Chapter published in:
Space in Diachrony
Edited by Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina and Chiara Zanchi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 188] 2017
► pp. 241280
References

References

Acedo-Matellán, Víctor
2006aUna aproximació sintàctica als verbs prefixats en català. Estudios Catalanes 4: 41–78.Google Scholar
2006bPrefixes in Latin and Romance and the satellite-/verb-framed distinction. Actes del VII Congrés de Lingüística General (CD-ROM). Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona. 〈http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/000295Google Scholar
2010Argument Structure and the Syntax-morphology Interface. A Case Study in Latin and Other Languages. PhD dissertation, Universitat de Barcelona.
2016aThe Morphosyntax of Transitions. A Case Study in Latin and Other Languages. Oxford: OUP.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016bPreverbs llatins: Aspectes morfosintàtics i semàntics. In Cuestiones de morfología léxica, Cristina Buenafuentes, Glòria Clavería & Isabel Pujol (eds), 63–99. Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana & Vervuert.Google Scholar
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor & Mateu, Jaume
2009L’expressió dels esdeveniments de canvi: Del llatí al català. In Diachronic Linguistics, Joan Rafel (ed.), 473–496. Girona: Documenta Universitaria.Google Scholar
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor & Mateu Jaume
2013Satellite-framed Latin vs. verb-framed Romance: A syntactic approach. Probus, International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics 25: 227–265.Google Scholar
Anderson, John M.
1971The Grammar of Case: Towards a Localistic Theory. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bartra, Anna & Mateu, Jaume
2005Aspecte i prefixació verbal en català antic. Caplletra 39: 85–108.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J.
1977Case Marking in Australian Languages [Linguistic Series 23]. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Bye, Patrik & Svenonius, Peter
2012Non-concatenative morphology as an epiphenomenon. In The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence: The State of the Art, Jochen Trommer (ed.), 427–495. Oxford: OUP.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M.
1985The acquisition of Japanese. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol.1, Dan I. Slobin (ed), 373–524. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Clave 2012 Diccionario Clave. Diccionario de uso del español actual. Ediciones SM. 〈http://​clave​.smdiccionarios​.com​/app​.phpGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter
1985Imbabura Quechua. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
CORDE Real Academia Española. Corpus Diacrónico del Español. 〈http://​www​.rae​.es
CREA Real Academia Española. Corpus de Referencia del Español Actual. 〈http://​www​.rae​.es
Covarrubias, Sebastián de
1611Tesoro de la lengua castellana o española. Madrid.Google Scholar
Crocco Galèas, Grazia & Iacobini, Claudio
1993Parasintesi e doppio stadio derivativo nella formazione verbale del latino. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 78: 167–199.Google Scholar
DHLE Real Academia Española 1960–1996Diccionario histórico de la lengua española. Madrid.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria
1997Prefixed verbs and adjunct-identification. In Projections and Interface Conditions. Essays on Modularity, Anna-Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), 52–74. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
DRAE Real Academia Española 2014Diccionaro de la lengua española. Madrid: RAE-Espasa Calpe. 〈http://​www​.rae​.esGoogle Scholar
Dufresne, Monique, Depuis, Fernande & Longtin, Catherine-Marie
2001Un changement dans la diachronie du français: La perte de la préfixation aspectuelle en a-. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique 30: 33–54.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dufresne, Monique, Dupuis, Fernande & Tremblay, Mireille
2003Preverbs and particles in Old French. In Yearbook of morphology, Geert Booij (ed), 30–60. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Efthymiou, Angelik
2015Modern Greek parasynthetic verbs. A hierarchical relationship between prefixes and suffixes? In Affix Ordering across Languages and Frameworks, Stela Manova (ed), 82–107. Oxford: OUP.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio
2007The Exhaustive Lexicalization Principle. Tromsø Working Papers on Language and Linguistics: Nordlyd 34(2): 165–199. 〈www​.ub​.uit​.no​/baser​/nordlyd/Google Scholar
2010On Spanish prepositional prefixes and the cartography of prepositions. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 9: 55–77. 〈https://​ddd​.uab​.cat​/pub​/cjol​/16956885v9​/16956885v9p55​.pdfCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gaffiot, Félix
1934Dictionnaire Latin-Français. Paris: Hachette. 〈http://​www​.lexilogos​.com​/latin​/gaffiot​.phpGoogle Scholar
García Hernández, Benjamín
1980Semántica estructural y lexemática del verbo. Tarragona: Avesta.Google Scholar
Gehrke, Berit
2008Ps in Motion: On the Semantics and Syntax of P Elements and Motion Events [LOT Dissertation Series 184]. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Gibert Sotelo, Elisabeth
In preparation. Source and Negative Prefixes. On the Syntax-lexicon Interface and the Encoding of Spatial Relations. PhD dissertation, Universitat de Girona.
Gibert Sotelo, Elisabeth & Pujol Payet, Isabel
2015Semantic approaches to the study of denominal parasynthetic verbs in Spanish. Morphology 25: 439–472.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, Maria
1994Opposizioni direzionali e prefissazione: Analisi morfologica e semantica dei verbi egressivi prefissati con des- e es- in catalano. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Gruber, Jeffrey S.
1965Studies in Lexical Relations. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Haverling, Gerd
2000On Sco-verbs, Prefixes and Semantic Functions. A Study in the Development of Prefixed and Unprefixed Verbs from Early to Late Latin. Gŏteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
1988Morphology, pragmatics and the un-verb. In ESCOL (5th Eastern State Conference on Linguistics), 210–233.
