Insubordinate clauses are a problem for grammatical analysis as they are subordinate in terms of their form but used like independent main clauses. This chapter investigates the grammatical status of insubordinate if-clauses in English on the basis of spoken data from the British Component of the International Corpus of English. The analysis shows that insubordinate if-clauses have highly specialised functions and fall into two main categories, viz. performatives and elaboratives. The former include directives, optatives, and exclamatives, while the latter express some elaboration of a previous utterance and as such are pragmatically linked to the preceding cotext. Directives represent the most frequent category and are shown to correspond with specific formal features which set them apart from ordinary conditional clauses: three dominant syntactic patterns (If you + [Verb: present], If you + [Modal: past], If you’d like to) and terminal prosodic contour. It is concluded that directive insubordinate if-clauses are not mere performance phenomena but represent a grammatical category in their own right in a Construction Grammar sense. It is further concluded that insubordinate if-clauses are part of a larger category of theticals (Heine et al. 2013), which also includes parenthetical if-clauses and conversational if-clauses (Dancygier 1998).
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1986. Conditionals are discourse-based. In On Conditionals, Elizabeth C. Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judith Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 333-351.Cambridge: CUP.
Auer, Peter. 2009. On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31: 1-13.
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2008. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. Version 4.4.33. <[URL]>.
Bowie, Jill & Aarts, Bas. forthc. Clause fragments in English dialogue. In Corpus Linguistics on the Move: Exploring and Understanding English through Corpora [Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics], María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo & Ignacio M. Palacios-Martínez (eds). Amsterdam: Brill/Rodopi.
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1): 1-44.
Brinton, Laurel J. 2014a. The extremes of insubordination. Exclamatory as if! Journal of English Linguistics 42(2): 93-113.
Brinton, Laurel J. 2014b. If you choose/like/prefer/want/wish: The origin of metalinguistic and politeness functions. In Late Modern English Syntax, Marianne Hundt, (ed.), 271-290. Cambridge: CUP.
Burton-Roberts, Noel. 1999. Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. In The Clause in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 33-52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Buscha, Annerose. 1976. Isolierte Nebensätze im dialogischen Text. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 13: 274-279.
Croft, William A. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP.
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.
D’Hertefelt, Sarah2013. Independent conditional clauses in Germanic languages. Paper given at Complex Sentences International Workshop, Leuven, 16 November.
D’Hertefelt, Sarah2015. Insubordination in Germanic: A Typology of Complements and Conditional Constructions. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.
D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2014. Independent complement constructions in Swedish and Danish: Insubordination or dependency shift?Journal of Pragmatics 60: 89-102.
Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals and Prediction. Time, Knowledge, and Causation in Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: CUP.
Dancygier, Barbara & Sweetser, Eve. 2005. Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: CUP.
Declerck, Renaat & Reed, Susan. 2001. Conditionals. A Comprehensive Empirical Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eilfort, William H. 1987. A unified analysis of intial if-clauses in English. In
Papers from the 23rd Annual Regional Meeting of the CLS, Part One: The General Session
, 56-63. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Elvira-García, Wendy. 2014. The prosody of insubordination. Talk given at University of Leuven.
Espinal, M. Teresa. 1991. The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67(4): 726-762.
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nicolaeva (ed.), 366-431. Oxford: OUP.
Ferguson, Gibson. 2001. If you pop over there: A corpus-based study of conditionals in medical discourse. English for Specific Purposes 20: 61-82.
Ford, Cecilia E. 1993. Grammar in Interaction. Cambridge: CUP.
Ford, Cecilia E. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1986. Conditionals in discourse: A text-based study from English. In On Conditionals, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judith Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 353-372. Cambridge: CUP.
Ford, Cecilia E. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 134-184. Cambridge: CUP.
Fried, Mirjam & Östman, Jan-Ola. 2004. Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective, Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds), 11-86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Geis, Michael L. & Zhang, Zheng Sheng. 1986. Conditional sentences in speech act theory. In
Proceedings of the Third Eastern States’ Conference on Linguistics
, 233-245. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gras, Pedro. 2016. Revisiting the functional typology of insubordination: que-initial sentences in Spanish. In Dynamics of Insubordination, Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In Aspects of Modern English Linguistics. Papers Presented to Masamoto Ukaji on his 60th Birthday, Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Norio Yamada, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Osama Koma & Takao Yagi (eds). 232-254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2003. Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18(4): 317-39.
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Kuteva Tania. 2016. On insubordination and cooptation. In Dynamics of Insubordination, Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping. 2013. An outline of discourse grammar. In Functional Approaches to Language, Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds), 175-233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Kac, Michael B. 1972. Clauses of saying and the interpretation of because. Language 48(3): 626-632.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 848-93.
Laury, Ritva. 2012. Syntactically non-integrated Finnish Jos ‘If’-conditional clauses as directives. Discourse Processes 49(3-4): 213-242.
Lindström, Jan, Lindholm, Camilla & Laury, Ritva. To appear. The interactional emergence of conditional clauses as directives: Constructions, trajectories and sequences of action. Language Sciences.
