Chapter 9
Embedding evidence in Tagalog and German
On two types of evidentials
We compare two particles with similar meaning contributions from two different languages, German wohl and Tagalog yata, both roughly translatable as ‘I infer’. Based on their context usage, we claim that both are inferential evidentials. Despite their identical meaning, we assume a non-uniform treatment of evidentials, in view of their differing behaviors. By applying well-established tests, we determine the level of meaning they operate on, the propositional level for yata and the illocutionary level for wohl. Our data show that the embeddability test needs modification, allowing for illocutionary operators to be embedded, but only in root-like clauses, as wohl does. Yata, being embeddable in both root and non-root clauses, operates on a propositional level, and is thus a modal evidential.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Evidentiality: Yata and wohl as evidential markers
- 2.1The notion of evidentiality
- 2.2
Wohl and yata as evidentials
- 2.2.1Yata
- 2.2.2Wohl
- 2.2.3
Context usage
- 3.Evidentials: Modals vs SAOs
- 3.1
Yata as a modal evidential
- 3.2Wohl as a SAO
- 3.3Embeddability test restrictions
- 3.3.1
Factive vs non-factive predicates
- 3.3.2Relative clauses: Restrictive vs non-restrictive
- 3.3.3Adverbial clauses
- 3.4Force as licenser for wohl
- 4.Conclusions and further issues
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References (94)
Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth
(eds) 2009 Modalität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
(ed.) 2018 The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anand, Pranav
2006 De De Se. PhD dissertation, MIT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anand, Pranav & Hacquard, Valentine
2013 Epistemics and attitudes.
Semantics and Pragmatics 6(8): 1–59.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
AnderBois, Scott
2014 On the exceptional status of reportative evidentials.
In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory,
Todd Snider,
Sarah D‘Antonio &
Mia Weigand (eds), 24: 234–254.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, Stephen R.
2008 Second position clitics in Tagalog.
The Nature of the Word,
Kristin Hanson &
Sharon Inkelas (eds), 549–466.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, John L.
1962 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barbet, Cécile
2012 Devoir et pouvoir, des marqueurs modaux ou évidentiels? Langue Française 173: 49–63.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bayer, Josef & Obenauer, Hans-Georg
2011 Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types.
The Linguistic Review 28, 449–491.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brugman, Claudia & Macaulay, Monica
2015 Characterizing evidentiality.
Linguistic Typology 19(2): 201–238.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michal
1999 The typology of structural deficiency. In
Clitics in the Languages of Europe,
Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 145–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, Williams & Nichols, Johanna
(eds) 1986 Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chung, Kyung-Sook
2005 Space in Tense: The Interaction of Tense, Aspect, Evidentiality and Speech Act in Korean. PhD dissertation, Simon Fraser University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chung, Kyung-Sook
2007 Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean.
Natural Language Semantics 15: 187–219.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coniglio, Marco
2008 Die Syntax der Deutschen Modalpartikeln: Ihre Distribution und Lizensierung in Haupt-und Nebensätzen. PhD dissertation, Universita Ca’foscari Venezia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coniglio, Marco & Zegrean, Iulia
Davis, Christopher, Potts, Christopher & Speas, Margaret
2007 The pragmatic values of evidential sentences.
Proceedings of SALT,
Tova Friedman and
Masayuki Gibson (eds), 17, 71–88. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dendale, Patrick
1994 Devoir: Marqueur modal ou évidentiel? Langue Française 102: 24–40.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dendale, Patrick
2001 Le futur conjectural versus devoir épistémique: Différences de valeur et restrictions d’emploi.
Le Français Moderne 69: 1–20.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dendale, Patrick & Tasmowski, Liliane
2001 Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions.
Journal of Pragmatics 33: 339–348.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diewald, Gabriele
2006 Discourse particles and modal particles as grammatical elements. In
Approaches to Discourse Particles,
Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 403–425. Amsterdam: Elvesier.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckardt, Regine
2017 Engaging questions: Wohl in German Vend-questions. Paper presented at the Non-At-Issue Meaning and Information Structure Workshop. University in Oslo, May 8–10.
