Chapter published in:
Space in Diachrony
Edited by Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina and Chiara Zanchi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 188] 2017
► pp. 147178
References

References

Beavers, John, Levin, Beth & Tham, Siao Wei
2010The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46: 331–377.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beekes, Robert S. P.
2010Etymological Dictionary of Greek. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Boley, Jacqueline
2004Tmesis and Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling
1949A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre
1942Le rôle et la valeur de en- dans la composition. Revue de Philologie 68, 115–125.Google Scholar
1953Grammaire homérique, Tome 2: Syntaxe. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
1999[1968]Dictionnaire étymologicque de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Conti, Luz & Luraghi, Silvia
2014The AG partitive genitive in typological perspective. In Partitive Cases and Related Categories, Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds), 443–476. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Croft, William, Barðdal, Jóhanna, Hollmann, Willem, Sotirova, Violeta & Taoka, Chiaki
2010Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Contrastive Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 10], Hans C. Boas (ed), 201–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuzzolin, Pierluigi, Putzu, Ignazio & Ramat, Paolo
2006The Indo-European adverb in diachronic and typological perspective. Indogermanische Forschungen 111: 1–38.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold
1879Die Grundlagen der griechischen Syntax. Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Dickey, Stephen M.
2012Orphan prefixes and the grammaticalization of aspect in South Slavic. Jezikoslovlje 13(1): 71–105.Google Scholar
Dunkel, George
2014aLexicon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominal-stämme, Band: Einleitung, Terminologie, Lautgesetze, Adverbialendungen, Nominalsuffixe, Anhäge und Indices. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
2014bLexicon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominal-stämme, Band II: Lexicon. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Filipović, Luna
2007Talking about Motion: A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Lexicalization Patterns [Studies in Language Companion Series 91]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Norman H., Sinha, Chris & Stedmon, Jacqui
1981The allative bias in 3-year-olds is almost proof against task naturalness. Journal of Child Language 8(2): 283–296.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hewson, John & Bubenik, Vit
2006From Case to Adposition: The Development of Configurational Syntax in Indo-European Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 280]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey
1981Space and Time in Homer. Prepositional and Adverbial Particles in the Greek Epic. New York NY: Arno.Google Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshiniko
1987‘Source’ vs. ‘goal’: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In Conceps of Case, René Dirven & Günter Radden (eds), 122–146. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Imbert, Caroline
2010Multiple preverbation in Homeric Greek: A typological insight. CogniTextes [En ligne], Vol. 4. 〈http://​cognitextes​.revues​.org​/387Google Scholar
Kabata, Kaori
2013Goal-source asymmetry and crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns: A cognitive-typological approach. Language Sciences 36: 78–89.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1964Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Lakusta, Laura & Landau, Barbara
2005Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition 96(1): 1–33.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1986An introduction to cognitive grammar. Cognitive Science 10: 1–40.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2004Theory and method in grammaticalization. In Grammatikalisierung, Gabriele Diewald (ed.). Special issue of Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 32: 152–187.Google Scholar
2015Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 3rd Edn [Classics in Linguistics]. Berlin: Language Science Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lestrade, Sanders
2010The Space of Case. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Létoublon, Françoise
1985Il allait, pareil à la nuit. Les verbes de mouvement en grec: Supplétisme et aspect verbal. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2003On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases: The Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009The internal structure of adpositional phrases and the notion of government. In Form and Function in Language Research: Papers in Honor of Christian Lehmann, Johannes Helmbrecht, Yoko Nishina, Zong-Min Shin, Stavros Skopeteas & Elisabeth Verhoeven (eds), 231–246. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2014Plotting diachronic semantic maps. In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language 106], Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds), 99–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. & Spencer, Andrew
2009The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Neri, Sergio
2013Zum urindogermanischen Wort für ‘Hand’. In Multi Nominis Grammaticus. Studies in Classical and Indo-European Linguistics in honor of Alan J. Nussbaum on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday, Adam I. Cooper, Jeremy Rau & Michael Weiss (eds), 185–205. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana
2009Subcategorization pattern and lexical meaning of motion verbs: A study of the source/goal ambiguity. Linguistics 47: 1113–1141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Lexical splits in the encoding of motion events from Archaic to Classical Greek. In Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events [Human Cognitive Processing 41], Juliana Goschler & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds), 185–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana & Maslov, Boris
2013Redefining Constructio Praegnans: On the variation between allative and locative expressions in Ancient Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 13: 105–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina
2010The syntactic structure of locations, goals, and sources. Linguistics 48(5): 1043–1081. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Regier, Terry & Zheng, Mingyu
2007Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science 31: 705–719. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ricca, Davide
1993I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: Una ricerca interlinguistica. Firenze: La Nova Italia.Google Scholar
Skopeteas, Stavros
2002Lokale Konstruktionen im Griechischen: Sprachwandel in funktionaler Sicht. PhD dissertation, University of Erfurt.
Slobin, Dan I.
1996From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds), 195–217. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Rohde, Ada
2004The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Studies in Linguistic Motivation, Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds), 249–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Svorou, Soteria
1994The Grammar of Space [Typological Studies in Language 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1983How language structures space. In Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application, Herbert L. Pick & Linda P. Acredolo (eds), 225–82. New York NY: Plenum Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1988The relation of grammar to cognition. In Topics in Cognitive Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 50], Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), 165–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Trousdale, Graeme
(eds) 2010Gradience, Gradualness, and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, Frierich & Schmidt, Hans-Jörg
1996An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Verkerk, Annamarie
2014The Evolutionary Dynamics of Motion Event Encoding [Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Series]. Nijmegen: MPI.Google Scholar
Verspoor, Marjolijn, René Dirven & Radden, Günter
1999Putting concepts together: Syntax. In Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 1], René Dirven & Marjolijn Verspoor (eds), 87–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Viti, Carlotta
2008aCoding spatial relations in Homeric Greek: Preverbs vs. prepositions. Historische Sprachforschung 121: 114–161.Google Scholar
2008bFrom space words to transitive markers: The case of Ancient Greek en “in”. Transactions of the Philological Society 106: 375–413. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert
1964Preliminaries to the reconstruction of Indo-European sentence structure. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists , 1035–1045.
Zanchi, Chiara
2014Multiple Preverbation in Homeric Greek. MA thesis, University of Pavia.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Joost
2010A hierarchy of locations: Evidence from the encoding of direction in adpositions and cases. Linguistics 48(5): 983–1009. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

De Pasquale, Noemi
2021. ‘Invisible’ spatial meaning: a text-based study of covert Path encoding in Ancient Greek. Folia Linguistica 0:0 Crossref logo
De Pasquale, Noemi
2021. ‘Invisible’ spatial meaning: a text-based study of covert Path encoding in Ancient Greek. Folia Linguistica 55:2  pp. 485 ff. Crossref logo
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis
2018. A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry. Constructions and Frames 10:1  pp. 61 ff. Crossref logo
Kopecka, Anetta & Marine Vuillermet
2021. Source-Goal (a)symmetries across languages. Studies in Language 45:1  pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.