Cover not available
Part of
Exploring Intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives
Edited by Maria Napoli and Miriam Ravetto
[Studies in Language Companion Series 189] 2017
► pp. 79–98

Chapter 4
Noun classification in Kiswahili

Linguistic strategies to intensify or to reduce

| Università del Piemonte Orientale
The evaluation strategies in Kiswahili display an ambiguous status between inflection (as it was in Proto-Bantu, where classes 12–13, 19 expressed diminution, and classes 20–23 intensification) and derivation. In Modern Kiswahili these classes are lost, and the evaluative category arises by means of a highly productive derivational rule shifting a noun stem to another class: to class 5 for augmentatives, to class 7 for diminutives, because of the semantics of these classes.
The morpheme (−)ji-, originally the prefix marker of class 5, is actually admitted also within a word after another class prefix, sanctioning the birth of noun derivational morphology in Kiswahili: in most cases it has become a morpheme of intensification, but sometimes it can mark a change in size, either augmentative or diminutive.
Keywords: evaluation, intensification, diminution, Kiswahili, noun classes
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Noun class system in Kiswahili
  • 3.Noun classes in Kiswahili: Are they semantic or arbitrary?
    • 3.1The point of view of the scholars
    • 3.2The weight of diachrony
  • 4.Evaluation from inflection towards derivation
    • 4.1Inflection or derivation?
  • 5.The morpheme (-)ji- from class prefix to evaluation marker
    • 5.1 ji- as cl. 5 prefix
    • 5.2-ji- as evaluation affix
  • 6.Diminutives
    • 6.1 ki-ji-
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 September 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.189.05cas
References (51)
References
Anderson, Stephen R. 1982. Where is morphology? Linguistic Inquiry 13: 571–612.Google Scholar
1985. Inflectional morphology. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 150–201. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Aoki, Haruo. 1963. Reduplication in Nez Perce. International Journal of American Linguistics 29: 42–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashton, Ethel O. 1944. Swahili Grammar. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Beard, Robert. 2001. Derivation. In The Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 13–43. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bertoncini Zúbková, Elena. 1987. Kiswahili kwa furaha. Napoli: Opera Universitaria dell’Istituto Universitario Orientale.Google Scholar
Blake, Frank R. 1917. Reduplication in Tagalog. American Journal of Philology 38(4): 425–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bochner, Harry. 1992. Simplicity in Generative Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castagneto, Marina. 2004. Chiacchierare, bisbigliare, litigare…in turco. Il complesso intreccio tra attività linguistiche, iconismo, reduplicazione. Cagliari: Arxiu de Tradicions.Google Scholar
. 2014. Chicchi, semi e semolini in Swahili. Categorie di genere e reduplicazione. Africa e Mediterraneo 81: 52–57.Google Scholar
Contini-Morava, Ellen. Noun Classification in Swahili. <[URL]> (22 June 2016).
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, Katherine. 2000. Bantu noun class systems: Loanword and acquisition evidence of semantic productivity. In Systems of Nominal Classification, Gunter Senft (ed.), 270–292. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Denny, J. Peter & Creider, Chet A. 1976. The semantics of noun classes in Proto-Bantu. Studies in African Linguistics 7(1): 1–30.Google Scholar
1986. The semantics of noun classes in Proto-Bantu. In Noun classes and Categorization [Typological Studies in Language 7], Colette G. Craig (ed.), 217–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Original edition 1976]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna M. & Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1971. Some historical changes in the noun-class system of Bantu, their possible causes and wider implications. In Papers in African Linguistics [Current Inquiry into Language and Linguistics 1], Kim Chin-Wu & Herbert Stahlke (eds), 33–54, Edmonton: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
. 1972. Studies in ChiBemba and Bantu Grammar. Studies in African Linguistics, Vol. 3. Los Angeles CA: Dept. of Linguistics and the African Studies Center, University of California.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gregersen, Edgar A. 1967. Prefix and pronoun in Bantu. In Memoir 21 of the International Journal of American Linguistics. Bloomington IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Guthrie, Malcom. 1948. Gender, number and person in Bantu languages. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 12: 847–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeberlin, Herman K. 1917/1920. Types of reduplication in the Salish dialect. International Journal of American Linguistics 1: 154–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1982. African noun class systems. In Apprehension. Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenstanden, Vol. 1, Hansjakob Seiler & Christian Lehmann (eds), 189–216. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Herbert, Robert K. 1985. Gender system and semanticity: Two case histories from Bantu. In Historical Semantics: Historical Word-Formation [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monograph 29], Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 171–197. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Key, Harold. 1965. Some semantic functions of reduplication in various languages. Anthropological Linguistics 3: 88–102.Google Scholar
Kiyomi, Setsuko. 1995. A new approach to reduplication: A semantic study of noun and verb reduplication in the Malayo-Polynesian languages. Linguistics 33: 1145–1167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundation of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1990. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 1980. On the Organization of the Lexicon. PhD dissertation, MIT. Reproduced by Indiana University Linguistic Club, 1981.Google Scholar
Malone, Joseph L. 1997. On reduplication in Ojibwa. Anthropological Linguistics 33(3): 437–458.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1923. Le genre féminin dans les langues Indo-Européennes. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 20: 943–944.Google Scholar
Merlo Pick, Vittorio. 1978. Vocabolario kiswahili-italiano italiano-kiswahili. Bologna: EMI.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith. 1978. Reduplicative constructions. In Universal of Human Language, Vol. III: Word Structure, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 297–334. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1971. Diminutive consonant symbolism in Western North America. Language 47: 826–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nurse, Derek & Hinnebusch, Thomas. 1993. Swahili and Sabaki: A Linguistic History. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Polome, Edgar C. 1967. Swahili Language Handbook. Washington DC: Centre for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz. 1996. Inflection inside derivation; Evidence from Spanish and Portuguese. In Yearbook of Morphology 1995, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 83–91. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Irvine. 1967. Linguistic evolution and Bantu noun class systems. In La classification nominale dans les langues Négro-Africaines. Colloques internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique: Sciences Humaines, Aix-en-Provence, 3–7 juillet 1967, Gabriel Manessy (ed.), 373–390. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Karl. 1989. The Structure of the Kiswahili Nominal. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Karl & Eastman, Carol. 1989. Morphologically based agreement in Swahili. Studies in African Linguistics 20(1): 63–77.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1915. Noun reduplication in Comox. Memoirs of the Canadian Department of Mines. Geological Survey 63: 1–53.Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio. 1994. Morfologia. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Bisetto, Antonietta. 2008. La struttura delle parole. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Stroganova, I. P. 1952. Process razvitija imennoj klassifikaciii v jazykax bantu. Učenye Zapisky LGU 128, Serija Vostočnovedčeskix Nauk 3: 199–211.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflection. In The Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 13–43. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Anna M. 2005. Morfologia. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Welmers, William E. 1973. African Language Structures. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zawawi, Sharifa M. 1979. Loan Words and their Effect on the Classification of Swahili Nominals. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar