Chapter published in:
Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New perspectives
Edited by Chiara Fedriani and Andrea Sansó
[Studies in Language Companion Series 186] 2017
► pp. 3769
References

References

Aijmer, Karin
1996 I think – an English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter
2005Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25: 7–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Gregory 1972[1956]A theory of play and fantasy. In Steps to an Ecology of Mind, 177–193. New York NY: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Becker, Alton L.
1988Language in particular: A lecture. In Linguistics in Context: Connecting Observation and Understanding (Lectures from the 1985 LSA/TESOL and NEH Institutes), Deborah Tannen (ed.), 17–35. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Blau, Yehoshua
1966yesodot hataxbir (Foundations of syntax). Jerusalem: hamaxon ha'ivri lehaskala bixtav.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001From matrix clause to pragmatic marker: The history of look-forms. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2: 177–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2003Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1994Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
De Mulder, Walter & Lamiroy, Béatrice
2012Gradualness of grammaticalization in Romance. The position of French, Spanish and Italian. In Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 130], Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 119–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
Forthcoming. Representing discourse. University of California at Santa Barbara, Fall 2012 version. http://​www​.linguistics​.ucsb​.edu​/projects​/transcription​/representing
Du Bois, John W., Cumming, Susanna, Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan & Paolino, Danae
1992Discourse Transcription [Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 4]. Santa Barbara CA: Department of Linguistics, University of California.Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert
2003Searching for Structure: The Problem of Complementation in Colloquial Indonesian Conversation [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
2006Towards an understanding of the spectrum of approaches to discourse particles: In Approaches to Discourse Particles [Studies in Pragmatics 1], Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 1–20. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara, Maschler, Yael, & Uhmann, Susanne
2010A cross-linguistic study of self-repair: Evidence from English, German, and Hebrew. Journal of Pragmatics 42(10): 2487–2505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara
2014The development of discourse and pragmatic markers. In Ghezzi & Molinelli (eds), 10–26.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara & Molinelli, Piera
(eds) 2014Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne
2006 “Was ihn trieb, war vor allem Wanderlust” (Hesse: Narziss und God- mund): Pseudocleft-Konstruktionen im Deutschen. In Konstruktionen in der Interaktion, Susanne Günthner & Wolfgang Imo (eds), 59–90. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Günthner, Susanne 2011Between emergence and sedimentation: Projecting constructions in German interactions. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, Peter Auer & Stephan Pfänder (eds), 156–185. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2004On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Up and Down the Cline – The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 59], Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde, & Harry Perridon (eds), 17–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1987Emergent grammar. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 13, Jon Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis, & Hana Filip (eds), 139–157. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
1991On some principles of grammaticalization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1, [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Grammatical constructions and their discourse origins: prototype or family resemblance? In Applied Cognitive Linguistics, I: Theory and Language Acquisition, 109–129. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004The openness of grammatical constructions. 40th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, April 15th, 2004. Ms.Google Scholar
2011Emergent grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, Peter Auer & Stephan Pfänder (eds), 22–44. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
2008Projectability and clause combining in interaction. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed.), 99–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Imo, Wolfgang
2011Clines of subordination – constructions with the German ‘complement-taking predicate’ glauben . In Subordination in Conversation: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 24], Ritva Laury & Ryoko Suzuki (eds), 165–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Ziv, Yael
(eds) 1998Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise
2003Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I think [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 115]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007The role of I guess in conversational stancetaking. In Englebretson (ed.), 183–219.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
2006From discourse pattern to epistemic marker: Estonian (ei) tea ‘don't know’. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 29: 173–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The terms of not knowing. In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, & Jakob Steensig (eds), 184–206. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krupik, Shani
2007Samaney siax batikshoret hakwazi-sinxronit metuvexet-hamaxshev (siax hachet) (Discourse Markers in Israeli Hebrew Quasi-Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication (Chat Discourse)). MA thesis, University of Haifa.Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva 2006On subordination, Finnish – style: Questioning the category of finite clausal complements in spoken Finnish. SKY journal of Linguistics Supplement 19: 310–321.Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva & Okamoto, Shigeko
2011 Teyuka and I mean as pragmatic parentheticals in Japanese and English. Ritva Laury & Ryoko Suzuki (eds.), Subordination in Conversation: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. & Kitzinger, Celia E.
2015 Or-prefacing in the organization of self-initiated repair. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48(1): 58–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Jan, Maschler, Yael & Pekarek Doehler Simona
(eds) 2016Grammar and Negative Epistemics in Talk-in-Interaction: Cross-Linguistic Studies. Special issue of Journal of Pragmatics 106.Google Scholar
Lindström, Jan & Wide, Camilla
2005Tracing the origins of a set of discourse particles: Swedish particles of the type you know . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 6: 211–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael
1988The Games Bilinguals Play: A Discourse Analysis of Hebrew-English Bilingual Conversation. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
1991The language games bilinguals play: Language alternation at language game boundaries. Language and Communication 11(4): 263–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Metalanguaging and discourse markers in bilingual conversation. Language in Society 23: 325–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997aDiscourse markers at frame shifts in Israeli Hebrew talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics 7(2). 183–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997bEmergent bilingual grammar: The case of contrast. Journal of Pragmatics 28(3): 279–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998 Rotse lishmoa keta? ‘wanna hear something weird/funny [lit. ‘a segment’]?’: The discourse markers segmenting Israeli Hebrew talk-in-interaction. In Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds.), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000What can bilingual conversation tell us about discourse markers? Introduction to the special issue on Discourse Markers in Bilingual Conversation. International Journal of Bilingualism 4: 437–445.Google Scholar
2009Metalanguage in Interaction: Hebrew Discourse Markers [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 181]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Emergent projecting constructions: The case of Hebrew yada (‘know’). Studies in Language 36(4): 785–847. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael & Estlein, Roi
2008Stance-taking in Israeli Hebrew casual conversation via be'emet (‘really, actually, indeed’, lit. ‘in truth’). Discourse Studies 10(3): 283–316 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael & Fishman, Stav
2015From multi-clausality to discourse markerhood: The Hebrew ma she- (‘what that’) construction in so-called ‘pseudo-clefts’. Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) conference, Antwerp, 27 July.
