Cover not available
Part of
Space in Diachrony
Edited by Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina and Chiara Zanchi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 188] 2017
► pp. 147–178

New evidence for the Source–Goal asymmetry

Ancient Greek preverbs

| | | University of Pavia | University of Bergamo

This paper provides new evidence for the Source–Goal asymmetry by analyzing the synchronic behavior and the diachronic developments of Ancient Greek preverbs. This investigation is based on a diachronic corpus, including Homer as well as later prose, obtained by selecting a number of verbs representing different verb classes. Ancient Greek preverbs show both synchronic and diachronic asymmetries. The Goal is expressed by a larger number of preverbs than the Source, and is often associated with Location. Source-preverbs are more advanced in grammaticalization than Goal-preverbs: they are more obligatory, more easily repeated, and show a stronger tendency to develop actional meanings. Moreover, compounds with Source-preverbs often take a Goal-participant, whereas the opposite is not attested. These asymmetries are due to the syncretism undergone by Ancient Greek cases, which turned the genitive into a highly polysemous case.

Keywords: Ancient Greek, preverbs, Source–Goal asymmetry, grammaticalization, case syncretism
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
    • 2.1Spatial relations in Cognitive Grammar
    • 2.2The typology of motion verbs
    • 2.3Grammaticalization theory
  • 3.Encoding spatial relations in Ancient Greek
  • 4.The synchronic Source–Goal asymmetries
  • 5.Source–Goal asymmetry in the grammaticalization of preverbs
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.188.06zan
References
Beavers, John, Levin, Beth & Tham, Siao Wei
2010 The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46: 331–377.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beekes, Robert S. P
2010 Etymological Dictionary of Greek. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Boley, Jacqueline
2004 Tmesis and Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling
1949 A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre
1942 Le rôle et la valeur de en- dans la composition. Revue de Philologie 68, 115–125.Google Scholar
1953 Grammaire homérique, Tome 2: Syntaxe. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
1999[1968] Dictionnaire étymologicque de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Conti, Luz & Luraghi, Silvia
2014 The AG partitive genitive in typological perspective. In Partitive Cases and Related Categories, Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds), 443–476. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Croft, William, Barðdal, Jóhanna, Hollmann, Willem, Sotirova, Violeta & Taoka, Chiaki
2010 Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Contrastive Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 10], Hans C. Boas (ed), 201–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuzzolin, Pierluigi, Putzu, Ignazio & Ramat, Paolo
2006 The Indo-European adverb in diachronic and typological perspective. Indogermanische Forschungen 111: 1–38.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold
1879 Die Grundlagen der griechischen Syntax. Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Dickey, Stephen M.
2012 Orphan prefixes and the grammaticalization of aspect in South Slavic. Jezikoslovlje 13(1): 71–105.Google Scholar
Dunkel, George
2014a Lexicon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominal-stämme, Band: Einleitung, Terminologie, Lautgesetze, Adverbialendungen, Nominalsuffixe, Anhäge und Indices. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
2014b Lexicon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominal-stämme, Band II: Lexicon. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Filipović, Luna
2007 Talking about Motion: A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Lexicalization Patterns [Studies in Language Companion Series 91]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Norman H., Sinha, Chris & Stedmon, Jacqui
1981 The allative bias in 3-year-olds is almost proof against task naturalness. Journal of Child Language 8(2): 283–296.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewson, John & Bubenik, Vit
2006 From Case to Adposition: The Development of Configurational Syntax in Indo-European Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 280]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey
1981 Space and Time in Homer. Prepositional and Adverbial Particles in the Greek Epic. New York NY: Arno.Google Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshiniko
1987 ‘Source’ vs. ‘goal’: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In Conceps of Case, René Dirven & Günter Radden (eds), 122–146. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Imbert, Caroline
2010 Multiple preverbation in Homeric Greek: A typological insight. CogniTextes [En ligne], Vol. 4. 〈[URL]〉Google Scholar
Kabata, Kaori
2013 Goal-source asymmetry and crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns: A cognitive-typological approach. Language Sciences 36: 78–89.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1964 Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Lakusta, Laura & Landau, Barbara
2005 Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition 96(1): 1–33.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1986 An introduction to cognitive grammar. Cognitive Science 10: 1–40.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2004 Theory and method in grammaticalization. In Grammatikalisierung, Gabriele Diewald (ed.). Special issue of Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 32: 152–187.Google Scholar
2015 Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 3rd Edn [Classics in Linguistics]. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lestrade, Sanders
