Cover not available
Part of
New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change
Edited by Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban and José Vicente Lozano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 202] 2018
► pp. 291–314

(Inter)subjectification and paradigmaticization

The case study of the final particle but

| University of Rouen
This paper proposes a diachronic analysis of final but in a corpus of Northern English, a dialect where final particles represent a characteristic feature of the grammar. Recently, much emphasis was given to the study of but from a synchronic perpective in American and Australian English. This investigation closes the gap and is pursued in Northern English in the DECTE corpus, extending over a 50 years’ span (1960–2010). The various semantico-pragmatic values are studied diachronically. It is shown that final but undergoes the process of paradigmaticization as it enters into the paradigm of final particles by enriching it with lexical and structural persistence. Besides, the subjective values are evaluated on Traugott and Dasher’s (2002) subjectivity cline.
Keywords: final particle, Northern English, paradigmaticization, persistence, subjectification
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous literature
  • 3.Presentation of the data
  • 4.Diachronic evolution of semantico-pragmatic meanings in the corpus
    • 4.1Textual values
    • 4.2Attitudinal values
    • 4.3Social value
  • 5.Lexical, procedural and structural persistence
  • 6.(Inter)subjectification and Traugott’s (2010) subjectivity cline
  • 7.Paradigmaticization
    • 7.1Word order, grammaticalization and paradigms
    • 7.2Final but and paradigmaticization
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.202.12han
References (37)
References
Adamson, Sylvia. 2000. A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beal, Joan & Burbano Elizondo, Lourdes & Llamas, Carmen. 2012. Urban North-Eastern English: Tyneside to Teeside. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Breban, Tine. 2006. Grammaticalization and subjectification of the English adjectives of general comparison. In Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity, Angeliki Athanasiadou, Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie (eds), 241–278. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Grammaticalization, subjectification, and leftward movement of English adjectives of difference in the noun phrase. Folia Linguistica 42(3): 259–305.Google Scholar
. 2009. Structural persistence: A case based on the grammaticalization of English adjectives of difference. English Language and Linguistics 13(1): 77–96.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Sandra. 2010. Newfoundland and Labrador English. Edinburgh: EUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49: 365–390.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2004. subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance: From stance markers to discourse markers. Discourse Studies 6: 427–448.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia & Thompson, Sandra A. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Interaction Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 14–164. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke. 2010. On the subjectification and intersubjectification paths followed by the adjeectives of completeness. In Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization [Topics in English Linguistics 66], Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 277–314. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke, Brems, Liselotte & Van de Velde Freek,. 2012. Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification: Typology and operationalization. English Text Constructioni 5(1): 128–152.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie. 2014. The final particle but in British English: An instance of cooptation and grammaticalization at work. In Grammaticalization – Theory and Data [Studies in Language Companion Series 162], Sylvie Hancil & Ekkehard König (eds), 235–255. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2015. Grammaticalization of final but: From discourse connective to final particle. In Hancil, Haselow & Post (eds), 157–172.Google Scholar
. 2016. Périphérie droite et macro-grammaire. In Modèles Linguistiques, Isabelle Gaudy-Campbell & Héloïse Parent (eds), 133–154. Paris: Éditions des Dauphins.Google Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, Haselow, Alexander & Post, Margje. 2015. Final Particles. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2013. Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2): 375–424.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & König, Christa. 2010. On the linear order of ditransitive objects. Language Sciences 32: 87–131.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heltoft, Lars. 2010. Paradigmatic structure in a usage-based theory of grammaticalisation. In Language Usage and Language Structure, Kasper Boye & Elizabeth Engberg-Pedersen (eds), 145–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 21–42. Berlin. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19:1], Traugott, Elizabeth Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, Mitsuko N. & Katsunobu, Izutsu. 2014. Truncation and backshift: Two pathways to sentence-final coordinating conjunctions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15: 1, 62–92.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulder, J. & Thompson, S. A.. 2008. The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Laury R. Aspects of Grammaticalization. (Inter)subjectification and Directionality. The multifunctionality of conjunctions, 179–204. Amsterdam, Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mulder, J., Thompson, S.A. & Williams, C. P.. 2009. Final but in Australian English conversation. In Peters, P., Collins, P. & Smith, A. (eds.), Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English, 339–359. Amsterdam. Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heike. 2016. Three types of subjectivity, three types of intersubjectivity, their dynamicization and a synthesis. In Aspects of Grammaticalization. (Inter)subjectification and Directionality, Hubert Cuyckens, Lobke Ghesquière & Dan Olmen (eds), 19–46. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nørgård-Sørensen, Jens & Heltoft, Lars. 2015. Grammaticalization as paradigmatisation. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series 166], Andrew D. M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale & Richard Waltereit (eds), 261–292. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nørgård-Sørensen, Jens, Helthoft, Lars & Schøsler, Lene. 2011. Connecting Grammaticalization [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Gail (eds). 1996. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features found in preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Structures of Social Action, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 232–254. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Ochs, Schegloff & Thompson (eds), 52–133.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Jefferson, Gail & Harvey Sacks 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2): 361–382.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers.Cambridge: CUP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Chaofen & Traugott, Elizabeth. 2011. Grammaticalization and word order change. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heike Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 378–388. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Constructions in grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds), 624–647.Oxford: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization [Topics in English Linguistics 66], Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth & Dasher, Richard B. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New Dialect Formation: The Inevitability of Colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2022. American and Irish English speakers’ perceptions of the final particles so and but. World Englishes 41:2 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.