Cover not available
Part of
Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages: Studies in prosody and syntax
Edited by Evangelia Adamou, Katharina Haude and Martine Vanhove
[Studies in Language Companion Series 199] 2018
► pp. 265–296

Chapter 10
The influence of the state distinction on word order and information structure in Kabyle and Siwi (Berber)

| LLACAN, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, CNRS
| Università degli studi di Napoli “L’Orientale” (DAAM)
This paper, based on monologues and dialogues recorded in the field, shows how the presence (Kabyle) or the absence (Siwi) of an inflectional marking on nouns called state impacts the number and functions of grammatical relations and information structure constructions in those two closely related Berber languages. Indeed, in Kabyle, state allows to distinguish between subject and object when two nouns follow each other after the verb, whereas in Siwi, sequences of two postverbal nominal arguments are avoided; only AVO is attested. As linear ordering is also a formal means for information structure coding, this results in Siwi having fewer constructions available for that functional domain, and consequently, different information structure functions encoded through linear ordering than Kabyle.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Kabyle and Siwi
  • 2.Grammatical relations
    • 2.1Coding means
    • 2.2Possible constructions
      • 2.2.1Vaff(cl) + one noun
      • 2.2.2Vaff(cl) + two nouns
    • 2.3Conclusion on grammatical relations
  • 3.Information structure
    • 3.1Same constructions, same functions: Noun outside the prosodic boundary
      • 3.1.1Function of N (+F0 rise) [Vaff(cl) (X)]
      • 3.1.2Function of [Vaff(cl) (X) ] N
    • 3.2Same constructions, same functions, noun inside the prosodic group containing the verb: Function of V(O)
    • 3.3Different form-function mappings
      • 3.3.1Function of the noun(s) in postverbal position
      • 3.3.2Function of [NVaff(N)] in Kabyle
      • 3.3.3Function of [NaffV] in Siwi
      • 3.3.4Function of [NVaffN] in Siwi
    • 3.4Summary
  • 4.Implications and conclusions
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 2 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.199.10met
References (50)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 1995. Split ergativity in Berber languages. St. Petersburg Journal of African Studies 4: 39–68.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter M. 2008. Poor (two-term) case systems: Limits of neutralization. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej L. Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 686–699. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville. 2005. The Syntax-Morphology Interface: A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basset, André. 1950. Sur l’anticipation en berbère. In Mélanges William Marçais, 17–27. Paris: Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
. 1952. La Langue Berbère [Handbook of African Languages 1]. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Brugnatelli, Vermondo. 1986. Alternanze accentuali e morfo-sintassi nominale nel berbero orientale. Contributi di orientalistica, glottologia e dialettologia. Quaderni di Acme 7: 61–72.Google Scholar
. 2005. Voyelles et accents dans l’histoire du berbère. In Proceedings of the 10th Meeting of Hamito-Semitic (Afroasiatic) Linguistics, Fronzaroli Pelio & Marrassini Paolo (eds), 371–380. Firenze.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chaker, Salem. 1983. Un parler berbère d’Algérie (Kabylie). Syntaxe. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar
. 1988. Annexion (Etat d’, linguistique). Encyclopédie berbère, 5 | Anacutas – Anti-Atlas, 686–695. Aix-en-Provence: Edisud.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 1997. Intonation, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John, Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Cumming, Susanna & Paolino, Danae. 1992. Discourse Transcription [Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 4]. Santa Barbara CA: Department of Linguistics, UCSB.Google Scholar
. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds), 45–89. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Shay, Erin. 2003. Explaining Language Structure through Systems Interaction [Typological Studies in Language 55]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 2005. The principle of Functional Transparency in language structure and in language evolution. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 72], Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds), 259–283. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galand, Lionel. 1964. L’énoncé verbal en berbère. Étude de fonctions. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 21: 33–53.Google Scholar
. 2002. Études de linguistique berbère. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
. 2010. Régards sur le berbère. Milan: Centro Studi Camito-Semitici.Google Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2(1): 39–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Christa. 2006. Marked nominative in Africa. Studies in Language 30(4): 655–732. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Case in Africa. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kossmann, Maarten. G. 2012. Berber. In The Afroasiatic Languages, Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Erin Shay (eds), 18–101. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2016. On word order in Figuig Berber narratives: The uses of pre- and postverbal lexical subjects. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgen­landes, 106: 115–146Google Scholar
Kuningas, Johanna. 2004. Structuration informationnelle – étude de deux constructions à thématisation en Kabyle. In Structure informationnelle et particules énonciatives: Essai de typologie [Grammaire & Cognition 1], Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Shirley Carter Thomas (eds), 167–188. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Lafkioui, Mena. 2010. La topicalisation en berbère: Formes et structures. In Studien zur Berberologie/ Etudes Berbères 5, Dymitr Ibriszimow, Rainer Vossen, Harry Stroomer & Maarten Kossmann (eds), 121–132. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
. 2014. Topicalization in Berber: A typological perspective. In Berber in Typological Perspective, Catherine Taine-Cheikh & Cécile Lux (eds). Special issue of Language Typology and Language Universals (STUF) 67(1): 97–112.Google Scholar
Leguil, Alphonse. 1986. Notes sur le parler berbère de Siwa (II). Bulletin des Etudes Africaines de L’Inalco VI(12): 97–124.Google Scholar
. 1992. Structures prédicatives en berbère. Bilan et perspectives. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Louali, Naima & Gérard Philippson. 2004. L’accent en Siwi (berbère d’Egypte). Proceedings of XXVe Journées d’Etudes sur la Parole, Fès, 325–328.Google Scholar
Louali, Naima & Philippson, Gérard. 2005. Deux systèmes accentuels berbères: Le Siwi et le touareg. Faits de Langues 26: 11–22.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 2000. Synkretismus. In Morphologie: Ein Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung, Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds), 638–647. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mettouchi, Amina. 2003a. Contrastive focalization on clefts in Taqbaylit Berber. In Proceedings of IP2003 Interfaces Prosodiques, Nantes 27–29 mars, 143–148.Google Scholar
. 2003b. Focalisation contrastive et structure de l’information en kabyle (berbère)”. In Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris : Fonctions et moyens d’expression de la focalisation, J. François & A. Lacheret (eds), 81–97. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
. 2005. Discourse-configurationality and the encoding of semantic macroroles in Taqbaylit Berber. In Studi afroasiatici. Contributi presentati all’XI Incontro italiano di linguistica camito-semitica (Bergamo, 5–7 giugno 2003) [Materiali Linguistici], Alessandro Mengozzi (ed.), 83–96. Milano: Franco Angeli Editore.Google Scholar
. 2007a. Word order in conversational Taqbaylit Berber: Preposed and postposed subjects. In “From Beyond the Mediterranean” – Akten des 7. Internationalen Semitohamitistenkongreßes, Berlin 13–15 September 2004 [Semitica et Semitohamitica Berolinensia 5], Rainer Voigt (ed.), 513–531. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
. 2007b. Preferred argument structure in Taqbaylit Berber: A preliminary study. In Proceedings of the XIIth Italian Meeting of Afroasiatic Linguistics, Università di Catania, Ragusa (Italy), 6–10 june 2005, Marco Moriggi & Mirella Cassarino (eds), 311–319. Soveria Mannelli (Cosenza): Rubbettino.Google Scholar
. 2008. Case-marking, syntactic domains and information structure in Kabyle (Berber). In Interaction of Syntax and Morphology: Case Studies in Afroasiatic [Typological Studies in Language 75], Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Erin Shay (eds), 7–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Segmenting spoken corpora in lesser-described languages: new perspectives for the structural analysis of speech. Plenary talk at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Split, 18–21 September.Google Scholar
, 2014. Foundations for a typology of the annexed/absolute state systems in Berber. In Berber in Typological Perspective, Catherine Taine-Cheikh & Cécile Lux (eds). Special issue of Language Typology and Language Universals (STUF) 67(1): 47–61.Google Scholar
. 2015. Aspect-mood and discourse in Kabyle (Berber) spoken narratives. In Beyond Aspect: The Expression of Discourse Functions in African languages [Typological Studies in Language 109], Doris L. Payne & Shahar Shirtz (eds), 119–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. The interaction of state, prosody and linear order in Kabyle (Berber): Grammatical relations and information structure. In AfroAsiatic: Data and Perspectives [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 339], Mauro Tosco (ed.), 261–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Paper first presented on 17 June 2011 at the 14th Italian Meeting of AfroAsiatic Linguistics in Turin). DOI logo
Mettouchi, Amina & Fleisch, Axel. 2010. Focus types, word order and case-marking in Taqbaylit and Tashelhit Berber. In The Expression of Information Structure: A Documentation of its Diversity across Africa [Typological Studies in Language 91], Ines Fiedler & Anne Schwarz (eds), 193–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mettouchi, Amina, Lacheret-Dujour, Anne, Silber-Varod, Vered & Izre’el, Shlomo. 2007. Only prosody? Perception of speech segmentation in Kabyle and Hebrew. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française 28: 207–218.Google Scholar
Mettouchi, Amina & Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 2013. A previously unrecognized typological category: The state distinction in Kabyle (Berber). Linguistic Typology 17(1): 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2003. Pronouns and agreement: The information status of pronominal affixes. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2): 235–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiattarella, Valentina. 2015. The Berber of Siwa: Documentation, Syntax and Semantics. PhD dissertation, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Paris.Google Scholar
Souag, Lameen. 2013. Berber and Arabic in Siwa (Egypt): A Study in Linguistic Contact [Berber Studies 37]. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 1996. Units in Mandarin Conversation: Prosody, Discourse, and Grammar [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vycichl, Werner. 1981. Die Konstruktion des Genetivs im Berberischen der Oase Siwa. In Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von P. Anton Vorbichler, Inge Hofman (ed.), 175–183. Vienna: Afro Pub.Google Scholar
. 2005. Berberstudien & A Sketch of Siwi Berber (Egypt) [Berber Studies 10]. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Schiattarella, Valentina
2024. The Functions of Independent Personal Pronouns in Berber. In The Handbook of Berber Linguistics [Springer Handbooks in Languages and Linguistics, ], ► pp. 615 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.