Cover not available
Part of
Language Contact and Change in Mesoamerica and Beyond
Edited by Karen Dakin, Claudia Parodi and Natalie Operstein
[Studies in Language Companion Series 185] 2017
► pp. 319–334

Chapter 15
Language contact across the Andes

The case of Mochica and Hibito-Cholón

| Leiden University
This paper proposes a case for language contact between two genetically unrelated and extinct Andean language groups: Mochica, which was spoken on the northern coast of Peru, and Hibito and Cholón, which were spoken in the Peruvian northern eastern slopes. The analysis offers evidence of both lexical items and morphological structures that support the hypothesis of contact between these languages. After examining possible contexts of interaction, this paper concludes that the correspondences may have been a consequence of language contact associated with intercultural exchange and trade. This study argues for the value of the possible external relations between Mochica and other languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Mochica language
  • 3.The Hibito-Cholón linguistic family
  • 4.Shared lexical and grammatical items
    • 4.1Shared lexical items
    • 4.2Shared and reanalyzed numeral classifiers
      • 4.2.1‘Stones’ and ‘eggs’ as counting devices: Shared numeral classifier between Hibito and Cholón
      • 4.2.2Counting “group of tens” with Mochica <pong> and “group of living beings” with Cholón <pon>
      • 4.2.3Counting “tens” with Cholón <lec> and “many tens” with Mochica <palæc>
    • 4.3Nominalizer <-Vc>: Shared morphological evidence between Mochica and Cholón
  • 5.Scenarios of probable contact between Mochica and Cholón
    • 5.1Pre-Hispanic and colonial contact beyond the eastern slopes
    • 5.2The Sicán culture
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.185.15elo
References (37)
References
Adelaar, Willem F. H. & Muysken Pieter C. [2004]2007. The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexander-Bakkerus, Astrid. 2002. Nominal morphophonological processes observed in Pedro de la Mata’s Arte de la Lengua Cholona (1748). In Current Studies on South American Languages, Mily Crevels, Simon van de Kerke, Sergio Meira & Hein van der Voort (eds), 103–110. Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies (CNWS).Google Scholar
. 2005. Eighteenth-Century Cholón. Leiden: LUCL.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
de Augusta, Félix José. 1916. Diccionario araucano-español, español-araucano. Santiago: Imprenta Universitaria.Google Scholar
Bastian, Adolf. 1878. Die Culturländer des Alten America, Vol. 1. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Bender, Andrea & Beller, Sieghard. 2006. Numeral classifiers and counting systems in Polynesian and Micronesian languages: Common roots and cultural adaptations. Oceanic Linguistics 45: 380–403. <[URL]> (13 January 2014).
. 2007. Numeral classifier in specific counting systems: Cultural context, linguistic principles, and cognitive implications. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (eds), 821–826. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brüning, Hans Heinrich. 2004[1905–1924]. Mochica Wörterbuch-Diccionario Mochica Mochica-Castellano/Castellano-Mochica, José Antonio Salas García (ed.). Lima: Universidad de San Martín de Porres, Escuela Profesional de Turismo y Hotelería.Google Scholar
de la Calancha, Antonio. 1638. Coronica Moralizadora del Orden de San Avgvstin en el Perv, con svcesos egenplares en esta monarqvia, Vol I. Barcelona: Lacavalleria.Google Scholar
de la Carrera Daza, Fernando. 1644. Arte de la lengva yvnga de los valles del Obispado de Truxillo del Peru, con vn Confessonario, y todas las Oraciones Christianas, traducidas en la lengua, y otras cosas. Lima: Joseph Contreras.Google Scholar
Church, Warren Brooks. 1996. Prehistoric Cultural Development and Interregional Interaction in the Tropical Montane Forests of Peru, Vol 1. PhD dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
De la Mata, Pedro. [1748]2007. Arte de la Lengua Cholona, Astrid Alexander-Bakkerus (transcr. & ed.). Frankfurt & Madrid: Vervuert & Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Eloranta, Rita. 2012. Un análisis historiográfico de la categoría de clasificador numeral en ocho gramáticas coloniales de tradición hispánica. MA thesis, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
. 2016a. Posesión nominal en la lengua mochica. Submitted to the Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Missionary Linguistics at the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru (PUCP), March 2014. Lima: Fondo Editorial PUCP.Google Scholar
. 2016b. Mochica lexical and grammatical nominalization. Submitted to Nominalization of the Languages in the Americas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. In preparation. Mochica numeral classifiers system.
