Cover not available
Part of
Essays on Linguistic Realism
Edited by Christina Behme and Martin Neef
[Studies in Language Companion Series 196] 2018
► pp. 139–184

Chapter 6
Languages and other abstract structures

| University of Cape Town
My aim in this chapter is to extend the Realist account of the foundations of linguistics offered by Postal, Katz and others. I first argue against the idea that naive Platonism can capture the necessary requirements on what I call a ‘mixed realist’ view of linguistics, which takes aspects of Platonism, Nominalism and Mentalism into consideration. I then advocate three desiderata for an appropriate ‘mixed realist’ account of linguistic ontology and foundations, namely (1) linguistic creativity and infinity, (2) linguistics as a theory of types (and not tokens) and (3) independence but structural respect between language and the linguistic competence thereof. My own brand of mixed realism, what I call ante rem realism, is defended along the lines of an ante rem or non-eliminative structuralism, the likes of which has been offered for mathematics by Resnik (1997) and Shapiro (1997). In other words, grammars describe a mind-independent (but not necessarily unconnected) linguistic reality in terms of linguistic patterns or structures also known as natural languages. I further amend this picture to allow for the possibility of a naturalistic account of language acquisition and evolution by arguing against a particular view of the type-token distinction.
Keywords: foundations of linguistics, ontology, linguistic realism, Platonism, philosophy of mathematics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Three desiderata for Mixed Realism
    • 2.1Linguistic creativity and infinity
      • 2.1.1Creativity
      • 2.1.2Rule-following and infinity
    • 2.2Of tokens and types
    • 2.3Mixed Realism and respect
    • 2.4Taking stock
      • 2.4.1Mixed Realism and Modified Realism
  • 3.Against Platonism
    • 3.1The right kind of ‘wrong view’
    • 3.2Benacerraf’s dilemma and respect
    • 3.3Conceptual distinctness
  • 4. Ante Rem realism and the foundations of linguistics
    • 4.1Mathematical structuralism
    • 4.2Linguistic structures
    • 4.3Natural types
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.196.06nef
References (85)
References
Awodey, Steven. 1996. Structure in mathematics and logic: A categorical perspective. Philosophia Mathematica (3)4: 209–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benacerraf, Paul. 1965. What numbers could not be. Philosophical Review 74: 47–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1973. Mathematical truth. The Journal of Philosophy 70(19): 661–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behme, Christina. 2015. Is the ontology of biolinguistics coherent? Language Sciences 47: 32–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boolos, Geoffrey. 2000. Must we believe in set theory? In Between Logic and Intuition: Essays in Honor of Charles Parsons, Gila Sher & Richard Tieszen (eds), 257–268. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bromberger, Sylvain. 1989. Types and tokens in linguistics. In Reflections on Chomsky, Alexander L. George (ed.), 58–90. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carr, Philip. 1990. Linguistic Realities. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1959. On certain formal properties of grammars. Information and Control 2: 137–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. In The Structure of Language, Jerry A. Fodor & Jerrold J. Katz (eds), 50–118. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
. 1972. Language and Mind. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Chomsky Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1982. A note on the creative aspect of language use. The Philosophical Review XCI(3): 423–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
. 1990. Language and the problems of knowledge. In The Philosophy of Language, Aloysius P. Matinich (ed.), 581–598. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. New Horizons for the Study of Mind and Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. The mysteries of nature: How deeply hidden? Journal of Philosophy 106 (4): 167–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, John. 2007. Review of Devitt 2006. Mind 116: 416–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008a. Knowledge of language redux. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8: 3–43.Google Scholar
. 2008b. On the Linguistic Conception of Linguistics. Ms.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, Francesco. 1984. Chomsky on creativity. Synthese 58: 85–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Michael. 2006. Ignorance of Language. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Explanation and reality in linguistics. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8(2): 203–231.Google Scholar
Drach, Margaret. 1981. The creative aspect of Chomsky’s use of the notion of creativity. Philosophical Review 90: 44–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Gareth. 1981[1985]. Semantic theory and tacit knowledge. In Gareth Evans: Collected Papers, Antonia Philipps (ed.), 322–342. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerrold A. 1981. Some notes on what linguistics is about. In Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. II, Ned Block (ed.), 197–207. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, Joseph Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Robert. 1987. Abstract Objects. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hellman, Geoffrey. 1989. Mathematics without Numbers: Towards a Modal-Structural Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heyting, Arend. 1956. Intuitionism: An Introduction. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
. 1974. Intuitionistic views on the nature of mathematics. Synthese 27(1–2): 79–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilbert, David. 1899. Grundlagen der Geometrie. Leipzig: Teubner; Foundations of Geometry, trans. by E. J. Townsend. 1959. La Salle Il: Open Court.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles. 1968. The State of the Art. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Iemhoff, Rosalie. 2015. Intuitionism in the philosophy of mathematics. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). <[URL]>
Janssen, Theodore. 1986. Foundations and Applications of Montague Grammar, Part 1. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1971. Linguistic Philosophy: The Underlying Reality of Language and its Philosophical Import. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
1981. Language and Other Abstract Objects. Totowa NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
