Cover not available
Part of
Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson
Edited by Roger Böhm and Harry van der Hulst
[Studies in Language Companion Series 204] 2018
► pp. 9–112

Investigating substance-based grammar

The grammar of semantic and grammatical relations – An interview with John M. Anderson

| University of Pécs
The interview, guided by Andor’s questions, focuses on the development of Anderson’s work and its relation to contemporaneous developments in linguistics. The topics covered include the evolution of case grammar and its localist manifestation, and the generalization of the latter into a re-statement of “notional grammar”. Anderson has proposed a grammar, both syntax and phonology, based on mental substance, crucially perceptional substance and its metaphorical application in lexicon and syntax to “abstract” mental domains, as illustrated by localism. Concepts invoked here are dependency, structural analogy between syntactic and phonological representations, valency, ergativity, and (cognitive) salience; and central is concern with the expression of semantic and grammatical relations, whether by morphological case, adpositions or syntactic sequence.
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.204.02and
References (98)
References
Akimoto, Minoji & Brinton, Laurel. 1999. The origin of composite predicates in Old English. In Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English [Studies in Language Companion Series 47], Laurel Brinton & Minoji Akimoto (eds), 21–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John M. 1971. The Grammar of Case. Towards a Localistic Theory. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1977. On Case Grammar. Prolegomena to a Theory of Grammatical Relations. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
1992. Linguistic Representation. Structural Analogy and Stratification. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. A Notional Theory of Syntactic Categories. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. The domain of semantic roles. In The Diversity of Linguistic Description: Studies in Linguistics in Honour of Béla Korponay, József Andor, Béla Hollósy, Tibor Laczkó & Péter Pelyvás (eds), 1–38. Debrecen: Kossuth University, Angol-Amerikai Intézet.Google Scholar
2000. Markedness and the ontogenesis of language. Folia Linguistica 34: 147–183.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005a. The argument structure of morphological causatives. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 40: 27–89.Google Scholar
2005b. Structuralism and autonomy: From Saussure to Chomsky. Historiographia Linguistica 32: 117–148.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Modern Grammars of Case. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. The Grammar of Names. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. The Substance of Language, Vol. I: The Domain of Syntax. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. The Substance of Language, Vol. II: Morphology, Paradigms, and Periphrases. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. The Substance of Language, Vol. III: Phonology-Syntax Analogies. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012a. Types of lexical complexity in English: Syntactic categories and the lexicon. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 47: 3–51.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b. Parasitic passives of intransitives in English. Token: A Journal of English Linguistics 1: 5–22.Google Scholar
2013a. What are ‘grammatical periphrases’? In Periphrasis, Replacement and Renewal: Studies in English Historical Linguistics, Irén Hegedűs & Dóra Pődör (eds), 14–33. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2013b. On so-called ‘conjunctions’ in English. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 49: 41–77.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014a. The grammar of figurativeness, with illustrations drawn from English. English Studies 95: 971–989.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b. Graphophonology and anachronic phonology: Notes on episodes in the history of pseudo-phonology. Folia Linguistica Historica 25: 1–53.Google Scholar
Anderson, John M. & Durand, Jacques (eds). 1987. Explorations in Dependency Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John M. & Ewen, Colin J. 1987. Principles of Dependency Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John M. & Jones, Charles 1974. Three theses concerning phonological representation. Journal of Linguistics 10: 1–26.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977. Phonological Structure and the History of English. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1976. The notion of subject in ergative languages. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed), 3–23. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Andor, József. 2010. The distribution of light verbs in English: An empirical, corpus-based study. British and American Studies 16: 189–201.Google Scholar
Böhm, Roger. 1993. Predicate-argument Structure, Relational Typology and (Anti)passives: Towards an Integrated Localist Case Grammar Account [Series A, No. 336]. Duisburg: LAUD.Google Scholar
1998. Notional Grammar, Wortklassen und Dependenz [BLicK 7]. Bremen: Universität Bremen, IAAS.Google Scholar
Borg, Albert J. & Comrie, Bernard. 1984. Object diffuseness in Maltese. In Objects, Frans Plank (ed), 109–126. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Kanerva, J. 1989. Locative inversion in Chicheva: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 1–50.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam 2006. Theories of Case. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carr, Philip, Durand, Jacques & Ewen, Colin (eds). 2005. Headhood, Elements, Specification and Contrastivity. Phonological papers in Honour of John Anderson [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 259] Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1966. Cartesian Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Colman, Fran. 2014. The grammar of Names in Anglo-Saxon England: The Linguistics and Culture of the Old English Onomasticon. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colman, Fran & Anderson, John M. 2004. On metonymy as word-formation: with special reference to Old English. English Studies 85: 547–565.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard 1981. The Languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1982. Grammatical relations in Huichol. In Studies in Transitivity, Paul Hopper & Sandra Thompson (eds), 95–115. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cottingham, John. 1992. Cartesian dualism: Theology, metaphysics, and science. In The Cambridge Companion to Descartes, John Cottingham (ed), 236–257. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darrigol, l’abbé J. P. 1829. Dissertation critique et apologétique sur la langue basque. Bayonne: Duhart-Fauvet.Google Scholar
Dešeriev, Junus D. 1953. Bacbijskij jazyk. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1991. A New Approach to English Grammar, on Semantic Principles. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dumézil, Georges. 1967. Documents anatoliens sur les langues et les traditions du Caucase, V: Études abkhaz. Paris: Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Egede, Paul. 1760. Grammatica Grönlandica-Danico-Latina. Havniae: Gottman Frid. Kisel.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1966. A proposal concerning English prepositions. Georgetown University Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics 19: 19–33.Google Scholar
1968. The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds), 1–88. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael. 1984. West Greenlandic. Beckenham: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Fries, Charles C. 1952. The Structure of English: An Introduction to the Construction of English Sentences. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. (ed). 2008. The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gildersleeve, Basil L. & Lodge, Gonzales B. 1895. Latin Grammar. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1961. Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17: 241–292.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2000. Periphrasis. In Morphologie/Morphology, Vol. I, Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds), 654–664. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hester, Thomas R. 1978. Some arguments against equi as a test for subject-of in Basque. Fontes Linguae Vasconum 28: 23–34.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis T. 1935/7. La catégorie des cas. Acta Jutlandica 7: i–xii, 1–184; 9: i–vii, 1–78. Reprinted 1972. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1972. Verbless stative sentences in Indonesian. In The Verb ‘be’ and its Synonyms: Philosophical and Grammatical Studies, Vol. 5, John M. W. Verhaar (ed), 115–152. Dordrecht: Reidel.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hurford, James R. 2007. The Origins of Meaning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2011. The Origins of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2014. The Origins of Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1942. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Vol. VI. London: Allen & Unwin & Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Jessen, Marilyn E. 1975. A Semantic Study of Spatial and Temporal Expressions in English. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Dryer, Matthew S. 2007. Passive in the world’s languages. In Language, Typology, and Syntactic Description (2nd edn.), Timothy Shopen (ed), 326–261. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2005. Blocking and periphrasis in inflectional paradigms. In Yearbook in Phonology 2004, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 115–135. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Kleinschmidt, Samuel P. 1851. Grammatik der grönländischen sprache mit teilweisem einschluss des Labradordialekts. Berlin: G. Reimer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korponay, Béla. 1986. Outlines of a Hungarian-English Case Grammar. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar
. 2001. A Hungarian-English Case Grammar. Budapest: Eötvös University Press.Google Scholar
