Cover not available
Part of
Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects: The Reykjavík-Eyjafjallajökull papers
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Na'ama Pat-El and Stephen Mark Carey
[Studies in Language Companion Series 200] 2018
► pp. 213–238

Chapter 9
Accusative sickness?

A brief epidemic in the history of German

| University of Nottingham
| University of Minnesota, Morris
Germanic languages that retain case marking and oblique subjects may undergo a change in argument structure over time. Nominative Sickness in Germanic has been demonstrated by Eythórsson (2002) and Barðdal (2009, 2011) for verbal arguments in which obliques are replaced with the nominative. Additionally, formerly accusative subjects become dative, a process widely referred to as Dative Sickness or Dative Substitution in the international literature. Dative Sickness is found across the development of several Germanic Languages (Barðdal 2011; Dunn et al. 2017). However, a change in case marking from a dative subject to an accusative subject is not well attested. The following examination explores instances in which Dative Subject Constructions in Old High German experience Accusative Sickness in Middle High German. That is, they start occurring with an accusative argument instead of the earlier, historically correct, dative.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Oblique subjects in German: A brief overview
  • 3.The semantic distribution of the Oblique Subject Construction
    • 3.1Accusative subjects in Old and Middle High German
  • 4.Variation in Old and Middle High German: Six case studies
    • 4.1Old High German thunken ‘think/seem’
    • 4.2Old High German girinnen ‘lack/run out of sth’
    • 4.3Old High German (un)uuillon ‘feel nausea’
    • 4.4Old High German angusten ‘fear’
    • 4.5Old High German wola sîn ‘be well’
    • 4.6Old High German gelimphen ‘be obliged’
    • 4.7Old High German wê sin ‘have woe’
  • 5.Formalization
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 2 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.200.09dew
References (33)
References
Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth. 2012. The case differential: Syntagmatic versus paradigmatic case – Its status in synchrony and diachrony. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(3): 316–341.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, Cynthia L. 1995. Case Marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 1998. Argument structure, syntactic structure and morphological case of the impersonal construction in the history of Scandinavian. Scripta Islandica 49: 21–33.Google Scholar
. 1999. Case and argument structure of some loan verbs in 15th century Icelandic. In Alla tiders språk. En Vänskrift til Gertrud Pettersson november 1999 [Lundastudier i Nordisk Språkvetenskap. Seria A], Inger Haskå & Carin Sandqvist (eds), 9–23. Lund: Institutionen för Nordiska Språk.Google Scholar
. 2009. The development of case in Germanic. In The Role of Semantic, Pragmatic, and Discourse Factors in the Development of Case [Studies in Language Companion Series 108], Jóhanna Barðdal & Shobhana L. Chelliah (eds) 123–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The rise of dative substitution in the history of Icelandic: A diachronic construction grammar approach. Lingua 121(1): 60–79.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður, Danesi, Serena, Dewey, Tonya Kim, Eythórsson, Thórhallur, Fedriani, Chiara & Smitherman, Thomas. 2013. The story of ‘Woe’. Journal of Indo-European Studies 41(3–4): 1–57.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Eythórsson, Tórhallur. 2012. ‘Hungering and lusting for women and fleshly delicacies’: Reconstructing grammatical relations for Proto-Germanic. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(3): 363–393.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Dewey, Tonya Kim. 2014. Alternating predicates in Icelandic and German: A sign-based construction grammar account. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 93: 50–101.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Smitherman, Thomas, Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður, Danesi, Serena, Jenset, Gard B. & McGillivray, Barbara. 2012. Reconstructing constructional semantics: The dative subject construction in Old Norse-Icelandic, Latin, Ancient Greek, Old Russian and Old Lithuanian. Studies in Language 36(3): 511–547.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danesi, Serena. 2014. Accusative subjects in Avestan: ‘Errors’ or noncanonically marked arguments? Indo-Iranian Journal 57(3): 223–260.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold. 1897. Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen, Zweiter Theil, Band IV. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Michael, Dewey, Tonya Kim, Arnett, Carlee, Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2017. Dative sickness: A phylogenetic analysis of argument structure evolution in Germanic. Language 93(1): e1–e22.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2000. Dative vs. nominative: Changes in quirky subjects in Icelandic. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 27–44.Google Scholar
. 2002. Changes in subject case marking in Icelandic. In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, David Lightfoot (Ed.), 196–212. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2005. Oblique subjects: A common Germanic inheritance. Language 81(4): 824–881.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), 111–138. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6: 222–254.Google Scholar
Friðriksson, Finnur. 2005. On ‘dative sickness’ and other linguistic diseases in Modern Icelandic. In Dialects Across Borders: Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Methods in Dialectology (Methods XI), Joensuu, August 2002 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 273], Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, Marjatta Palander and Esa Penttilä, 157–171. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graff, Eberhard Gottlieb & Massmann, Hans Ferdinand. 1840. Althochdeutscher Sprachschatz, oder, Wörterbuch der althochdeutschen Sprache, Fünfter Theil. Berlin: Nikolaischen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jacob & Grimm, Wilhelm. Deutsches Wörterbuch. <[URL]>
Hennig, Joachim Dieter. 1957. Studien zum Subjekt impersonal gebrauchter Verben im Althochdeutschen und Altniederdeutschen unter Berücksichtigung gotischer und altwestnordischer Zeugnisse. PhD dissertation, Georg-August University Göttingen.Google Scholar
Hole, Daniel, Meinunger, André & Abraham, Werner (eds). 2006. Datives and other cases: Between Argument Structure and Event Structure [Studies in Language Companion Series 75]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes G. & Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2005. Variation in subject case marking in Icelandic. In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, David Lightfoot (Ed.). 196–212. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lenerz, Jürgen. 1977. Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen. Tübingen: Günter Narr.Google Scholar
Petruck, Miriam. 1996. Frame semantics. In Handbook of Pragmatics Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen (eds), 1–13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Primus, Beatrice. 2012. Semantische Rollen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
von Seefranz-Montag, Ariane. 1983. Syntaktische Funktionen und Wortstellungsveränderungen: Die Entwicklung “subjektloser” Konstruktionen in einigen Sprachen. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael B. 2001. Why quirky case really isn’t quirky, or how to treat dative sickness in Icelandic. In Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected papers from the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, 1997, Hubert Cuyckens & Britta Zawada (eds), 115–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Henry. 1994. Dative sickness in Germanic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 12(4): 675–736.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornburg, Linda Louise. 1984. Syntactic Reanalysis in Early English. California PhD dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar