Chapter published in:
Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Dalila Ayoun, Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Studies in Language Companion Series 197] 2018
► pp. 185212
References

References

Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth
(eds) 2009Modalität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2018The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anand, Pranav
2006De De Se. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Anand, Pranav & Hacquard, Valentine
2013Epistemics and attitudes. Semantics and Pragmatics 6(8): 1–59.Google Scholar
AnderBois, Scott
2014On the exceptional status of reportative evidentials. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Todd Snider, Sarah D‘Antonio & Mia Weigand (eds), 24: 234–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
2008Second position clitics in Tagalog. The Nature of the Word, Kristin Hanson & Sharon Inkelas (eds), 549–466.Google Scholar
Austin, John L.
1962How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Barbet, Cécile
2012Devoir et pouvoir, des marqueurs modaux ou évidentiels? Langue Française 173: 49–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Obenauer, Hans-Georg
2011Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. The Linguistic Review 28, 449–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brugman, Claudia & Macaulay, Monica
2015Characterizing evidentiality. Linguistic Typology 19(2): 201–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michal
1999The typology of structural deficiency. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 145–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chafe, Williams & Nichols, Johanna
(eds) 1986Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chung, Kyung-Sook
2005Space in Tense: The Interaction of Tense, Aspect, Evidentiality and Speech Act in Korean. PhD dissertation, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
2007Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean. Natural Language Semantics 15: 187–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2008Die Syntax der Deutschen Modalpartikeln: Ihre Distribution und Lizensierung in Haupt-und Nebensätzen. PhD dissertation, Universita Ca’foscari Venezia.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco & Zegrean, Iulia
2012Splitting up force: Evidence from discourse particles. In Main Clause Phenomena. New horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 229–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, Bert
2009Evidentiality and epistemic modality. On the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language 16(1): 44–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Christopher, Potts, Christopher & Speas, Margaret
2007The pragmatic values of evidential sentences. Proceedings of SALT, TovaFriedman and Masayuki Gibson (eds), 17, 71–88. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dendale, Patrick
1994Devoir: Marqueur modal ou évidentiel? Langue Française 102: 24–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Le futur conjectural versus devoir épistémique: Différences de valeur et restrictions d’emploi. Le Français Moderne 69: 1–20.Google Scholar
Dendale, Patrick & Tasmowski, Liliane
2001 Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 339–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2006Discourse particles and modal particles as grammatical elements. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 403–425. Amsterdam: Elvesier.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2017Engaging questions: Wohl in German Vend-questions. Paper presented at the Non-At-Issue Meaning and Information Structure Workshop. University in Oslo, May 8–10.
Egg, Markus & Mursell, Johannes
2017The syntax and semantics of discourse particles. In Discourse Particles. Formal Approaches to Their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 15–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Faller, Martina
2002Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
2003Propositional- and illocutionary-level evidentiality in Cuzco Quechua. Proceedings of SULA, Jan Anderssen, Paula Menéndez-Benito & Adam Werle (eds), 2, 19–33. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
2007Evidentiality above and below speech acts. Ms. University of Manchester.Google Scholar
2011A possible world semantics for Cuzco Quechua evidentials. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 20, Li Nan & David Lutz (eds), 660–683. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
2014Do speech act evidentials embed after all? Paper presented at the Workshop on the Semantics of Embedding and the Syntax of the Left Periphery, LAGB, Oxford, September.
von Fintel, Kai & Gillies, Anthony S.
2010Must… stay… strong!. Natural Language Semantics 18: 351–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Edward
2001 Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. PhD dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2001Syntax: An Introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975Logic and conversation. In The Logic of Grammar, Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds), 64–75. Encino CA: Dickenson.Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel
2015Use-Conditional Meaning: Studies in Multidimensional Semantics. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand
1999Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics: 18 91–105.Google Scholar
2001The relation between modality and evidentiality. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 9: 201–216.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2006Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116: 1651–1669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L.
1973Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41–53.Google Scholar
Haumann, Dagmar & Letnes, Ole
2012German wohl: An evidential? In Covert Patterns of Modality, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 202–238. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Heim, Johannes, Keupdjio, Hermann, Wai-Man Lam, Zoe, Osa-Gómez, Adriana & Wiltschko, Martina
2014How to do things with particles. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Laura Teddiman (ed.), 1–15. Toronto: Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
Helbig, Gerhard
1988Lexikon Deutscher Partikeln. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Hentschel, Elke
1986Funktion und Geschichte Deutscher Partikeln. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heycock, Caroline
2005Embedded root phenomena. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 179–209. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Izvorski, Roumyana
1997The present perfect as an epistemic modal. In Proceedings of the 7th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, held March 21–23 1997 at Stanford University, Aaron Lawson (ed.), 222–239. https://​journals​.linguisticsociety​.org​/proceedings​/index​.php​/SALT​/issue​/view​/102
Jacobs, Joachim
1984Funktionale Satzperspektive und Illokutionssemantik. Linguistische Berichte 91: 25–58.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, William H.