Lombardi Vallauri, E. 2004. Grammaticalization of syntactic incompleteness: Free conditionals in Italian and other languages. SKY Journal of Linguistics 17: 189-215.
Mato-Míguez, Beatriz. (forthc.). The expression of directive meaning: A corpus-based study on the variation between imperatives, conditionals and insubordinate if-clauses in spoken British English. In Corpus Linguistics on the Move: Exploring and Understanding English through Corpora [Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics], María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo & Ignacio M. Palacios-Martínez (eds). Amsterdam: Brill/Rodopi.
Mato-Míguez, Beatriz. 2014a. Are isolated if-clauses independent clauses? Evidence from spoken British and American English. In Current Research in Applied Linguistics: Issues on Language and Cognition, Paula Rodríguez-Puente, Teresa Fanego, Evelyn Gandón-Chapela, Sara Riveiro-Outeiral & Mª Luisa Roca-Varela (eds), 48-71. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Mato-Míguez, Beatriz. 2014b. If you would like to lead: on the grammatical status of directive isolated if-clauses in spoken British English. In Diachrony and Synchrony in English Corpus Linguistics, Alejandro Alcaraz-Sintes & Salvador Valera-Hernández (eds), 259-283. Bern: Peter Lang.
McEnery, Tony, Baker, Paul & Cheepen, Christine. 2002. Lexis, indirectness and politeness in operator calls. In New Frontiers of Corpus Research. Papers from the 21st Interantional Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Sydney 2000, Pam Peters, Peter Collins, Adam Smith (eds), 53-69. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Mithun, Marianne. 2008. The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 84(1): 69-119.
Mondorf, Britta. 2014. Apparently competing motivations in morphosyntactic variation. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov, Edith Moravcsik (eds), 209-228. Oxford: OUP.
Peterson, Peter. 1999. On the boundaries of syntax: Non-syntagmatic relations. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 229-250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed 1988, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Rutherford, William W. 1970. Some observations concerning subordinate clauses in English. Language 46(1): 97-115.
Sansiñena, María Sol, De Smet, Hendrik & Cornillie, Bert. 2015. Between subordinate and insubordinate. Paths toward complementizer-initial main clauses. Journal of Pragmatics 77: 3-19.
Schwenter, Scott. 1996. The pragmatics of independent si-clauses in Spanish. Hispanic Linguistics 8: 316-351.
Schwenter, Scott A. 2016. Independent si-clauses in Spanish: Functions and consequences for insubordination. In Dynamics of Insubordination, Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stirling, Lesley. 1998. Isolated if-clauses in Australian English. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 273-294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sweetser, Eve E. 1984. Semantic structure and semantic change: a cognitive linguistic study of modality, perception, speech acts, and logical relations. PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Trousdale, Graeme. 2010. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect? In Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 19-44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2010. Grammaticalization. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Historical Linguistics, Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds), 271-285. London: Continuum.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP.
Van linden, An & Van de Velde, Freek. 2014. (Semi-)autonomous subordination in Dutch: Structures and semantic-pragmatic values. Journal of Pragmatics 60: 226-50.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2007. Rethinking the Coordinate-subordinate Dichotomy: Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1987. System-dependent morphological naturalness in inflection. In Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology [Studies in Language Companion Series 10], Wolfgang U. Dressler (ed.), 59-96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yuasa, Etsuyo. 2005. Modularity in Language. Constructional and Categorial Mismatch in Syntax and Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2020. Subordination and insubordination in contemporary spoken English. English Today 36:2 ► pp. 48 ff.
Van linden, An
2023. Review of Lastres-López, Cristina. 2021. From Subordination to Insubordination: A Functional-pragmatic Approach to If/si- constructions in English, French and Spanish Spoken Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang. ISBN: 978-3-0343-4220-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/b18393. Research in Corpus Linguistics 11:1 ► pp. 184 ff.
杜, 莉娜
2023. A Cognitive Contrastive Study of English and Chinese Hypothetical Conjunctions “If” and “Ru Guo”. Modern Linguistics 11:10 ► pp. 4749 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Evelien Keizer
2022. Insubordinateif-clauses in FDG: Degrees of independence. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 675 ff.
2024. Bidirectional grammaticalization: Chinese modal and conditional. Journal of Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 363 ff.
la Roi, Ezra
2021. The Insubordination of If- and That-Clauses from Archaic to Post-Classical Greek: A Diachronic Constructional Typology. Symbolae Osloenses 95:1 ► pp. 2 ff.
la Roi, Ezra
2022. Insubordination in Archaic and Classical Latin: commands, requests, wishes and assertives. Journal of Latin Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Sansò, Andrea
2020. Routes Towards The Irrealis. Transactions of the Philological Society 118:3 ► pp. 401 ff.
Cappelle, Bert
2017. What’s Pragmatics Doing Outside Constructions?. In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11], ► pp. 115 ff.
TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH CLOSS
2017. ‘Insubordination’ in the light of the Uniformitarian Principle. English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 289 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.