References

References

Alba-Juez, Laura
2009‘Little words’ in small talk: Some considerations on the use of the pragmatic markers Man in English and Macho/Tío in Peninsular Spanish. In Little Words: Their History, Phonology, Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics, and Acquisition [Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics Series], Ronald P. Leow, Héctor Campos & Donna Lardiere (eds), 171–181. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, Gisle
Androutsopoulos, Jannis
2001Ultra korregd Alder! Zur medialen Stilisierung und Aneignung von ‘Türkendeutsch’. Deutsche Sprache 29: 321–339.Google Scholar
2007Ethnolekte in der Mediengesellschaft. Stilisierung und Sprachideologie in Performance, Fiktion und Metasprachdiskurs. In Standard, Variation und Sprachwandel in germanischen Sprachen / Standard, Variation and Language Change in Germanic Languages, Christian Fandrych & Reiner Salverda (eds), 113–155. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter
2003“Türkenslang” – ein jugendsprachlicher Ethnolekt des Deutschen und seine Transformationen. In Spracherwerb und Lebensalter, Annelies Häcki-Buhofer (ed.), 255–264. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Bañón Hernández, Antonio Miguel
1993El vocativo: Propuestas para su análisis linguístico. Barcelona: Octaedro.Google Scholar
Besnier, Niko
1990Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 419–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyero Rodríguez, María José
2005Aportación al estudio de los marcadores conversacionales que intervienen en el desarrollo del diálogo. PhD dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid [URL]> (7 October 2014).
Braun, Friederike
1988Terms of Address. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1995Pragmatic markers in a diachronic perspective. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society February 17–20, 1995: General Session and Parasession on Historical Issues in Sociolinguistics/Social Issues in Historical Linguistics, Jocelyn Ahlers, Leela Bilmes, Joshua S. Guenter, Barbara A. Kaiser & Ju Namkung (eds), 377–388. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary
2009From stance to Style. Gender, interaction, and indexicality in Mexican immigrant youth slang. In Stance. Sociolinguistic Perspectives, Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), 146–170. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bücker, Tanja
2007Ethnolektale Varietäten des Deutschen im Sprachgebrauch Jugendlicher. SASI Heft 9. [URL]> (5 February 2016).
Bühler, Karl
1934Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar
Conte, Maria-Elisabeth
1972Vocativo ed imperativo secondo il modello performativo. In Scritti e ricerche di grammatica italiana, Centro per lo studio dell’insegnamento dell’italiano all’estero (ed.), 159–179. Triest: Lint.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25(3): 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf
2007Playing with the voice of the other: Stylized Kanaksprak in conversations among German adolescents. In Style and Social Identities – Alternative Approaches to Linguistic Heterogeneity, Peter Auer (ed.), 325–360. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dishman, Amalia C.
1982Sobre el origen y uso del che argentino. Hispania 65(1): 93–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donati, Margherita
2009La categoria del vocativo nelle lingue classiche: Aspetti teorici, dia – cronici e tipologici. PhD dissertation, Università Roma Tre.Google Scholar
2013The vocative case between system and asymmetry. In Vocative! Addressing between System and Performance, Barbara Sonnenhauser & Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna (eds), 269–282. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
2007The stance triangle. In Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164], Robert Englebretson (ed.), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
2003Language and adolescent peer groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22(1): 112–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Formentelli, Maicol
2007The vocative mate in contemporary English: A corpus-based study. In Language Resources and Linguistic Theory: Typology, Second Language Acquisition, English Linguistics [Materiali Linguistici 59], Andrea Sansò (ed.), 180–199. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1990An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 383–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6(2): 167–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31(7): 931–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von der Gabelentz, Georg
[1891]1901Die Sprachwissenschaft. Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse, 2nd edn. Leipzig: Weigel.Google Scholar
Harweg, Roland
1967Skizze einer neuen Theorie des Vokativs. Linguistics 33: 37–48.Google Scholar
Haverkate, Henk
1978The vocative phrase in modern Spanish. A contribution to the study of illocutionary functions. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1974–1976, Wim Zonneveld (ed.), 46–62. Lisse: Peter de Ridder.Google Scholar
Helincks, Kris
2013 ¿Oye huevón, cachaste que huevón más huevón es ese huevón, huevón? The particular meanings and uses of the nominal term of address huevón in Chile. Paper presented at Address(ing) (Pro)Nouns. Sociolinguistics and Grammar of Terms of Address, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin 30 May1 June 2013 <[URL]
Heyd, Theresa
2014 Dude, Alter! A tale of two vocatives. Pragmatics and Society 5(2): 271–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Richard A.
1994You’ve come a long way, dude: A history. American Speech 69(3): 321–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1991On some principles of grammaticalization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
(eds) 1993Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra
2009Introduction. The sociolinguistics of stance. In Stance. Sociolinguistic Perspectives, Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), 3–28. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, Annette Myre
2008 Tío y tía como marcadores en el lenguaje juvenil de Madrid. In Actas del XXXVII Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística (SEL), Inés Olza Moreno, Manuel Casado Velarde & Ramón González Ruiz (eds), 387–396. Pamplona: Departamento de Lingüística hispánica y Lenguas modernas. [URL]
Keller, Rudi
1994Sprachwandel. Von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred
1997Varieties of rudeness: Types and functions of impolite utterances. Functions of Language 4(2): 251–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, Scott
2004Dude. American Speech 79(3): 281–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleinknecht, Friederike
2013Mexican güey – From vocative to discourse marker: A case of grammaticalization? In Vocative! Addressing between System and Performance, Barbara Sonnenhauser & Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna (eds), 235–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Küpper, Heinz
1982Illustriertes Lexikon der deutschen Umgangssprache, Vol. I: A-Blatt. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1999The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In Out of Corpora. Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, Hilde Hasselgård & Signe Oksefjell (eds), 107–118. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael J. & O’Keeffe, Anne
2003‘What’s in a name?’: Vocatives in casual conversations and radio phone-in calls. In Corpus Analysis. Language Structure and Language Use, Pepi Leistyna & Charles F. Meyer (eds), 153–185. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Mugford, Gerrard
2013Foreign-language users confronting anti-normative politeness in a Mexican university. Intercultural Pragmatics 10(1): 101–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nava Sanchezllanes, Nelisahuel
2006El proceso de gramaticalización de la palabra güey en el habla de la ciudad de México. BA thesis, TESIUNAM, UNAM.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor & Bambi Schieffelin
1989Language has a heart. Text 9(1): 7–25. [URL]
Ochs, Elinor
1996Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In Rethinking linguistic relativity, John J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds), 407–438. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Palacios, Niktelol
2002aAlgunos marcadores discursivos característicos del habla de los adolescentes mexicanos. Iztapalapa 18(53): 225–247.Google Scholar
2002bLa interdicción lingüística en el habla de los adolescentes mexicanos. BA thesis, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.Google Scholar
Parrott, Lillian A.
2010Vocatives and other direct address forms: A contrastive study. In Russian in Contrast [Oslo Studies in Language 2:1], Atle Grønn & Irena Marijanovic (eds), 211–229. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Queretanita
2009¿Ser o hacerse Güey? [URL]> (5 February 2016).
Rendle-Short, Johanna
2010‘Mate’ as a term of address in ordinary interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 42(5): 1201–1218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santamaría, Francisco J.
1978[1959]Diccionario de mejicanismos, 3rd edn. México: Ed. Porrua.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret
1994Emphatic speech style – With special focus on the prosodic signalling of heightened emotive involvement in conversation. Journal of pragmatics 22(3): 375–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shiina, Michi
2007aPositioning and functioning of vocatives: Casework in historical pragmatics (1). Bulletin of the Faculty of Letters, Hosei University 55: 17–32.Google Scholar
2007bPositioning and functioning of vocatives: Casework in historical pragmatics (2). Bulletin of the Faculty of Letters, Hosei University 56: 29–48.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Meaning in Anthropology, Keith H. Basso & Henry A. Selby (eds), 11–55. Albuquerque NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Souza, Miguel
2013Die Semiotik soziolinguistischer Marker am Beispiel der Diskurspartikel alter. Sprachliche Variation in einer Gesamtschule. In Was machen Marker? Logik, Materialität und Politik von Differenzierungsprozessen, Eva Bonn, Christian Knöppler & Miguel Souza (eds), 47–84. Bielefeld: Transcript. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In process. Sprachliche Variation in einer Gesamtschule (working title). PhD dissertation, Universität Mainz.
Swan, Michael
2005Practical English use. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Klaus
2003Constitución de la identidad y anticortesía verbal entre jóvenes masculinos hablantes de español. In La perspectiva no etnocentrista de la cortesía: Identiad sociocultural de las comunidades hispanohablantes. Actas del Primer Coloquio del Programa EDICE [Estudios del Discurso de Cortesía en Español], Diana Bravo (ed.), 47–59. Stockholm: CD-ROM.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M.
1974Hey whatsyourname! Chicago Linguistic Society 10: 787–801.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

De Latte, Fien
2024. Los vocativos contraculturales. Spanish in Context DOI logo
Heine, Bernd
2023. The Grammar of Interactives, DOI logo
Iglesias Recuero, Silvia
2023. Reseña de La configuración histórica del discurso: nuevas perspectivas en los procesos de gramaticalización, lexicalización y pragmaticalización / F. Javier Herrero Ruiz de Loizaga, M. Elena Azofra Sierra y Rosario González Pérez (eds.). Madrid / Frankfurt am Main: Iberoamericana / Vervuert, 2022.. Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española :18  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Jain, Kate Hazel
2022. You Hoboken! Semantics of an expressive label maker. Linguistics and Philosophy 45:2  pp. 365 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.