Cover not available
Part of
Essays on Linguistic Realism
Edited by Christina Behme and Martin Neef
[Studies in Language Companion Series 196] 2018
► pp. 61–78

Chapter 4
The relevance of realism for language evolution theorizing

| Kwantlen Polytechnic University
It may appear counterintuitive to suggest a connection between language evolution and linguistic realism. Only biological objects evolve but linguistic realism holds that natural languages are abstract objects. However, given the fact that currently no approach to language evolution can account satisfactorily for all aspects of language, I suggest that reconsidering the ontological status of natural languages might lead to novel approaches to language evolution puzzles. Most contemporary work on language evolution assumes without argument that natural languages are either biological entities or produced by biological organs (human brains), and focuses on brain evolution, language acquisition, and communication systems of other primates. Yet, so far such approaches have been unable to account for some aspects of grammar. Furthermore, to date little is known about the bio-physiological implementation of natural languages. I suggest that the debate could profit from paying closer attention to the ontological status of language and the exact relationship between language and biology. Finally, I discuss the kinds of evidence used in linguistic research and demonstrate that, contra to widespread belief, the linguistic Platonist is neither relying on inferior evidence nor ruling out evidence that is clearly relevant to linguistic research.
Keywords: realism, language evolution, innatism, animal communication, linguistic evidence
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Some highlights from current language evolution research
    • 2.1Cognitive capacities in non-human animals
    • 2.2How close to language is animal communication?
  • 3.Ontological considerations
  • 4.Does linguistic evidence rule out linguistic realism?
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.196.04beh
References (69)
References
Arbib, Michael A. 2005. From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28: 105–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behme, Christina. 2015. Is the ontology of biolinguistics coherent? Language Sciences 47: 32–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berwick, Robert C., Pietroski, Paul, Yankama, Beracah & Chomsky, Noam. 2011. Poverty of the stimulus revisited. Cognitive Science 35: 1207–1242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1981. Roots of Language. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bugnyar, Thomas & Heinrich, Bernd. 2005. Food-storing ravens differentiate between knowledgeable and ignorant competitors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 272: 1641–1646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burling, Robbins. 1986. The selective advantage of complex language. Ethology and Sociobiology 7: 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Iani, Jansen, Naomi & ten Cate, Carel. 2014. Zebra finches can learn to recognize affixations. In The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference EVOLANG 10, Erica C. Cartmill, Seán Roberts, Heid Lyn & Hannah Cornish (eds), 411–412. Singapore: World Scientific. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1975. Reflections on Language. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
. 1977. Essays on Form and Interpretation. New York NY: North Holland.Google Scholar
. 1980. The linguistic approach. In Language and Learning, Massimo Piatelli-Palmerini (ed.), 107–130. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. Knowledge of Language. New York NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
. 2009. Opening remarks. In Of Minds and Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country, Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, Juan Uriagereka & Pello Salaburu (eds), 13–43. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2012. The Science of Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve. 2009. First Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris & Postal, Paul M.. 2012. Imposters. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, John. 2009. A question of irresponsibility: Postal, and Chomsky, Gödel. Biolinguistics 3: 99–103.Google Scholar
Corballis, Michael C. 2007. Recursion, language, and starlings. Cognitive Science 31: 697–704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curme, George. 1931. Syntax. Boston MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Deacon, Terrence. 1997. The Symbolic Species. New York NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
. 2009. Relaxed selection and the role of epigenesis in the evolution of language. In Oxford Handbook of Development Behavioral Neuroscience, Mark S. Blumberg, John H. Freeman & Scott R. Robinson (eds), 730–752. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Emery, Nathan J. & Clayton, Nicola S. 2001. Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays. Nature 414: 443–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2005. Australian languages reconsidered: A review of Dixon (2002). Oceanic Linguistics 44(1): 242–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Levinson, Stephen. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 429–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. 2014. The Language Myth: Why Language is not an Instinct. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel. 2012. Language: The Cultural Tool. New York NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2010. The Evolution of Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W. Tecumseh & Friederici, Angelika D. 2012. Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: An overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 367: 1933–1955. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerrold. 1985. Some notes on what linguistics is about. In The Philosophy of Linguistics, Jerrold J. Katz (ed.), 146–160. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gentner, Timothy Q., Fenn, Kimberly M., Margoliash, Daniel & Nusbaum, Howard C. 2006. Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds. Nature 440: 1204–1207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genty, Emilie, Clay, Zanna, Hobaiter, Catherine & Zuberbuehler, Klaus. 2013. Multi-modal use of a socially directed call in bonobos. PLoS ONE 9(1): e84738.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene. 2008. Features on bound pronouns. In Phi-theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces, Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Bejar (eds), 35–56. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hurford, James. 1989. Biological evolution of the Saussurean sign as a component of the language acquisition device. Lingua 77(2): 187–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The Origins of Meaning: Language in the Light of Evolution. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2011. The Origins of Grammar: Language in the Light of Evolution. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2014. The Origins of Language: A Slim Guide. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Iten, Corinne, Stainton, Robert & Wearing, Catherine. 2007. On restricting the evidence base for linguistics. In Philosophy of Psychology, Paul Thagard, Dov Gabbay & John Woods (eds), 219–246. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray & Pinker, Steven. 2005. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition 97: 211–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janik, Vincent M. 2014. Cetacean vocal learning and communication. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 28: 60–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanwal, Jagmeet S., Matsumura, Sumiko, Ohlemiller, Kevin & Suga, Nobuo. 1994. Analysis of acoustic elements and syntax in communication sounds emitted by mustached bats. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 96: 1229–1254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1981. Language and Other Abstract Objects. Totowa NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
1996. The unfinished Chomskyan revolution. Mind and Language 11: 270–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. Realistic Rationalism. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M.. 1991. Realism vs. conceptualism in linguistics. Linguistics and Philosophy 14: 515–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Philip. 2013. The Unpredictable Species. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ludlow, Peter. 2011. The Philosophy of Generative Linguistics. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 2004. A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 31: 883–914. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGilvray, James. 2006. On the innateness of language. In Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science, Robert Stainton (ed.), 97–112. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2009. Introduction to the third edition. In Cartesian Linguistics. A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought, Noam Chomsky, 1–52. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Appendix VI: Semantics and how to do it. In The Science of Language: Interviews with James McGilvray, Noam Chomsky, 206–231. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Pepperberg, Irene M. 2008. Alex & Me. New York NY: Harper Luxe.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1994. The Language Instinct. New York NY: William Morrow.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven & Bloom, Paul. 1990. Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 707–784. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 2009. The incoherence of Chomsky’s ‘biolinguistic’ ontology. Biolinguistics 3: 104–123.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard van Orman. 1987. Quiddities. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reali, Florencia K. & Christiansen, Morten H. 2005. Uncovering the richness of the stimulus: Structural dependence and indirect statistical evidence. Cognitive Science 29: 1007–1028. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, Sue & Lewin, Roger. 1994. Kanzi: The Ape at the Brink of the Human Mind. New York NY: WileyGoogle Scholar
Schel, Anne Marijke, Townsend, Simon W., Machanda, Zarin, Zuberbühler, Klaus & Slocombe, Katie E. 2013. Chimpanzee alarm call production meets key criteria for intentionality. PLoS ONE 8(10): e76674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlenker Philippe, Chemla, Emmanuel, Arnold, Kate, Lemasson, Alban, Ouattara, Karim, Keenan, Sumir, Stephan, Claudia, Ryder, Robin & Zuberbühler, Klaus. 2014. Monkey semantics: Two ‘dialects’ of Campbell’s monkey alarm calls. Linguistics and Philosophy 37: 439–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schnelle, Helmut. 2010. Language in the Brain. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 1973. Chomsky’s revolution in linguistics. In On Noam Chomsky: Critical essays, Gilman Harman (ed.), 2–33. New York NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, Robert M., Cheney, Dorothy L. & Marler, Peter. 1980. Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: Evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science 210(4471): 801–803. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Neil. 1999. Chomsky. Ideas and Ideals. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stainton, Robert. 2006. Words and Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Ryuji, Buck, John R. & Tyack, Peter L. 2006. Information entropy of humpback whale songs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(3): 1849–1866. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Alexander H., Miller, Rachael & Gray, Russel D. 2012. New Caledonian crows reason about hidden causal agents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U S A 109(40): 16389–16391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ten Cate, Carel. 2014. On the phonetic and syntactic abilities of birds. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 28: 157–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. Origins of Communication. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Watumull, Jeffrey. 2014. Biolinguistics and platonism: Contradictory or consilient? Biolinguistics 7: 301–315.Google Scholar