Cover not available
Part of
Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson
Edited by Roger Böhm and Harry van der Hulst
[Studies in Language Companion Series 204] 2018
► pp. 365–383

On grounding, internalism, modularity and grammaticalization in phonology

| Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3
The chapter begins with Chomsky’s conception of linguistic knowledge as ‘knowledge without grounds’, and then discusses two different approaches to the grounding of linguistic knowledge: that of Noel Burton-Roberts and that of John Anderson. I adopt Tomasello’s view that the child is not formulating hypotheses, as claimed by Fodor and others, but is undergoing a process of socialisation in acquiring linguistic conventions. I accommodate the Andersonian notion of grammaticalisation with a conception of grammaticalisation as conventionalization. I argue in favour of the idea of grounded phonological knowledge as a form of emergent modularity (as suggested in the work of Karmiloff-Smith), as distinct from innate modularity.
Article outline
  • 1.Knowledge without grounds
  • 2.Andersonian grounding and modularity
  • 3.Phonological knowledge as knowledge of social conventions
    • 3.1Itkonen, autonomism and normativity
    • 3.2Fodor on the LoT and Tomasello on socialisation
  • 4.Emergent modularity
  • 5.On the acquisition of grounded phonological knowledge
  • 6.Concluding remarks: placing Andersonian grounding in a broader context
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.204.09car
References (28)
References
Anderson, John M. 2011. The Substance of Language, Vol. I: The Domain of Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Berko, Jean. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14: 150–177.Google Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel 2011. On the grounding of syntax and the role of phonology in human cognition. Lingua 121(14): 2089–2102.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carr, Philip. 1990. Linguistic Realities. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2012. The philosophy of phonology. In Philosophy of Linguistics, Ruth Kempson, Tim Fernando & Nicholas Asher (eds), 403–444. Amsterdam: North Holland.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1986. Knowledge of Language. New York NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
. 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, Robert. 1973. Transformational Grammar as a Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Andrew W. & Young, Andrew W. 1988. Human Cognitive Neuropsychology. Hove: The Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1983. The Modularity of Mind: An Essay in Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gopnik, Alison. 2001. Theories, language and culture: Whorf without wincing. In Language Development: The Essential Readings, Melissa Bowerman & Stephen Levinson (eds), 45–69. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hale, Mark & Reiss, Charles. 2000. Phonology as cognition. In Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues, Noel Burton-Roberts, Philip Carr & Gerard Docherty (eds), 161–184. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa. 1978. Grammatical Theory and Metascience [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1983. Causality in Linguistic Theory. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. 1998. Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2(10): 389–398. Reprinted in Tomasello, Michael & Bates, Elizabeth (eds). 2001. Language Development: The Essential Readings, 331–350. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mehler, Jacques & Dupoux, Emanuel. 1994. What Infants Know: The New Cognitive Psychology of Early Development. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, Andrew. 1988. Imitation, objects, tools and the rudiments of language in human ontogeny. Human Evolution 3: 47–66.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 2000. Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Port, Robert. 2007. How are words stored in memory? Beyond phones and phonemes. New Ideas in Psychology 25: 143–170.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzolatti, Giacomo & Arbib, Michael A. 1998. Language within our grasp. Trends in Neuroscience 21: 188–194.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, Steven. 1993. The Making of Memory: From Molecules to Mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 2005. The ‘Language Instinct’ Debate. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil. 1999. Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2001. Perceiving intentions and learning words in the second year of life. In Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, Melissa Bowerman & Stephen Levinson (eds), 132–158. Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Language Development: The Essential Readings, Michael Tomasello & Elizabeth Bates (eds), 111–128. Oxford: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vihman, Marilyn M. & Velleman, Shelley. 2000. Phonetics and the origin of phonology. In Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues, Noel Burton-Roberts, Philip Carr & Gerard Docherty (eds), 305–339. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Vihman, Marilyn M. 2015. Phonological Development: The First Two Years. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar