Chapter published in:
Focus Realization in Romance and Beyond
Edited by Marco García García and Melanie Uth
[Studies in Language Companion Series 201] 2018
► pp. 33–70

Chapter 2
Language variation at the prosody-syntax interface

Focus in European Spanish

| Universitat de les Illes Balears
| Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Spanish is generally considered a “word order language” with respect to focus marking, since the syntactic strategies used to alter the canonical order seem to depend on focus type. Thus, prosodically motivated movement is utilized for information narrow focus, and focus fronting, clefting, and focus in situ are used in contrastive focus cases. However, recent empirical studies do not fully support this assumption. This paper investigates the effect of focus type and syntactic function of the focused constituent on the syntactic and prosodic realization of focus in different varieties of European Spanish. Our data show that Spanish employs both word order and intonation to different degrees depending on the language variety, the nature of the focused constituent (subject or object), and the constituent’s informational vs. contrastive features.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2The corpus/data
    • 2.3Procedure
    • 2.4Analysis
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Information focus
      • 3.1.1Focus on the subject
      • 3.1.2Focus on the direct object
    • 3.2Contrastive focus
      • 3.2.1Focus on the subject
      • 3.2.2Focus on the direct object
  • 4.A preliminary perception experiment
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 November 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.201.02van
References
Aguilar, Lourdes, de-la-Mota, Carme, Prieto, P.
(eds) 2009 Sp_ToBI Training Materials. http://​prosodia​.upf​.edu​/sp​_tobi/
Armstrong, Meghan E.
2010 Puerto Rican Spanish intonation. In Transcription of intonation of the Spanish Language, Pilar Prieto & Paolo Roseano (eds), 155–189. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul
2001 Praat. A system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5(9–10): 341–345.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L.
1954 English prosodic stress and Spanish sentence order. Hispania 37: 152–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1954–1955 Meaningful word order in Spanish. Boletín de Filología 8: 45–56.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel & Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo
2001 Focus-related word order variation without the NSR: A prosody based cross-linguistic analysis. In SASC 3: Syntax and Semantics at Santa Cruz. Linguistics Research Center, James McCloskey (ed). Santa Cruz CA: University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel
2010 Towards a typology of focus realization. In Information Structure, Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry, 177–205. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris
1968 The Sound Pattern of English. New York NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Contreras, Heles
1976 A Theory of Word Order with Special Reference to Spanish. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1978 El orden de palabras en español. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
1980 Sentential stress, word order and the notion of subject in Spanish. In The Melody of Language, Linda R. Waugh & Cornelis H. van Schooneveld (eds), 45–53. Baltimore MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan
1993 The de-accenting and re-accenting of repeated lexical items. In Proceedings of the ESCA workshop on Prosody, 16–19. Lund.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Laura
2004a Mapping Focus: The Syntax and Prosody of Focus in Spanish. PhD dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
2004b The effects of phonological cues on the syntax of focus constructions in Spanish. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 256], Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe & Petra Sleeman (eds), 69–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dufter, Andreas
2009 Clefting and discourse organization: Comparing Germanic and Romance. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 112], Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 83–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Estebas, Eva & Prieto, Pilar
2008 La notación prosódica en español. Una revisión de Sp_ToBI. Estudios de Fonética Experimental XVII: 263–283.Google Scholar
Face, Timothy L. & D’Imperio, Mariapaola
2005 Reconsidering a focal typology: Evidence from Spanish and Italian. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica 17(2): 271–289.Google Scholar
Feldhausen, Ingo & Vanrell, Maria del Mar
2015 Oraciones hendidas y marcación del foco estrecho en español: Una aproximación desde la Teoría de la Optimidad Estocástica. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 26: 39–59Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline
2013 Focus as prosodic alignment. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31 : 683–734.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, Ines Hartmann, Katharina Reineke, Brigitte Schwarz, Anne & Zimmerman, Malte
2010 Subject focus in West African languages. In Information Structure from Different Perspectives, Malte Zimmerman & Caroline Féry (eds), 234–257. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara
2000 The Syntax-phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frota, Sonia Arvaniti, Amalia & D’Imperio, Mariapaola
2012 Prosodic representations: Prosodic structure, constituents, and their implementation. Segment-to-tone association. Tonal alignment. In Handbook in Laboratory Phonology, Abigail Cohn, Cécil Fougeron & Marie K. Huffman (eds), 254–287. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Christoph
2010 On focus, prosody, and word order in Argentinean Spanish: A minimalist OT account. ReVEL Sp. 4: 183–222.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Christoph, Feldhausen, Ingo & Pešková, Andrea
2009 Contrastive and neutral focus in porteño Spanish”. Paper presented at DGfS 2009, Osnabrück. http://​www​.ilg​.uni​-stuttgart​.de​/focus​/Gabriel​.pdf (23 July 2015).
Grice, Martine Savino, Michelina & Refice, Mario
1997 The intonation of questions in Bari Italian: Do speakers replicate their spontaneous speech when reading? Phonus 3: 1–7.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos
2007 Types of focus in English. In Topic and focus: Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Meaning and Intonation, Daniel Büring, Matthew Gordon & Chungmin Lee (eds), 83–100. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo
2002 Focus, word order variation and intonation in Spanish and English: An OT account. In Romance Phonology and Variation [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 217], Caroline R. Wiltshire & Joachim Camps (eds), 39–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 La identificación de los tópicos y los focos. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 56: 362–401.Google Scholar
Hoot, Bradley
2012a Narrow focus on pre-nominal modifiers in Spanish. In Proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Kimberly Geeslin and Manuel Díaz-Campo (eds), 293–307. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
2012b Presentational Focus in Heritage and Monolingual Spanish. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Hualde, José I. & Prieto, Pilar
2015 Intonational variation in Spanish: European and American varieties. In Intonational Variation in Romance, Sonia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds), 350–391. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José I.
2005 The Sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jiménez Fernández, Ángel L.
2015 When focus goes wild: Syntactic positions for information focus. Linguistics Beyond and Within 1: 119–133. http://​lingbaw​.com​/2015​/Ángel​-L​.-Jiménez​-Fernández
Ladd, D. Robert
2008 Intonational phonology. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leal-Méndez, Tania & Shea, Christine
2012 L1 Mexican Spanish and L2 Spanish learners at the syntax-discourse interface: P-movement or in-situ prosody? Paper presented at the 42nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Cedar City, UT, 21 April.
Moreno Cabrera, Juan Carlos
1999 Las funciones informativas: Las perífrasis de relativo. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 4245–4302. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Muntendam, Antje
2009 Linguistic transfer in Andean Spanish: Syntax or pragmatics? PhD dissertation, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
2013 On the nature of cross-linguistic transfer: A case study of Andean Spanish. BLC 16: 111–131.Google Scholar
Nadeu, Marianna & Hualde, José I.
2012 Acoustic correlates of emphatic stress in Central Catalan. Language and Speech 55(4): 517–542.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nadeu, Marianna & Vanrell, Maria del Mar
2015 Postfocal material in sentences with contrastive focus in Catalan and Spanish. Paper presented at the conference Phonetics and phonology in Europe, Cambridge, UK, 29–30 June.
Ordóñez, Francisco
2000 The Clausal Structure of Spanish: A Comparative Study. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Roseano, Paolo; Vanrell, Maria del Mar & Prieto, Pilar
2015 Intonational phonology of Friulian and its dialects. In Intonation in Romance, Sonia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds), 101–139. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri
2005 Prosody-syntax interaction in the expression of focus. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23: 637–755.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez Alvarado, Covadonga
2018 The realization of focus in Asturian Spanish. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 17(1): 1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Savino, Michelina
2012 The intonation of polar questions in Italian: Where is the rise? Journal of the International Phonetic Association 42(1): 23–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swerts, Marc, Krahmer, Emiel & Avesani, Cinzia
2002 Prosodic marking of information status in Dutch and Italian: A comparative analysis. Journal of Phonetics 30: 629–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
1995 Phonological Phrases: Their Relation to Syntax, Focus and Prominence. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Uth, Melanie
2014 Spanish preverbal subjects in contexts of narrow information focus: Non-contrastive focalization or epistemic-evidential marking? Grazer Linguistische Studien 81: 87–104.Google Scholar
2016 Prosodic realization of contrastive focus in Yucatecan Spanish: Spanish dominant and monolingual speakers opposed to balanced bilinguals. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 67: 255–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vallduví, Enric
1991 The role of plasticity in the association of focus and prominence. In Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL) 7: 295–306.Google Scholar
Vanrell, Maria del Mar & Fernández-Soriano, Olga
2013 Variation at the Interfaces in Ibero-Romance. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 12: 253–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Dialectal variation at the Prosody-Syntax interface: Evidence from Catalan and Spanish interrogatives. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2014, 698–702. Dublin: Science Foundation Ireland.Google Scholar
Vanrell, Maria del Mar, Ballone, Francesc, Schirru, Carlo & Prieto, Pilar
2015 Sardinian intonational phonology: Logudorese and Campidanese varieties. In Intonation in Romance, Sonia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds), 317–349. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
1998 Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1999 Las funciones informativas: Tema y foco. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 4215–4424. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Cruschina, Silvio
2021.  In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2018 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 357], ► pp. 50 ff. Crossref logo
Mendoza Vázquez, Érika , Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo & Pedro Martín Butragueño
2020. The prosodic properties of narrow information focus in Central Mexican Spanish: Pitch accents, de-emphasis and phrasing. Loquens 7:1 ► pp. e069 ff. Crossref logo
Sánchez, Liliana & Pablo Zdrojewski
2019.  In Exploring Interfaces, ► pp. 268 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.