Article published in:
Outside the Clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents
Edited by Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer and Arne Lohmann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 178] 2016
► pp. 341378
References

References

Akatsuka, Noriko
1986Conditionals are discourse-based. In On Conditionals, Elizabeth C. Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judith Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 333-351.Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter
2009On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31: 1-13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
2008Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. Version 4.4.33. http://​www​.praat​.org.Google Scholar
Bowie, Jill & Aarts, Bas
forthc. Clause fragments in English dialogue. In Corpus Linguistics on the Move: Exploring and Understanding English through Corpora [Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics], María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo & Ignacio M. Palacios-Martínez (eds) Amsterdam Brill/Rodopi Crossref
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter
2012A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1): 1-44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
2014aThe extremes of insubordination. Exclamatory as if! Journal of English Linguistics 42(2): 93-113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014bIf you choose/like/prefer/want/wish: The origin of metalinguistic and politeness functions. In Late Modern English Syntax, Marianne Hundt, (ed.), 271-290. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel
1999Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. In The Clause in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 33-52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buscha, Annerose
1976Isolierte Nebensätze im dialogischen Text. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 13: 274-279.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
1996Intonation and clause combining in discourse: The case of because. Pragmatics 6(3): 389-426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2003Subordination. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Croft, William A.
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Hertefelt, Sarah
2013Independent conditional clauses in Germanic languages. Paper given at Complex Sentences International Workshop, Leuven, 16 November.
2015Insubordination in Germanic: A Typology of Complements and Conditional Constructions. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2014Independent complement constructions in Swedish and Danish: Insubordination or dependency shift? Journal of Pragmatics 60: 89-102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara
1998Conditionals and Prediction. Time, Knowledge, and Causation in Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Sweetser, Eve
2005Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat & Reed, Susan
2001Conditionals. A Comprehensive Empirical Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C.
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eilfort, William H.
1987A unified analysis of intial if-clauses in English. In Papers from the 23rd Annual Regional Meeting of the CLS, Part One: The General Session , 56-63. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Elvira-García, Wendy
2014The prosody of insubordination. Talk given at University of Leuven.
Espinal, M. Teresa
1991The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67(4): 726-762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2007Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nicolaeva (ed.), 366-431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Gibson
2001If you pop over there: A corpus-based study of conditionals in medical discourse. English for Specific Purposes 20: 61-82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E.
1993Grammar in Interaction. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Speaking conditionally: Some contexts for if-clauses in conversation. In On Conditionals Again, Angeliki Athanasiadou & René Dirven (eds), 387-413. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1986Conditionals in discourse: A text-based study from English. In On Conditionals, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judith Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 353-372. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 134-184. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam & Östman, Jan-Ola
2004Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective, Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds), 11-86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geis, Michael L. & Zhang, Zheng Sheng
1986Conditional sentences in speech act theory. In Proceedings of the Third Eastern States’ Conference on Linguistics , 233-245. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gras, Pedro
2016Revisiting the functional typology of insubordination: que-initial sentences in Spanish. In Dynamics of Insubordination, Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1984Pragmatic conditionals in English. Folia Linguistica 18: 485-502. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In Aspects of Modern English Linguistics. Papers Presented to Masamoto Ukaji on his 60th Birthday, Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Norio Yamada, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Osama Koma & Takao Yagi (eds). 232-254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.Google Scholar
2003Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18(4): 317-39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K.
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Kuteva Tania
2016On insubordination and cooptation. In Dynamics of Insubordination, Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping
2013An outline of discourse grammar. In Functional Approaches to Language, Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds), 175-233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kac, Michael B.
1972Clauses of saying and the interpretation of because . Language 48(3): 626-632. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2011On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 848-93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva
2012Syntactically non-integrated Finnish Jos ‘If’-conditional clauses as directives. Discourse Processes 49(3-4): 213-242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Jan, Lindholm, Camilla & Laury, Ritva
To appear. The interactional emergence of conditional clauses as directives: Constructions, trajectories and sequences of action. Language Sciences.
Lombardi Vallauri, E.
