Cover not available
Part of
Changing Structures: Studies in constructions and complementation
Edited by Mark Kaunisto, Mikko Höglund and Paul Rickman
[Studies in Language Companion Series 195] 2018
► pp. 129–149

The use of optional complement markers in present-day English

The role of passivization and other complexity factors

| University of Paderborn
This paper reports on the results of a corpus-based study exploring several major types of omissible complement clause markers. Throughout, the distribution of rival variants with or without these markers is accounted for in terms of the Complexity Principle correlating processing complexity and grammatical explicitness. The focus is on the use of passivized matrix verbs as well as other complexity factors in the active, which favour the more explicit variants containing the function words in question. At the same time, the paper registers, wherever practical and instructive, any parallels and differences between British and American English. In most cases, the variation phenomena in question are the result of ongoing developments either introducing or reducing the use of the relevant function words.
Keywords: complement markers, variation, corpus linguistics, Complexity Principle, passivization, (in)transitive complement verbs
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The complementizer that
    • 2.1Verb-dependent complement clauses
    • 2.2Noun-dependent complement clauses
  • 3.Infinitive marking
  • 4.Modal should in mandative complements
  • 5.The variable use of from introducing gerundial complements
    • 5.1Negative verbs of causation like put off
    • 5.2The particle verb hold off
  • 6.Interrogative complement clauses
  • 7.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 22 May 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.195.08roh
References (54)
References
Primary sources
d91-00, 02, 04-05 The Daily Telegraph and Sunday Telegraph on CD-ROM 1991–2000, 2002, 2004–2005. Chadwyck-Healey/ProQuest. (478,837,273 words)
D92-95 Detroit Free Press on CD-ROM 1992–1995. Knight Ridder Information Inc. (102,989,512 words)
g90-05 The Guardian (including The Observer 1994–2005) on CD-ROM 1990–2005. Chadwyck-Healey/ProQuest. (645,817,821 words)
i93-94, 02-05 The Independent and The Independent on Sunday on CD-ROM 1993–94, 2002–2005. ProQuest. (242,608,117 words)
L92-95 The Los Angeles Times on CD-ROM 1992–1995 Knight Ridder Information Inc. (320,016,164 words)
L96-99 The Los Angeles Times 1996–1999 (courtesy of The Los Angeles Times Editorial Library). (275,506,490 words)
LOB The Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus on CD-ROM 1961. ICAME. (1,000,000 words)
m93-00 The Daily Mail and The Mail on Sunday on CD-ROM 1993–2000. Chadwyck-Healey. (206,762,410 words)
N01 The New York Times on CD-ROM 2001. ProQuest. (52,132,979 words)
NCF Nineteenth Century Fiction 1999–2000 Chadwyck-Healey. (37,589,837 words)
t90-04 The Times and The Sunday Times on CD-ROM 1990–2004 Chadwyck-Healey/ProQuest. (729,848,339 words)
W90-92 The Washington Times (including Insight on the News 1990–1992) on CD-ROM 1990–1992. Wayzata Technology. (93,889,488 words)
Secondary sources
Atkinson, Martin, Kilby, David & Roca, Iggy. 1988. Foundations of General Linguistics, 2nd edn. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Berlage, Eva. 2014. Noun Phrase Complexity in English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Clark, Eve. 1977. Psychology and Linguistics: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. New York NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Davison, Alice & Lutz, Richard. 1985. Measuring syntactic complexity relative to discourse context. In Natural Language Parsing, David R. Dowty, Lauri Karttunen & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 26–66. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1991. A New Approach to English Grammar, on Semantic Principles. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Eitelmann, Matthias. 2016. Support for end-weight as a determinant of linguistic variation and change. English Language and Linguistics 20: 395–420.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elsness, Johan. 1984. That or zero? A look at the choice of object clause connective in a corpus of American English. English Studies 65: 519–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1984/1990. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vols. I–II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1999. Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language 75: 244–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1978. Some aspects of negation. In Universals of Language, Vol. IV, Joseph Greenberg (ed.), 127–210. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2009. Colonial lag, colonial innovation or simply language change? In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 13–37. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The complements of causative make in Late Middle English. In Middle and Modern English Corpus Linguistics: A Multi-Dimensional Approach [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 50], Manfred Markus, Yoko Iyeri, Reinhard Heuberger & Emil Chamson (eds), 59–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran. 2009. The revived subjunctive. In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds.), 246–256. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lohse, Barbara, Hawkins, John A. & Wasow, Thomas. 2004. Processing domains in English verb-particle constructions. Language 80: 238–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian. 1995. Changing patterns of complementation, and concomitant grammaticalisation, of the verb help in present-day English. In The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description, Bas Aarts & Charles F. Meyer (eds), 258–272. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2002. Three changing patterns of verb complementation in Late Modern English: A real-time study based on matching text corpora. English Language and Linguistics 6: 105–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDavid, Virginia. 1964. The alternation of “that” and zero in noun clauses. American Speech 39: 102–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondorf, Britta. 2009. More support for more-support: The Role of Processing Constraints on the Choice between Synthetic and Analytic Comparative Forms [Studies in Language Variation 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English Syntax, Part I: Parts of Speech. Helsinki: Societé Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter. 1996. Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7: 149–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. The complexity principle as a factor determining grammatical variation and change in English. In , Language Use Language Acquisition and Language History: (Mostly) Empirical Studies in Honour of Rüdiger Zimmermann, Ingo Plag & Klaus Peter Schneider (eds), 25–44. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2002. Processing complexity and the variable use of prepositions in English. In Perspectives on Prepositions, Hubert Cuyckens & Günter Radden (eds), 79–100. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Cognitive complexity and horror aequi as factors determining grammatical variation and change in English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds), 205–249. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006a. The role of functional constraints in the evolution of the English complementation system. In Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000, Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikolaus Ritt & Herbert Schendl (eds), 143–166. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2006b. Processing complexity and competing sentential variants in present-day English. In Linguistik International: Festschrift für Heinrich Weber, Wilfried Kürschner & Reinhard Rapp (eds), 51–67. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.Google Scholar
. 2007. Functional constraints in syntactic change: The rise and fall of prepositional constructions in Early and Late Modern English. English Studies 88: 217–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Grammatical divergence between British and American English in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In Current Issues in Late Modern English, Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade & Wim van der Wurff (eds), 301–329. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2012. Britisches und Amerikanisches Englisch: Eine Sprache, zwei Grammatiken? In Sprachmythen – Fiktion oder Wirklichkeit?, Lieselotte Anderwald (ed), 137–160. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2014a. Reflections on reflexives in Modern English. Anglia 132: 536–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014b. Relative clauses of reason in British and American English. American Speech 89: 288–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. The embedded negation constraint and the choice between more or less explicit clausal structures in English. In Perspectives on Complementation: Theory, Structure and Variation, Mikko Höglund, Paul Rickman, Juhani Rudanko & Jukka Havu (eds), 101–127. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 2016. Testing two processing principles with respect to the extraction of elements out of complement clauses in English. English Language and Linguistics 20: 463–486.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia. 2000. Determinanten grammatischer Variation im Früh- und Spätneuenglischen. Sprachwissenschaft 25: 443–496.Google Scholar
. 2009. New departures. In , One Language Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 364–423. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlüter, Julia. 2005. Rhythmic Grammar: The Influence of Rhythm on Grammatical Variation and Change in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. The conditional subjunctive. In , One Language Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 277–305. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Smith, Jennifer. 2005. No momentary fancy! The zero ‘complementizer’ in English dialects. English Language and Linguistics 9: 289–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vosberg, Uwe. 2006. Die große Komplementverschiebung. Außersemantische Einflüsse auf die Entwicklung satzwertiger Ergänzungen im Neuenglischen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Wanner, Anja. 2009. Deconstructing the English Passive. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, Robert David. 1976. Theories of Linguistic Variation. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

ROMASANTA, RAQUEL P.
2022. Negation as a predictor of clausal complement choice in World Englishes. English Language and Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Vosberg, Uwe
2022. Juho Ruohonen and Juhani Rudanko, Infinitival vs gerundial complementation with afraid, accustomed, and prone: Multivariate corpus studies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021. Pp. xiii + 161. ISBN 9783030567576.. English Language and Linguistics 26:4 ► pp. 929 ff. DOI logo
Rohdenburg, Günter
2021. Ambiguity Avoidance by Means of Function Words in English? Providing Additional Corpus-based Counterevidence. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 69:3 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
BERG, THOMAS, TIM ZINGLER & ARNE LOHMANN
2020. The range of linguistic units: Distance effects in English mandative subjunctive constructions. Journal of Linguistics 56:2 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
García‐Castro, Laura
2020. Finite and non‐finite complement clauses in postcolonial Englishes. World Englishes 39:3 ► pp. 411 ff. DOI logo
Kaunisto, Mark & Juhani Rudanko
2019. Introduction. In Variation in Non-finite Constructions in English, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.