1984. An outline of Platonist grammar. In Talking Minds: The Study of Language in the Cognitive Sciences, Thomas G. Bever, John M. Carroll & Lance A. Miller (eds.), 17–48. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995. What mathematical knowledge could be. Mind 104(415): 491–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. The unfinished Chomskyan revolution. Mind and Language 11(3): 270–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. Realistic Rationalism. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M.. 1991. Realism vs. conceptualism in linguistics. Linguistics and Philosophy 14(5): 515–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel. 2002. Composite objects and the abstract/concrete distinction. Journal of Philosophical Research 27: 215–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirby, Simon. 1999. Learning, bottlenecks and infinity: A working model of evolution of syntactic communication. In Proceedings of the AISB’99 Symposium on Imitation in Animals and Artifacts, Kerstin Dautenhahn & Chrystopher Nehaniv (eds). Hove: Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behavior.Google Scholar
Langendoen, Terence. 2003. Merge. In Formal Approaches to Functional Phenomena: In Honor of Eloise Jelinek [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 62], Andrew Carnie, Mary Willie & Heidi Harley (eds), 307–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langendoen, D. Terence. 2018. Languages as complete and distinct systems of reference. In Essays on Linguistic Realism, Christina Behme & Martin Neef (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume).DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langendoen, Terence & Postal, Paul M.. 1984. The Vastness of Natural Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Stephen. 2003. Is linguistics a branch of psychology? In Epistemology of Language, Alex Barber (ed.), 69–106. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1975. Languages and language. In The Philosophy of Language, Aloysius P. Matinich (ed.), 3–35. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich. 1992. The case for a New Structuralism. In Prospects for a New Structuralism [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 96], Hans-Heinrich Lieb (ed.), 33–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Describing linguistic objects in a realist way. In Essays on Linguistic Realism, Christina Behme & Martin Neef (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume).DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linsky, Bernhard & Edward N. Zalta. 1995. Naturalized Platonism vs. Platonized naturalism. Journal of Philosophy xcii(10): 525–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ludlow, Peter. 2009. Review: Ignorance of language. The Philosophical Review 118(3): 393–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Millikan, Ruth. 2005. Language: A Biological Model. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neef, Martin. 2018. Autonomous declarative phonology: A realist approach to the phonology of German. In Essays on Linguistic Realism, Christina Behme & Martin Neef (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume).DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nefdt, Ryan. 2016a. Linguistic modelling and the scientific enterprise. Language Sciences 54: 43–57.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016b. Scientific modelling in generative grammar and the dynamic turn in syntax. Linguistics and Philosophy 39(5): 357–394.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Charles. 1990. The structuralist view of mathematical objects. Synthese 84: 303–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Structuralism and metaphysics. The Philosophical Quarterly 54(214): 56–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles. 1958. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 4. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1994. The Language Instinct. New York NY: Morrow.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul M.. 2003. Skeptical Linguistic Essays. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2009. The incoherence of Chomsky’s ‘biolinguistic’ ontology. Biolinguistics 3(1): 104–123.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey. 2011. On the mathematical foundations of syntactic structures. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20(3): 277–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey & Scholz, Barbara. 2010. Recursion and the infinitude claim. In Recursion in Human Language [Studies in Generative Grammar 104], Harry van der Hulst (ed.), 113–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylyshyn, Zenon. 1973. What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psycholological Bulletin 80: 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1972. Methodological reflections on current linguistic theory. In Semantics of Natural Language, Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds), 442–454. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1987. Quiddities. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Resnik, Michael. 1982. Mathematics as a science of patterns: Epistemology. Nous 16: 95–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Mathematics as a Science of Patterns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rey, Georges. 2006. Conventions, intuitions and linguistic inexistents: A reply to Devitt. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6: 549–569.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1972. Chomsky’s Revolution in Linguistics. New York Review of Books, June 29, 1972.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Stewart. 1997. Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Shieber, Stuart. 1985. Evidence against the context-freeness of natural language. In The Formal Complexity of Natural Language [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 33], Walter J. Savitch, Emmon Bach, William E. Marsh & Gila Safran-Naveh (eds), 320–334. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shieber, Stuart & Schabes, Yves. 1991. Synchronous tree-adjoining grammars. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Hans Karlgren (ed.). Helsinki: Helsingiensis Universitas.Google Scholar
Slezak, Peter. 2007. Linguistic explanation and psychological reality. lingbuzz/000453.Google Scholar
Soames, Scott. 1984. Linguistics and psychology. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 155–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stainton, Robert. 2014. Philosophy of Linguistics. Oxford Handbooks Online. <[URL]>DOI logo
Stanley, Jason & Szabó, Zoltan. 2000. On quantifier domain restriction. Mind & Language 15(2–3): 219–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomalin, Marcus. 2006. Linguistics and the Formal Sciences. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wetzel, Linda. 2014. Types and Tokens. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta, (ed.). <[URL]>
Yablo, Steven. 2013. Explanation, extrapolation, and existence. Mind 121(484): 1007–1029. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Forker, Diana
2021. General linguistics and the nature of human language. Theoretical Linguistics 47:1-2 ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich
2021. Theories of language, language comparison, and grammatical description. In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132], ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Nefdt, Ryan M.
2019. The philosophy of linguistics: Scientific underpinnings and methodological disputes. Philosophy Compass 14:12 DOI logo
Nefdt, Ryan M.
2021. Structural realism and generative linguistics. Synthese 199:1-2 ► pp. 3711 ff. DOI logo
Nefdt, Ryan M.
2024.  Theoretical Linguistics and the philosophy of linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 50:1-2 ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.