2010 The Space of Case. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Létoublon, Françoise
1985 Il allait, pareil à la nuit. Les verbes de mouvement en grec: Supplétisme et aspect verbal. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2003 On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases: The Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 The internal structure of adpositional phrases and the notion of government. In Form and Function in Language Research: Papers in Honor of Christian Lehmann, Johannes Helmbrecht, Yoko Nishina, Zong-Min Shin, Stavros Skopeteas & Elisabeth Verhoeven (eds), 231–246. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2014 Plotting diachronic semantic maps. In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language 106], Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds), 99–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. & Spencer, Andrew
2009 The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Neri, Sergio
2013 Zum urindogermanischen Wort für ‘Hand’. In Multi Nominis Grammaticus. Studies in Classical and Indo-European Linguistics in honor of Alan J. Nussbaum on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday, Adam I. Cooper, Jeremy Rau & Michael Weiss (eds), 185–205. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana
2009 Subcategorization pattern and lexical meaning of motion verbs: A study of the source/goal ambiguity. Linguistics 47: 1113–1141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Lexical splits in the encoding of motion events from Archaic to Classical Greek. In Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events [Human Cognitive Processing 41], Juliana Goschler & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds), 185–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana & Maslov, Boris
2013 Redefining Constructio Praegnans: On the variation between allative and locative expressions in Ancient Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 13: 105–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina
2010 The syntactic structure of locations, goals, and sources. Linguistics 48(5): 1043–1081. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regier, Terry & Zheng, Mingyu
2007 Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science 31: 705–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricca, Davide
1993 I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: Una ricerca interlinguistica. Firenze: La Nova Italia.Google Scholar
Skopeteas, Stavros
2002 Lokale Konstruktionen im Griechischen: Sprachwandel in funktionaler Sicht. PhD dissertation, University of Erfurt.
Slobin, Dan I.
1996 From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds), 195–217. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Rohde, Ada
2004 The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Studies in Linguistic Motivation, Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds), 249–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Svorou, Soteria
1994 The Grammar of Space [Typological Studies in Language 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1983 How language structures space. In Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application, Herbert L. Pick & Linda P. Acredolo (eds), 225–82. New York NY: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1988 The relation of grammar to cognition. In Topics in Cognitive Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 50], Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), 165–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Trousdale, Graeme
(eds) 2010 Gradience, Gradualness, and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, Frierich & Schmidt, Hans-Jörg
1996 An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Verkerk, Annamarie
2014 The Evolutionary Dynamics of Motion Event Encoding [Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Series]. Nijmegen: MPI.Google Scholar
Verspoor, Marjolijn, René Dirven & Radden, Günter
1999 Putting concepts together: Syntax. In Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 1], René Dirven & Marjolijn Verspoor (eds), 87–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viti, Carlotta
2008a Coding spatial relations in Homeric Greek: Preverbs vs. prepositions. Historische Sprachforschung 121: 114–161.Google Scholar
2008b From space words to transitive markers: The case of Ancient Greek en “in”. Transactions of the Philological Society 106: 375–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert
1964 Preliminaries to the reconstruction of Indo-European sentence structure. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists , 1035–1045.
Zanchi, Chiara
2014 Multiple Preverbation in Homeric Greek. MA thesis, University of Pavia.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Joost
2010 A hierarchy of locations: Evidence from the encoding of direction in adpositions and cases. Linguistics 48(5): 983–1009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

De Pasquale, Noemi
2021. ‘Invisible’ spatial meaning: a text-based study of covert Path encoding in Ancient Greek. Folia Linguistica 55:2 ► pp. 485 ff. DOI logo
De Pasquale, Noemi
2021. ‘Invisible’ spatial meaning: a text-based study of covert Path encoding in Ancient Greek. Folia Linguistica 55:2 ► pp. 485 ff. DOI logo
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis
2018. A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry. Constructions and Frames 10:1 ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Kopecka, Anetta & Marine Vuillermet
2021. Source-Goal (a)symmetries across languages. Studies in Language 45:1 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Tan, Tamisha L.
2024. The morphosyntax of Gothic preverb compounds: incorporation and applicativisation. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 27:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.