Chapter published in:
Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects: The Reykjavík-Eyjafjallajökull papers
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Na'ama Pat-El and Stephen Mark Carey
[Studies in Language Companion Series 200] 2018
► pp. 5582
References
Abdulaev, Arsen K. & Abdullaev, Isa K.
2010Cezyas folklor. Leipzig–Makhachkala: Lotos.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2006Construction-specific properties of syntactic subjects in Icelandic and German. Cognitive Linguistics 17: 39–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Eythórsson, Thórhallur
2018Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam, Grimm, Scott & Ahmed, Tafseer
2006Dative subjects. Talk presented at the NWO/DFG Workshop on Optimal Sentence Processing, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
2001Love your enemies: Affective constructions in two Daghestanian languages. In Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse: A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 90], István Kenesei & Robert M. Harnish (eds), 59–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Oblique-case subjects in Tsez. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol.1 [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 113–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & van den Berg, Helma
2006Experiencer constructions in Daghestanian languages. In Semantic Role Universals and Argument Linking: Theoretical, Typological and Psycholinguistic Perspectives, Ina Bornkessel, Matthias Schlesewsky, Bernard Comrie & Angela D. Friederici (eds), 127–154. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Forker, Diana & Khalilova, Zaira
2011Alignment typology, reflexives, and reciprocals in Tsezic languages. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Chundra Cathcart, I-Hsuan Chen, Greg Finley, Shinae Kang, Clare S. Sandy & Elise Stickles (eds), 32–51. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Crisp, Simon
1983Subject marking in some languages of Daghestan. Paper in Linguistics 16: 203–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, Michael & Forker, Diana
2009Reconstruction of morphosyntactic function: Nonspatial usage of spatial case marking in Tsezic. Language 85: 588–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dabrowska, Ewa
1997Cognitive Semantics and the Polish Dative. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Eystein
2014The morphosyntax of the Experiencer in Early Vedic. In Perspectives on Semantic Roles, Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds), 181–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Forker, Diana
2011Grammatical relations in Hinuq. In Languages and Cultures in the Caucasus. Papers from the International Conference “Current Advances in Caucasian Studies”, Macerata, January 21–23, 2010, Vittorio S. Tomelleri, Manana Topadze & Anna Lukianowicz (eds), 553–568. Berlin: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
2012The bi-absolutive construction in Nakh-Daghestanian. Folia Linguistica 46: 75–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013A Grammar of Hinuq. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ganenkov, Dmitry
2006Experiencer coding in Nakh-Daghestanian. In Case, Valence and Transitivity, Leonid Kulikov, Andrej Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds), 179–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1991On the question of deep ergativity. Papiere zur Linguistik 44/45: 5–27.Google Scholar
Isakov, Isak A. & Khalilov, Madžid Š.
2001Gunzibsko-russkij slovar’. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1990Semantic Structures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Khalilov, Madžid Š.
1999Cezsko-russkij slovar’. Maxačkala: Institut JaLI DNC RAN.Google Scholar
Khalilova, Zaira
2009A Grammar of Khwarshi. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E.
1994Archi. In The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 4: The North East Caucasian Languages, II, Rieks Smeets (ed.), 297–365. Delmar NY: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
1997Beyond subject and object: Towards a comprehensive relational typology. Linguistic Typology 1: 279–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Konstanty i peremennye jazyka. St. Petersburg: Aletheia.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan
2010The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ljutikova, Ekatеrina A.
2001Anaforičeskie sredstva. In Bagvalinskij jazyk, Aleksandr E. Kibrik (ed.), 615–681. Moscow: Nasledie.Google Scholar
Mohanan, Karavannur P. & Mohanan, Tara
1990Dative subjects in Malayalam: Semantic information in syntax. In Verma & Mohanan (eds), 43–57.Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulike
2006Grammaticography: The art and craft of writing grammar. In Catching Language: The Standing Challange of grammer writing. Felix K. Ameka, Alan Charles Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.), 41–68. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2007Prototypical Transitivity [Typological Studies in Language 72]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1980Control and Ergativity in Chechen. Chicago Linguistics Society 16: 259–268.Google Scholar
Pandharipande, Rajeshwari
1990Experiencer (dative) NPs in Marathi. In Verma & Mohanan (eds), 161–179.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria & Potsdam, Eric
2002Backward control. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 245–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Primus, Beatrice
1999Cases and Thematic Roles: Ergative, Accusative and Active. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang
2009A new model of metaphorization: Case systems in East Caucasian. In Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar [Human Cognitive Processing 25], Klaus Uwe Panther, Linda L. Thornburg & Antonio Barcelona (eds), 147–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toldova, Svetlana J.
1999Mestoimennye sredstva podderžanija referencii. In Èlementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii, Aleksandr E. Kibrik (ed.), 629–674. Moscow: Nasledie.Google Scholar
van den Berg, Helma
1995A Grammar of Hunzib. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, Elisabeth
2007Experiential Constructions in Yucatec Maya [Studies in Language Companion Series 87]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verma, Mandindra K. & Karavannur Puthanvettil Mohanan
(eds) 1990Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar