The Semantics of Grammar

• Introduction
• 1. Language and meaning | p. 1
• 2. Grammatical semantics | p. 3
• 3. ‘Autonomous syntax’: an illustration | p. 4
• 4. The need for a semantic metalanguage | p. 7
• 5. The need for an integrated linguistic description | p. 8
• 6. The proposed semantic metalanguage | p. 9
• 7. The idea of ‘ethno-grammar’ | p. 12
• 8. The philosophy of grammar | p. 14
• 9. Universals of grammatical semantics | p. 15
• 10. By their fruits shall ye know them | p. 19
• Part 1: The semantics of syntax
• 1. The semantics of English complementation in a cross-linguistic perspective
• 1. Introduction
• 2. TO and ‘wanting’
• 3. TO and opinion
• 4. ING and time
• 5. TO, ING and aspectuals
• 6. TO and emotion
• 7. FOR TO versus TO
• 8. THAT and knowledge
• 9. The subjunctive: a cross-linguistic perspective
• 10. Conclusion
• Note
• 2. Ethno-syntax and the philosophy of grammar
• 1. Introduction
• 2. Bodily actions and events
• 3. The good/bad dichotomy
• 4. The unknown
• 5. Concluding remark
• Notes
• 3. The semantics of causative constructions in a cross-linguistic perspective
• 1. Introduction
• 2. Japanese
• 3. English
• 4. Hindi
• 5. ‘Indirect causation’ in English and in French
• 6. Italian
• 7. ‘Indirect causation’ in Russian
• 8. Causation in grammar: towards a semantic typology of grammatical systems
• 4. The Japanese ‘adversative’ passive in a typological context (Are grammatical categories vague or multiply polysemous?)
• 1. Introduction
• 2. Main-verb passives
• 3. Some cross-linguistic comparisons
• 4. Conclusion
• Summary of Japanese constructions
• 5. Why can you have a drink when you can't *have an eat?
• 1. Introduction
• 2. Periphrastic verbal construction with have defined
• 3. The over-all semantic invariant of the have a V construction
• 4. Subtypes of the have a V construction
• 5. Have a fall
• 6. Have a V versus take a V
• 7. Comparable constructions in other languages
• 8. Conclusion
• Notes
• Summary of contruction subtypes
• 6. The semantics of ‘internal dative’ in English
• 1. Introduction
• 2. Semantic constraints on the ‘internal dative’ construction
• 3. Semantic subtypes
• 4. Apparent exceptions
• 5. The semantic core
• 6. The semantic basis of transitivity
• 7. Three participants on the stage: but how many in the limelight?
• 8. A semantic common denominator
• 9. One semantic invariant or eight distinct subtypes?
• Summary of English internal dative constructions
• Part 2: The semantics of morphology
• 7. The meaning of a case: a study of the Polish dative
• 1. Introduction
• 2. Polish datives with external causes
• 3. Datives without external causes
• 4. Conclusion
• Summary of Polish dative constructions
• 8. The semantics of case marking
• 1. Introduction
• 2. The Russian accusative case
• 3. The Russian ‘partitive’
• 4. The Russian genitive plural
• 5. The genitive marking of the accusative in Polish
• 6. The nominative plural in Polish
• 7. Conclusion
• 9. What's in a noun? (Or: how do nouns differ in meaning from adjectives?)
• 1. Introduction
• 2. Description versus categorization
• 3. The notion of ‘kind’
• 4. Semantic nouniness and syntactic nouniness
• 5. Core adjectival concepts
• 6. Where do nouns ‘come from’?
• 7. What are adjectives for?
• 8. Final illustration
• 9. Concluding remarks
• Definitions
• Notes
• 10. Oats and wheat: mass nouns, iconicity, and human categorization
• 1. Introduction
• 2. Preliminary discussion
• 3. The logic of names of fruits and vegetables in Russian
• 4. Water (names of homogeneous substances)
• 5. Chocolate and chocolates (solids with a double status)
• 6. Crockery (names of heterogeneous classes of objects)
• 7. Scissors (names of ‘dual objects’)
• 8. A grain of rice (substances with a minimal unit)
• 9. Hair, noodles and apples (‘singularia mostly’, ‘pluralia mostly’ and ‘edible objects’)
• 10. Oats (names of substances composed of particles and limited in quantity)
• 11. Guts and woods (names of body parts and places)
• 12. Leftovers (names of heterogenous groups of objects and/or ‘stuffs’)
• 13. Clothing versus clothes
• 14. Fruit versus vegetables
• 15. Conclusions
• Summary of class meanings
• Conclusion | p. 561
• Subject and name index | p. 585
• Index of lexical items | p. 597

Cited by 306 other publications

No author info given

2003. Book Reviews. Linguistic Typology 7:2

No author info given

2015.  In Demonstratives and Possessives with Attitude [Human Cognitive Processing, 51],

No author info given

2015.  In Semantics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 168],

No author info given

2016.  In A Cognitive Grammar of Japanese Clause Structure [Human Cognitive Processing, 53],

No author info given

2018.  In Compliments and Positive Assessments [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 289],

No author info given

2018.  In Landscape and Culture – Cross-linguistic Perspectives [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 9],

No author info given

2018.  In Lexical meaning as a testable hypothesis [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 75],

No author info given

2018.  In Tag Questions in Conversation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 83],

No author info given

2019.  In Reference Point and Case [Human Cognitive Processing, 68],

No author info given

2019.  In Semantic Plurality [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 349],

Achard-Bayle, Guy

2000. Référents évolutifs et point de vue. Linx :43 ► pp. 121 ff.

Achard-Bayle, Guy

2007. Les réalités conceptuelles et leur ancrage matériel. Corela :HS-6

Achard-Bayle, Guy & Amélie Cure

2008. Trivial Pursuit. Pratiques :139-140 ► pp. 29 ff.

Acquaviva, Paolo

2014.  In Morphology and Meaning [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 327], ► pp. 49 ff.

Acquaviva, Paolo

2016. Structures for plurals. Lingvisticae Investigationes 39:2 ► pp. 217 ff.

ACUÑA-FARIÑA, JUAN CARLOS

2009. Aspects of the grammar of close apposition and the structure of the noun phrase. English Language and Linguistics 13:3 ► pp. 453 ff.

Agbo, Maduabuchi Sennen

2014. Causativity in Ìgbò Personal Names. Journal of Universal Language 15:2 ► pp. 1 ff.

Aleksandrova, Angelina

2016.  In Des noms d’âge aux noms de phase, ► pp. 223 ff.

Allan, Keith

2008. Review of Peeters (2006): Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar: Empirical evidence from the Romance languages. Studies in Language ► pp. 447 ff.

Ameka, Felix

1990. The grammatical packaging of experiencers in ewe: A study in the semantics of syntax. Australian Journal of Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 139 ff.

Ameka, Felix K.

1988. The grammatical coding of the terminal viewpoint of situations in Ewe: A semantic perspective. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8:2 ► pp. 185 ff.

Arab, Reza

2022. Cultural semantics of the ‘salt’ word in Persian. International Journal of Language and Culture 9:1 ► pp. 119 ff.

Arkadiev, Peter

2017. Multiple ergatives. Studies in Language 41:3 ► pp. 717 ff.

Arkadiev, Peter M.

2009.  In Differential Subject Marking [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 72], ► pp. 151 ff.

Arnaud, Pierre

2018. Bateau phare, magasin phare : composés [N1N2]N et séquences syntaxiques N1+N2 à N2 adjectivé. Travaux de linguistique n° 76:1 ► pp. 7 ff.

Arnaud, Pierre J. L.

2010. Judging the Degree of Adjectivization of English Nouns: An Investigation of the Discourse Behaviour of a Sample of Frequent Premodifier Nouns. English Studies 91:3 ► pp. 303 ff.

Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A. & Nora Boneh

2015. Reconsidering the Emergence of Non-core Dative Constructions in Modern Hebrew. Journal of Jewish Languages 3:1-2 ► pp. 309 ff.

BARTOLOTTA, ANNAMARIA

2009. Root lexical features and inflectional marking of tense in Proto-Indo-European. Journal of Linguistics 45:3 ► pp. 505 ff.

Bateman, John A.

1998. James R. Martin's English Text . Functions of Language 5:2 ► pp. 213 ff.

Becker, Israela

2022. It’s all about the sentential construction. Studies in Language

Belyaeva-Standen, Yelena

2003. The functional–pragmatic field of possibility in Russian: meaning and structure. Language Sciences 25:3 ► pp. 239 ff.

Benczes, Réka & Bence Ságvári

2018. Where metaphorsreallycome from: Social factors as contextual influence in Hungarian teenagers’ metaphorical conceptualizations of life. Cognitive Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 121 ff.

Benić, Mislav

2021. Bezličnost i srodne pojave: osnovni problemi. Jezikoslovni zapiski 27:1 ► pp. 139 ff.

Blake, Barry J.

2001.  In Case,

BLYTH, CARL

1997. A Constructivist Approach to Grammar: Teaching Teachers to Teach Aspect. The Modern Language Journal 81:1 ► pp. 50 ff.

Bonadonna, Maria Francesca

2020. Using lexical functions to describe adjectives in terminography. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 26:1 ► pp. 7 ff.

Boucher, Paul

2018.  In A Linguistic Handbook of French for Translators and Language Students,

Boulonnais, Dominique

2013. AT et la sémantique des prépositions. Anglophonia :17 (34) ► pp. 9 ff.

Bugenhagen, Robert D.

1990. Experiential constructions in Mangap‐Mbula∗. Australian Journal of Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 183 ff.

Burridge, Kate

2015.  In Language Structure and Environment [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 6], ► pp. 45 ff.

Béal, Christine

2002. Présentation : repenser les lignes de démarcation entre langue, discours, culture à la lumière des approches interculturelles. Cahiers de praxématique :38 ► pp. 11 ff.

Börstell, Carl, Ryan Lepic & Gal Belsitzman

2016. Articulatory plurality is a property of lexical plurals in sign language. Lingvisticae Investigationes 39:2 ► pp. 391 ff.

Caldwell, T. Price, Oliver Cresswell & Robert J. Stainton

2018.  In Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 101], ► pp. 45 ff.

Calude, Andreea S.

2017. Clausal Complements in Native and Learner Spoken English: A Corpus-Based Study with LINDSEI and VICOLSE. Australian Journal of Linguistics 37:1 ► pp. 91 ff.

CALUIANU, DANIELA

2004. Emotions across Linguistic Theories (A. Wierzbicka, Emotions across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 21:1 ► pp. 144 ff.

Carlier, Anne

1996. ‘Les gosses ça se lève tôt le matin’: l'interprétation générique du syntagme nominal disloqué au moyen de ce ou ça. Journal of French Language Studies 6:2 ► pp. 133 ff.

Carlier, Anne

2016. The capricious evolution of the indefinite plural article uns and its relationship with lexical plurality in medieval French. Lingvisticae Investigationes 39:2 ► pp. 309 ff.

Chelliah, Shobhana L. & Willem J. de Reuse

2010.  In Handbook of Descriptive Linguistic Fieldwork, ► pp. 279 ff.

Chen, Lian

2020. Les stéréotypes dans la zoo-anthroponymie française et chinoise. Itinéraires :2020-2

Chen, Yue

2019. A construction-based account of the synchrony and diachrony of the Chinese middle construction. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 6:2 ► pp. 260 ff.

Cohen, Dana

2020.  In Mass and Count in Linguistics, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science [Language Faculty and Beyond, 16], ► pp. 37 ff.

Condon, Nora & Peter Kelly

2002. Does Cognitive Linguistics have anything to offer English language learners in their efforts to master phrasal verbs?. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 137-138 ► pp. 205 ff.

Corbett, Greville G.

2019. Pluralia tantum nouns and the theory of features: a typology of nouns with non-canonical number properties. Morphology 29:1 ► pp. 51 ff.

Corradetti, Claudio

2022.  In Relativism and Human Rights, ► pp. 3 ff.

Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse

2004.  In Cognitive Linguistics,

Cuffari, Elena C.

2014. Keep meaning in conversational coordination. Frontiers in Psychology 5

Culpeper, Jonathan & Michael Haugh

2021. The metalinguistics of offence in (British) English. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:2 ► pp. 185 ff.

Curnow, Timothy Jowan

1993. Semantics of Spanish causatives involvinghacer. Australian Journal of Linguistics 13:2 ► pp. 165 ff.

Cuyckens, Hubert & Frauke D’hoedt

2015.  In Perspectives on Complementation, ► pp. 77 ff.

D'Hertefelt, Sarah

2017.  In Imperatives and Directive Strategies [Studies in Language Companion Series, 184],

Dalmas, Martine, Dmitrij Dobrovol’skij, Dirk Goldhahn & Uwe Quasthof

2015. Bewertung durch Adjektive. Ansätze einer korpusgestützten Untersuchung zur Synonymie. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 45:1 ► pp. 12 ff.

Davidse, Kristin

2018.  In The Noun Phrase in English [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 246], ► pp. 11 ff.

Davidse, Kristin

2022.  In English Noun Phrases from a Functional-Cognitive Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 221], ► pp. 28 ff.

Davidse, Kristin & Lobke Ghesquière

2016. Content-purport, content-substance and structure: focusingmereandmerely. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 48:1 ► pp. 85 ff.

Davidse, Kristin & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen

2008. Introduction: The realization of interpersonal meaning. <i>WORD</i> 59:1-2 ► pp. 3 ff.

Davidse, Kristin, Lieven Vandelanotte, Caroline Gentens & Lobke Ghesquière

2014.  In Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 63], ► pp. 1 ff.

De Smet, Hendrik & Hubert Cuyckens

2005. Pragmatic Strengthening and the Meaning of Complement Constructions. Journal of English Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

DE SMET, HENDRIK & LIESBET HEYVAERT

2011. The meaning of the English present participle. English Language and Linguistics 15:3 ► pp. 473 ff.

DE SMET, HENDRIK & EVELYN VANCAYZEELE

2015. Like a rolling stone: the changing use of English premodifying present participles. English Language and Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 131 ff.

de Stadler, Leon

1995. The Indirect Object in Afrikaans. South African Journal of Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 26 ff.

de Stadler, Leon G.

1995. The indirect object in Afrikaans: a schematic network. South African Journal of Linguistics 13:3 ► pp. 100 ff.

Deshors, Sandra C. & Stefan Th. Gries

2016. Profiling verb complementation constructions across New Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 192 ff.

de Carvalho, Paulo

2007. Le Nom et le Nombre. CogniTextes 1:Volume 1

Divjak, Dagmar & Laura A. Janda

2008. Ways of attenuating agency in Russian. Transactions of the Philological Society 106:2 ► pp. 138 ff.

Dor, Daniel & Eva Jablonka

2001. From Cultural Selection to Genetic Selection: A Framework for the Evolution of Language. Selection 1:1-3 ► pp. 33 ff.

Driem, George Van

1991. Tangut verbal agreement and the patient category in Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 54:3 ► pp. 520 ff.

Driem, George Van

1993. Language change, conjugational morphology and the Sino-Tibetanurheimat. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 26:1 ► pp. 45 ff.

Duffley, Patrick & Maryse Arseneau

2012. Tense and control interpretations in gerund-participle and to-infinitive complement constructions with verbs of risk. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 57:1 ► pp. 31 ff.

Duffley, Patrick & Ryan Fisher

2021.  To ‐Infinitive and Gerund‐Participle Clauses with the Verbs Dread and Fear . Studia Linguistica 75:1 ► pp. 72 ff.

Duffley, Patrick J.

2000. Gerund versus Infinitive as Complement of Transitive Verbs in English. Journal of English Linguistics 28:3 ► pp. 221 ff.

Duffley, Patrick J. & Jean-François Joubert

1999. The Gerund and the Infinitive with the Verbs intend, mean, propose and their Close Synonyms. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 44:3 ► pp. 251 ff.

Durst-Andersen, Per

2000. The English progressive as picture description. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 32:1 ► pp. 45 ff.

Durst-Andersen, Per & Elena Lorentzen

2017. Pure case and prepositional case in Russian. Russian Linguistics 41:2 ► pp. 177 ff.

Egan, Thomas

2015.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Egan, Thomas & Hildegunn Dirdal

2017.  In Cross-linguistic Correspondences [Studies in Language Companion Series, 191], ► pp. 1 ff.

Endresen, Anna, Laura A. Janda, Robert Reynolds & Francis M. Tyers

2016. Who needs particles? A challenge to the classification of particles as a part of speech in Russian. Russian Linguistics 40:2 ► pp. 103 ff.

Enfield, N. J.

2022. Enchrony. WIREs Cognitive Science 13:4

Enfield, N. J.

2014.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 48 ff.

Enfield, N. J., Jack Sidnell & Paul Kockelman

2014.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 25 ff.

Enghels, Renata & Kim Wylin

2015. Expressing the source of dispossession acts in French and Spanish. Languages in Contrast 15:1 ► pp. 102 ff.

Erofeeva, Irina & Alexey Muravyov

2021. Cognitive-Linguistic Tools for Modeling the Country’s Media Image: A China’s Discourse on Russia. Russian and Chinese Studies 5:2 ► pp. 83 ff.

Erofeeva, Irina, Yulia Tolstokulakova & Alexey Muravyov

2021. The Coronavirus Pandemic in the Conceptual Sphere of Media Discourse in Russia and China: a Survival Strategy. Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism 10:1 ► pp. 78 ff.

Fieder, Nora, Lyndsey Nickels, Britta Biedermann & Wendy Best

2014. From “some butter” to “a butter”: An investigation of mass and count representation and processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology 31:4 ► pp. 313 ff.

Fieder, Nora, Lyndsey Nickels & Britta Biedermann

2014. Representation and processing of mass and count nouns: a review. Frontiers in Psychology 5

Fieder, Nora, Lyndsey Nickels, Trudy Krajenbrink & Britta Biedermann

2017. Garlic and Ginger are not like Apples and Oranges: Effects of Mass/Count Information on the Production of Noun Phrases in English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology ► pp. 17470218.2016.1 ff.

