dressler (ed.), 59-96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuasa, Etsuyo. 2005. Modularity in Language. Constructional and Categorial Mismatch in Syntax and Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Sideltsev, Andrei V.
Lastres-López, Cristina
Lastres–López, Cristina
2020. Subordination and insubordination in contemporary spoken English. English Today 36:2  pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
Van linden, An
2023. Review of Lastres-López, Cristina. 2021. From Subordination to Insubordination: A Functional-pragmatic Approach to If/si- constructions in English, French and Spanish Spoken Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang. ISBN: 978-3-0343-4220-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/b18393. Research in Corpus Linguistics 11:1  pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
杜, 莉娜
2023. A Cognitive Contrastive Study of English and Chinese Hypothetical Conjunctions “If” and “Ru Guo”. Modern Linguistics 11:10  pp. 4749 ff. DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Evelien Keizer
2022. Insubordinateif-clauses in FDG: Degrees of independence. Open Linguistics 8:1  pp. 675 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
KUO, YUEH HSIN
2024. Bidirectional grammaticalization: Chinese modal and conditional. Journal of Linguistics 60:2  pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
la Roi, Ezra
2021. The Insubordination of If- and That-Clauses from Archaic to Post-Classical Greek: A Diachronic Constructional Typology. Symbolae Osloenses 95:1  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
la Roi, Ezra
2022. Insubordination in Archaic and Classical Latin: commands, requests, wishes and assertives. Journal of Latin Linguistics 21:1  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Sansò, Andrea
2020. Routes Towards The Irrealis. Transactions of the Philological Society 118:3  pp. 401 ff. DOI logo
Cappelle, Bert
2017. What’s Pragmatics Doing Outside Constructions?. In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11],  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH CLOSS
2017. ‘Insubordination’ in the light of the Uniformitarian Principle. English Language and Linguistics 21:2  pp. 289 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.