Chapter 12
The perfect in Avar and Andi
Cross-linguistic variation among two closely-related East Caucasian languages
Samira Verhees | National Research University, Higher School of Economics Moscow
This chapter deals with perfect forms of the verb in Avar and Andi, two East Caucasian languages. The presence of an ergative agent is shown to be an important parameter in distinguishing resultative constructions from resultative perfects in these languages. This distinction is relevant to determine whether current relevance meanings of the perfect are at all represented in these languages, alongside resultative proper and evidential usages. Based on elicitation as well as corpus data, this study shows that the Avar perfect represents a highly polysemic verb form that combines resultative proper, current relevance and indirect evidentiality, while its Andi counterpart shows a more advanced stage of grammaticalization of the indirect evidential meaning.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Typology of the perfect and East Caucasian languages
- 2.1
The problem of the resultative
- 2.2Grammaticalization: From resultative to current relevance and indirect evidence
- 2.3
Perfects in narrative sequences and with definite past time reference
- 2.4
The functional distribution of universal gram-types associated with the perfect
- 3.
Avar and Andi
- 3.1Verbal morphology and the perfect
- 3.2Data
- 3.3
Current relevance
- 3.4Resultatives and agents
- 3.5Non-witnessed and witnessed events
- 3.6Forms derived from the perfect
- 4.Conclusion
-
Abbreviations
-
Notes
-
References
References (20)
References
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Dahl, Östen. 2000. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Diewald, Gabriele. 2006. Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. In Constructions All Over – Case Studies and Theoretical Implications, Doris Schönefeld (ed.) (Special Vol. 1 of Constructions
).
Forker, Diana. 2018. The semantics of evidentiality and epistemic modality in Avar. In The Semantics of Verbal Categories in Nakh-Daghestanian Languages, Diana Forker & Timur Maisak (eds). Leiden: Brill.
Kibrik, Andrej. 1985. Absentiv-aorist und resultativ in der andischen Sprache. In Sprachen Europas und Asiens, Heinz Fähnrich (ed.), 55–66. Jena: Friedrich Schiller Universität.
Lindstedt, Jouko. 2000. The perfect – Aspectual, temporal and evidential. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 365–384. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Maisak, Timur. 2016. Glagol’naja sistema Rikvaninskogo govora andijskogo jazyka: Formoobrazovanije (The verbal system of the Rikvani dialect of the Andi language: Conjugation). Ms, Andi working seminar. Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Mallaeva, Zulajxat. 2007. Glagol avarskogo jazyka: Struktura, semantika, funkcii (The verb in Avar: Structure, semantics and functions). Makhachkala: Institut Jazyka, Literatury i Iskusstva imeni Gamzata Cadasy Dagestanskogo Naučnogo Centra Rossijskoj Akademij Nauk (IJaLI).
Nedyalkov, Vladimir. 1983. Tipologija rezul’tativnyx konstrukcii (The typology of resultative constructions). Leningrad: Nauka.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir & Jaxontov, Sergei. 1988. The typology of resultative constructions. In Typology of Resultative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 12], Vladimir Nedjalkov (ed.), 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Plungian, Vladimir. 2010. Types of verbal evidentiality marking: an overview. In Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages, Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (eds), 15–58. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Plungian, Vladimir. 2016. K tipologii perfekta v jazykax mira: Predislovije (Towards a typology of the perfect in the world’s languages: Introduction). In Tipologija Perfekta [Typology of the perfect], Timur Maisak, Vladimir Plungian, Ksenia Semënova (eds), 7–38. St. Petersburg: Nauk.
Ritz, Marie-Eve. 2012. Perfect tense and aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert Binnick (ed.), 881–907. Oxford: OUP.
Salimov, Khangerej. 1968. Gagatlinskij govor andijskogo jazyka (The Gagatl dialect of the Andi language). Makhachkala: IJALI.
Sulejmanov, Jakub. 1957. Grammaticheskij ocherk andijskogo jazyka (po dannym govora s. Rikvani) (Sketch of the grammar of Andi (based on the sub-dialect of the village Rikvani)). PhD dissertation, Institut Jazykoznania Akademii Nauk Sojuza SSR, Moscow.
Tatevosov, Sergei. 2001. From resultatives to evidentials: Multiple uses of the perfect in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 443–464.
Tsertsvadze, Ilja. 1965. Andiuri ena (The Andi language). Tbilisi: Metsniereba.
van den Berg, Helma. 2005. The East Caucasian language family. Lingua 115: 147–190.
Verhees, Samira. 2017. Évidencial’nost’ i perfekt v rutul’skom jazyke (na materiale govora s. Kina (Evidentiality and the perfect in Rutul (based on the Kina dialect)). In Élektronnaja pis’mennost’ narodov Rossijskoj Federacii: opyt, problemy, perspektivy [Electronic writing of the peoples of the Russian Federation: practice, problems and perspectives], Marina S. Fedina (ed.), 228–235. Syktyvkar: GOU VO KRAGSiU. <[URL]>
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.