Chapter published in:
Changing Structures: Studies in constructions and complementation
Edited by Mark Kaunisto, Mikko Höglund and Paul Rickman
[Studies in Language Companion Series 195] 2018
► pp. 112
Berlage, Eva
2014Noun Phrase Complexity in English. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curme, George O.
1931Syntax. Boston MA: Heath.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2006Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2(2): 243–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Collostructional analysis: Measuring associations between constructions and lexical elements. In Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy [Human Cognitive Processing 43], Dylan Glynn & Justyna A. Robinson (eds), 391–404. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Francis, Gill
1999Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1940A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part V: Syntax. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Egan, Thomas
2008Emotion verbs with to-infinitive complements: From specific to general predication. In Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006, Vol. I: Syntax and Morphology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 296], Richard Dury, Maurizio Gotti & Marina Dossena (eds), 223–240. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fanego, Teresa
1996On the historical development of English retrospective verbs. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 97: 71–79.Google Scholar
1997On patterns of complementation with verbs of effort. English Studies 78(1): 60–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2004Fitting a slim dime between the verb template and argument structure construction approaches. Theoretical Linguistics, 4(1–2): 113–1135. Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred
1987Colonial lag? The alleged conservative character of American English and other ‘colonial’ varieties. English World-Wide 8(1): 41–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
2009Colonial lag, colonial innovation or simply language change? In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 13–37. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Braj B.
1985Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and the Literature, Randolph Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (eds), 11–30. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kruisinga, Etsko
1922A Handbook of Present-Day English, Vols. 1–2, 3rd edn. Utrecht: Kemink & Zoon.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nick
2009Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Hardie, Andrew
2012Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Mondorf, Britta
2009More Support for More-support: The Role of Processing Constraints on the Choice between Synthetic and Analytic Comparative Forms [Studies in Language Variation 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Michael
2001British and Irish antecedents. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. VI: English in North America, John Algeo (ed.), 86–153. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poutsma, Hendrik
1929A Grammar of Late Modern English, 2nd edn. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter
1996The complexity principle as a factor determining grammatical variation and change in English. In Language Use, Language Acquisition and Language History: (Mostly) Empirical Studies in Honour of Rüdiger Zimmermann, Ingo Plag & Klaus Peter Schneider (eds), 25–44. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
2006The role of functional constraints in the evolution of the English complementation system. In Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000, Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Nikolaus Ritt, Herbert Schendl & Dieter Kastovsky (eds), 143–166. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2009Nominal complements. In , One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 1–12. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rudanko, Juhani
2010Explaining grammatical variation and change: A case study of complementation in American English over three decades. Journal of English Linguistics 38(1): 4–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Changes in Complementation in British and American English: Corpus-Based Studies on Non-Finite Complements in Recent English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Linking Form and Meaning: Studies on Selected Control Patterns in Recent English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Infinitives and Gerunds in Recent English: Studies of Non-Finite Complements with Data from Large Corpora. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.
2003The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2): 233–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan T.
2003Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2), 209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vosberg, Uwe
2003The role of extractions and horror aequi in the evolution of ‑ing-complements in Modern English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, Günter Rohdenburg and Britta Mondorf (eds), 305–327. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Die große Komplementverschiebung. Außersemantische Einflüsse auf die Entwicklung satzwertiger Ergänzungen im Neuenglischen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar