Chapter published in:
Reorganising Grammatical Variation: Diachronic studies in the retention, redistribution and refunctionalisation of linguistic variants
Edited by Antje Dammel, Matthias Eitelmann and Mirjam Schmuck
[Studies in Language Companion Series 203] 2018
► pp. 175208
References

References

Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2004Voice morphology in the causative-inchoative alternation: evidence for a non unified structural analysis of unaccusatives. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds), 114–136. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Rutger
2003The Middle Voice in Ancient Greek: A Study in Polysemy. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian
2012Towards a parameter hierarchy for auxiliaries: Diachronic considerations. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 6: 209–236.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Roberts, Ian, Sheehan, Michelle & Holmberg, Anders
2014Complexity in comparative Syntax: The view from modern parametric theory. In Measuring Grammatical Complexity, Frederick J. Newmeyer & Laurel B. Preston (eds), 103–127. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek
1984The language bioprogram hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7: 173–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005Structuring Sense, Volume 2: The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Branigan, Phil
2012Macroparameter Learnability: An Algonquian Case Study. Ms, Memorial University of Newfoundland.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2004The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity [Studie in Language Companion Series 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Increases in complexity as a result of language contact. In Convergence and Divergence in Language Contact Situations [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 8], Kurt Braunmüller & Juliane House (eds), 41–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria
2005Asymmetry in Morphology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2012Perspectives on morphological complexity. In Current Issues in Morphology. (Ir)regularity, Frequency, Typology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 322], Ferenc Kiefer, Mária Ladányi & Péter Siptár (eds), 105–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fotiadou, Georgia
2010Voice Morphology and Transitivity Alternations in Greek: Evidence from Corpora and Psycholinguistic Experiments. PhD Dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Fotiadou, Georgia & Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria
2010The acquisition of transitivity alternations in Greek: Does frequency count? Lingua 120(11): 2605–2626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2004Grammaticalization as Economy [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Economy against prescriptivism: Internal and external factors of language change. LASSO Presidential address. SWJL 25(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Gildersleeve, Basil L.
1900Syntax of Classical Greek from Homer to Demosthenes. New York NY: American Book Company.Google Scholar
Goodwin, William W.
1978 [1894]. A Greek Grammar. London: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1980The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56: 515–540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59: 781–819.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John. A.
2004Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Humbert, Jean
1945Syntaxe Grecque. Paris: Librairie Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Jankuhn, Harald
1969Die passive Bedeutung medialer Formen untersucht an der Sprache Homers [KZ; Ergänzungsheft 21]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. & Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2012All languages are equally complex. Historiographia Linguistica 39(2–3): 341–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kolmogorov, Andrej N.
1965Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information. Problemy Peredachi Informatsii 1(1): 3–11.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
(eds) 2012Linguistic Complexity: Second Language Acquisition, Indigenization, Contact. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid & Lavidas, Nikolaos
2017Between passive and middle. Evidence from Greek and beyond. In Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 237], Lars Hellan, Andrej L. Malchukov & Michela Cennamo (eds), 298–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kusters, Wouter
2003Linguistic Complexity: The Influence of Social Change on Verbal Inflection. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
2008Complexity in linguistic theory, language learning and language change. In Miestamo, Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds), 3–22.Google Scholar
Kühner, Raphael & Gerth, Bernhard
1963[1898–1904]. Ausführliche Grammatik der Griechischen Sprache, Zweiter Teil: Satzlehre. Hannover: Hannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Lavidas, Nikolaos
2009Transitivity Alternations in Diachrony. Changes in Argument Structure and Voice Morphology. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Lavidas, Nikolaos, Fotiadou, Georgia & Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria
2012Active vs nonactive voice in the Greek diachrony: Real or apparent optionality in the use of voice morphology? In Selected Papers of the 10th ICGL, Zoe Gavriilidou, Angeliki Efthymiou, Evangelia Thomadaki & Penelope Kambakis-Vougiouklis (eds), 390–400. Komotini: Democritus University of Thrace.Google Scholar
Lavidas, Nikolaos & Papangeli, Dimitra
2007Deponency in the diachrony of Greek. In Deponency and Morphological Mismatches, Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds), 97–126. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1979Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lightfoot David
2006How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2010The extension of the transitive construction in Ancient Greek. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 42(1): 60–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, April M. S.
1994Understanding Language Change. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, John H.
2002What happened to English? Diachronica 19(2): 217–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Linguistic Simplicity and Complexity: Why Do Languages Undress? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, Matti
2008Grammatical complexity in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Miestamo, Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds), 23–41.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti, Sinnemäki, Kaius & Karlsson, Fred
(eds) 2008Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 94]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter
1977Pidginisation and Simplification of Language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2001Typology and universals of pidginization. In Language Typology and Language Universals, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1648–1655. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1992Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peristeri, Eleni, Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria & Tsapkini, Kyrana
2013The on-line processing of unaccusativity in Greek agrammatism. Applied Psycholinguistics 34(2): 233–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2008Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1999Verb movement and markedness. In Language Creation and Language Change, Michel DeGraff (ed), 287–328. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2012Macroparameters and Minimalism: A programme for comparative research. In Parameter Theory and Linguistic Change, Charlotte Galves, Sonia Cyrino, Ruth Lopez, Filomena Sandalo & Juanito Avelar (eds), 319–334. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna
2003Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey, Gil, David & Trudgill, Peter
(eds) 2009Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard & Debrunner, Albert
1950Griechische Grammatik. Zweiter Band: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik [Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft, 2. Abt., 1. Teil, 2. Bd], rev. ed. by Gordon M. Messing, 13th edn. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Smyth, Herbert W.
1984[1920]Greek Grammar. Cambridge MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Stahl, Johann M.
1907Kritisch-historische Syntax des griechischen Verbums der klassischen Zeit. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Theophanopoulou-Kontou, Dimitra
2004The structure of the VP and the mediopassive morphology. The passives and anticausatives in Modern Greek. Parousia 15–16: 173–206.Google Scholar
Thompson, Cynthia K.
2003Unaccusative verb production in agrammatic aphasia: The argument structure complexity hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics 16: 151–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1983On Dialect: Social and Geographical Perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2009Sociolinguistic typology and complexification. In Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable, Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds), 97–108. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2011Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Tsapkini, Kyrana, Jarema, Gonia & Di Sciullo, Anna Maria
2004The role of configurational asymmetry in the lexical access of prefixed verbs: Evidence from French. Brain and Language 90: 143–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria
2006The acquisition of voice and transitivity alternations in Greek as native and second language. In Paths of Development in L1 and L2 Acquisition. In Honor of Bonnie D. Schwartz [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 39], Sharon Unsworth, Teresa Parodi, Antonella Sorace & Martha Young-Scholten (eds), 15–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vassilaki, Sofia
1989The morphology of passive voice in Modern Greek (in Greek). Studies in Greek Linguistics 9: 185–204.Google Scholar