1986The heterogeneity of evidentials in Makah. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, William Chafe & John Nichols (eds), 3–28. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David
1989Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In Themes from Kaplan, Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds), 481–563. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri
1977Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel
2010The Morphosyntax of Tagalog Clitics: A Typologically Driven Approach. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
van der Klok, Jozina
2014On the use of questionnaires in semantic fieldwork: A case study in modality. Ms, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Korotkova, Natalia
2016Heterogeneity and Uniformity in the Evidential Domain. PhD dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1981The notional category of modality. In Words, Worlds and Contexts, Hans J. Eikmeyer & Hannes Rieser (eds), 38–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1991Modality. Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Dieter Wunderlich & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 639–650. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1999Beyond ouch and oops . Paper presented at the Cornell Conference on Theories of Context Dependency. Ithaca NY, Cornell University, March 26.
Kroeger, Paul
1998Clitics and clause structure in Tagalog. In Pagtanaw: Essays on Language in Honor of Teodoro A. Llamzon, 53–72. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar
1993Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics, Vol. 2. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa
2012When fieldwork meets theory: Evidence about evidentials. In Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Theory: Studies of Meaning and Structure, Britta Stolterfoht & Sam Featherston (eds), 85–114. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2015Evidential restrictions on epistemic modals. In Epistemic Indefinites, Luis Alonso-Ovalle & Paula Menéndez-Benito (eds), 141–160. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa, Rullmann, Hotze & Davis, Henry
2007Evidentials as epistemic modals: Evidence from St’át’imcets. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 7: 201–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCready, Eric & Ogata, Norry
2007Evidentiality, modality and probability. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(2): 147–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCready, Eric
2015aEvidentiality. Lecture given at the 27th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, August.
2015bReliability in Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Modicom, Pierre-Yves
2012Shared knowledge and epistemic reductionism: Covert semantics of German modal particles. In Covert Patterns of Modality, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 202–238. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Murray, Sarah
2010Evidentiality and the Structure of Speech Acts. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2006Modality: Overview and linguistic issues. In The Expression of Modality, William Frawley (ed.), 1–26. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank
1986Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Peterson, Tyler
2010Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Gitksan at the Semantics- Pragmatics Interface. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2007The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2): 165–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Repp, Sophie
2009Negation in Gapping. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006¬(A&B). Gapping, negation and speech act operators. In Special issue Ellipsis , Jennifer Spenader & Petra Hendricks (eds). Research on Language and Computation 4(4): 397–423.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rooryck, Johan
2001Evidentiality, Part I. Glot International 5: 125–133.Google Scholar
de Saussure, Louis
2014Inferential evidentiality with epistemic modality. A pragmatic stance. Paper presented at Chronos 11, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 16–18 June.
Schachter, Paul
1973Constraints on clitic order in Tagalog. In Parangal kay Cecilio Lopez, Andrew B. Gonzalez (ed.), 214–231. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul & Otanes, Fe
1972Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schenner, Mathias & Sode, Frank
2014Modal particles in causal clauses. The case of German weil wohl . In Modes of Modality [Studies in Language Companion Series 149], Elisabeth Leiss & Abraham Werner (eds), 291–314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scherf, Nathalie
2017The syntax of Swedish modal particles. In Discourse Particles. Formal Approaches to Their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 78–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe
2003A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(1): 29–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
SEALang Library Tagalog Text Corpus
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simons, Mandy
2006 Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition. Lingua 117: 1034–1056. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speas, Margaret & Tenny, Carol
2003Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar, Vol. 1: Syntax and Semantics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 57], Anna-Maria DiSciullio (ed.), 315–343. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
2002Common Ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5): 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tan, Jennifer
2016On the modality of Tagalog evidentials. In Proceedings of the 23rd Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association, Hiroki Nomoto, Takuya Miyauchi & Asako Shiohara (eds), 273–287. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Thurmair, Maria
1989Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith & Matthewson, Lisa
2015Empirical evidence in research on meaning. Ms. http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/002595
Vanderveken, Daniel
1990Meaning and Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Waldie, Ryan, Peterson, Tyler, Rullmann, Hotze & Mackie, Scott
2009Evidentials as epistemic modals or speech act operators: testing the tests. Paper presented at The 14th Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas (WSCLA), Purdue University.
Willett, Thomas
1988A crosslinguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12: 51–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeevat, Henk
2000Discourse particles as speech act markers. LDV-Forum 17: 74–91.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2004Zum ‘wohl’: Diskurspartikeln als Satztypmodifikatoren. Linguistische Berichte 199: 253–286.Google Scholar