Part of
Space in Diachrony
Edited by Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina and Chiara Zanchi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 188] 2017
► pp. 147178
Beavers, John, Levin, Beth & Tham, Siao Wei
2010The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46: 331–377.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beekes, Robert S. P
2010Etymological Dictionary of Greek. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Boley, Jacqueline
2004Tmesis and Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling
1949A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre
1942Le rôle et la valeur de en- dans la composition. Revue de Philologie 68, 115–125.Google Scholar
1953Grammaire homérique, Tome 2: Syntaxe. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
1999[1968]Dictionnaire étymologicque de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Conti, Luz & Luraghi, Silvia
2014The AG partitive genitive in typological perspective. In Partitive Cases and Related Categories, Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds), 443–476. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Croft, William, Barðdal, Jóhanna, Hollmann, Willem, Sotirova, Violeta & Taoka, Chiaki
2010Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Contrastive Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 10], Hans C. Boas (ed), 201–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuzzolin, Pierluigi, Putzu, Ignazio & Ramat, Paolo
2006The Indo-European adverb in diachronic and typological perspective. Indogermanische Forschungen 111: 1–38.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold
1879Die Grundlagen der griechischen Syntax. Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Dickey, Stephen M.
2012Orphan prefixes and the grammaticalization of aspect in South Slavic. Jezikoslovlje 13(1): 71–105.Google Scholar
Dunkel, George
2014aLexicon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominal-stämme, Band: Einleitung, Terminologie, Lautgesetze, Adverbialendungen, Nominalsuffixe, Anhäge und Indices. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
2014bLexicon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominal-stämme, Band II: Lexicon. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Filipović, Luna
2007Talking about Motion: A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Lexicalization Patterns [Studies in Language Companion Series 91]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Norman H., Sinha, Chris & Stedmon, Jacqui
1981The allative bias in 3-year-olds is almost proof against task naturalness. Journal of Child Language 8(2): 283–296.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewson, John & Bubenik, Vit
2006From Case to Adposition: The Development of Configurational Syntax in Indo-European Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 280]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey
1981Space and Time in Homer. Prepositional and Adverbial Particles in the Greek Epic. New York NY: Arno.Google Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshiniko
1987‘Source’ vs. ‘goal’: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In Conceps of Case, René Dirven & Günter Radden (eds), 122–146. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Imbert, Caroline
2010Multiple preverbation in Homeric Greek: A typological insight. CogniTextes [En ligne], Vol. 4. 〈[URL]Google Scholar
Kabata, Kaori
2013Goal-source asymmetry and crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns: A cognitive-typological approach. Language Sciences 36: 78–89.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1964Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Lakusta, Laura & Landau, Barbara
2005Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition 96(1): 1–33.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1986An introduction to cognitive grammar. Cognitive Science 10: 1–40.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2004Theory and method in grammaticalization. In Grammatikalisierung, Gabriele Diewald (ed.). Special issue of Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 32: 152–187.Google Scholar
2015Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 3rd Edn [Classics in Linguistics]. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lestrade, Sanders
2010The Space of Case. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Létoublon, Françoise
1985Il allait, pareil à la nuit. Les verbes de mouvement en grec: Supplétisme et aspect verbal. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2003On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases: The Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009The internal structure of adpositional phrases and the notion of government. In Form and Function in Language Research: Papers in Honor of Christian Lehmann, Johannes Helmbrecht, Yoko Nishina, Zong-Min Shin, Stavros Skopeteas & Elisabeth Verhoeven (eds), 231–246. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2014Plotting diachronic semantic maps. In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language 106], Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds), 99–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. & Spencer, Andrew
2009The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Neri, Sergio
2013Zum urindogermanischen Wort für ‘Hand’. In Multi Nominis Grammaticus. Studies in Classical and Indo-European Linguistics in honor of Alan J. Nussbaum on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday, Adam I. Cooper, Jeremy Rau & Michael Weiss (eds), 185–205. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana
2009Subcategorization pattern and lexical meaning of motion verbs: A study of the source/goal ambiguity. Linguistics 47: 1113–1141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Lexical splits in the encoding of motion events from Archaic to Classical Greek. In Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events [Human Cognitive Processing 41], Juliana Goschler & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds), 185–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana & Maslov, Boris
2013Redefining Constructio Praegnans: On the variation between allative and locative expressions in Ancient Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 13: 105–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina
2010The syntactic structure of locations, goals, and sources. Linguistics 48(5): 1043–1081. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regier, Terry & Zheng, Mingyu
2007Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science 31: 705–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricca, Davide
1993I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: Una ricerca interlinguistica. Firenze: La Nova Italia.Google Scholar
Skopeteas, Stavros
2002Lokale Konstruktionen im Griechischen: Sprachwandel in funktionaler Sicht. PhD dissertation, University of Erfurt.
Slobin, Dan I.
1996From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds), 195–217. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Rohde, Ada
2004The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Studies in Linguistic Motivation, Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds), 249–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Svorou, Soteria
1994The Grammar of Space [Typological Studies in Language 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1983How language structures space. In Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application, Herbert L. Pick & Linda P. Acredolo (eds), 225–82. New York NY: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1988The relation of grammar to cognition. In Topics in Cognitive Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 50], Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), 165–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Trousdale, Graeme
(eds) 2010Gradience, Gradualness, and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, Frierich & Schmidt, Hans-Jörg
1996An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Verkerk, Annamarie
2014The Evolutionary Dynamics of Motion Event Encoding [Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Series]. Nijmegen: MPI.Google Scholar
Verspoor, Marjolijn, René Dirven & Radden, Günter
1999Putting concepts together: Syntax. In Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 1], René Dirven & Marjolijn Verspoor (eds), 87–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viti, Carlotta
2008aCoding spatial relations in Homeric Greek: Preverbs vs. prepositions. Historische Sprachforschung 121: 114–161.Google Scholar
2008bFrom space words to transitive markers: The case of Ancient Greek en “in”. Transactions of the Philological Society 106: 375–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert
1964Preliminaries to the reconstruction of Indo-European sentence structure. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists , 1035–1045.
Zanchi, Chiara
2014Multiple Preverbation in Homeric Greek. MA thesis, University of Pavia.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Joost
2010A hierarchy of locations: Evidence from the encoding of direction in adpositions and cases. Linguistics 48(5): 983–1009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

De Pasquale, Noemi
2021. ‘Invisible’ spatial meaning: a text-based study of covert Path encoding in Ancient Greek. Folia Linguistica 55:2  pp. 485 ff. DOI logo
De Pasquale, Noemi
2021. ‘Invisible’ spatial meaning: a text-based study of covert Path encoding in Ancient Greek. Folia Linguistica 55:2  pp. 485 ff. DOI logo
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis
2018. A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry. Constructions and Frames 10:1  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Kopecka, Anetta & Marine Vuillermet
2021. Source-Goal (a)symmetries across languages. Studies in Language 45:1  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 june 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.