Cover not available
Part of
Exploring Intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives
Edited by Maria Napoli and Miriam Ravetto
[Studies in Language Companion Series 189] 2017
► pp. 327–352

Chapter 16
Ways to intensify

Types of intensified meanings in Italian and German

| Università del Piemonte Orientale
| Università del Piemonte Orientale
Intensification has traditionally been regarded as a category that is closely related to the concept of degree, i.e., to gradability (since Bolinger 1972). However, as has been shown by, among others, Paradis (2001, 2008), intensifiers are used not only with gradable bases (as adjectives typically are), but also with non-gradable bases, including nouns and verbs. The nature of the modified base – gradable vs. non-gradable, but also bounded vs. unbounded – may influence the value of the intensifiers, which as a result do not represent a homogenous category. Italian and German confirm this state of affairs in their use of some evaluative prefixes, mainly of Greek and Latin origin, with different kinds of base and different semantic and pragmatic functions. The aim of this paper is to analyze the behaviour of the most representative of these prefixes using a corpus-based approach. We will try to illustrate how the values assumed by Italian and German prefixes cannot be accounted for only in terms of degree modification, as related to the quantity and/or quality dimensions of intensification, since these forms show an increase in their subjectivity and expressive strength, which leads them to lose their semantic specificity and to assume a more general intensifying (and emphasizing) function.
Keywords: intensification, emphasis, prefixes, subjectivity, subjectification
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Gradability and intensification
  • 3.The intensifying function of Italian evaluative prefixes
    • 3.1Intensification of adjectives
    • 3.2Intensification of nouns
    • 3.3Intensification of verbs
  • 4.The intensifying function of German evaluative prefixes
    • 4.1Intensification of adjectives
    • 4.2Intensification of nouns
    • 4.3Intensification of verbs
  • 5.Analysis of the data and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 September 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.189.17nap
References (48)
References
Athanasiadou, Angeliki. 2007. On the subjectivity of intensifiers. Language Sciences 29(4): 554–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austerlitz, Robert. 1991. The European absolute superlative, an orphan of grammar, of the lexicon, and of history. In Languages in Contact and Contrast, Vladimir Ivir & Kalogjera Damir (eds), 1–13. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Boer, Minne G. 2003. Fortuna del prefisso ‘iper’. In Italia linguistica anno Mille – Italia linguistica anno Duemila: Atti del XXXIV Congresso internazionale di studi della Società di linguistica italiana (SLI), Firenze, 19–21 ottobre 2000, Nicoletta Maraschio & Teresa Poggi Salani (eds), 521–530. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L. 1972. Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Cacchiani, Silvia. 2011. Intensifying affixes across Italian and English. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 47(4): 758–794.Google Scholar
Cimaglia, Riccardo. 2011. Intensificatori. In Enciclopedia dell’italiano, Raffaele Simone (ed.), 666–667. Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia italiana Giovanni Treccani.Google Scholar
Constantinescu, Camelia. 2011. Gradability in the Nominal Domain. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Costa, Marcella. 2004. Alterati accrescitivi e peggiorativi. In Italiano e tedesco: Un confronto, Sandra Coletsos Bosco & Marcella Costa (eds), 163–192. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Cuzzolin, Pierluigi & Lehmann, Christian. 2004. Comparison and Gradation. In Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung, Vol. 2, Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan & Stavros Skopeteas (eds), 1212–1220. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia. 1994. Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and intensifiers in Italian, German and other languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaeta, Livio. 2011a. Accrescitivo. In Enciclopedia dell’italiano, Raffaele Simone (ed.), 14–16. Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia italiana Giovanni Treccani.Google Scholar
. 2011b. Alterazione. In Enciclopedia dell’italiano, Raffaele Simone (ed.), 53–55. Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia italiana Giovanni Treccani.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke & Davidse, Kristin. 2011. The development of intensification scales in noun-intensifying uses of adjectives: sources, paths and mechanisms of change. English Language and Linguistics 15(2): 251–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grandi, Nicola. 2002. Morfologie in contatto. Le costruzioni valutative nelle lingue del Mediterraneo. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
