Cover not available
Part of
Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Dalila Ayoun, Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Studies in Language Companion Series 197] 2018
► pp. 1–18

Chapter 1
Introduction

On the gradience of TAM-E categories

| University of Arizona
| Université Paris Diderot and University of Colorado
| Université Paris Diderot
Article outline
  • 1.Categorization in tense, aspect, modality and evidentiality: Theoretical issues and state of the art
    • 1.1Futurity, modality and conditionals
    • 1.2Evidentiality and epistemicity
    • 1.3Aspect
  • 2.Presentation of the volume
    • 2.1Part I: Futurity, modality, conditionals
    • 2.2Part II: Evidentiality and epistemicity
    • 2.3Part III: Aspect and past temporality
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.197.01ayo
References (66)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1998. The morphological and semantic classification of ‘evidentials’ and modal verbs in West Germanic: The perfect(ive) catalyst. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 42: 192–206.Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Kulikov, Leonid (eds). 1999. Tense-aspect, Transitivity and Causativity. Essays in honor of Vladimir Nedjalkov [Studies in Language Companion Series 50]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth (eds). 2008. Modality-Aspect Interfaces: Implications and Typological Solutions [Typological Studies in Language 79]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2014. The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. In The Grammar of Knowledge. A Cross-Linguistic Typology, Alexandra Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), 1–51. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd. 1986. Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 273–312. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Delfitto, Denis. 2000. Aspect vs. actionality: Why they should be kept apart. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 189–225. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert, I. 1991. Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-cognitive Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye Kasper & Harder, Peter. 2009. Evidentiality: Linguistics categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language 16: 9–43 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bres, Jacques. 2003. Temps verbal, aspect et point de vue: De la langue au discours. Cahiers de Praxématique 41: 55–84.Google Scholar
Bres, Jacques, Azzopardi, Sophie & Sarrazin, Sophie. 2012. Présentation générale: Ultériorité du passé et valeurs modales. Faits de Langues 40: 5–11.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Dahl, Östen. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13(1): 51–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee Joan. 1985. Morphology. A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace & Nichols, Johanna (eds). 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Celle, Agnès. 1997. Etude contrastive du futur français et de ses réalisations en anglais. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
. 2006. Temps et modalité: l’anglais, le français et l’allemand en contraste. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2009. Hearsay adverbs and modality. In Modality in English: Theory and Description, Raphael Salkie, Pierre Busuttil & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 269–293. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Celle, Agnès & Tsangalidis, Anastasios. 2017. Introduction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, The Linguistic Expression of Mirativity 15(2): 305–311.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2000. The tense-aspect systems of European languages in a typological perspective. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 3–25. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand. 1999. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18: 83–101.Google Scholar
. 2005. Semantic distinctions of evidentiality. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 314–317. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Swart, Henriëtte. 2000. Tense, aspect and coercion in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Formal Grammar Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway (eds), 1–20. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
De Wit, Astrid. 2017. The Present Perfective Paradox across Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele & Smirnova, Elena. 2010. Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John. 2007. The stance triangle. In Stancetaking in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164], Robert Englebretson (ed.), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faller, Martina. 2002. Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gosselin, Laurent, Enjalbert, Patrice, Mathet, Yann & Becher, Gérard. 2013. Aspect de l’itération. L’expression de la répétition en français: Analyse linguistique et formalisation. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at Work. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Guentchéva Zlatka (ed.). 1996. L’énonciation médiatisée. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Guentchéva, Zlatka. 2016. Introduction. In Aspectuality and Temporality: Descriptive and Theoretical Issues [Studies in Language Companion Series 172], Zlatka Guentchéva (ed.), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 2000. Viewpoint operators in European Languages. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 27–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 2009. How time is encoded. In The Expression of Time, Wolfgang Klein & Ping Li (eds), 39–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korotkova, Natalia. 2016. Heterogeneity and Uniformity in the Evidential Domain. PhD dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Lansari, Laure. 2009. Les périphrases verbales aller + infinitif et be going to. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. Forthcoming. On categorization: Stick to the facts of the languages. Linguistic Typology.
Leiss, Elisabeth & Abraham, Werner (eds). 2014. Modes of Modality. Modality, Typology, and Universal Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 149]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Manning, Liliann, Cassel, Daniel & Cassel, Jean-Christophe. 2013. St Augustine’s reflections on memory and time and the current concept of subjective time in mental time travel. Behavioral Sciences 3(2): 232–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. 1998. Aspectual Grammar and Past-Time Reference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2004. Type shifting in Construction Grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15: 1–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura. 2006. Tense in English. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds), 220–243. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1986. Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford Universty.Google Scholar
Mortelmans, Tanya. 2000. On the ‘evidential’ nature of the ‘epistemic’ use of the German modals müssen and sollen . Belgian Journal of Linguistics 14: 131–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mushin, Ilana. 2001. Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance: Narrative Retelling [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 87]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2017. Evidentiality reconsidered. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 271], Juana Isabel Marίn Arrese, Gerda Haβler & Marta Carretero (eds), 57–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Poutsma, Hendrik. 1922. Mood and Tense of the English Verb. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Prior, Arthur. 1967. Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sahoo, Kalyanamalini & Lemmens, Maarten. 2017. Degrees of mirativity. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, The Linguistic Expression of Mirativity 15(2): 343–384.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlota. 1991. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ultan, Russell. 1978. The nature of future tenses. In Universals of Human Language, IV: Word Structure , Joseph Greenberg (ed.), 83–123. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Wassenhove, Virginie. 2017. Time consciousness in a computational mind/brain. Journal of Consciousness Studies 24(3–4): 177–202.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai & Gillies, Anthony S. 2010. Must … stay … strong! Natural Language Semantics 18(4): 351–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1): 51–97 DOI logoGoogle Scholar