Chapter published in:
Cross-linguistic Correspondences: From lexis to genre
Edited by Thomas Egan and Hildegunn Dirdal
[Studies in Language Companion Series 191] 2017
► pp. 199217
References

References

Aijmer, Karin & Altenberg, Bengt
2002Zero translations and cross-linguistic equivalence: Evidence from the English–Swedish Parallel Corpus. In From the COLT’s Mouth … and Others’: Language Corpora Studies in Honour of Anna-Brita Stenström, Leiv Egil Breivik & Angela Hasselgren (eds), 19–41. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Čermák, František
1996Systém, funkce, forma a sémantika čekých předložek. Slovo a slovesnost 57(1): 30–46.Google Scholar
Čermák, František & Křen, Michal
2011A Frequency Dictionary of Czech: Core Vocabulary for Learners. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cosme, Christelle & Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2008Free and bound prepositions in a contrastive perspective: The case of with and avec . In Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Sylviane Granger & Fanny Meunier (eds), 259–274. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cvrček, Václav et al.
2010Mluvnice současné češtiny I. Jak se píše a jak se mluví. Praha: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Dušková, Libuše
1999Studies in the English Language, Part 2. Praha: Karolinum.Google Scholar
2015From Syntax to Text: The Janus Face of Functional Sentence Perspective. Praha: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Egan, Thomas
2013 Between and through revisited. In Corpus Linguistics and Variation in English: Focus on Non-Native Englishes, Magnus Huber & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds). A special issue of Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 13. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/series​/volumes​/13​/egan/
Firbas, Jan
1964From comparative word-order studies. Brno Studies in English 4: 111–128.Google Scholar
1992Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Groom, Nicholas
2010Closed-class keywords and corpus-driven discourse analysis. In Keyness in Texts, Marina Bondi & Mike Scott (eds), 59–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan
2008Starting with the small words: Patterns, lexis and semantic sequences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(3): 271–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1973The base rules for prepositional phrases. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 345–356. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Klégr, Aleš & Malá, Markéta
2009English equivalents of the most frequent Czech prepositions: A contrastive corpus-based study. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference, CL2009, University of Liverpool, UK 20–23 July 2009, Michaela Mahlberg, Victorina González-Díaz & Catherine Smith (eds). http://​ucrel​.lancs​.ac​.uk​/publications​/cl2009/
Klégr, Aleš, Malá, Markéta & Šaldová, Pavlína
2012Anglické ekvivalenty nejfrekventovanějších českých předložek. Praha: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Rayson, Paul & Wilson, Andrew
2001Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus. London: Longman. http://​ucrel​.lancs​.ac​.uk​/bncfreq/
Lüdeling, Anke and Merja Kytö
(eds) 2008Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook. Volume 1. Berlin: Walter de Gryuter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malá, Markéta & Šaldová, Pavlína
2015English non-finite participial clauses as seen through their Czech counterparts. Nordic Journal of English Studies 14(1): 232–257.Google Scholar
Mluvnice češtiny
2 1986 Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schmied, Josef
1998Differences and similarities of close cognates: English with and German mit . In Corpora and Cross-Linguistic Research: Theory, Method and Case Studies, Stig Johansson & Signe Oksefjell (eds.), 255–274. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Scott, Mike & Tribble, Christopher
2006Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 22]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John
1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar

Sources

SYN2015: Český národní korpus – SYN
2015Ústav Českého národního korpusu FF UK, Praha. http://​www​.korpus​.cz> (22 January 2016).
InterCorp8: Český národní korpus – InterCorp8
. Ústav Českého národního korpusu FF UK, Praha. http://​www​.korpus​.cz> (22 January 2016).