. 2015. The place of evaluation within morphology. In The Edinburgh Handbook of Evaluative Morphology, Nicola Grandi & Lívia Kortvelyessy (eds), 74–90. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Grandi, Nicola. & Montermini, Fabio. 2005. Valutativi suffissali e prefissali: Un’unica categoria? In La formazione delle parole. Atti del 37. Congresso internazionale di studi della Società di linguistica italiana (L’Aquila, 25–27 settembre 2003), Maria Grossmann & Anna Thornton (eds), 271–288. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Iacobini, Claudio. 2004. Prefissazione. In La formazione delle parole in italiano, Maria Grossmann & Franz Rainer (eds), 97–164. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 2005. I verbi italiani come base di derivazione prefissale. In La formazione delle parole. Atti del 37. Congresso internazionale di studi della Società di linguistica italiana (L’Aquila, 25–27 settembre 2003), Maria Grossmann & Anna Thornton (eds), 289–308. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Kammerer, Matthias. 2001. Verstärkungsbildungen im Deutschen. In Sprache im Alltag, Andrea Lehr et al. (eds), 293–319. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kann, Hans-Joachim. 1973. Spielfreude in der Sprache: Super‑ und Mini-. Muttersprache 83: 198–210.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Chris & McNally, Louise. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81(2): 345–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marx, Sonia. 1993. Leggere e tradurre. La formazione delle parole in tedesco. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Montermini, Fabio. 2008. Il lato sinistro della morfologia. La prefissazione in italiano e nelle lingue del mondo. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo & Reynolds, Bill. 1995. Evaluative affixes in Italian. In Yearbook of Morphology 1994, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 151–178. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Maria. 2012. Uno stra-prefisso: L’evoluzione di stra‑ nella storia dell’italiano. Rivista Italiana di Linguistica e Dialettologia 14: 89–112.Google Scholar
. 2013. On Italian past participles with ‑issimo: The superlative of events between intensification and pluractionality. Linguistica e Filologia 33: 85–126.Google Scholar
. 2015. The syntax of excess: On the Italian (essere) troppo per construction. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 100(1): 51–84.Google Scholar
. 2017. Nomi in stra- in italiano. Intensificazione tra semantica e pragmatica. In Actes du XXVII Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes (Nancy, 15–20 juillet 2013), Section 1: Linguistique générale/linguistique romane, Alaine Lemaréchal, Peter Koch & Pierre Swiggers (eds), 95–105. Nancy: ATILF. <[URL]>
Pander Maat, Henk. 2006. Subjectification in gradable adjectives. In Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity, Angeliki Athanasiadou, Canakis Costas & Bert Cornillie (eds), 279–320. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 2001. Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics 12(1): 47–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of DEGREE. English Language and Linguistics 12(2): 317–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rainer, Franz. 1983. Intensivierung im Italienischen. Salzburg: Institut für Romanistik der Universität Salzburg.Google Scholar
Renzi, Lorenzo. 2012. Come cambia la lingua. L’italiano in movimento. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Ruf, Birgit. 1996. Augmentativbildungen mit Lehnpräfixen: eine Untersuchung zur Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Sassoon, Galit W. 2011. Adjectival vs. nominal categorization processes. Belgium Journal of Linguistics 25: 104–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1944. Grading. A study on semantics. Philosophy of Science 11(2): 93–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scalise, Sergio. 1984. Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Schmale, Günter. 2011. Das Adjektiv im heutigen Deutsch: Syntax, Semantik, Pragmatik. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Günter Dietrich. 2005. Super- und top-. Ein Vergleich von zwei im Deutschen heute produktiven Lehnpräfixen. In Fremdwortbildung. Theorie und Praxis in Geschichte und Gegenwart, Peter Müller (ed.), 407–415. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Searle, John Roger & Vandervecken, Daniel. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sobrero, Alberto A. (ed). 1993. Introduzione all’italiano contemporaneo, Vol. 1: Le strutture. Roma: Laterza.Google Scholar
Suščinskij, Iossif. 1985. Die Steigerungsmittel im Deutschen. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 2: 95–100.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 57(1): 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds), 37–54. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Os, Charles. 1988. Intensivierung im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Zifonun, Gisela, Hoffmann, Ludger & Strecker, Bruno. 1997. Grammatik der deutschen Sprache, Bd. 3. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Méndez-Naya, Belén
2021. Synthetic Intensification Devices in Old English. Journal of English Linguistics 49:2 ► pp. 208 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.