Fortescue, Michael

1994. How ‘concrete’` is West Greenlandic?. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 27:1 ► pp. 131 ff.

Fortescue, Michael

2002. Report to the elders (A discourse on semantic relativity). Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 34:1 ► pp. 107 ff.

Fortuin, Egbert & Ico Davids

2013. Subordinate clause prolepsis in Russian. Russian Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 125 ff.

Fortuin, Egbert & Hetty Geerdink-Verkoren

2019.  In Universal Semantic Syntax,

Franceschi, Daniele

2014. Licensing and blocking factors in the use of BEGIN verbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 304 ff.

Franco, Ludovico, Benedetta Baldi & Leonardo M. Savoia

2020. Collectivizers in Italian (and beyond). The interplay between collectivizing and evaluating morphology (and the Div paradox). Studia Linguistica 74:1 ► pp. 2 ff.

Gardelle, Laure

2016. Five crew, how many clergy : pourquoi certains noms collectifs peuvent-ils servir à nommer des membres ?. Anglophonia :22

Gardelle, Laure

2016. Lexical plurals for aggregates of discrete entities in English. Lingvisticae Investigationes 39:2 ► pp. 355 ff.

Gardelle, Laure

2017. Are superordinates such as furniture and belongings collective nouns?. Lingvisticae Investigationes 40:2 ► pp. 150 ff.

Gardelle, Laure

2018. Are there any collective nouns among lexical plurals in English?. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 63:1 ► pp. 25 ff.

George, Gloria

1999. Sexual orientation and the Oxford Dictionary of Slang. English Today 15:3 ► pp. 52 ff.

Gillon, Brendan S.

1999.  In Breadth and Depth of Semantic Lexicons [Text, Speech and Language Technology, 10], ► pp. 19 ff.

Girard, Geneviève

1999.  In Langage et linéarité, ► pp. 51 ff.

Girard-Gillet, Geneviève

2016. Aspectual Verbs: a study of cease and continue. Anglophonia :22

Gladkova, Anna

2012.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,

Gladkova, Anna

2014.  In Multilingual Cognition and Language Use [Human Cognitive Processing, 44], ► pp. 121 ff.

Goddard, Cliff

1990. The lexical semantics of “good feelings” in Yankunytjatjara. Australian Journal of Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 257 ff.

GODDARD, CLIFF

1995. Lucy's “grammatical categories and cognition”. American Ethnologist 22:3 ► pp. 617 ff.

Goddard, Cliff

1997. Semantic primes and grammatical categories∗. Australian Journal of Linguistics 17:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Goddard, Cliff

2003.  In Contrastive Analysis in Language, ► pp. 13 ff.

Goddard, Cliff

2017.  In International Handbook of Modern Lexis and Lexicography, ► pp. 1 ff.

Goddard, Cliff

2020.  In Meaning, Life and Culture: In conversation with Anna Wierzbicka, ► pp. 13 ff.

Goddard, Cliff

2022. The semantics of coming and going. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 147 ff.

Goddard, Cliff, Keith Allan, K.J. Franklin, Susanne Döpke, Elizabeth Pearce, Kate Burridge & Jean Mulder

1995. Reviews. Australian Journal of Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 95 ff.

Goldberg, Adele E.

2002. Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics 13:4

Golebiowski, Zosia & Anthony J. Liddicoat

2002. The interaction of discipline and culture in academic writing. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 25:2 ► pp. 59 ff.

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco

2018. Taming iconicity in the Spanish and Italian translations of Shakespeare’sSonnets. English Text Construction 11:1 ► pp. 105 ff.

Goy, Anna

2002.  In Spatial Language, ► pp. 121 ff.

Grimm, Scott & Mojmír Dočekal

2021.  In Countability in Natural Language, ► pp. 85 ff.

Gwilliams, Laura & Lise Fontaine

2015. Indeterminacy in process type classification. Functional Linguistics 2:1

GÜNTHER, CHRISTINE, SVEN KOTOWSKI & INGO PLAG

2020. Phrasal compounds can have adjectival heads: evidence from English. English Language and Linguistics 24:1 ► pp. 75 ff.

Hackett, Paul M. W.

2021.  In Facet Theory and the Mapping Sentence, ► pp. 25 ff.

Hamawand, Zeki

2004. Determinants of Complement Clause Variation in English. English Studies 85:5 ► pp. 451 ff.

Harder, Peter

2007. Shaping the interactive flowlanguage as input, process and product. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 39:1 ► pp. 7 ff.

Heltoft, Lars

2014.  In Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 69], ► pp. 203 ff.

Hens, Gregor

1997. Constructional Semantics in German: The Dative of Inaction. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 9:2 ► pp. 191 ff.

Hernández-Paricio, Francisco

1994. La négation et l’hypothèse inaccusative. Linx :5 ► pp. 91 ff.

Higginbotham, D. Jeffery & David P. Wilkins

2006. The Short Story of Frametalker: An Interactive AAC Device. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication 15:1 ► pp. 18 ff.

Hlebec, Boris

2015. Lexical Definitions of Some Performative Verbs. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 50:1 ► pp. 27 ff.

Hoffmann, Thomas

2019.  In English Comparative Correlatives,

Holmes, Janet, Koenraad Kuiper, Alan R. Libert, Bert Peeters & Brian Taylor

1996. Reviews. Australian Journal of Linguistics 16:2 ► pp. 229 ff.

Houben, Jan E. M.

2008.  In Sanskrit Computational Linguistics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5406], ► pp. 6 ff.

Hudcovičová, Marianna

2019. Analysis of Verbal Prepositional “of” Structures. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 70:2 ► pp. 191 ff.

Hudson, Richard, Andrew Rosta, Jasper Holmes & Nikolas Gisborne

1996. Synonyms and syntax. Journal of Linguistics 32:2 ► pp. 439 ff.

Høeg Müller, Henrik

2014. Lexical coding vs. syntactic marking of homogeneity. Studies in Language 38:4 ► pp. 896 ff.

Iwasaki, Noriko, David P. Vinson & Gabriella Vigliocco

2010. Does the grammatical count/mass distinction affect semantic representations? Evidence from experiments in English and Japanese. Language and Cognitive Processes 25:2 ► pp. 189 ff.

IWATA, SEIZI

2006. Where Do Constructions Come From? (W. Croft, Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 23:2 ► pp. 493 ff.

Jamrozik, Anja & Dedre Gentner

2015.  Well‐Hidden Regularities: Abstract Uses of in and on Retain an Aspect of Their Spatial Meaning . Cognitive Science 39:8 ► pp. 1881 ff.

Jaszczolt, Katarzyna

1995. Typology of contrastive studies: specialisation, progress and applications. Language Teaching 28:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M.

1995.  In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 561 ff.

Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M.

2022.  In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 1499 ff.

Jouitteau, Mélanie & Milan Rezac

2016. Fourteen tests for Breton collectives, an inquiry into number and numerosity. Lapurdum :19 ► pp. 357 ff.

Junker, Marie-Odile & Louise Blacksmith

2006. Are There Emotional Universals? Evidence from the Native American Language East Cree. Culture & Psychology 12:3 ► pp. 275 ff.

Kaheraoui, Malika

2008. Sur la structure argumentale de la forme faire + infinitif. Corela :6-1

Kaleta, Agnieszka

2016.  In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54], ► pp. 143 ff.

Kaleta, Agnieszka

2020.  In Foreign Language Pedagogy in the Light of Cognitive Linguistics Research [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 51 ff.

Kaluga, Michał

2018. Nice to Meet You or Nice Meeting You: Complementation Patterns of Emotive Adjectives. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :27/2 ► pp. 47 ff.

Kaneko, Makoto, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba & S. Prévost

2018. La détermination et la pluralisation : l’exigence de l’uniformité référentielle. SHS Web of Conferences 46 ► pp. 12010 ff.

Kaneko, Makoto, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba, S. Prévost & A. Steuckardt

2020. Comment situer les emplois dénominatif et métonymique des noms propres par rapport à leur emploi référentiel et aux noms communs ? – les cas de la coordination nominales. SHS Web of Conferences 78 ► pp. 12008 ff.

Karczewski, Daniel

2022.  In Wissenschaften und ihr Dialog, ► pp. 231 ff.

Karlsson, Susanna

2020.  In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication, ► pp. 223 ff.

Kemmerer, David

2000. Grammatically relevant and grammatically irrelevant features of verb meaning can be independently impaired. Aphasiology 14:10 ► pp. 997 ff.

Kemmerer, David

2006.  In Action to Language via the Mirror Neuron System, ► pp. 347 ff.

KIM, HYUNWOO & YANGON RAH

2016. Effects of Verb Semantics and Proficiency in Second Language Use of Constructional Knowledge. The Modern Language Journal 100:3 ► pp. 716 ff.

King, John T.

2002. Marked transitive scenarios and archaic biactinal agreement morphology in Dhimal. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 34:1 ► pp. 39 ff.

Kintsch, Walter

2001. Predication. Cognitive Science 25:2 ► pp. 173 ff.

Kleiber, Gœrges

1999.  In Problèmes de sémantique, ► pp. 211 ff.

Kliffer, Michael D.

1999. The Western Romance drift away from external dative possessors. <i>WORD</i> 50:2 ► pp. 155 ff.

Kluender, Robert & Marta Kutas

1993. Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes 8:4 ► pp. 573 ff.

Koontz-Garboden, Andrew

2005.  In Yearbook of Morphology 2005 [Yearbook of Morphology, ], ► pp. 83 ff.

Korte, Barbara, Klaus Peter Müller & Josef Schmied

1997.  In Einführung in die Anglistik, ► pp. 244 ff.

Korte, Barbara, Klaus Peter Müller & Josef Schmied

2004.  In Einführung in die Anglistik, ► pp. 269 ff.

Kortlandt, Frederik

1992. On the meaning of the Japanese passive. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 24:1 ► pp. 97 ff.

Koselak, Arkadiusz

2003. La sémantique naturelle d’Anna Wierzbicka et les enjeux interculturels. Questions de communication :4 ► pp. 83 ff.

Kotorova, Elizaveta

2021. The interrelation of language, culture and mind in the works of Anna Wierzbicka. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski 12:1 ► pp. 417 ff.

Koutsoukos, Nikos, Kristel Van Goethem & Hendrik De Smet

2018. Asymmetries, mismatches and construction grammar. Constructions and Frames 10:2 ► pp. 123 ff.

Kudrnáčová, Naděžda

2019. Contrastive semantics of human locomotion verbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1 ► pp. 53 ff.

Kudrnáčová, Naděžda

2021.  In Corpus Approaches to Language, Thought and Communication [Benjamins Current Topics, 119], ► pp. 53 ff.

Kwak, Eun-Joo

2014. Cross-Linguistic Evidence for Semantic Countability. Journal of Universal Language 15:2 ► pp. 55 ff.

LACASSAIN-LAGOIN, Christelle

2018. On the margins of perception - TO-clauses: a standard construction of perception verbs?. E-rea :15.2

Lammert, Marie

2016. Lexical plurals through meronymy and hyperonymy. Lingvisticae Investigationes 39:2 ► pp. 335 ff.

Lauwers, Peter

2016. Les pluriels lexicaux dits « massifs » face au conditionneur universel. Lingvisticae Investigationes 39:2 ► pp. 272 ff.

Lauwers, Peter & Marie Lammert

2016. Introduction. Lingvisticae Investigationes 39:2 ► pp. 207 ff.

Ldrup, Helge

2008. Raising to object in Norwegian and the derived object constraint. Studia Linguistica 62:2 ► pp. 155 ff.

Leclercq, Benoît

2020. Semantics and pragmatics in Construction Grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34 ► pp. 225 ff.

Lemghari, El Mustapha, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost

2016. Quand le nom massif et / ou comptable change de référent : recatégorisation, décryptage métonymique et faits de polysémie lexicale. SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 12014 ff.

