Cover not available
Part of
Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Dalila Ayoun, Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Studies in Language Companion Series 197] 2018
► pp. 19–40

Chapter 2
A quantitative perspective on modality and future tense in French and German

| Université de Neuchâtel
This chapter looks at modal nuances conveyed by future tenses in French (futur simple, futur antérieur) and German (Futur I, Futur II) via a corpus-based study, using comparable newspaper corpora (Le Monde, Süddeutsche Zeitung). In addition to a qualitative analysis based on an enunciative approach to modal forms (Rossari 2016), we will adopt a quantitative perspective in order to elicit statistical evidence on the nature and degree of modality expressed by the future tense in daily newspapers. Besides the fact that modal use of future tenses is rather rare in both languages compared to their temporal use, the quantitative analysis shows that French appears to have a more modal use of future tense than German in the text type sampled.
Keywords: modality, future tense, French, German, corpus study, quantitative analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Qualitative analysis
    • 2.1Representation of future tense uses
    • 2.2Future tense in French and German
      • 2.2.1 Temporal use of future tense
      • 2.2.2Modal use of future tense
  • 3.Quantitative analysis
    • 3.1 Corpora and procedures
    • 3.2Quantitative data
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 2 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.197.02hut
References (19)
References
Azzopardi, Sophie. 2011. Le futur et le conditionnel: Valeur en langue et effets de sens en discours. Analyse contrastive Espagnol/Français. PhD dissertation, University of Montpellier 3.Google Scholar
Azzopardi, Sophie & Bres, Jacques. 2015. Quand le futur ne porte pas sur le procès qu’il actualise: Futur d’énonciation et futur de découverte. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 38: 77–96.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Celle, Agnès. 2006. Temps et modalité. L’Anglais, le français et l’allemand en contraste. [Études Contrastives 7]. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Confais, Jean-Paul. 1992. No future? Les ‘futurs’ du français et de l’allemand. In Systèmes interactifs. Mélanges en l’honneur de Jean David, Gertrud Gréciano & Georges Kleiber (eds), 81–91. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Damourette, Jacques & Pichon, Édouard. 1911–1936. Des mots à la pensée. Essai de grammaire de la langue française, Vol. 5. Paris: Éditions d’Artrey.Google Scholar
Duden (Bibliographisches Institut). 2009. Duden 4: Die Grammatik, 8th edn. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language. Diachronic Evidence from Romance [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 36]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fritz, Thomas A. 2000. Wahr-Sagen: Futur, Modalität und Sprecherbezug im Deutschen. [Beiträge zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft 16]. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice & Goosse, André. 2016. Le bon usage: Grammaire française, 16th edn. Brussels: De Boeck Supérieur.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1995. Agent-oriented modality vs. epistemic modality: Some observations on German modals. In Modality in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 32], Joan L. Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds), 17–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Monde. 2007. Paris: Le Monde.Google Scholar
Revaz, Françoise. 2009. Valeurs et emplois du futur simple et du présent prospectif en français. Faits de Langues 26: 149–161.Google Scholar
Ricci, Claudia, Rossari, Corinne & Siminiciuc, Elena. 2016. La représentation des sens modaux dans trois langues romanes: Le français, l’italien et le roumain. Du qualitatif au quantitatif et retour. Syntaxe et Sémantique 17: 93–113.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Süddeutsche Zeitung. 2013. Munich: Süddeutsche Verlag.Google Scholar
Rossari, Corinne. 2016. Les fluctuations de sens dans quelques formes modales à la lumière d’une approche quantitative et qualitative. Studii de Lingvistică 6: 127–142.Google Scholar
Rossari, Corinne, Ricci, Claudia & Siminiciuc, Elena. 2017. Les valeurs rhétoriques du futur en français, italien et roumain. In Le futur dans les langues romanes, Laura Baranzini (ed.), 49–77. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sundell, Lars-Göran. 2003. Le futur modal revisité. In Aspects de la modalité, Merete Birkelund, Gerhard Boysen & Poul Søren Kjærsgaard (eds), 217–228. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vater, Heinz. 1975. Werden als Modalverb. In Aspekte der Modalität [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 1], Joseph Calbert & Heinz Vater (eds), 71–148. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kishketon, Brendan
2023. Jussive Constructions in Ojibwe. International Journal of American Linguistics 89:1 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.