Chapter published in:
Changing Structures: Studies in constructions and complementation
Edited by Mark Kaunisto, Mikko Höglund and Paul Rickman
[Studies in Language Companion Series 195] 2018
► pp. 129149
References

References

Primary sources

d91-00, 02, 04-05 The Daily Telegraph and Sunday Telegraph on CD-ROM 1991–2000, 2002, 2004–2005. Chadwyck-Healey/ProQuest. (478,837,273 words)
D92-95 Detroit Free Press on CD-ROM 1992–1995. Knight Ridder Information Inc. (102,989,512 words)
g90-05 The Guardian (including The Observer 1994–2005) on CD-ROM 1990–2005. Chadwyck-Healey/ProQuest. (645,817,821 words)
i93-94, 02-05 The Independent and The Independent on Sunday on CD-ROM 1993–94, 2002–2005. ProQuest. (242,608,117 words)
L92-95 The Los Angeles Times on CD-ROM 1992–1995 Knight Ridder Information Inc. (320,016,164 words)
L96-99 The Los Angeles Times 1996–1999 (courtesy of The Los Angeles Times Editorial Library). (275,506,490 words)
LOB The Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus on CD-ROM 1961. ICAME. (1,000,000 words)
m93-00 The Daily Mail and The Mail on Sunday on CD-ROM 1993–2000. Chadwyck-Healey. (206,762,410 words)
N01 The New York Times on CD-ROM 2001. ProQuest. (52,132,979 words)
NCF Nineteenth Century Fiction 1999–2000 Chadwyck-Healey. (37,589,837 words)
t90-04 The Times and The Sunday Times on CD-ROM 1990–2004 Chadwyck-Healey/ProQuest. (729,848,339 words)
W90-92 The Washington Times (including Insight on the News 1990–1992) on CD-ROM 1990–1992. Wayzata Technology. (93,889,488 words)

Secondary sources

Atkinson, Martin, Kilby, David & Roca, Iggy
1988Foundations of General Linguistics, 2nd edn. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Berlage, Eva
2014Noun Phrase Complexity in English. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Clark, Eve
1977Psychology and Linguistics: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. New York NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Davison, Alice & Lutz, Richard
1985Measuring syntactic complexity relative to discourse context. In Natural Language Parsing, David R. Dowty, Lauri Karttunen & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 26–66. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1991A New Approach to English Grammar, on Semantic Principles. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Eitelmann, Matthias
2016Support for end-weight as a determinant of linguistic variation and change. English Language and Linguistics 20: 395–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elsness, Johan
1984 That or zero? A look at the choice of object clause connective in a corpus of American English. English Studies 65: 519–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1984/1990Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vols. I–II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
1999Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language 75: 244–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
1978Some aspects of negation. In Universals of Language, Vol. IV, Joseph Greenberg (ed.), 127–210. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
2009 Colonial lag, colonial innovation or simply language change? In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 13–37. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iyeri, Yoko
2010Verbs of Implicit Negation and their Complements in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012The complements of causative make in Late Middle English. In Middle and Modern English Corpus Linguistics: A Multi-Dimensional Approach [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 50], Manfred Markus, Yoko Iyeri, Reinhard Heuberger & Emil Chamson (eds), 59–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran
2009The revived subjunctive. In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds.), 246–256. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lohse, Barbara, Hawkins, John A. & Wasow, Thomas
2004Processing domains in English verb-particle constructions. Language 80: 238–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian
1995Changing patterns of complementation, and concomitant grammaticalisation, of the verb help in present-day English. In The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description, Bas Aarts & Charles F. Meyer (eds), 258–272. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2002Three changing patterns of verb complementation in Late Modern English: A real-time study based on matching text corpora. English Language and Linguistics 6: 105–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDavid, Virginia
1964The alternation of “that” and zero in noun clauses. American Speech 39: 102–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondorf, Britta
2009More support for more-support: The Role of Processing Constraints on the Choice between Synthetic and Analytic Comparative Forms [Studies in Language Variation 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F.
1960A Middle English Syntax, Part I: Parts of Speech. Helsinki: Societé Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter
1996Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7: 149–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000The complexity principle as a factor determining grammatical variation and change in English. In , Language Use Language Acquisition and Language History: (Mostly) Empirical Studies in Honour of Rüdiger Zimmermann, Ingo Plag & Klaus Peter Schneider (eds), 25–44. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
2002Processing complexity and the variable use of prepositions in English. In Perspectives on Prepositions, Hubert Cuyckens & Günter Radden (eds), 79–100. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Cognitive complexity and horror aequi as factors determining grammatical variation and change in English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds), 205–249. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006aThe role of functional constraints in the evolution of the English complementation system. In Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000, Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikolaus Ritt & Herbert Schendl (eds), 143–166. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2006bProcessing complexity and competing sentential variants in present-day English. In Linguistik International: Festschrift für Heinrich Weber, Wilfried Kürschner & Reinhard Rapp (eds), 51–67. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.Google Scholar
2007Functional constraints in syntactic change: The rise and fall of prepositional constructions in Early and Late Modern English. English Studies 88: 217–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Grammatical divergence between British and American English in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In Current Issues in Late Modern English, Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade & Wim van der Wurff (eds), 301–329. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2012Britisches und Amerikanisches Englisch: Eine Sprache, zwei Grammatiken? In Sprachmythen – Fiktion oder Wirklichkeit?, Lieselotte Anderwald (ed), 137–160. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2014aReflections on reflexives in Modern English. Anglia 132: 536–574. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014bRelative clauses of reason in British and American English. American Speech 89: 288–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015The embedded negation constraint and the choice between more or less explicit clausal structures in English. In Perspectives on Complementation: Theory, Structure and Variation, Mikko Höglund, Paul Rickman, Juhani Rudanko & Jukka Havu (eds), 101–127. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2016Testing two processing principles with respect to the extraction of elements out of complement clauses in English. English Language and Linguistics 20: 463–486.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia
2000Determinanten grammatischer Variation im Früh- und Spätneuenglischen. Sprachwissenschaft 25: 443–496.Google Scholar
2009New departures. In , One Language Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 364–423. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schlüter, Julia
2005Rhythmic Grammar: The Influence of Rhythm on Grammatical Variation and Change in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009The conditional subjunctive. In , One Language Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 277–305. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Smith, Jennifer
2005 No momentary fancy! The zero ‘complementizer’ in English dialects. English Language and Linguistics 9: 289–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vosberg, Uwe
2006Die große Komplementverschiebung. Außersemantische Einflüsse auf die Entwicklung satzwertiger Ergänzungen im Neuenglischen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Wanner, Anja
2009Deconstructing the English Passive. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, Robert David
1976Theories of Linguistic Variation. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

BERG, THOMAS, TIM ZINGLER & ARNE LOHMANN
2020. The range of linguistic units: Distance effects in English mandative subjunctive constructions. Journal of Linguistics 56:2  pp. 231 ff. Crossref logo
García‐Castro, Laura
2020. Finite and non‐finite complement clauses in postcolonial Englishes. World Englishes 39:3  pp. 411 ff. Crossref logo
Kaunisto, Mark & Juhani Rudanko
2019.  In Variation in Non-finite Constructions in English,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Rohdenburg, Günter
2021. Ambiguity Avoidance by Means of Function Words in English? Providing Additional Corpus-based Counterevidence. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 69:3  pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo
ROMASANTA, RAQUEL P.
2021. Negation as a predictor of clausal complement choice in World Englishes. English Language and Linguistics  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.