Lepic, Ryan, Carl Börstell, Gal Belsitzman & Wendy Sandler

2016. Taking meaning in hand. Sign Language & Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 37 ff.

Levisen, Carsten

2019.  In Languages – Cultures – Worldviews, ► pp. 319 ff.

Levisen, Carsten

2021. The syntax of something: Evaluative affordances ofnogetin Danish construction grammar. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 44:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara

2006.  In La Négation, ► pp. 379 ff.

LIAMKINA, OLGA & MARIANNA RYSHINA-PANKOVA

2012. Grammar Dilemma: Teaching Grammar as a Resource for Making Meaning. The Modern Language Journal 96:2 ► pp. 270 ff.

Liddicoat, Anthony J.

2004. Grammar as a Feature of Text Construction. Written Communication 21:4 ► pp. 316 ff.

Lieber, Rochelle

2001.  In Morphology and Lexical Semantics,

Liu, Haitao & Yu Fang

2018. Book review. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 54:1 ► pp. 175 ff.

Lyashevskaya, Olga

2015. Corpus-Based Profiles of Russian Nouns: From Grammatical Number to Lexical Semantics. SSRN Electronic Journal

Majid, Asifa

2012. Current Emotion Research in the Language Sciences. Emotion Review 4:4 ► pp. 432 ff.

Makaroğlu, Bahtiyar, Elif Arıca Akkök & Yeşim Aksan

2018. Türk İşaret Dilinde Eylemler: Bilişsel Dibilimsel Bir Yaklaşım. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi ► pp. 119 ff.

Maldonado, Ricardo

2002. Objective and subjective datives. Cognitive Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Martínez-Vázquez, Montserrat

2018. I’m loving it! A Corpus-Based Study of the Progress of love. Journal of English Linguistics 46:2 ► pp. 140 ff.

Matushansky, Ora

2015. The Other Francis Bacon: On Non-BARE Proper Names. Erkenntnis 80:S2 ► pp. 335 ff.

Matushansky, Ora

2021. Intersecting location and possession. Linguistic Variation 21:1 ► pp. 174 ff.

Mayer, Rolf

1992. To win and lose: Linguistic aspects of prospect theory. Language and Cognitive Processes 7:1 ► pp. 23 ff.

Maynard, Senko K.

1997. Synergistic strategies in grammar: A case of nominalization and commentary predicate in Japanese. <i>WORD</i> 48:1 ► pp. 15 ff.

McGregor, William B.

2003. A Fundamental misconception of modern linguistics. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 35:1 ► pp. 39 ff.

McGregor, William B.

2008. Complementation as interpersonal grammar. <i>WORD</i> 59:1-2 ► pp. 25 ff.

McIntosh, Janet

2021. ‘Because it's easier to kill that way’: Dehumanizing epithets, militarized subjectivity, and American necropolitics. Language in Society 50:4 ► pp. 583 ff.

McKoon, Gail & Roger Ratcliff

2003. Meaning through syntax: Language comprehension and the reduced relative clause construction.. Psychological Review 110:3 ► pp. 490 ff.

Mignot, Elise

2010. Exploitation stylistique du processus de composition nominale en anglais contemporain. Lexis :5

Mignot, Élise

2006. Les adjectifs : entre déterminant et nom. Études anglaises 59:4 ► pp. 453 ff.

Mitkovska, Liljana

2021. The network of reflexive dative constructions in South Slavic. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:1 ► pp. 59 ff.

Moravcsik, Edith A.

2017.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology, ► pp. 440 ff.

Mosel, Ulrike

2017. Teop – an Oceanic language with multifunctional verbs, nouns and adjectives. Studies in Language 41:2 ► pp. 255 ff.

Mostovaia, Anna D.

1995. The semantics of the noun‐focused metaphor in Russian. Australian Journal of Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 69 ff.

Mueller Gathercole, Virginia C., Enlli Mon Thomas & Dylan Evans

2000. What's in a noun? Welsh-, English-, and Spanish- speaking children see it differently. First Language 20:58 ► pp. 055 ff.

NEMOTO, NORIKO

1998. ON THE POLYSEMY OF DITRANSITIVE SAVE: THE ROLE OF FRAME SEMANTICS IN CONSTRUCTION GRAMMAR. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 15:0 ► pp. 219 ff.

Newman, John

2020.  In Meaning, Life and Culture: In conversation with Anna Wierzbicka, ► pp. 319 ff.

NEY, JAMES W. & BETHYL A. PEARSON

1990. Connectionism as a Model of Language Learning: Parallels in Foreign Language Teaching. The Modern Language Journal 74:4 ► pp. 474 ff.

Nickels, Lyndsey, Britta Biedermann, Nora Fieder & Niels O. Schiller

2015. The lexical-syntactic representation of number. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30:3 ► pp. 287 ff.

NOMURA, MASUHIRO

1993. THE SEMANTICS OF THE CONTENT CLAUSE CONSTRUCTION IN ENGLISH. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 10:0 ► pp. 184 ff.

Noël, Dirk

1997. The choice between infinitives and that-clauses after believe. English Language and Linguistics 1:2 ► pp. 271 ff.

OHORI, TOSHIO

1994. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information, by William Croft, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1991, xiii+331pp. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 11:0 ► pp. 318 ff.

OKUDA, MASANOBU

1998. THE MAKE-CAUSATIVE IN ENGLISH: ITS STRUCTURE AND MEANING. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 15:0 ► pp. 195 ff.

Ortiz Ciscomani, Rosa María

2020.  In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350], ► pp. 66 ff.

Paducheva, E.

2009. Event structure: Taxonomy, semantic roles, aspect, causation. Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics 43:3 ► pp. 196 ff.

Paillard, Denis & Владимир Александрович Плунгян

1993. Об Одном Типе Конструкций С Повтором Глагола в Русском Яэыке. Russian Linguistics 17:3 ► pp. 263 ff.

Palmer, F. R.

1990. The semantics of grammar. Journal of Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 223 ff.

Paszenda, Joanna

2017.  In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 241 ff.

Pavlovic, Vladan

2021.  In Corpus Approaches to Language, Thought and Communication [Benjamins Current Topics, 119], ► pp. 29 ff.

Pavlović, Vladan

2019. Massive corpora and models of cross‑cultural communication styles in Cognitive Linguitics. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1 ► pp. 29 ff.