Egg, Markus & Mursell, Johannes
2017 The syntax and semantics of discourse particles. In
Discourse Particles. Formal Approaches to Their Syntax and Semantics,
Josef Bayer &
Volker Struckmeier (eds), 15–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Faller, Martina
2002 Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Faller, Martina
2003 Propositional- and illocutionary-level evidentiality in Cuzco Quechua.
Proceedings of SULA,
Jan Anderssen,
Paula Menéndez-Benito &
Adam Werle (eds), 2, 19–33. Amherst MA: GLSA.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Faller, Martina
2007 Evidentiality above and below speech acts. Ms. University of Manchester.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Faller, Martina
2011 A possible world semantics for Cuzco Quechua evidentials. In
Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 20,
Li Nan &
David Lutz (eds), 660–683. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Faller, Martina
2014 Do speech act evidentials embed after all? Paper presented at the Workshop on the Semantics of Embedding and the Syntax of the Left Periphery, LAGB, Oxford, September.
von Fintel, Kai & Gillies, Anthony S.
2010 Must… stay… strong!.
Natural Language Semantics 18: 351–383.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garrett, Edward
2001 Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. PhD dissertation, University of California.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, Talmy
2001 Syntax: An Introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, H. Paul
1975 Logic and conversation. In
The Logic of Grammar,
Donald Davidson &
Gilbert Harman (eds), 64–75. Encino CA: Dickenson.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gutzmann, Daniel
2015 Use-Conditional Meaning: Studies in Multidimensional Semantics. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Haan, Ferdinand
1999 Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries.
Southwest Journal of Linguistics: 18 91–105.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Haan, Ferdinand
2001 The relation between modality and evidentiality.
Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 9: 201–216.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane
2006 Conditionals, factives and the left periphery.
Lingua 116: 1651–1669.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane
2012 Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hamblin, Charles L.
1973 Questions in Montague English.
Foundations of Language 10: 41–53.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haumann, Dagmar & Letnes, Ole
2012 German wohl: An evidential? In
Covert Patterns of Modality,
Werner Abraham &
Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 202–238. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heim, Johannes, Keupdjio, Hermann, Wai-Man Lam, Zoe, Osa-Gómez, Adriana & Wiltschko, Martina
2014 How to do things with particles. In
Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association,
Laura Teddiman (ed.), 1–15. Toronto: Canadian Linguistic Association.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Helbig, Gerhard
1988 Lexikon Deutscher Partikeln. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hentschel, Elke
1986 Funktion und Geschichte Deutscher Partikeln. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heycock, Caroline
2005 Embedded root phenomena. In
The Blackwell Companion to Syntax,
Martin Everaert &
Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 179–209. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Izvorski, Roumyana
1997 The present perfect as an epistemic modal. In
Proceedings of the 7th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, held March 21–23 1997 at Stanford University,
Aaron Lawson (ed.), 222–239.
[URL]
Jacobs, Joachim
1984 Funktionale Satzperspektive und Illokutionssemantik.
Linguistische Berichte 91: 25–58.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobsen, William H.
1986 The heterogeneity of evidentials in Makah. In
Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology,
William Chafe &
John Nichols (eds), 3–28. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaplan, David
1989 Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In
Themes from Kaplan,
Joseph Almog,
John Perry &
Howard Wettstein (eds), 481–563. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Karttunen, Lauri
1977 Syntax and semantics of questions.
Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 1–44.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaufman, Daniel
2010 The Morphosyntax of Tagalog Clitics: A Typologically Driven Approach. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van der Klok, Jozina
2014 On the use of questionnaires in semantic fieldwork: A case study in modality. Ms, University of British Columbia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Korotkova, Natalia
2016 Heterogeneity and Uniformity in the Evidential Domain. PhD dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, Angelika
1981 The notional category of modality. In
Words, Worlds and Contexts,
Hans J. Eikmeyer &
Hannes Rieser (eds), 38–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, Angelika
1991 Modality.
Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research,
Dieter Wunderlich &
Arnim von Stechow (eds), 639–650. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, Angelika
1999 Beyond ouch and oops
. Paper presented at the Cornell Conference on Theories of Context Dependency. Ithaca NY, Cornell University, March 26.
Kroeger, Paul
1998 Clitics and clause structure in Tagalog. In
Pagtanaw: Essays on Language in Honor of Teodoro A. Llamzon, 53–72. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kroeger, Paul
1993 Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford CA: CSLI.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics, Vol. 2. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthewson, Lisa
2012 When fieldwork meets theory: Evidence about evidentials. In
Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Theory: Studies of Meaning and Structure,
Britta Stolterfoht &
Sam Featherston (eds), 85–114. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthewson, Lisa
2015 Evidential restrictions on epistemic modals. In
Epistemic Indefinites,
Luis Alonso-Ovalle &
Paula Menéndez-Benito (eds), 141–160. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthewson, Lisa, Rullmann, Hotze & Davis, Henry
McCready, Eric & Ogata, Norry
2007 Evidentiality, modality and probability.
Linguistics and Philosophy 30(2): 147–206.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCready, Eric
2015a Evidentiality. Lecture given at
the 27th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, August.
McCready, Eric
2015b Reliability in Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Modicom, Pierre-Yves
2012 Shared knowledge and epistemic reductionism: Covert semantics of German modal particles. In
Covert Patterns of Modality,
Werner Abraham &
Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 202–238. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Murray, Sarah
2010 Evidentiality and the Structure of Speech Acts. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, Jan
2006 Modality: Overview and linguistic issues. In
The Expression of Modality,
William Frawley (ed.), 1–26. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Palmer, Frank
1986 Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peterson, Tyler
2010 Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Gitksan at the Semantics- Pragmatics Interface.
PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Potts, Christopher
2007 The expressive dimension.
Theoretical Linguistics 33(2): 165–198.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Repp, Sophie
2009 Negation in Gapping. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Repp, Sophie
2006 ¬(A&B). Gapping, negation and speech act operators.
In Special issue Ellipsis
,
Jennifer Spenader &
Petra Hendricks (eds).
Research on Language and Computation 4(4): 397–423.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In
Elements of Grammar,
Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rooryck, Johan
2001 Evidentiality, Part I.
Glot International 5: 125–133.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Saussure, Louis
2014 Inferential evidentiality with epistemic modality. A pragmatic stance. Paper presented at
Chronos 11, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 16–18 June.
Schachter, Paul
1973 Constraints on clitic order in Tagalog. In
Parangal kay Cecilio Lopez,
Andrew B. Gonzalez (ed.), 214–231. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schachter, Paul & Otanes, Fe
1972 Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schenner, Mathias & Sode, Frank
Scherf, Nathalie
2017 The syntax of Swedish modal particles. In
Discourse Particles. Formal Approaches to Their Syntax and Semantics,
Josef Bayer &
Volker Struckmeier (eds), 78–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schlenker, Philippe
2003 A plea for monsters.
Linguistics and Philosophy 26(1): 29–120.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
SEALang Library Tagalog Text Corpus
[URL] (10 November 2016).
Searle, John R.
1969 Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simons, Mandy
2006 Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition.
Lingua 117: 1034–1056.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Speas, Margaret & Tenny, Carol
Stalnaker, Robert
2002 Common Ground.
Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5): 701–721.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tan, Jennifer
2016 On the modality of Tagalog evidentials. In
Proceedings of the 23rd Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association,
Hiroki Nomoto,
Takuya Miyauchi &
Asako Shiohara (eds), 273–287. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thurmair, Maria
1989 Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tonhauser, Judith & Matthewson, Lisa
2015 Empirical evidence in research on meaning. Ms.
[URL]
Vanderveken, Daniel
1990 Meaning and Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Waldie, Ryan, Peterson, Tyler, Rullmann, Hotze & Mackie, Scott
2009 Evidentials as epistemic modals or speech act operators: testing the tests. Paper presented at The 14th Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas (WSCLA), Purdue University.
Zeevat, Henk
2000 Discourse particles as speech act markers.
LDV-Forum 17: 74–91.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zimmermann, Malte
2004 Zum ‘wohl’: Diskurspartikeln als Satztypmodifikatoren.
Linguistische Berichte 199: 253–286.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Monforte, Sergio
2022.
Modalitate-markatzaileak: partikula modalak ote dira euskarazko partikula modalak? [Marcadores de modalidad: ¿son realmente las partículas modales del vasco partículas modales?].
Fontes Linguae Vasconum :132
► pp. 515 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.