Eloranta, Rita & Rojas-Berscia, Luis Miguel. Submitted. ‘Stones’ and ‘grains’ as counting devices: Grammaticalisation and lexicalisation in a possible North Peruvian Coastal-Upper Amazonian Sprachbund.
Gil, David. 2013. Numeral classifiers. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (3 February 2015).
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeberlin, Berlin, Moritz, Robert & Fontboté, Lluís. 2002. Paleozoic orogenic deposits in the eastern Central Andes and its foreland, South America. Ore Geology Reviews 22: 41–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heggarty, Paul. 2014. Prehistory through language and archaeology. In Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds), 598–626. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hovdhaugen, Even. 2000. A loanword from Mapudungun in Mochica? In Essays in Honour of Arne Skjølsvold, 75 Years, Paul Wallin & Helene Martinsson-Wallin (eds), 133–138. Oslo: Kon-Tiki Museet.Google Scholar
. 2004. Mochica. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Martínez Compañón, Baltasar Jaime. 1783a. Truxillo del Perú, Vol. I. <[URL]> (29 January 2015).
. 1783b. Truxillo del Perú, Vol. II. <[URL]> (29 January 2015).
Oré, Luis Jerónimo. 1607. Rituale, Sev Manvale Pervanvm. Naples: Iacobum Carlinum & Constantinum Vitalem.Google Scholar
Salas García, José Antonio. 2012. El sistema de clasificadores del cholón. Boletín de la Academia Peruana de la Lengua 54: 87–138.Google Scholar
Shimada, Izumi. 2009. Who were the Sicán? Their development, characteristics and legacies. English text of the introductory chapter (pp. 25–61) of the 2009 exhibit catalog entitled The Golden Capital of Sicán that was edited by Izumi Shimada, Ken-ichi Shinoda & Masahiro Ono, Tokyo Broadcasting System, Tokyo. Published in Japanese.Google Scholar
Shimada, Izumi, Shinoda, Ken-ichi, Bourget, Steve, Alva, Walter & Uceda, Santiago. 2005. MtDNA analysis of Mochica and Sicán populations of pre-Hispanic Peru. Biomolecular Archaeology: Genetic Approaches to the Past, David M. Reed (ed.), 61–92. Carbondale IL: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Shimada, Izumi, Goldstein, David J., Wagner, Ursel & Bezúr, Anikó. 2007. Pre-Hispanic Sicán furnaces and metalworking: Toward a holistic understanding. In Metalurgía en la América antigua: Teoría, arqueología, simbología y tecnología de los metales prehispánicos, Roberto Lleras Pérez (ed.), 337–361. Bogota: Fundación de Investigaciones Arqueológicas Nacionales, Banco de la República & Lima: Instituto Francés de Estudios Andinos. Became available in 2008.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sobreviela, Manuel, Álvarez de Villanueva, Francisco & Gómez, Vicente. [1787]1922. Diario y mapa del de la Visita que el Guardían del Colegio de Misiones de Ocopa Fr. Manuel Sobreviela ha hecho con otros diferentes religiosos de su orden a las conversiones situadas en las fronteras de las montañas de Huánuco y Pataz o Cajamarquilla. In Historia de las Misiones Franciscanas y Narración de los progresos de la Geografía en el Oriente del Perú, Bernandino Izaguirre (1922–1929), Vol. 6, 1781–1791. Lima: Talleres Tipográficos de la Penitenciaria.Google Scholar
Stark, Louisa. 1968. Mayan Affinities with Yunga of Peru. PhD dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
. 1972. Maya-Yunga-Chipayan: A new linguistic alignment. International Journal of American Linguistics 38: 119–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tessmann, Günter. 1930. Die Indianer Norost-Perus, Grundlegende Forschungen für eine systematische Kulturkunde. Hamburg: Friederichsen, De Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language Contact: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torero, Alfredo. 1986. Deslindes lingüísticos en la costa norte peruana. Revista Andina 4: 523–548.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Bertus van Rooy & Haidee Kotze
2024. Constraints on Language Variation and Change in Complex Multilingual Contact Settings [Contact Language Library, 60], DOI logo
Urban, Matthias
2021. Language classification, language contact and Andean prehistory: The North. Language and Linguistics Compass 15:5 DOI logo
Eloranta, Rita & Angela Bartens
2020. Chapter 11. New Mochica and the challenge of reviving an extinct language. In Variation and Evolution [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 29], ► pp. 254 ff. DOI logo
Rojas Berscia, Luis Miguel & Rita Eloranta
2019. The Marañón-Huallaga exchange route. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 19 ► pp. e019011 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Pre-Historical Language Contact in Peruvian Amazonia [Contact Language Library, 58], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.