Lafitte, Pierre. 1962. Grammaire basque (navarro-labourdin littéraire). Bayonne: Éditions des ‘Amis du Musée Basque’ et ‘Ikas’.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Law, Vivien. 1995. Wisdom, Authority and Grammar in the Seventh Century: Decoding Virgilius Maro Grammaticus. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 1995. Typological research on actancy: The Paris RIVALC group. In Approaches to Language Typology, Masayoshi Shibatani & Theodora Bynon (eds), 167–213. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lepschy, Giulio (ed). 1998. History of Linguistics, III: Renaissance and Early Modern Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1967. A note on possessive, existential and locative sentences. Foundations of Language 3: 390–396.Google Scholar
. 1977. Semantics, Vol. II. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Marcus, Solomon. 1967. Algebraic Linguistics: Analytical Models [Mathematics in Science and Engineering 29]. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Meiko. 2008. From Simple Verbs to Periphrastic Expressions. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, Anna. 2014. History of Linguistics, IV: Nineteenth-century Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nilsen, Don L. F. 1973. The Instrumental Case in English. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1994. Grammatical Roles and Relations. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Holger. 1931. The Discovery of Language: Linguistic Science in the Nineteenth Century. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Percival, Keith W. 1972. On the non-existence of Cartesian linguistics. In Cartesian Studies, Ronald J. Butler (ed), 137–145. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Persson, Gunnar. 1990. Meaning, Models and Metaphors. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Persson, Gunnar & Magnusson, Ulf. 1986. Facets, Phases and Foci. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Primus, Beatrice. 1999. Cases and Thematic Roles [Linguistische Arbeiten 393]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Proceedings of the Philological Society, 6 Vols, 1842–1853. London: George Bell.
Rosen, Sara T. 1989. Argument Structure and Complex Predicates. PhD thesis, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
Salmon, Vivian. 1969. Review of Chomsky (1966). Journal of Linguistics 5: 165–187.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1922. Cours de linguistique générale, publié par Charles Bally et Albert Sechehaye, avec la collaboration de Albert Riedlinger, 2nd edn. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schaub, Willi. 1985. Babungo. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Bodil K. 2003. West Greenlandic antipassive. Nordlyd 31(2): 385–399.Google Scholar
Starosta, Stanley. 1988. The Case for Lexicase: An Outline of Lexicase Grammatical Theory. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 1997. Intransitive Predication. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry. 1994. Radical CV phonology: The locational gesture. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 439–477.Google Scholar
. 1995. Radical CV phonology: The categorial gesture. In Frontiers of Phonology: Atoms, Structures, Derivations, Jacques Durand & Francis Katanga (eds), 80–116. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2005. The molecular structure of phonological segments. In Headhood, Elements, Specification and Contrast. Phonological Papers in Honour of John Anderson [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 259], Philip Carr, Jacques Durand & Colin J. Ewen (eds), 193–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woodbury, Anthony C. 1977. Greenlandic Eskimo: Ergativity and relational grammar. In Grammatical Relations, Peter Cole & Jerry M. Sadock (eds), 307–336. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Karl E. 1968. Review of Chomsky (1966). International Journal of American Linguistics 34: 290–303.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Additional references
Arotçarena, l’abbé. 1951 Grammaire basque (Dialectes Navarro-Labourdins). Tours: Maison Mame.Google Scholar
Arrieta, Kutz, Joseph, Brian, & Smirniotopoulos, Jane. 1986. How ergative is Basque? In Proceedings of the Third Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL 86), 25–36. Columbus OH: OSU Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lhande, Pierre. 1926. Dictionnaire basque-français. Paris: Gabriel Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Bassac, Christian
2018. The substance of the lexicon in a Generative Lexicon. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series, 204], ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Böhm, Roger
2018. Just for the record. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series, 204], ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Colman, Fran
2018. Entitatives and Indo-European n-stems. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series, 204], ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Fortis, Jean-Michel
2018. Anderson’s case grammar and the history of localism. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series, 204], ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Trousdale, Graeme
2018. Figurativeness in English grammar. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series, 204], ► pp. 311 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.