2002Uncovering the un-word: A study in lexical pragmatics. Sophia Linguistica 49: 1–64.Google Scholar
Iacobini, Claudio
2010Les verbes parasynthétiques: De l‘expression de l‘espace à l‘expression de l‘action. De Lingua Latina 3. 〈http://​www​.paris​-sorbonne​.fr​/IMG​/pdf​/Iacobini​_parasynthetiques​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshihiko
1982Source vs. Goal: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In Language and Cognitive Styles [Neurolinguistics 11], Richard Hoops & Yvan Lebrun (eds), 292–308. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1983Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1990Semantic Structures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jake, Janice L.
1985Grammatical Relationships in Imbabura Quechua. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Keresztes, Laszlo
1998Mansi. In The Uralic Languages [Routledge Language Family Descriptions], Daniel Abandolo (ed), 387–427. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta
2006The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakusta, Laura & Landau, Barbara
2005Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition 96: 1–33.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakusta, Laura, Wagner, Laura, O’Hearn, Kirsten & Landau, Barbara
2007Conceptual foundations of spatial language: Evidence for a goal bias in infants. Language Learning and Development 3(3): 179–197.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1983Latin preverbs and cases. In Latin Linguistics and Linguistic Theory [Studies in Language Companion Series 12], Harm Pinkster (ed), 145–161. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lestrade, Sander
2010The Space of Case. PhD disseration, Radboud University.
Levin, Beth
1993English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, Wojciech
2014La alternancia locativa en castellano y polaco: un análisis tipológico-construccional. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Lewis, Charlton T. & Charles Short
1879A Latin Dictionary: Founded on Andrews’ Edition of Freund’s Latin Dictionary: Revised, Enlarged, and in Great Part Rewritten by Charlton T. Lewis, Ph.D. 〈http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.eduGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle
2010Introducing Morphology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Magomedbekova, Zagidad
1971Karatinskii iazyk: Grammaticheskii analiz, teksty, slovar (The Karata Language: Grammar Analysis, Texts, Glossary). Tbilisi: Metsniereba.Google Scholar
Mulugeta, Seyoum
2008A Grammar of Dime. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.
de Nebrija Antonio
1495Dictionarium hispanum latinum o Vocabulario español-latino. Madrid: RAE (facsimile of the first edition, 1989).Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1994Ingush. In North East Caucasian Languages, Vol. 4: The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, Part 2, Rieks Smeets (ed), 79–145. Delmar NY: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina
2011Decomposing Path: The Nanosyntax of Directional Expressions. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Papafragou, Anna, Massey, Christine & Gleitman, Lila
2006When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition 98: B75–B87.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papanastassiou, Georgios
2011The preverb apo- in Ancient Greek. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, 29–31 October 2009, Chatzopoulou, Katerina, Alexandra Ioannidou & Suwon Yoon (eds), 97–111. Chicago, IL. 〈http://​www​.ling​.ohio​-state​.edu​/ICGL​/proceedings​/10​_papanastassiou​_edited​_97​.pdf
Pashov, Petâr
1999Bǔlgarska Gramatika (A Grammar of Bulgarian). Plovdiv: Hermes.Google Scholar
Perseus Digital Library
University of Tufts. 〈http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu
Plag, Ingo
1999Morphological Productivity. Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2008Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana
2013El valor aspectual de los verbos reversativos: Claves pragmáticas para un proceso de verbalización. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 54: 99–129. 〈http://​www​.ucm​.es​/info​/circulo​/no54​/rosique​.pdfCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scalise, Sergio
1986Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Serrano-Dolader, David
1995Las formaciones parasintéticas en español. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal
2009Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd, 36(1): 1–6. 〈http://​septentrio​.uit​.no​/index​.php​/nordlyd​/issue​/view​/31
Svenonius, Peter
2010Spatial P in English. In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 6Cinque, Guglielmo, Luigi Rizzi & Giorgos Spathas (eds), 127–160. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2007Adpositions, particles and the arguments they introduce. In Argument Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today] Reuland, Eric, Tanmoy Bhattacharya & Giorgos Spathas (eds), 63–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter, Gillian Ramchand, Michal Starke & Tarald Taraldsen
(eds) 2009Nordlyd 36(1).Special issue on Nanosyntax, Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing. 〈http://​septentrio​.uit​.no​/index​.php​/nordlyd​/issue​/view​/31Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1975Semantics and syntax of motion. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 4, John P. Kimbal (ed), 181–238. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timothry Shopen (ed), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1991Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Linguistic Society (BLS) 17: 480–519.Google Scholar
2000Toward a Cognitve Semantics. Cambridge MA: The Mit Press.Google Scholar
Torres Martínez, Marta
2006Sobre el valor intensivo del prefijo des- en la lexicografía académica española. In El diccionario de la Real Academia Española: Ayer y hoy. Anexos de Revista de Lexicografía. Campos Souto, Mar & José Ignacio Pérez Pascual (eds), 237–249.Google Scholar
Vellard, Jahen A.
1967Contribución al estudio de la lengua Uru. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Gibert-Sotelo, Elisabeth
2021. On the encoding of negation by Source prefixes and the satellite-/verb-framed distinction. Linguistic Variation 21:1  pp. 214 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.