Maschler, Yael & Miller Shapiro, Carmit
2016The role of prosody in the grammaticization of Hebrew naxon (‘right/true’): Synchronic and diachronic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 92: 42–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael & Schiffrin, Deborah
2015Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd edn, Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds), 189–221. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Miller Shapiro, Carmit 2012 hamaba naxon basiax ha'ivri hayom-yomi hadavur . (The utterance naxon (lit., ‘right’) in casual Hebrew conversation). balshanut 'ivrit (Hebrew Linguistics) 66: 107–130.Google Scholar
2014 “tir'i, hara'ayon po hu shone”: hapo'al ra'a vesamaney hasiax hamexilim 'oto basiax ha'ivri hayomyomi hadavur (“look, the idea here is different”: The verb see and the discourse markers containing it in casual spoken Hebrew discourse). Leshonenu 76(1–2): 165–200.Google Scholar
Pagliuca, William
(ed.) 1994Perspectives on Grammaticalization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona
2011Clause-combining and the sequencing of actions: Projector constructions in French talk-in-interaction. In Ritva Laury & Ryoko Suzuki (eds.), Subordination in Conversation: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polak-Yitzhaki, Hilla
2004tafkideyhem hashonim shel kinuyey haguf hanos'iyim basiax ha'ivri hadavur (Subject Pronouns: Attached, Overt and Proclitic in Israeli Hebrew Spoken Discourse). MA thesis, University of Haifa.Google Scholar
Polak-Yitzhaki, Hilla & Maschler, Yael
Disclaiming understanding? Hebrew ′ani lo mevin/a (‘I don’t understand masc/fem’) in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 106: 163–183. Crossref
Ravid, Dorit
1995Language Change in Child and Adult Hebrew: A Psycholinguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rosén, Haiim Baruch
1992 zutot mehitgabshuta shel ha'ivrit hayisre'elit (“ Obiterdicta” concerning the crystallization of Israeli Hebrew’). Haxug hayisre'eli shel xavrey haxevra ha'eropit levalshanut, divrey hamifgash hashmini ( Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae Sodalicium Israelense Studia V ), 33–39.Google Scholar
Reshef, Yael
2013Revival of Hebrew: Grammatical structure and lexicon. In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, Vol. 3, Geoffrey Khan et al. (eds), 397–405. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1969Guess who? In Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Robert I. Binnick, Alice Davidson, Georgia M. Green & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 252–286. Chicago IL: The Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1979Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In Everyday language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, George Psathas (ed.), 23–78. New York NY: Irvington.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel, Jefferson, Gail & Sacks, Harvey
1977The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53: 361–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scheibmann, Joanne
2000 I dunno: A usage-based account of the phonological reduction of don't in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 105–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds), 54–75. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006Discourse marker research and theory: Revisiting and . In Approaches to Discourse Particles [Studies in Pragmatics 1], Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 315–338. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence
1999Discourse markers: Tutorial overview. Lingua 107: 227–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 2002“Object complements” and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26: 125–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony
1991A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. II [Typoloical Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1995The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Manchester, August 1995 (version of 11/97). http://​www​.stanford​.edu​/~traugott​/traugott​.html
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B.
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Weatherall, Ann
2011 I don’t know as a prepositioned epistemic hedge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 44(4): 317–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Laury, Ritva & Marja-Liisa Helasvuo
2020.  In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32],  pp. 55 ff. Crossref logo
Maschler, Yael
2018. The on-line emergence of Hebrew insubordinate she- (‘that/which/who’) clauses. Studies in Language 42:3  pp. 669 ff. Crossref logo
Maschler, Yael
2020.  In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32],  pp. 87 ff. Crossref logo
Pekarek Doehler, Simona
2019. At the Interface of Grammar and the Body: Chais pas (“dunno”) as a Resource for Dealing with Lack of Recipient Response. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:4  pp. 365 ff. Crossref logo
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Yael Maschler, Leelo Keevallik & Jan Lindström
2020.  In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Hilla Polak-Yitzhaki, Xiaoting Li, Ioana Maria Stoenica, Martin Havlík & Leelo Keevallik
2021. Multimodal Assemblies for Prefacing a Dispreferred Response: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Shor, Leon
2020.  In Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew [Studies in Language Companion Series, 210],  pp. 583 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Wei & Hongyin Tao
2020.  In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32],  pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.