2004Grammaticalization of syntactic incompleteness: Free conditionals in Italian and other languages. SKY Journal of Linguistics 17: 189-215.Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
2010Free conditionals. Linguisticæ Investigationes 33(1): 50-85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mato-Míguez, Beatriz
forthc.). The expression of directive meaning: A corpus-based study on the variation between imperatives, conditionals and insubordinate if-clauses in spoken British English. In Corpus Linguistics on the Move: Exploring and Understanding English through Corpora [Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics], María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo & Ignacio M. Palacios-Martínez (eds) Amsterdam Brill/Rodopi Crossref
2014aAre isolated if-clauses independent clauses? Evidence from spoken British and American English. In Current Research in Applied Linguistics: Issues on Language and Cognition, Paula Rodríguez-Puente, Teresa Fanego, Evelyn Gandón-Chapela, Sara Riveiro-Outeiral & Mª Luisa Roca-Varela (eds), 48-71. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2014b If you would like to lead: on the grammatical status of directive isolated if-clauses in spoken British English. In Diachrony and Synchrony in English Corpus Linguistics, Alejandro Alcaraz-Sintes & Salvador Valera-Hernández (eds), 259-283. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony, Baker, Paul & Cheepen, Christine
2002Lexis, indirectness and politeness in operator calls. In New Frontiers of Corpus Research. Papers from the 21st Interantional Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Sydney 2000, Pam Peters, Peter Collins, Adam Smith (eds), 53-69. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2008The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 84(1): 69-119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondorf, Britta
2014Apparently competing motivations in morphosyntactic variation. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov, Edith Moravcsik (eds), 209-228. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean & Thompson, Sandra A.
2008The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining. The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, Ritva Laury (ed.), 179-204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Gerald, Wallis, Sean & Aarts, Bas
2002Exploring Natural Language. Working with the British Component of the International Corpus of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2007‘Incrementing’ in conversation. A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics 17(4): 513-52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Peter
1999On the boundaries of syntax: Non-syntagmatic relations. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 229-250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet
1980The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed 1988, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rutherford, William W.
1970Some observations concerning subordinate clauses in English. Language 46(1): 97-115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sansiñena, María Sol, De Smet, Hendrik & Cornillie, Bert
2015Between subordinate and insubordinate. Paths toward complementizer-initial main clauses. Journal of Pragmatics 77: 3-19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott
1996The pragmatics of independent si-clauses in Spanish. Hispanic Linguistics 8: 316-351.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A.
2016Independent si-clauses in Spanish: Functions and consequences for insubordination. In Dynamics of Insubordination, Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley
1998Isolated if-clauses in Australian English. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 273-294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E.
1984Semantic structure and semantic change: a cognitive linguistic study of modality, perception, speech acts, and logical relations. PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Trousdale, Graeme
2010Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect? In Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 19-44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2010Grammaticalization. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Historical Linguistics, Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds), 271-285. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van linden, An & Van de Velde, Freek
2014 (Semi-)autonomous subordination in Dutch: Structures and semantic-pragmatic values. Journal of Pragmatics 60: 226-50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007Rethinking the Coordinate-subordinate Dichotomy: Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe, D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Van linden, An
2012A typology of complement insubordination in Dutch. Studies in Language 36:123-153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang U.
1987System-dependent morphological naturalness in inflection. In Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology [Studies in Language Companion Series 10], Wolfgang U. Dressler (ed.), 59-96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yuasa, Etsuyo
2005Modularity in Language. Constructional and Categorial Mismatch in Syntax and Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Cappelle, Bert
2017.  In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11],  pp. 115 ff. Crossref logo
Lastres–López, Cristina
2020. Subordination and insubordination in contemporary spoken English. English Today 36:2  pp. 48 ff. Crossref logo
Sansò, Andrea
2020. Routes Towards The Irrealis. Transactions of the Philological Society 118:3  pp. 401 ff. Crossref logo
TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH CLOSS
2017. ‘Insubordination’ in the light of the Uniformitarian Principle. English Language and Linguistics 21:2  pp. 289 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.