Cover not available
Part of
Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Dalila Ayoun, Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Studies in Language Companion Series 197] 2018
► pp. 1–18

Chapter 1
Introduction

On the gradience of TAM-E categories

| University of Arizona
| Université Paris Diderot and University of Colorado
| Université Paris Diderot
Article outline
  • 1.Categorization in tense, aspect, modality and evidentiality: Theoretical issues and state of the art
    • 1.1Futurity, modality and conditionals
    • 1.2Evidentiality and epistemicity
    • 1.3Aspect
  • 2.Presentation of the volume
    • 2.1Part I: Futurity, modality, conditionals
    • 2.2Part II: Evidentiality and epistemicity
    • 2.3Part III: Aspect and past temporality
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.197.01ayo
References

References

Abraham, Werner
1998 The morphological and semantic classification of ‘evidentials’ and modal verbs in West Germanic: The perfect(ive) catalyst. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 42: 192–206.Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Kulikov, Leonid
(eds) 1999 Tense-aspect, Transitivity and Causativity. Essays in honor of Vladimir Nedjalkov [Studies in Language Companion Series 50]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth
(eds) 2008 Modality-Aspect Interfaces: Implications and Typological Solutions [Typological Studies in Language 79]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2014 The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. In The Grammar of Knowledge. A Cross-Linguistic Typology, Alexandra Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), 1–51. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd
1986 Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 273–312. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Delfitto, Denis
2000 Aspect vs. actionality: Why they should be kept apart. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 189–225. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert, I.
1991 Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper
2012 Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-cognitive Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye Kasper & Harder, Peter
2009 Evidentiality: Linguistics categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language 16: 9–43 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bres, Jacques
2003 Temps verbal, aspect et point de vue: De la langue au discours. Cahiers de Praxématique 41: 55–84.Google Scholar
Bres, Jacques, Azzopardi, Sophie & Sarrazin, Sophie
2012 Présentation générale: Ultériorité du passé et valeurs modales. Faits de Langues 40: 5–11.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994 The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Dahl, Östen
1989 The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13(1): 51–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee Joan
1985 Morphology. A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace & Nichols, Johanna
(eds) 1986 Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Celle, Agnès
1997 Etude contrastive du futur français et de ses réalisations en anglais. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
2006 Temps et modalité: l’anglais, le français et l’allemand en contraste. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2009 Hearsay adverbs and modality. In Modality in English: Theory and Description, Raphael Salkie, Pierre Busuttil & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 269–293. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Celle, Agnès & Tsangalidis, Anastasios
2017 Introduction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, The Linguistic Expression of Mirativity 15(2): 305–311.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976 Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1985 Tense. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2012 Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2000 The tense-aspect systems of European languages in a typological perspective. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 3–25. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand
1999 Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18: 83–101.Google Scholar
2005 Semantic distinctions of evidentiality. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 314–317. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2001 The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Swart, Henriëtte
2000 Tense, aspect and coercion in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Formal Grammar Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway (eds), 1–20. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
De Wit, Astrid
2017 The Present Perfective Paradox across Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele & Smirnova, Elena
2010 Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John
2007 The stance triangle. In Stancetaking in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164], Robert Englebretson (ed.), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faller, Martina
2002 Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne
1982 The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gosselin, Laurent, Enjalbert, Patrice, Mathet, Yann & Becher, Gérard
2013 Aspect de l’itération. L’expression de la répétition en français: Analyse linguistique et formalisation. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
2006 Constructions at Work. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Guentchéva Zlatka
(ed.) 1996 L’énonciation médiatisée. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Guentchéva, Zlatka
2016 Introduction. In Aspectuality and Temporality: Descriptive and Theoretical Issues [Studies in Language Companion Series 172], Zlatka Guentchéva (ed.), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1924 The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars
2000 Viewpoint operators in European Languages. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 27–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
2009 How time is encoded. In The Expression of Time, Wolfgang Klein & Ping Li (eds), 39–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korotkova, Natalia
2016 Heterogeneity and Uniformity in the Evidential Domain. PhD dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Lansari, Laure
2009  Les périphrases verbales aller + infinitif et be going to. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
Forthcoming. On categorization: Stick to the facts of the languages. Linguistic Typology.
Leiss, Elisabeth & Abraham, Werner
(eds) 2014 Modes of Modality. Modality, Typology, and Universal Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 149]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1968 Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977 Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Manning, Liliann, Cassel, Daniel & Cassel, Jean-Christophe
2013 St Augustine’s reflections on memory and time and the current concept of subjective time in mental time travel. Behavioral Sciences 3(2): 232–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A.
1998 Aspectual Grammar and Past-Time Reference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2004 Type shifting in Construction Grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15: 1–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura
2006 Tense in English. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds), 220–243. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1986 Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford Universty.Google Scholar
Mortelmans, Tanya
2000 On the ‘evidential’ nature of the ‘epistemic’ use of the German modals müssen and sollen . Belgian Journal of Linguistics 14: 131–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mushin, Ilana
2001 Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance: Narrative Retelling [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 87]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2017 Evidentiality reconsidered. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 271], Juana Isabel Marίn Arrese, Gerda Haβler & Marta Carretero (eds), 57–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.
1986 Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Poutsma, Hendrik
1922 Mood and Tense of the English Verb. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Prior, Arthur
1967 Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sahoo, Kalyanamalini & Lemmens, Maarten
2017 Degrees of mirativity. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, The Linguistic Expression of Mirativity 15(2): 343–384.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlota
1991 The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ultan, Russell
1978 The nature of future tenses. In Universals of Human Language, IV: Word Structure , Joseph Greenberg (ed.), 83–123. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir
1998 Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Wassenhove, Virginie
2017 Time consciousness in a computational mind/brain. Journal of Consciousness Studies 24(3–4): 177–202.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1967 Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai & Gillies, Anthony S.
2010 Must … stay … strong! Natural Language Semantics 18(4): 351–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willett, Thomas
1988 A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1): 51–97 DOI logoGoogle Scholar