Peeters, Bert

1990.  Carl Pollard and Ivan A. Sag. Information-Based Syntax and Semantics. Volume 1: Fundamentals. CSLI Lecture Notes 13. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information. 1987. Pp. x + 233. US$39.95 (relié), $17.95 (non-relié).. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 35:1 ► pp. 96 ff.

Peeters, Bert

1991.  Michael Herslund. Le datif en français. Bibliothèque de l’Information grammaticale 14. Paris: Editions Peeters. 1988. Pp. 364. FF 250,–.. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 36:1 ► pp. 94 ff.

Peeters, Bert

1991. More About Axiological Fields. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 36:2 ► pp. 113 ff.

Peeters, Bert

1992. Cervoni, Jean, La Préposition: Etude sémantique et pragmatique. (Champs linguistiques.) Paris/Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot, 1991, 309 pp.. Journal of French Language Studies 2:2 ► pp. 267 ff.

Peeters, Bert

1994. Syntax and Human Experience: la perspective de Nicolas Ruwet. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 39:3 ► pp. 225 ff.

Pennec, Blandine

2008. Phénomènes de discordance entre morphologie et syntaxe : de la zizanie dans le collectif !. Corela :6-2

Perini, Mário A.

2019.  In Thematic Relations, ► pp. 91 ff.

Perini, Mário A.

2019.  In Thematic Relations, ► pp. 149 ff.

Perini, Mário Alberto

2021.  In Function and Class in Linguistic Description, ► pp. 37 ff.

Pettersson-Traba, Daniela

2022.  In English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 359], ► pp. 120 ff.

Phindane, Pule Alexis

2015. Verbal Alternations in Sesotho: A Case of Lexical Semantics. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology 6:2 ► pp. 303 ff.

Pinson, Mathilde

2015. On the polysemy of help. Lexis :9

Pinto, Alexandra

2017.  In National Identity and Europe in Times of Crisis, ► pp. 187 ff.

PRIOR, ANAT, JUDITH F. KROLL & BRIAN MACWHINNEY

2013. Translation ambiguity but not word class predicts translation performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16:2 ► pp. 458 ff.

Prior, Anat, Brian MacWhinney & Judith F. Kroll

2007. Translation norms for English and Spanish: The role of lexical variables, word class, and L2 proficiency in negotiating translation ambiguity. Behavior Research Methods 39:4 ► pp. 1029 ff.

Rakhilina, Ekaterina & Tatiana Reznikova

2022.  In The Typology of Physical Qualities [Typological Studies in Language, 133], ► pp. 1 ff.

Raskin, Victor, Salvatore Attardo & Donalee H. Attardo

1994. Augmenting formal semantic representation for NLP: The story of SMEARR. Machine Translation 9:2 ► pp. 81 ff.

Riemer, Nick

2006. Reductive Paraphrase and Meaning: A Critique of Wierzbickian Semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 29:3 ► pp. 347 ff.

Rips, Lance J. & Susan J. Hespos

2019. Concepts of objects and substances in language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 26:4 ► pp. 1238 ff.

Rotge, Wilfrid

2009. Plurality in English and other languages: does it add up?. Anglophonia :13 (26) ► pp. 101 ff.

Rudanko, Juhani

2014.  In Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 63], ► pp. 223 ff.

Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida

1996.  In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Sadow, Lauren & Kerry Mullan

2020.  In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication, ► pp. 13 ff.

Sanromán Vilas, Begoña

2017. From the heavy to the light verb. Lingvisticae Investigationes 40:2 ► pp. 228 ff.

Sato, Yoshiaki & Shunsuke Nakamura

2018.  In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff.

Schooneveldt, John

2019. Ecology in Context: A New Conceptual Frame. Human Ecology Review 25:1 ► pp. 131 ff.

Shopen, Tim

1993. William Frawley, Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, NJ, Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992. Pp. xvii+533.. Journal of Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 206 ff.

Silva , Gustavo de Godoy e

2022. Língua de sinais, gestos e cores. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 22 ► pp. e022012 ff.

Smet, Hendrik De

2007. For … to-infinitives as verbal complements in Late Modern and Present-Day English: Between motivation and change. English Studies 88:1 ► pp. 67 ff.

Smith, Chris

2012. Double whammy! The dysphemistic euphemism implied in unVables such as u. Lexis :7

Snoj, Jerica

2015. Metaforična pomenotvornost z vidika sintagmatike. Jezikoslovni zapiski 17:2

Song, Jae Jung

1997. Review of Goddard & Wierzbicka (1994): Semantic and lexical universals. Lingvisticae Investigationes 21:1 ► pp. 249 ff.

Song, Sooho

2018.  In Second Language Acquisition as a Mode-Switching Process, ► pp. 37 ff.

Song, Sooho

2018.  In Second Language Acquisition as a Mode-Switching Process, ► pp. 53 ff.

Szcześniak, Konrad

2019. Meaning hides in the confusion of the construction. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1 ► pp. 58 ff.

Szymańska, Izabela

2011.  In New Perspectives in Language, Discourse and Translation Studies [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 215 ff.

Tanaka, Shigenori

2018.  In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff.

Taylor, John R.

1993. Possessives and the Learnability Problem. South African Journal of Linguistics 11:sup16 ► pp. 1 ff.

Thibeau, Tully

2005. Review of Rohdenburg & Mondorf (2003): Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English. Studies in Language 29:3 ► pp. 683 ff.

TOMOZAWA, HIROTAKA

2003. ASPECTS OF THE SEMANTICS OF THE ENGLISH PARTICIPIAL CONSTRUCTION. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 20:2 ► pp. 493 ff.

Tordesillas Colado, Marta

2021. Regards croisés sur la conception émotionnelle du langage. Les émotions linguistiques. Bulletin hispanique :123-2 ► pp. 77 ff.

Troiano, Enrica, Aswathy Velutharambath & Roman Klinger

2022. From theories on styles to their transfer in text: Bridging the gap with a hierarchical survey. Natural Language Engineering ► pp. 1 ff.

Tsang, Art

2017. Judgement of countability and plural marking in English by native and non-native English speakers. Language Awareness 26:4 ► pp. 343 ff.

VAN LINDEN, AN

2010. The rise of theto-infinitive: evidence from adjectival complementation. English Language and Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 19 ff.

