Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek
Edited by Camille Denizot and Olga Spevak
[Studies in Language Companion Series 190] 2017
► pp. 45–62

Chapter 3
Pragmatic functions of the Latin vocative

| Charles University (Faculty of Arts), Prague
This article explores pragmatic aspects of the Latin vocative. The vocative is taken as a syntactically independent utterance and independent speech act with its specific communicative functions (illocutionary force). The traditionally recognized functions of “call” and “address” are first defined and shown not to cover (contrary to the common opinion) the whole scope of vocative functions. Then, the other functions of the vocative in Latin and other languages are described. Finally, some space is given to a discussion about how such a pragmatic approach to the study of the vocative is related to the sociolinguistic approach of Dickey (2002).
Keywords: vocative, vocative-utterance, vocative-construction, vocative as a discourse marker, vocative of sincerity and guarantee, reduplicated vocative
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Vocative: Form, construction, utterance
  • 3.The traditionally recognized call and address functions and their definition
  • 4.Vocative as a marker of discourse structure
  • 5.Vocative of sincerity and guarantee
  • 6.Reduplicated vocative of discontent
  • 7.Functions of the vocative-construction and the lexical meaning of the words involved
  • 8.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.190.03cti
References (15)
References
Austin, John L. 1975. How to do Things with Words, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Charles E. 1914. Syntax of Early Latin, Vol. II: The Cases. Boston MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Braun, Friederike. 1988. Terms of Address: Problems ad Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cabrillana, Concepción. 2008. Vocativo y participantes en el acto de habla en la comedia latina y la novela de Petronio. In Latin vulgaire – Latin tardif VIII, Roger Wright (ed.), 69–77. Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann.Google Scholar
. 2009. Nominativo y vocativo. In Sintaxis del latín clásico, José Miguel Baños Baños (coord.), 111–130. Madrid: Liceus.Google Scholar
Dickey, Eleanor. 2002. Latin Forms of Address. From Plautus to Apuleius. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2012. The Oxford Dictionary of Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kühner, Raphael & Stegmann, Carl. 1912. Ausfürliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache, II: Satzlehre, Vol. 1. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Panhuis, Dirk, 1985. Traditional, structuralist, and textlinguistic approaches to the (Latin) vocative. Studies in Language 9(1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinkster, Harm. 2015. Oxford Latin Syntax, Vol. 1: The Simple Clause. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shalev, Donna. 1995. Vocatives in responses. A bridging mechanism in dialogue exchange? In Estudios de lingüística latina II, Benjamín García-Hernández (ed.), 766–779. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.Google Scholar
Wakker, Gerry C. 2009. ‘Well I will now present my arguments’. Discourse cohesion marked by oyn and toinyn in Lysias. In Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, Stephanie J. Bakker & Gerry C. Wakker (eds), 63–81. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff/Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1974. ‘Hey, Whatsyourname’. In Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting. Chicago, Linguistic Society, April 19–21, 1974, Michael W. La Galy, Robert A. Fox & Anthony Bruck (eds), 787–801. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar