Part of
Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Dalila Ayoun, Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Studies in Language Companion Series 197] 2018
► pp. 261280
References (20)
References
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2000. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2006. Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. In Constructions All Over – Case Studies and Theoretical Implications, Doris Schönefeld (ed.) (Special Vol. 1 of Constructions ).
Forker, Diana. 2018. The semantics of evidentiality and epistemic modality in Avar. In The Semantics of Verbal Categories in Nakh-Daghestanian Languages, Diana Forker & Timur Maisak (eds). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej. 1985. Absentiv-aorist und resultativ in der andischen Sprache. In Sprachen Europas und Asiens, Heinz Fähnrich (ed.), 55–66. Jena: Friedrich Schiller Universität.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, Jouko. 2000. The perfect – Aspectual, temporal and evidential. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 365–384. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Maisak, Timur. 2016. Glagol’naja sistema Rikvaninskogo govora andijskogo jazyka: Formoobrazovanije (The verbal system of the Rikvani dialect of the Andi language: Conjugation). Ms, Andi working seminar. Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Mallaeva, Zulajxat. 2007. Glagol avarskogo jazyka: Struktura, semantika, funkcii (The verb in Avar: Structure, semantics and functions). Makhachkala: Institut Jazyka, Literatury i Iskusstva imeni Gamzata Cadasy Dagestanskogo Naučnogo Centra Rossijskoj Akademij Nauk (IJaLI).Google Scholar
Nedyalkov, Vladimir. 1983. Tipologija rezul’tativnyx konstrukcii (The typology of resultative constructions). Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir & Jaxontov, Sergei. 1988. The typology of resultative constructions. In Typology of Resultative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 12], Vladimir Nedjalkov (ed.), 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir. 2010. Types of verbal evidentiality marking: an overview. In Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages, Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (eds), 15–58. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
. 2016. K tipologii perfekta v jazykax mira: Predislovije (Towards a typology of the perfect in the world’s languages: Introduction). In Tipologija Perfekta [Typology of the perfect], Timur Maisak, Vladimir Plungian, Ksenia Semënova (eds), 7–38. St. Petersburg: Nauk.Google Scholar
Ritz, Marie-Eve. 2012. Perfect tense and aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert Binnick (ed.), 881–907. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Salimov, Khangerej. 1968. Gagatlinskij govor andijskogo jazyka (The Gagatl dialect of the Andi language). Makhachkala: IJALI.Google Scholar
Sulejmanov, Jakub. 1957. Grammaticheskij ocherk andijskogo jazyka (po dannym govora s. Rikvani) (Sketch of the grammar of Andi (based on the sub-dialect of the village Rikvani)). PhD dissertation, Institut Jazykoznania Akademii Nauk Sojuza SSR, Moscow.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei. 2001. From resultatives to evidentials: Multiple uses of the perfect in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 443–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsertsvadze, Ilja. 1965. Andiuri ena (The Andi language). Tbilisi: Metsniereba.Google Scholar
van den Berg, Helma. 2005. The East Caucasian language family. Lingua 115: 147–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhees, Samira. 2017. Évidencial’nost’ i perfekt v rutul’skom jazyke (na materiale govora s. Kina (Evidentiality and the perfect in Rutul (based on the Kina dialect)). In Élektronnaja pis’mennost’ narodov Rossijskoj Federacii: opyt, problemy, perspektivy [Electronic writing of the peoples of the Russian Federation: practice, problems and perspectives], Marina S. Fedina (ed.), 228–235. Syktyvkar: GOU VO KRAGSiU. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Verhees, Samira
2019. General converbs in Andi. Studies in Language 43:1  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.