Chapter published in:
Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects: The Reykjavík-Eyjafjallajökull papers
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Na'ama Pat-El and Stephen Mark Carey
[Studies in Language Companion Series 200] 2018
► pp. 115132
References

References

Barðdal, Jóhanna
2001Case in Icelandic: A Synchronic, Diachronic and Comparative Approach [Lundastudier i Nordisk språkvetenskap A 57]. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University.Google Scholar
2004The semantics of the impersonal construction in Icelandic, German and Faroese: Beyond thematic roles. In Focus on Germanic Typology, Werner Abraham (ed.), 105–137. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
2011aThe rise of dative substitution in the history of Icelandic: A diachronic construction grammar account. Lingua 121: 60–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011bLexical vs. structural case: A false dichotomy. Morphology 21(3–4): 619–659.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bills, Garland, Vallejo, Bernardo & Troike, Rudolph
1969An Introduction to Spoken Bolivian Quechua. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry
2001Case, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam
2006Theories of Case. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Czepluch, Hartmut
1996Kasus im Deutschen und Englischen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1972The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Cathryn
2007Complex predicates in Basque. In On Interpreting Construction Schemas: From Action and Motion to Transitivity and Causation, Nicole Delbecque & Bert Cornillie (eds), 125–142. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert
1989Datives in German ECM-constructions. In Grammar in Progress, J. Mascaro & M. Nespor (eds), 173–187. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Holisky, Dee Ann
1987The case of the intransitive subject in Tsova-Tush (Batsbi). Lingua 71: 103–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Thompson, Sandra A.
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli
1997–98Sagnir með aukafallsfrumlagi (Verbs with oblique subjects). Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 19–20: 11–43.Google Scholar
Joppen, Sandra & Wunderlich, Dieter
1995Argument linking in Basque. Lingua 97: 123–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumo
1973The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
2018Forty years in search of a/the subject. In Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects: The Reykjavík–Eyjafjallajökull Papers, Jóhanna Barðdal, Na’ama Pat-El & Stephen Mark Carey (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)Google Scholar
Maling, Joan
2002Það rignir þágufalli á Íslandi (Verbs with dative objects in Icelandic). Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 24: 31–105.Google Scholar
Minger, David
2002An Analysis of Grammatical Relations and Case Marking in Icelandic. MA thesis, University of California, Davis. http://​linguistics​.buffalo​.edu​/people​/faculty​/vanvalin​/rrg​/vanvalin​_papers​/Mingerthesis​.pdf
Næss, Åshild
2009Varieties of dative. In The Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 572–80. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M. W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
1981Case marking and the nature of language. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1: 227–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993Of nominatives and datives: Universal grammar from the bottom up. In Advances in Role and Reference Grammar [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 82], Robert Van Valin Jr. (ed.), 465–498. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sridhar, Shikaripur N.
1976Dative subjects. CLS 12: 582–93.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
2007The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
1990Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66: 221–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Another look at Icelandic case marking and grammatical relations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9:145–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Exploring the Syntax-semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Case in Role and Reference Grammar. In The Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 102–120. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J.
1997Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr., & Wilkins, David
1996The case for ‘effector’: Case roles, agents and agency revisited. In Grammatical constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 289–322. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Wegener, Heide
1991Der Dativ – ein struktureller Kasus? In Merkmale und Strukturen syntaktischer Kategorien, Gisbert Fanselow & Sascha Felix (eds), 70–103. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Maling, Joan & Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1985Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 441–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar