Cover not available
Part of
Imperatives and Directive Strategies
Edited by Daniël Van Olmen and Simone Heinold
[Studies in Language Companion Series 184] 2017
► pp. 79–110

Rhetorical imperatives

Reasons to reasoning

| University of Murcia
Rhetorical imperatives are formal imperatives that convey an assertion of the opposite polarity. As assertions, they can be judged to be true or false. As morphological imperatives, they reject embedding and have verb-subject word order. Rhetorical imperatives involve a widening of the domain operator, responsible both for the generic interpretation of the subject pronoun tú ‘you (singular)’ and for the licensing of negative polarity items. A speaker uses a rhetorical imperative to make the addressee aware of the impossibility of putting into action the content of p. This supports the theories that analyze imperatives as inherently conveying directive force. Finally, it is argued that rhetorical imperatives may result from the grammaticalization of a non-directive imperative-like conditional.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The syntax and the semantics of regular imperatives
    • 2.1Grammatical properties
    • 2.2Semantic properties
    • 2.3On the relationship between imperatives and modals
  • 3.Grammatical properties of RIs
    • 3.1The subject
    • 3.2The verb
    • 3.3Negative polarity items
    • 3.4RIs and regular imperatives
  • 4.Semantic properties of RIs
    • 4.1Assertoric potential and polarity
    • 4.2Some consequences of being assertions (and not commands)
    • 4.3The absence of directivity
    • 4.4RIs as reasons for reasoning
    • 4.5RIs as modalized assertions
  • 5.RIs as a widening of the domain operation
    • 5.1The widening of the domain operation
    • 5.2On the reference of the subject pronoun
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 11 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.184.03bra
References (42)
References
Abney, Steven Paul. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Andueza, Patricia. 2011. Rhetorical Exclamatives in Spanish. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Aranovich, Raúl. 2007. Negative polarity and scalar semantics in Spanish. Lingvisticae Investigationes 30(2): 181–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio. 1980. Retrospective imperatives. Linguistic Inquiry 11(2): 415–419.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 2009. Fundamentos de Sintaxis Formal. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere D. & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Condoravdi, Cleo & Lauer, Sven. 2012. Imperatives: Meaning and illocutionary force. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9, Christopher Piñón (ed.), 37–58. <[URL]> (25 June 2015).Google Scholar
CREA [Corpus de Referencia del Español Actual]. Real Academia Española. <[URL]>
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fortuin, Egbert. 2000. Polysemy or Monosemy. Interpretation of the Imperative and Dative-Infinitive Construction in Russian. Amsterdam: ILLC Dissertation Series.Google Scholar
Grano, Thomas. 2011. Mental action and event structure in the semantics of try . In Proceedings of the 21st Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, Neil Ashton, Anca Chereches & David Lutz (eds), 426–443. <[URL]> (28 September 2014).Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 1998. Rhetorical questions, relevance and scales. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 11: 139–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine. 2011. Modality. In Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), 1484–1515. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-Hye. 1998. The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives. Mood and Force in Universal Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
. 1999. The contribution of mood and force in the interpretation of imperatives. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, Pius N. Tamanji, Masako Hirotani & Nancy Hall (eds), 97–111. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa. 1990a. Personas generales y tiempo verbal. Verba, Anexo 32: 153–162.Google Scholar
. 1990b. En torno a los sujetos arbitrarios de segunda persona del singular. In Estudios Lingüísticos de España y de México, Beatriz Garza & Violeta Demonte (eds), 151–179. Mexico City: Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jary, Mark & Kissine, Mikhail. 2014. Imperatives. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kadmon, Nirit & Landman, Fred. 1993. Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(4): 353–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufmannn, Magdalena. 2012. Interpreting Imperatives. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitagawa, Chisato & Lehrer, Adrienne. 1990. Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics 14(5): 739–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. Modality. In Semantics. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 639–650. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Malamud, Sophia A. 2012. Impersonal indexicals: One, you, man and du . Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 15(1): 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Medeiros, David J. 2013. Formal Approaches to the Syntax and Semantics of Imperatives. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Nauze, Fabrice. 2008. Modality in Typological Perspective. Amsterdam: ILLC Dissertation SeriesGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert. 1979. Modality and the English Modals. New York NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Pérez-Saldanya, Manuel & Hualde, José I. 2003. On the origin and evolution of the catalan periphrastic preterit. In Verbalperiphrasen in den (ibero)romanischen Sprachen, Claus D. Pusch (ed.), 46–70. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2005. The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 14, Kazuha Watanabe & Robert B. Young (eds), 235–252. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
. 2009. Modality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rigau, Gemma. 1986. Some remarks on the nature of strong pronouns in null subject languages. In Generative Studies in Spanish Syntax, Ivonne Bordelois, Heles Contreras & Karen T. Zagona (eds), 143–163. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1988. Strong pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3): 503–511.Google Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa. 1994. On indirect questions, commands and Spanish quotative que . Linguistic Inquiry 25(3): 547–554.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B. 2001. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, Dobrushina, Nina & Goussev, Valentin. 2013. Imperative-hortative systems. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (4 March 2014).Google Scholar
van der Wurff, Wim. 2007. Imperative clauses in generative grammar: An introduction. In Imperative Clauses in Generative Grammar. Studies in Honour of Frits Beukema [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 103], Wim van der Wurff (ed.), 1–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vicente, Luis. 2010. Past counterfactuality in Spanish imperatives. Paper presented at the 20th Colloquium in Generative Grammar , Barcelona, March. <[URL]> (25 June 2015)
von Fintel, Kai. 1995. The formal semantics of grammaticalization. In Proceedings of the 25th Meeting of the North East Linguistics Association, Jill N. Beckman (ed.), 175–190. Amherst MA: Graduate Student Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Zagona, Karen. 2002. The Syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 1998. Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Bosque, Ignacio
2021. La gramática de construcciones. Una mirada externa. Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 10:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Holvoet, Axel
2018. Sources for historical imperatives. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 50:1 ► pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Holvoet, Axel
2023. Towards an enhanced semantic map for imperatives. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 76:4 ► pp. 635 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.