Van linden, An & Jean-Christophe Verstraete

2011. Revisiting deontic modality and related categories: A conceptual map based on the study of English modal adjectives. Journal of Pragmatics 43:1 ► pp. 150 ff.

Van Valin Jr., Robert D.

1990. Review of Kuno (1987): Functional syntax: anaphora, discourse and empathy. Studies in Language 14:1 ► pp. 169 ff.

Vanparys, Johan, Carole Zimmer, Xinghua Li & Peter Kelly

1997. Some salient and persistent difficulties encountered by Chinese and Francophone students in the learning of English vocabulary. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 115-116 ► pp. 137 ff.

Vergaro, Carla

2018. “And the Rabbi Begins the Benediction … ”: Declarative Shell Nouns in English. English Studies 99:8 ► pp. 817 ff.

Vergaro, Carla & Hans-Jörg Schmid

2017. Do the meanings of abstract nouns correlate with the meanings of their complementation patterns?. Pragmatics & Cognition 24:1 ► pp. 91 ff.

VERMOTE, TIMOTHEUS

2014. Entre système et usage en discours: nouvelles perspectives sur la localisation de l'opposition massif/comptable. Le cas des noms de fruits et de légumes. Journal of French Language Studies 24:3 ► pp. 403 ff.

Vesterinen, Rainer

2013. Instructions or dominion?. Pragmatics & Cognition 21:2 ► pp. 359 ff.

Välimaa-Blum, Riitta

2009. Phonotactic constraints in cognitive phonology1. Corela :7-1

Välimaa-Blum, Riitta

2009. The phoneme in cognitive phonology: episodic memories of both meaningful and meaningless units?. CogniTextes 2:Volume 2

WADA, NAOAKI

2009. THE PRESENT PROGRESSIVE WITH FUTURE TIME REFERENCE VS. BE GOING TO: IS DOC BROWN GOING BACK TO THE FUTURE BECAUSE HE IS GOING TO RECONSTRUCT IT?. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 26:1 ► pp. 96 ff.

Watanabe, Akira

2010. Vague Quantity, Numerals, and Natural Numbers. Syntax 13:1 ► pp. 37 ff.

Wiedenhof, Jeroen

2015.  In A Grammar of Mandarin,

Wierzbicka, Anna

1990. Antitotalitarian language in Poland: Some mechanisms of linguistic self-defense. Language in Society 19:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Wierzbicka, Anna

1990. The semantics of emotions:Fearand its relatives in English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 359 ff.

Wierzbicka, Anna

1991. Japanese key words and core cultural values. Language in Society 20:3 ► pp. 333 ff.

Wierzbicka, Anna

1991. The semantics of grammar: a reply to Professor Palmer. Journal of Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 495 ff.

Wierzbicka, Anna

1992. Defining Emotion Concepts. Cognitive Science 16:4 ► pp. 539 ff.

Wierzbicka, Anna

1992. Talking about emotions: Semantics, culture, and cognition. Cognition and Emotion 6:3-4 ► pp. 285 ff.

Willems, Klaas

2016. The universality of categories and meaning: a Coserian perspective. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 48:1 ► pp. 110 ff.

Willim, Ewa

2020.  In Beyond Emotions in Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 263], ► pp. 245 ff.

Winters, Margaret E.

2013.  In Research on Old French: The State of the Art [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 88], ► pp. 351 ff.

Winters, Margaret E. & Geoffrey S. Nathan

2020.  In Cognitive Linguistics for Linguists [SpringerBriefs in Linguistics, ], ► pp. 27 ff.

Wisniewski, Edward J.

2002.  In Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology,

Wolff, Phillip, Ga-Hyun Jeon & Yu Li

2009. Causers in English, Korean, and Chinese and the individuation of events. Language and Cognition 1:2 ► pp. 167 ff.

WOLFF, PHILLIP & TATYANA VENTURA

2009. When Russians learn English: How the semantics of causation may change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12:2 ► pp. 153 ff.

Wong, Jock

2004. Reduplication of nominal modifiers in Singapore English: a semantic and cultural interpretation. World Englishes 23:3 ► pp. 339 ff.

Wonnacott, Elizabeth

2013.  In The Language Phenomenon [The Frontiers Collection, ], ► pp. 65 ff.

Ye, Zhengdao

2019. The Emergence of Expressible Agency and Irony in Today’s China: A Semantic Explanation of the New Bèi-construction. Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:1 ► pp. 57 ff.

Yliopisto, Helsingin

1990. ‘пРИжНАкИ’, ‘пРИЧИНы ’ И ‘ОБЩьсНЕНИь’, ИлИ РАжНыЕ пОДхОДы к ИстОлкОВАНИУ ьжыкОВ ых ФАктОВ. Russian Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 147 ff.

Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann

2019.  In Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax,

Zakrewska, Ewa D.

2015.  In Causation, Permission, and Transfer [Studies in Language Companion Series, 167], ► pp. 227 ff.

Zakrzewska, Ewa

2017.  In Argument Realisation in Complex Predicates and Complex Events [Studies in Language Companion Series, 180], ► pp. 213 ff.

Zuckerman, Charles H. P.

2021. Introduction to the Generic Special Issue. Language in Society 50:4 ► pp. 509 ff.

Zuckerman, Charles H. P.

2021. On the unity of types: Lao gambling, ethno-metapragmatics, and generic and specific modes of typification. Language in Society 50:4 ► pp. 557 ff.

Šipka, Danko

2019.  In Lexical Layers of Identity,

кронгауз, Максим Анисимович

1993. СЕМАНТИКА РУССКОГО ГЛАГОЛА И ЕГО СЛОВООБРАЗОВАТЕЛьН ЫЕ ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ. Russian Linguistics 17:1 ► pp. 15 ff.

Падучева, Е. В.

1994. Типы каузальных Отношений В Семантической Структуре Лексемы. Russian Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

ПАДУЧЕВА, ЕЛЕНА ВИКТОРОВНА

1992. О СЕМАНТИЧЕСКОМ ПОДХОДЕ К СИНТАКСИСУ И ГЕНИТИВНОМ СУБЪЕКТЕ ГЛАГОЛА БЬТЬ. Russian Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 53 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.